Kerala Economics and Statistics dept report pegs average monthly income of agricultural households at ₹28,984
The average monthly income of agricultural households, at current prices, stood at ₹28,984 in 2024, according to the Situation Assessment Survey of Agricultural Households in Kerala: 2024-25, compiled by the department in collaboration with the Agriculture Department. Of this, crop production by itself accounted for a mere 22.97% (₹6,658), with the rest being contributed by wages (60.71%), animal farming (6.25%), non-farm business (9.93% and income from leasing out land (0.13%). In addition to these sources, the earnings from pensions and remittances stood at ₹6,348.
'This income profile underscores a high dependence on wage labour, indicating the limited profitability or scale of agricultural operations on own-farm holdings,' the report observed. Compared to 2019, the average monthly income of agricultural households in the State has risen by 61.79% – from ₹17,915 to ₹28,984 at current prices. The income from crop production rose from ₹3,638 to ₹6,658, an increase of 83.01%.
The Situation Assessment Survey captured data for the agricultural year 2023-24 and employs statistical techniques to project income levels for 2025-26. The primary objective of the survey was to assess the progress toward the State government's policy goal, announced in 2021, of increasing the agricultural household income by 50% by 2026. Projections show that the monthly income, on an average, would increase to ₹33,411 in 2026.
For the purposes of the survey, an agricultural household is defined as 'a household that has received some value of produce from agricultural activities during the reference period.'
An agricultural household was defined as any household where at least one member has self-employment in agriculture as their 'principal activity or subsidiary status.' The survey also looked at households whose major source of income is self-employment in crop production. In their case, the average income rose to ₹29,011 in 2024 from ₹18,891 in 2019.
'While agricultural household incomes have improved considerably over the five-year period, the data reveals a continued reliance on wage labour and limited progress in diversifying income sources. Gains from crop and animal farming are notable but require further support. Meanwhile, stagnation in non-farm business income and the decline in land leasing returns suggest the need for targeted interventions. Strengthening farm-based enterprises and promoting dynamic non-farm rural economic activities are essential for ensuring sustainable and resilient agricultural livelihoods,' it said.
Persistent challenges, including wild animal intrusion, climate variability, pest and disease outbreaks, and water scarcity continue to jeopardise the sustainability and profitability of agriculture in the State, according to the report.
'Farmers are increasingly investing time and resources in agriculture, leaving less scope for alternative income sources. These challenges underscore the need for climate-resilient, productivity-enhancing agricultural policies,' the report said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
17 hours ago
- News18
How to make climate-friendly, sustainable choices when shopping online
Agency: New York, Aug 20 (AP) One way to be climate-friendly: Shop sustainably. But figuring out which products count as 'sustainable" can be hard, especially when buying online. As ordering with a computer or phone becomes more ubiquitous, the number of online products labeled sustainable is also increasing. Yet there is no single seal of approval across e-commerce platforms that verifies whether something is climate-friendly, partly because there are multiple ways to define sustainability. Third-party nonprofit organisations study manufacturers and sellers' practices and offer certifications that are displayed online. Government programmes such as the Agriculture Department's organic certification or Environmental Protection Agency's Energy Star efficiency standard are also often listed. Large e-commerce websites may highlight the certifications with special icons, hyperlinks to certification programmes or written descriptions. The mixture can invite homework from buyers. Elwyn Grainger-Jones, who leads a nonprofit that certifies product sustainability, said there also isn't a single clearinghouse that tracks which third-party certifications are the most credible. 'Therein lies an issue and a challenge," said Grainger-Jones, CEO of Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute. 'What we haven't seen so far is a third-third party step in and be the information portal on what a good certification is." And while shopping online might come with more packaging, it doesn't always come with more emissions. A person shopping online may even emit less than if they went to the store in person, according to a study published in Environmental Science and Technology. But there are a lot of variables, including which e-commerce site they use, the shipping speed they select and how close they live to a brick-and-mortar alternative. There might not be one surefire way to tell sustainable products from unsustainable ones, but certification experts shared tips on what to look for. Many apply to in-person purchases, too, so you can keep them in mind for the supermarket or furniture store. Know how sustainability is measured There are multiple measures of sustainability, and sometimes positive attributes can be offset by negative ones. Third-party certification is meant to show that an independent group studied these factors. Some focus on one issue, while others look holistically at how different factors fit together. Manufacturing an item might have low emissions but use lots of water. A company might reduce plastic, but if its products don't last long, they can still wind up in the landfill. Other sustainability concerns include energy efficiency, how far the item has travelled and how resources were extracted to make it. Certification labeling also varies. Sometimes it's printed on the product, sometimes it's listed on the manufacturer's website and sometimes the certifying body lists the products that have earned its approval. Large retail websites, in turn, often list certifications in a product description. Check whether it's verified by a third party Third-party verification is a core avenue for determining whether a manufacturer's sustainability claims are legitimate. 'Ideally you want to look for some certifying bodies because they've removed some of that up-front labour that as a consumer you otherwise might have to do," said Clementina Consens of B-Lab, which certifies companies that meet environmental and social standards. Grainger-Jones said some companies create their own self-certifications that look convincing but don't mean much. 'You can go and buy a self-declared certificate for a couple of thousand dollars," he said. Look for quantifiable and transparent climate goals If a company is serious about sustainability, it should have its practices assessed and make that information easy for customers to find, Consens said. She said she looks to see whether a company has completed an environmental impact assessment, whether it publicises its findings or whether there is any tangible data on the company's greenhouse gas emissions, water or energy use. Large e-commerce websites such as Amazon, Walmart and Target have set emissions benchmarks and other climate-related targets for their suppliers and list their own company-wide sustainability goals. Walmart, for example, has released extensive information on its Project Gigaton, including a list of participating suppliers, definitions of its recognition tiers and science-based requirements for suppliers' goals. Target publishes its climate goals, and has provided updates on where the company has surpassed expectations, and where it has fallen short. It also displays icons and hyperlinks next to products that meet sustainability goals. Amazon's Climate Pledge Friendly programme vets products based on a set of verified third-party certifications and posts a green leaf label alongside products that meet the certifications, along with hyperlinks. 'Having those third-party standards is super important for credibility," said Nneka Leiba, Amazon's principal sustainability specialist. Certifications that aren't quantifiable or are too permissive don't meet Leiba's bar for inclusion in the programme. She said when evaluating a certification, she looks to see whether it's following International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) standards, or other relevant standards. She said certifications should be backed by scientific rigour and require companies or products meet specific benchmarks. Leiba said manufacturers' efforts to become certified can be good for their business. She said products in the Climate Pledge Friendly programme experience a 12 per cent sales increase in the first year after earning the green leaf badge. 'That cycle is really beneficial to our customer, and beneficial to the environment," she said. (AP) NPK NPK (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments First Published: August 20, 2025, 19:45 IST News agency-feeds How to make climate-friendly, sustainable choices when shopping online Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...
Hans India
3 days ago
- Hans India
Farmers left high & dry amid acute urea shortage in Bhadradri
Kothagudem: Althoughthe state government had flagged the sharp shortfall in urea supply to the state and the Centre has since claimed that 'adequate' urea is being supplied to Telangana, the ground reality is pathetic in Bhadradi, where farmers a facing a double whammy. The monsoon has played truant in Bhadradri Kothagudem, where rainfall in June stood at 134.4 mm, against the expected 169.1 mm — a 20% shortfall. Although July saw surplus rainfall, it was unevenly spread and provided little relief to most farmers. That apart, right in the district's heartland and elsewhere an acute shortage of urea is pushing farmers to the brink. The district has over 2.08 lakh acres under cotton cultivation and more than 12,000 acres under paddy. With the Kharif season in full swing, farmers were expecting timely rainfall and adequate fertiliser supplies. However, both have fallen short of the requirement. The district requires 30,277 metric tonnes (MT) of urea by August, but only 19,202 MT have been supplied so far. Of this, 16,786 MT have been distributed, while 3,166 MT remain locked away with private dealers selling them at a premium— raising serious questions over supply chain transparency and accountability. Scenes of desperation are playing out daily at primary agricultural society godowns and dealers' shops. Farmers are queuing up before dawn, hoping to get their hands on just a couple of urea bags. In many mandals, godowns are located miles away, forcing small and marginal farmers to spend avoidable extra on transport — often Rs. 50 per bag just, apart from auto fares. The other option is worse: 'We can't afford to wait in line for hours, only to be told 'stock is over'. If we go to private dealers, they charge Rs. 350 or more per bag,' laments Satish, a farmer from Rampuram. 'Cultivating cotton without urea at this stage is unthinkable.' Amid spotty monsoon rains, nutrient support becomes even more vital. Although the Agriculture Department claims 'there is no shortage', officials quietly admit in confidence that 'at least 10,000 MT more urea is needed immediately'. What is galling is that, some large farmers are allegedly hoarding stock by leveraging their influence at cooperative societies. This way, small farmers are being elbowed out by biometric systems and unwarranted delays in distribution. When contacted, District Agriculture Officer V. Baburao said, 'We are conducting inspections and have warned dealers against overpricing. Nano urea is also being promoted as an alternative, though farmers remain hesitant. Another 10,000 MT of urea is expected soon.' All told, hope is wearing thin for most farmers. Paddy fields are drying up, and cotton crops are showing stunted growth. As the Kharif season enters a critical phase, farmers are demanding immediate government intervention, transparent distribution of fertilisers, and strict action against black marketing. As of now, the fields of Bhadradri are parched, abandoned by the very systems that are meant to sustain them.
The Print
4 days ago
- The Print
Kerala agriculture growth doubles national average, says CM Vijayan
'In the last financial year, while the agricultural sector at the national level recorded a growth of 2.1 per cent, Kerala achieved a growth of 4.65 per cent. The Agriculture Department implemented several measures aimed at increasing farmers' income by 50 per cent. He was speaking while inaugurating an online state-level celebration of Farmers' Day and the distribution of state farmer awards. Thrissur (Kerala), Aug 17 (PTI) Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan said on Sunday that Kerala's agricultural sector is on the path of growth and that the state has achieved more than double the national average growth. 'A short-term agricultural programme named Mission 2026 and a long-term plan called Mission 2033 have been highly supportive in this effort,' the chief minister said on the occasion of the Malayalam New Year, Chingam 1. The state has also been able to implement a comprehensive crop insurance scheme, Vijayan said. He noted that during this government's tenure, paddy productivity had increased to 3,108 kg per hectare, while coconut cultivation achieved 54 per cent growth through the Keragramam project. The procurement of coconuts rose from 6.28 lakh tonne to 17.20 lakh tonne, the CM added. Vijayan said climate change, market uncertainties and wild animal attacks were adversely affecting the agricultural sector. 'To counter climate change and bring changes in value-added production, the state is implementing the KERA Project with World Bank support at a cost of Rs 2,365 crore. The project will directly benefit four lakh farmers and indirectly benefit another 10 lakh farmers,' he said. The chief minister added that this was the first major World Bank-supported project for the agricultural sector in 40 years. Vijayan said the agricultural calendar should be adjusted in line with climate change, and the sector should move forward through constructive discussions and innovative farming practices. The government, he said, was looking into combining modern technologies as well. 'More than 150 agritech start-ups have been launched. The government is also making efforts to carry out effective interventions in the value-added products sector. Moving ahead with the goal of branding agricultural value-added products under the motto 'One Krishi Bhavan, One Value-Added Product', over 200 value-added products have been prepared for marketing,' he said. The chief minister said curbing the menace of wild animals was indeed essential. 'However, this cannot be fully achieved through the intervention of the state government alone. Timely amendments to central laws are required, and for this the state government is putting pressure on the Centre,' he said. In addition, special projects that can be implemented at the state level have also been designed. The CM said the government's aim was to combine traditional farming practices with modern agriculture techinques and put them into practice. State Agriculture Minister P Prasad presided over the function. PTI TGB TGB KH This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
