Telangana HC pulls up Bhoodan board for failing to furnish land details
While hearing multiple writ petitions pertaining to alleged irregularities in the sale and mutation of Bhoodan lands, the judge directly addressed Kiran Kumar Gattu, standing counsel for the Bhoodan Yagna Board, and questioned the board's commitment to its statutory responsibilities.
'Is it not your duty to protect the Bhoodan lands, not only at Nagaram village, Maheshwaram mandal, RR district, but also in the entire state of Telangana? You have not even furnished one square foot of information pertaining to the Bhoodan lands,' Justice Lakshman observed.
In response, standing counsel submitted that the relevant information was available with the Chief Commissioner of Land Administration (CCLA). The judge then directed him to obtain the required data from the CCLA and submit a comprehensive report to the court.
The court specifically sought details under three key heads: Lands received by the Bhoodan Yagna Board from donors; extent of Bhoodan lands distributed to needy peasants and farmers and the remaining lands still with the Bhoodan Yagna Board across Telangana.
Meanwhile, senior advocate P Sriraghu Ram, appearing on behalf of a land purchaser, opposed the plea filed by petitioner Vadthya Ramulu, who sought the appointment of a Commission of Inquiry by the state government. He argued that a private individual could not seek a judicial direction for such an appointment.
However, T Rajnikanth Reddy, additional advocate general of Telangana, informed the court that the state government is willing to constitute an inquiry commission to investigate allegations of illegal mutation and alienation of Bhoodan lands, particularly in survey No: 194 and 195 of Nagaram village, provided the court issues the necessary directions.
The matter pertains to a writ petition filed by Vadthya Ramulu, a resident of Padmavati Colony, RR district, and two similar petitions filed by Birla Mallesh, alleging that Bhoodan lands were sold illegally to private parties in collusion with revenue officials, and even mutated in the names of senior IAS and IPS officers.
After hearing arguments from all sides, Justice Lakshman adjourned the matter to Thursday for further hearing.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Bribery case outlives the very municipal body where it began
HYDERABAD: The Telangana High Court has finally drawn curtains on a bribery case that lingered in the judicial system for nearly 20 years by upholding the acquittal of a former junior assistant in the tax section of the erstwhile Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad (MCH). Justice EV Venugopal dismissed the state's appeal challenging the 2013 verdict of the Special Judge for Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) Cases, which had acquitted the accused. The appeal was filed by the Inspector of Police, ACB, City Range-II, Hyderabad. The case traces back to February 2005, when B Srinivas, a resident of Begumpet, approached MCH for mutation of a recently purchased property. The prosecution claimed that the accused officer demanded a Rs 500 bribe to process the application. Srinivas refused and subsequently lodged a complaint, prompting the ACB to set a trap. Though the accused was arrested, and the prosecution claimed to have established demand and acceptance of the bribe under the Prevention of Corruption Act, the trial court in 2006 acquitted him, citing failure to prove key elements of the offence. The state, however, filed an appeal seven years later, which remained pending until its final disposal this week. In the high court, the state argued that the trial court had erred despite evidence pointing to both demand and acceptance. The defence maintained that no official favour was due at the time of the alleged incident and highlighted the complainant's admission during cross-examination that the complaint stemmed from a personal grievance after the accused insisted on proper documentation. Upholding the acquittal, Justice Venugopal noted that the complainant had 'categorically admitted' to acting with ill-intent. 'This court does not see any reason or ground to interfere with the well-reasoned and well-founded judgment of the Special Judge,' the order read. With the HC's ruling, the legal proceedings that began in 2005 have now drawn to a close, bringing an end to a case that outlasted the very municipal body where it began.
Hans India
3 hours ago
- Hans India
Ponnam Prabhakar says govt. will conduct local body elections as per HC directives
Telangana Transport Minister Ponnam Prabhakar has made significant remarks regarding the upcoming local body elections, confirming that they will proceed in accordance with the directives of the Telangana High Court. He further clarified that the government has not introduced any talk of Muslim reservations in the context of these elections. Prabhakar expressed his displeasure at what he perceives as a deliberate stir created by BJP leaders, noting their previous support of the BC reservation bill during its introduction in the state assembly. In a more festive spirit, Minister Ponnam Prabhakar extended warm greetings to the citizens of Telangana and the nation on the occasion of Rakhi Pournami. He celebrated the day by tying Rakhi to Minister Seethakka and her brothers at the Minister's Quarters, presenting her with a saree and seeking her blessings. In a show of goodwill, Minister Seethakka and Minister Konda Surekha also tied Rakhi to Chief Minister Revanth Reddy at his residence in Jubilee Hills. Additionally, Seethakka tied Rakhi to Assembly Speaker Gaddam Prasad Kumar, who responded warmly by addressing her as "Sister Seethakka." Women from the Manthani constituency joined in the celebrations, tying Rakhi to Minister Sridhar Babu at the Banjara Hills Minister's Quarters and wishing him well.
India Today
6 hours ago
- India Today
Supreme court to look into legality of NOTA for voters in uncontested polls
The Supreme Court on Thursday said that it will look into whether the option of NOTA (None of the Above) vote could legally be given in constituencies where there is an 'uncontested' election with only one candidate.'The issue is that the invisible will of the people should be allowed to be exercised. If there is only one candidate and voters don't like him shouldn't they be allowed to vote? I believe this is a very interesting proposition,' observed the bench of Justice Suryakant, Justice Ujjal Bhuyan and Justice N Kotishwar Singh on observation came from a petition filed by the NGO Vidhi Center for Legal Policy and the intervention plea filed by the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), which have challenged the polling process for 'uncontested' elections under section 53 (2) of the Representation of People Act. The petition had sought a declaration that the NOTA option should be available to voters in case there is only one contesting candidate for an election. The petition has argued that after the introduction of the NOTA option in polls since 2013, the 'Right to vote' of the electorate was being violated in situations where only one candidate contested the petitioners also submitted that while there was a sharp decline in uncontested seats in the Lok Sabha elections after 1989, there are several instances in State assembly elections when a candidate is elected unopposed. The figure is even higher at the level of Panchayat/Local body elections. During the brief hearing on Thursday, the bench noted that the averments by the petitioners seem to seek 'an extension of the NOTA principle.''If there is only one candidate and people still go and vote NOTA, then it shows there is so much resentment against the candidate,' suggested Justice government and the ECI, however, vehemently opposed the General R Venkataramani, during the hearing, informed the bench that, due to rare situations where an election is uncontested, 'this is an academic exercise.' The Attorney General also submitted that the court would have to 'see how far NOTA can be stretched.'Senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, for the ECI, also argued that "if people are so unhappy with the candidate, they can field their own candidate." Dwivedi also submitted that Advocate Harsh Parasher, appearing for Vidhi Legal however, said that the matter affected the people's right to choose their representative.'This has happened in Vidhan Sabhas more than 290 times in the last few years. In Arunachal Pradesh, in the 2024 polls, 6 seats were uncontested,' said Parashar. The counsel also submitted that the rules should allow countermanding an election if the NOTA votes are polled in an "uncontested" election. "What will happen then?" asked bench then observed that if the NOTA is accepted and an election is countermanded, it is likely that political parties would field different candidates in the bypoll."I think all parties will field candidates. In India, we also have independent candidates. It's rare to have an uncontested election. That's why the AG says it's an academic exercise," noted Justice Prashant Bhushan, appearing for ADR, also pointed out that some states have brought in rules for Local Body elections that if NOTA votes are more than votes for a winning candidate, then the election is countermanded and a fresh election can be held. The ECI counsel, however, argued that the local body polls, held under the state rules, are legally different from the State Assembly and Lok Sabha polls that are held under the RP Act and ECI hearing has for now been adjourned to November 6 as the affidavit filed by the central government on Thursday was not available on the court record at the time of the Centre and the ECI, in their affidavits, have opposed the plea, submitting that Section 53 of the RP Act and Rule 11 of the Conduct of Elections Rules specifically lay down the process for an 'Uncontested Election.'advertisementIn its affidavit filed on Thursday, the central government argued that 'there is a difference between the 'Right to Vote' and the 'Freedom of Voting' under the Constitution,' which has been recognised by the Supreme Government has further argued that NOTA cannot be included as a 'candidate' in the election, as the law clearly defines the procedure depending on the number of candidates in the election. According to the Center's affidavit, 'NOTA is merely an opinion or expression,' and therefore cannot be substituted as a 'candidate' as per the procedure prescribed under Section 53(2).- EndsTune InMust Watch
