Trump Bill Advances as Team Owner and College Tax Breaks in Peril
'The bill itself, vis-a-vis sports teams ownership, isn't really a great thing,' Irwin Kishner, a partner at the law firm of Herrick, Feinstein, said on a phone call. 'You could argue the valuations of sports teams would be less than they were prior to that tax treatment.'
More from Sportico.com
Baseball America the Latest to Be Target of 'Bork Bill'
Congress May Have to Settle NCAA Athlete Eligibility Issue
Coffey Talk: Donn Davis on PFL's Rise and Sports 'Ego Money'
The bill, now numbered H.R. 1, covers a multitude of spending priorities including border security, defense and taxation, among others. The legislation also takes a hatchet to amortization, which is the depreciation of non-tangible assets often termed goodwill. Typically, 90% or more of a team's purchase price is goodwill, which excludes physical assets a team might possess, such as its stadium and weight room equipment.
'Team owners were allowed to deduct 100% of the purchase price over 15 years, and now they're only allowed to deduct 50% over 15 years, if it comes to law,' Robert Raiola, director of the sports and entertainment group at PKF O'Connor Davies accounting firm, said on a phone call.
Amortization is an accounting principle meant to assess a decline in value over time, like its cousin depreciation, which is meant to account for physical assets wearing out, such as machinery. In sports, values don't typically decline. The 1973 New York Yankees sale to George Steinbrenner is believed to be the last time a franchise from the big four U.S. leagues traded hands at a loss.
The amortization of team values is an under-the-radar tax benefit that is a key part of the calculus used in the decision to buy a U.S. sports franchise—and it plays a role in the skyrocketing prices paid for franchises in recent years. For example, under existing law, a team owner paying $1.6 billion for a franchise where $1.5 billion is intangible goodwill could deduct that $1.5 billion over 15 years. That $100 million annual deduction of taxable income probably saves the average team owner $40 million in actual taxes, assuming a 40% blended federal and state tax rate. Those deductions do raise the taxable income if and when the team is sold—all $1.5 billion would be a gain to be taxed—but not paying taxes today is preferable to paying them in the distant future.
The proposed law, which now moves to the Senate, means team owners would still get a $20 million annual tax savings under the example above. As drafted, it would cover all professional sports teams, and specifies football, hockey, soccer, baseball and basketball as examples. The amortization reduction applies only to new purchases after the bill becomes law, so any revenue bump to the federal government would be muted by the fact current team owners will be exempt under the proposal.
'The general public doesn't really feel sorry for these people either way, but for the owners themselves, it has a huge impact,' Kevin Thorne, managing partner of tax-focused Thorne Law Group, said on a phone call. 'I think it's going to be changed by the time it goes fully through [the Senate and reconciliation process]. A lot of people are going to be getting phone calls on The Hill.'
Two years ago Congress eliminated the ability of team owners to immediately depreciate the value of tangible assets of their franchises.
Tax benefits 'are a big part of the calculus' of buying a team, Kishner said. 'But it's still a regulated asset in that supply is less than demand and people have historically done very well owning these franchises.'
H.R. 1 also seeks to tax college athletic department licensing revenue. Typically, all nonprofits must pay income tax on revenue from activities not central to their tax-exempt status to avoid giving charities a competitive advantage over for-profit businesses.
Yet under current law, income from the sale or licensing by a college of its name and logo is exempt from unrelated business income taxation. This money can be significant: Ohio State University's athletic department for example, made $34.1 million in licensing and advertising revenue in the latest reported year, according to the Sportico College Sports Finances Database. Athletic department logos of seemingly every college in the U.S. are widely licensed for apparel and other goods. That money would now be subject to the 21% corporate tax rate—at the same time the NCAA is proposing expanded scholarship limits and direct payments to athletes.
Another clause in the budget as passed would allow health savings account money to be used to pay for gym membership, capped at $500 a year per person and $1,000 per family. Publicly traded gym operators Planet Fitness (PLNT) and Life Time Group Holdings (LTH) were up modestly in trading today, outpacing the broader market.
H.R. 1 passed the full House by a vote of 215-214 with one abstention, and it will likely see changes in the Senate, despite the Republicans' six-seat advantage. Senate Majority Leader John Thune has set a July 4 target date to pass the legislation. The bill, weighing in at more than 1,100 pages, will now be referred to the Senate finance and budget committees, which may propose amendments that will need to be reconciled with the House version. Both bodies will need to approve by majority vote a final version before it can be sent to President Trump to be signed into law.
With assistance from Michael McCann
Best of Sportico.com
Most Expensive Sports Memorabilia and Collectibles in History
The 100 Most Valuable Sports Teams in the World
NFL Private Equity Ownership Rules: PE Can Now Own Stakes in Teams
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
5 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Interior Department unveils Alaska, Gulf oil drilling lease timeline
The U.S. Department of the Interior on Tuesday unveiled its long-term schedule for new Alaskan and Gulf of Mexico (renamed to the Gulf of America by President Donald Trump by executive order) offshore oil and gas leases that are part of Trump's recently signed legislation called the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act.' The first sale on Dec. 10 will be the start of a minimum of 30 by March 2040 for the Gulf and six sales by 2032 for Alaska's Cook Inlet along Alaska's south-central coast near Anchorage. On Tuesday, U.S. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said the Trump administration was putting in place what he characterized as a 'bold, long-term program that strengthens American energy dominance.' The so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill' legislation was unanimously rejected by Democrats. Data by October 2022 showed the Gulf produced about 1.7 million barrels of oil per day compared to the 12 million bpd for the entire country. Burgum added that with Interior's 'predictable sale schedule,' a goal is to create 'good-paying jobs and ensure we continue to responsibly develop our offshore resources,' he said in a statement. The administration said Alaska plays a 'vital' role in America's energy future and argued sales will provide 'much-needed clarity' in pursuit of 'continued investment in deepwater infrastructure.' It added that oil drilling in the Gulf supports 'hundreds of thousands' of jobs, contributes tens of billions of dollars to the nation's annual gross domestic product and generates 'substantial' federal and state tax revenue. The Interior Department claimed the economic and energy-security gains from the sales were 'both immediate and long-lasting.' 'Every year, oil, gas, and mineral activity on public lands brings in billions through lease sales, rent and royalties,' the department argued Tuesday on social media. It said those revenues support schools, roads, conservation projects and 'essential public services in communities across the country.' The White House announced in June a plan to open nearly 82% of the fragile Alaskan landscape to oil and gas development, including some of its most ecologically sensitive areas. According to the department, the Gulf accounts for roughly 14-15% of U.S. crude oil production and serves as the 'linchpin' of offshore energy output. Interior officials added in the news release that the inclusion of at least 30 finalized lease sales in the Gulf underscored what they characterized as the region's 'indispensable role in America's energy ecosystem.' It added that Cook Inlet along Alaska's south-central coast was 'at the center' of perceived economic opportunity. 'Alaska's unique position as both a strategic energy hub and a gateway to the Arctic makes it essential to U.S. energy security,' according to U.S. Interior officials. Alaska was at the forefront of Trump's brief meeting last week in that state with Russian President Vladimir Putin when the two men discussed Russia's ongoing war in Ukraine. Meanwhile, the department stated the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management will publish the final notice at least 30 days before the sale. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.


UPI
5 hours ago
- UPI
Interior Department unveils Alaska, Gulf of Mexico oil drilling lease timeline
Aug. 19 (UPI) -- The U.S. Department of the Interior on Tuesday unveiled its long-term schedule for new Alaskan and Gulf of Mexico offshore oil and gas leases that are part of President Donald Trump's recently signed legislation called the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act." The first sale on December 10 will be the start to a minimum of 30 by March 2040 for the gulf and six sales by 2032 for Alaska's Cook Inlet along Alaska's south-central coast near Anchorage. On Tuesday, U.S. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said the Trump administration was putting in place what he characterized as a "bold, long-term program that strengthens American energy dominance." The so-called "Big Beautiful Bill" legislation was unanimously rejected by Democrats. Data by October 2022 showed the Gulf of Mexico produced about 1.7 million barrels of oil per day compared to the 12 million bpd for the entire country. Burgum added with Interior's "predictable sale schedule" a goal to create "good-paying jobs and ensure we continue to responsibly develop our offshore resources," he said in a statement. The administration said Alaska plays a "vital" role in America's energy future and argued sales will provide "much-needed clarity" in pursuit of "continued investment in deepwater infrastructure." It added that oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico supports "hundreds of thousands" of jobs, contributes tens of billions of dollars to the nation's annual gross domestic product and generates "substantial" federal and state tax revenue. The Interior Department claimed the economic and energy-security gains from the sales were "both immediate and long-lasting." "Every year, oil, gas, and mineral activity on public lands brings in billions through lease sales, rent and royalties," the department argued Tuesday on social media. It said those revenues support schools, roads, conservation projects and "essential public services in communities across the country." The White House announced in June a plan to open nearly 82% of fragile Alaskan landscape to oil and gas development, including some of its most ecologically sensitive areas. According to the department, the Gulf of Mexico accounts for roughly 14-15% of U.S. crude oil production and serves as the "linchpin" of offshore energy output. Interior officials added in its release that the inclusion of at least 30 finalized lease sales in the gulf underscored what they characterized as the region's "indispensable role in America's energy ecosystem." It added Cook Inlet along Alaska's south-central coast was "at the center" of perceived economic opportunity. "Alaska's unique position as both a strategic energy hub and a gateway to the Arctic makes it essential to U.S. energy security," according to U.S. Interior officials. Alaska was at the forefront of Trump's brief meeting last week in that state with Russian President Vladimir Putin when the two men discussed Russia's ongoing war in Ukraine. Meanwhile, the department stated the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management will publish the final notice at least 30 days before the sale.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Stimulus check 2025? What we know about current rebate legislation
**Related Video Above: Third stimulus checks were processed in 2021 (WJW) — It's not a pandemic stimulus check, but Congress is currently weighing the possibility of sending the American people more money. As part of the American Worker Rebate Act, introduced by Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri in July, people would receive hundreds of dollars in tariff rebate checks, which work to counteract the financial burden imposed on families by the Trump administration's tariffs. Federal government putting an end to paper checks As the bill stands now, a household would get $600 for every child and adult — meaning a family of four would receive $2,400. Check amounts go down for those U.S. residents who are making more than $150,000 as a family or $75,000 individually. The bill has not been passed by the Senate or the House of Representatives, and it must overcome multiple obstacles before being brought to President Trump's desk to sign. However, last month, Trump did make clear he would approve of the rebates. If the revenue from the Trump tariffs exceeds projections, the bill makes exceptions for a larger rebate being sent out to the American people. Bald eagles in Ohio: How many nests in each county So far, there has been no word from Congress or the IRS on the possibility of a fourth $2,000 stimulus check. A rebate is a refund of something already paid for, while a stimulus is simply money given to pump up the economy. The U.S. Senate is currently on break for the summer and is back in action on Sept. 2. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.