Impeachment proceedings against Justice Yashwant Varma likely
NEW DELHI: The NDA-led government at the Centre is reportedly preparing to introduce an impeachment motion against Justice Yashwant Varma during the forthcoming Monsoon session of Parliament. This follows serious allegations of a substantial cash recovery at his official residence, which reportedly came to light after a fire broke out on the night of 8 April.
According to reliable sources, the government is expected to proceed with the impeachment process through the relevant ministry.
Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal and Home Minister Amit Shah recently held a meeting with the President of India, Droupadi Murmu, a development that has fuelled speculation regarding the potential initiation of proceedings against Justice Varma.
A three-member in-house enquiry committee, constituted by the Supreme Court to examine the allegations, has reportedly not given Justice Varma a clean chit. The committee's findings are said to include photographs and a video of burnt currency notes recovered from the judge's residence. Despite these developments, no First Information Report (FIR) has yet been lodged, and Justice Varma has not tendered his resignation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
BJP & BJD spar over govt's one-year performance
Bhubaneswar: With the BJP-led govt in Odisha nearing its first anniversary in power, ruling party MLAs and opposition BJD locked horns over the administration's performance on Wednesday, highlighting contrasting narratives of success and systemic failures. BJP MLAs Jayanarayan Mishra and Irasis Acharya, separately praised the Mohan Charan Majhi-led govt for what they termed as "widespread development" across the state. "This has been a historic year for Odisha," said Sambalpur MLA Mishra, emphasising significant initiatives for farmers and women's welfare, during a media interactions on the anniversary of party's election victory in Odisha. He also challenged the BJD to account for its previous 24-year tenure. Bhatli legislator Acharya said the govt and BJP would present detailed report cards showcasing its "glorious performance" across various sectors. "From farmers to women, youth to the poor, Odisha has witnessed remarkable positive changes," he claimed. However, BJD spokesperson Lenin Mohanty countered these claims by citing a May 15 note sheet from the chief minister's office that acknowledged significant administrative delays. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo "Files are pending at various levels without sufficient justification, from ministers to department secretaries and directors," Mohanty told a press conference. He criticised the govt's plans for grand celebrations, questioning their appropriateness when internal communications indicate administrative bottlenecks. "How can they celebrate so-called successes when their own documents reveal systemic failures?" he asked. The political face-off comes exactly one year after BJP's victory in the assembly election, marking the end of BJD's long tenure in power.
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
LGBTQIA+ couples have right to find a family: Madras high court
Madras high court CHENNAI: Though Supreme Court has not legalised same-sex marriage, individuals can still form a family, Madras high court has said, adding: 'Marriage is not the sole mode to find a family. The concept of a 'chosen family' is now well settled and acknowledged in LGBTQIA+ jurisprudence.' A division bench of Justices G R Swaminathan and V Lakshminarayanan made the observation on May 22, while setting at liberty a 25-year-old lesbian woman, who was forcefully separated from her partner and subjected to harassment by her family. 'Not every parent is like Justice Leila Seth. She could acknowledge and accept her son's sexual orientation,' the judges said. 'The mother of the detenue is no Leila Seth. We could understand her feelings and temperament. She wants her daughter to be like any other normal, heterosexual woman, get married and settle down in life. We endeavoured in vain to impress upon her that her daughter, being an adult, is entitled to choose a life of her own,' they added. Also, deprecating the use of the word 'queer' to identify non-heterosexual individuals, the judges said: 'We feel a certain discomfort in employing the expression 'queer'. Any standard dictionary defines this word as meaning strange or odd. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 가상화폐 3개이상 가지고 있다면 '이렇게'해라 크립토시그널 더 알아보기 Queering one's pitch means spoiling the show.' 'To a homosexual individual, his/her/their sexual orientation must be perfectly natural and normal. There is nothing strange or odd about such inclinations. Why then should they be called queer?' they asked. The court further placed on record that the jurisdictional police behaved in an insensitive manner in the issue by forcing the detenue to go with her parents. 'We censure the rank inaction on the part of police and the insensitivity shown by them. We hold that govt officials, in particular the jurisdictional police, have a duty to expeditiously and appropriately respond whenever complaints of this nature are received from the members of the LGBTQIA+ community,' the court said. The court then restrained the detenue's family members from interfering with her personal liberty and issued a writ of continuing mandamus to the jurisdictional police to afford adequate protection to the detenue and her partner who moved the habeas corpus petition.
NDTV
27 minutes ago
- NDTV
Muslim Law Board Warns Of Contempt Petition Against Centre Over Waqf Portal
New Delhi: The All India Muslim Personal Law Board has taken exception to the Centre's move to activate the Waqf Umeed Portal from June 6. In a statement, the board alleged that the government's move is illegal and amounts to contempt of court since the law backing it - the Waqf (Amendment) Act of 2025 - has been challenged before the Supreme Court. The statement also appealed to Muslims and State Waqf Boards not to use the portal until the Supreme Court delivers its verdict. The Muslim Law Board also said it would approach the Supreme Court against the government move by filing a contempt of court petition. According to the law board, all Muslim organizations have opposed the law, and it has also drawn criticism from Opposition parties, human rights groups and minority communities including Sikh and Christian bodies. The law board also alleged that though the matter is pending before the Supreme Court, the government has proceeded to launch the portal and made registration of Waqf properties mandatory through it. The law board has contended that such a move constitutes contempt of court as the very basis of the portal - the validity of the amended Waqf law - is sub judice. The Supreme Court has heard a clutch of petitions challenging Waqf Amendment Act of 2025. Last month, the court had reserved its order on the question of interim stay on certain provisions of the UMEED Act of 2025 till it takes a call on the legality of the new law.
