Decades of separatism crumble as Jammu and Kashmir leaders join national mainstream
This shift began earlier this year, with more than 15 people submitting sworn affidavits and placing public advertisements in newspapers to declare their commitment to India and its Constitution.
Productivity Tool
Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide
By Metla Sudha Sekhar
View Program
Finance
Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory
By Dinesh Nagpal
View Program
Finance
Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code
By CA Rahul Gupta
View Program
Digital Marketing
Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel
By Neil Patel
View Program
Finance
Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading
By Kunal Patel
View Program
Productivity Tool
Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide
By Study at home
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals Batch 2
By Ansh Mehra
View Program
"We do get many applications from erstwhile separatists, and everyone is evaluated based on their involvement in
anti-national activities
," a senior official said on the condition of anonymity.
He added that if the separatist is involved in a "heinous crime, we allow the law to take its own course."
Among the key leaders who have pledged to the Constitution include DPM's Mohammad Shafi Reshi, a former close aide of late Syed Ali Geelani and Shahid Saleem, chairman of the
Jammu and Kashmir People's Movement
.
Live Events
Neelofer Akbar Bhat, the spouse of Jammu and Kashmir Salvation Movement patron Zaffar Akbar Bhat, has made a public disassociation of her family with separatist conglomerate the
All Parties Hurriyat Conference
(APHC).
Similarly, Fareeda Behenji, chairperson of the Jammu Kashmir Mass Movement, has also formally separated herself and her organisation from separatist groups, stating in an affidavit that they have no links to the APHC or any similar platforms.
Former Director General of Jammu and Kashmir police, Kuldeep Khoda, believes these developments are the result of a concerted effort to corner separatists.
"These separatists have finally understood the futility of being a caged parrot of Pakistan's ISI," Khoda said.
"Better sense has prevailed upon them, and they don't want to be part of the violence and false propaganda being peddled from across the border," he added.
The government, in line with its policy of "zero tolerance" towards terrorism and secessionist activities, have proscribed a number of organisations under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) that included the
Tehreek-e-Hurriyat
(TeH),
Muslim League Jammu Kashmir
(Masarat Alam group), Jamaat-e-Islami, Jammu and Kashmir (JeI) and Muslim Conference headed by Abdul Gani Bhat.
Recently,
Awami Action Committee
(AAC), headed by Mirwaiz Umer Farooq and Jammu and Kashmir Ittihadul Muslimeen (JKIM), were prohibited under the UAPA.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Work done by officers in Hindi to be taken on record for assessment, says Southern Railway
The Southern Railway has asked its officers to take 'maximum' efforts to use Hindi in their official work. Launching a special drive from August 14 to September 15, to promote usage of Hindi, the Deputy General Manager (Official Language), Suresh Chandra, said the work done by officers during the period would be taken up for assessment and record purposes. Directing the officers to check the implementation of Hindi during departmental inspections and include the progress made in their report, he said they could give dictations in Hindi and also make small noting like 'sanctioned', 'agreed', 'approved' in the official language. A Southern Railway spokesperson said the circular was part of the routine instructions given to promote Hindi as an official language. Parrying questions on linking of the progress made in usage of Hindi by an officer to his/her assessment or appraisal, another senior railway officer said using Hindi as a medium of communication, including oral instructions, letter correspondence and inspection reports, was only an advisory to promote the language in tune with national policy and not mandatory on non-Hindi speaking States like Tamil Nadu. The Government of India, in its annual programme (2025-26) for transacting the official work of the union in Hindi said the use of Hindi in government offices was progressively increasing but substantial business was still being done in English. The objective of the 'Official Language' policy was that normally Hindi be used in all government business to the maximum extent possible. This would be in keeping with the spirit of the Constitution. 'Needless to say that doing official work in the peoples' language will speed-up development and bring transparency in administration.' Southern Railway covers the States of Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Puducherry and a small portion of Andhra Pradesh. All these States come under Region 'C' of the demarcation of States/Union Territories by the Union government done on the basis of prevalence of spoken and written Hindi language.
NDTV
4 hours ago
- NDTV
Exclusive - "India Shouldn't Allow Itself To Be Used By US Against China": Top Economist On Tariffs
New Delhi: India should not allow itself to be used by the US in the West's misguided trade war with China, a top American economist told NDTV. Professor Jeffrey D Sachs, who teaches at Columbia University, also pointed at huge flaws in how US President Donald Trump worked on issues like tariffs. "Well, in general, a one-person rule in the United States determining which countries pay which tariffs is absolutely beyond the law in the US. If you look at our Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, it says tariffs are the responsibility of the US Congress. But Trump declares emergency after emergency that are, from a legal point of view, outrageous and invalid. We should not have a one-person rule in the US," said Mr Sachs, who has advised governments in Latin America, Eastern Europe, the former Soviet Union, Asia, and Africa. He agreed the 50 per cent tariff imposed by Mr Trump on India may affect bilateral ties which have been assiduously built up over the last several decades. "Of course it has a negative consequence, but it merely bears out what I have been saying to dear Indian friends for years, which is that the United States uses other countries. It does not act responsibly towards other countries, so be careful. India should not allow itself to be used by the US, for example, as somehow in the US' misguided trade war with China," said Mr Sachs. "India, I think according to at least some people, was going to become the replacement for China. The US would fight China, and it would welcome India to replace the Chinese supply chains. I said that I regarded that as unrealistic, that the US would not allow a major expansion of exports from India anymore than it would allow them from China today. "I think that these events should give warning or pause to Indian officials. Yes, I'm not saying to arbitrarily break relations with the US, but also don't rely on them. India needs to rely on a diversified base of partners - Russia, China, ASEAN, Africa, and elsewhere, and not see itself as mainly focusing on the US market, which is going to be unstable, slow-growing, and basically protectionist," said the economist most famous for his work on reforms and with international agencies to promote poverty reduction, disease control, and debt reduction of poor countries. According to him, a strong India-China trade and investment in technology relations would be very beneficial for both the neighbours. "So if you look at green energy or at digital or at AI or at advanced chips, China is a good partner for India. Of course, I would be told immediately, yes, but India-China relations are strained for other reasons. But my own view is, solve those, because the benefits of the two giants really having good economic and trade and investment and finance relations would be wonderful for the two, and I think very good for the world," Mr Sachs told NDTV. Prime Minister Narendra Modi will be going to China soon to attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit, which marks a kind of thaw in ties since the Galwan face-off. Mr Trump is also meeting his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin today. On whether Mr Trump's move to push 50 per cent tariffs on India might end up bringing India and China closer, Mr Sachs there is a real possibility. "Absolutely. I think Trump is the great unifier of the rest of the world, that is. I think Trump is the greatest friend of the BRICS. By attacking Brazil, Russia, India and China simultaneously, he has brought all of the leaders together. There have been a flurry of calls between Lula, Putin, Prime Minister Modi, President Xi in recent days because of Trump. So he's played a very constructive role. Not the one he thought he was playing, but a very constructive role in my view," the professor said. On the sensitive issue of India buying Russian oil, Mr Sachs said the whole point is that one person should not decide who trades with whom. "The unilateral US measures are illegal under international law. That may sound a little quaint these days, but we actually have rules. We have international law... I don't think what Trump's doing is legal from the point of view of American law, nor do I think it's legal from the point of view of international law. Nor should the US tell India with whom to trade, nor is the whole premise correct that the US has the right to punish Russia and its partners because of the war in Ukraine. That's another issue, but the war in Ukraine in my view was caused by the United States, not caused by Russia. "This is a war over NATO enlargement. This is very important to understand. This war goes back to 30 years of US provocation because America is very arrogant, not only Trump, the whole political class. "And for 30 years they've said we can go where we want, when we want, how we want in security terms, including putting military bases on Russia's borders. That's why there's a war in Ukraine. And then to sanction India because of US provocations, well, the whole thing's absurd. "So I think we went down a very bad road. The US is flailing around because Russia's winning on the battlefield, and Russia said no to the US, you don't dictate to us our security terms," Mr Sachs said.
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
Letters to The Editor — August 15, 2025
Reflections on August 15 On Independence Day, I wonder whether we are truly free. We broke the chains of colonialism, yet we forged new ones: corruption that has seeped into the system making it rotten; injustice that spares the powerful; the divisions of caste and religion, and the silent suffering of the poor. Women still fight for safety and millions still sleep hungry. Our freedom fighters dreamed of dignity, equality and unity but speeches and parades cannot hide how far we are from that dream. True independence will come to us only when justice is swift, opportunities are equal, and no Indian lives in fear. Until then, August 15 is not just a celebration. It is a reminder that the fight for real freedom is not over. Hemashree, Bengaluru Lessons from the West The Data Point, 'Before tackling stray dogs issue, India must count them properly' (Opinion page, August 13), has pertinent data. Last year when I was travelling in western Europe, I did not spot a single stray dog on any street. In Switzerland, most people have pet dogs and great care is taken to ensure that no one is disturbed when the pet travels with the owner on public transportation systems such as trams, trains and buses. We have much to learn from the West. Vijaya Segara Ramsait, Courtallam, Tamil Nadu Workers' strike It is most unfortunate that the Tamil Nadu government has not been able to solve the problems of the conservancy workers, despite days of protest, and has resorted to forcibly vacating and detaining the protesting workers. It is ironic that the demand of the conservancy workers for permanency has not been considered by the ruling DMK government despite this being a part of its election promise. The authorities cannot ask the workers, who have been directly engaged by the Corporation, to go and work under contractors. The Supreme Court, as early as 1985, in the Food Corporation case, made it clear that the march of law is from contract labour to direct labour and not the other way. The Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act 1970 was meant for regulating and ultimately abolishing contract labour. Courts and politicians keep saying that the Constitution is a living instrument meant for emancipating the weaker sections. But not only are promises not kept, they are being forgotten. N.G.R. Prasad, Chennai
