In Allan's Victoria, pouring concrete is more important than our kids

Sydney Morning Herald

14-05-2025

According to the state government's own calculations, this decision strips from Victorian government schools $2.4 billion in state funding they would otherwise have received.
Loading
This leaves less money to pay teachers, less money to hire more teachers and less capacity to access the specialised skills and services that schools need to ensure disadvantaged kids don't fall behind.
It means that if you are a parent of a kid with a learning difficulty or other disadvantage who started high school in Victoria this year, your child will get bugger all benefit from the grandly titled 'Better and Fairer Schools Agreement' recently signed by the state and federal governments.
There is $2.5 billion in extra funding on offer from the Commonwealth but, due to Victoria's delay in upholding its end of the bargain, $2.2 billion of this money won't flow into schools until 2031. By this time, a kid who started high school this year will be finished year 12 – if they get that far.
The premier's response from platform 9 ¾, a response she later repeated in parliament, was a mix of post-truth Trumpism and home-grown chutzpah. She denied her government had cut funding from state schools, arguing that every year, it has increased total funding. This is both correct and disingenuous.
What we didn't hear – or perhaps couldn't because of the passing trains – is any explanation for why the premier, treasurer and other senior ministers who sit on the government's budget and finance committee thought it was reasonable to take the decision they did.
Is it because the self-titled Education State doesn't believe in the Gonski reforms? Is it because the government does not believe the benefits to students from fully funding its share of the Schooling Resource Standard by 2028 instead of 2031 are worth $2.4 billion?
Or is it because this government doesn't know what it believes any more?
After this masthead revealed the government's decision to delay its Gonski commitment, a former Andrews government minister rang to talk about what was going on. They observed that Victoria is starting to experience the opportunity cost of its decade-long obsession with big, expensive transport projects.
Loading
They reflected: 'What is a Labor government for if it is doing this?'
There is a real and pressing need to find savings in the state budget. Treasurer Jaclyn Symes will on Tuesday confirm Victoria's first operating surplus since the pandemic but in real terms, Victoria's finances remain deep in the red.
According to the last budget update, the government will spend nearly $40 billion more than the revenue it generates over the next four years. The interest Victoria must pay to service its growing debt is $6.5 billion this year and is tracking towards $10 billion. In Neville Bartos' immortal words to Chopper Read, 'There is no cash here. Here, there's no cash.'
But there is always cash for the $35 billion Suburban Rail Loop. Or the $26 billion North East Link. Or the proposed, $4 billion upgrade of Sunshine station. In next week's $100 billion budget, one out of every five dollars will go to capital works.
The Victorian government, having elevated transport infrastructure into an electoral art-form, has decided that what matters most, even more than public schools, is digging tunnels, pouring concrete and laying tracks. The Education State has become the Hi-Vis State, where you can earn as much as a state school principal by holding a stop-go sign at a Big Build site.
The only reason we know about last year's raid on schools funding is there are people working in government who are passionate about the value of education and willing to speak up about it. They don't necessarily think the SRL is a bad idea. They just know a good education will do more than a new train line to help young people get where they want to go.