DOGE Put Him in the Treasury Department. His Company Has Federal Contracts Worth Millions
Krause is now in charge of both a sensitive government payment system and a company that has millions of dollars worth of active contracts with various federal agencies through distribution partners, according to a WIRED review of searchable spending records. The Department of Treasury alone accounts for a dozen ongoing contracts tied to Krause's company that are together valued between $7.3 million to $11.8 million. These include licenses for the data visualization tool ibi WebFocus and purchases of systems called Citrix NetScaler that help manage traffic to apps. (Some publicly posted procurement records do not break out contract details, so actual figures may be even higher.)
Critics have expressed concern about the alleged conflicts of interest posed by Krause's decision to keep his role in the private sector. Cloud Software could benefit from extending its federal contracts or securing additional ones, though there is no public evidence that Krause has done anything improper with his dual roles. Existing federal regulations also bar actual and apparent unjust favoritism in contracting. 'Public trust in those safeguards is nonnegotiable,' says Scott Amey, general counsel at the Project On Government Oversight, a nonpartisan watchdog group.
As Krause moves forward with two jobs, he could have to potentially navigate not only contracting conflicts, but also dueling crises. 'What would happen if a Citrix emergency emerges at the same time as Treasury obligations?' says Jeff Hauser, founder and executive director of the Revolving Door Project, which researches federal appointees. 'Generally, the thicket of restrictions on full time employees would make a CEO role impossible in an administration which took adherence to ethics laws seriously.'
Krause, the Treasury Department, and Cloud Software didn't respond to requests for comment. Cloud Software investors also didn't respond to a request for comment.
The Treasury Department has told Congress that Krause is a 'special government employee'—a type of temporary role—that is supposed to be held to 'the same ethical standards of privacy, confidentiality, conflicts of interest assessment, and professionalism of other government employees.' In a foreword to a code of conduct policy posted on Cloud Software's website, Krause states, 'Cloud Software Group is committed to ensuring that its business is conducted ethically, in compliance with the law, and according to its values of integrity, honesty and respect.'
Krause is among a group of several dozen veteran tech executives, mid-level tech operations managers, and fresh-out-of-school software coders who have been recently installed across a series of federal agencies under the auspices of the self-styled Department of Government Efficiency. DOGE's authority is being challenged by some Democratic state attorneys general. In the meantime, its representatives have been carrying out an order from President Donald Trump to cut costs and modernize technology across the government.
There is some precedent for corporate executives to simultaneously work in the US government. When the US was at war in the early 1900s, the federal government recruited business leaders to fill key posts. They retained their private sector jobs and wages; the government pitched in a $1 annual salary to the executives who became known as 'dollar-a-year men.' Congress later raised concerns that some of them had engaged in self-dealing.
Since then, other executives have continued to retain their jobs as they serve on government boards and commissions, typically in a part-time capacity. But maintaining a day-to-day operational role in both the federal government and at a corporation is now virtually unheard of, says David E. Lewis, a political scientist who wrote a book on appointed government bureaucrats. 'Most persons in regular executive positions divest themselves of private interests before government service,' he says.
Trump, according to his company, has handed management of his businesses, including hotels and golf courses, to his children for the duration of his presidency (though he reportedly still takes meetings that have raised questions among ethics experts). Musk, who is CEO of Tesla and SpaceX and has oversight of four other companies, including X and Neuralink, has been a vocal figure in DOGE's operations, but the White House has said he's not actually in charge—without specifying who is leading the project. Some of the other individuals associated with DOGE are otherwise unemployed, have taken leave, or maintain dual roles but at lower levels than chief executive.
Krause is the only Trump administration official identified so far as being a CEO and a day-to-day decision maker inside one particular agency. After years of working as an executive at chip companies, Krause joined Florida-based Cloud Software Group in 2022. The company was created that year as part of a private equity-backed acquisition of Citrix, followed by a merger with Tibco, another tech company. At the time, Citrix was saddled with an extensive amount of debt and generating essentially stagnant revenues, and while Tibco had not recently publicly disclosed its finances, analysts had considered the company's outlook to be 'negative.'
The US government, including state and local agencies, is expected to spend $287 billion on technology this year, or about 14 percent of overall US tech spending, according to Forrester, a research and advisory company. Whether DOGE's efforts to boost the quality and efficiency of federal IT systems will lead that spending to increase or decrease isn't clear. So far, DOGE has both tried to purchase emerging technologies and moved to cancel some existing contracts. But Krause's inside access could potentially provide an advantage to Cloud Software at a pivotal moment for the company.
Over the past couple of years, Cloud Software has laid off thousands of people and faced accusations that it potentially became lax with cybersecurity. Cloud Software's most well-known offering, Citrix, enables groups of workers to access data and run apps that are located on a remote machine. But increasing adoption of tools that can operate on any device has chipped away at some of Citrix's dominance, according to Will McKeon-White, senior analyst for infrastructure and operations at Forrester. There are other options now, he says, including from Microsoft and smaller companies such as Island.
Cloud Software's Tibco program, which helps workers automate tasks such as adding a new user to multiple internal databases, is often mentioned in the wrong sort of conversations these days, according to David Mooter, a Forrester principal analyst. 'They tend to come up more when somebody wants to abandon them,' he says.
That said, some Cloud Software services are more affordable than alternatives for governments, and they also are better suited for the older infrastructure used by some agencies. Last year appears to have been one of Citrix's best in a long time financially, says Shannon Kalvar, a research director for enterprise systems management and other areas at IDC. One reason for the upswing is that Citrix has put more emphasis on catering to the feature demands of its largest customers, including governments.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
WIRED
6 hours ago
- WIRED
Pebblebee Is Getting Serious About Personal Safety Tracking
The Bluetooth tracker maker is adding free and paid SOS features to its products, including emergency contact alerts, silent alarms, and real-time location sharing. All products featured on WIRED are independently selected by our editors. However, we may receive compensation from retailers and/or from purchases of products through these links. Learn more. Think of Bluetooth trackers and safety in the past few years and your first thought might be the misuse of Apple AirTags and similar devices against women in domestic abuse and stalking cases. Alongside collaborative initiatives to counter and shut down these malicious uses (such as the IETF's Detection of Unwanted Location Trackers, or DULT, standard), tracker makers themselves are flipping the script, turning tech that has been used to monitor women against their will into tech that protects them. In mid-July, Seattle-based Pebblebee announced a new, free SOS safety feature, named Alert, for its $35 Clip Bluetooth tracker which, like the rest of its Universal line-up, can be set up with either Apple's Find My or Google's Find Hub networks, is made from around 30 percent recycled plastic and runs on a rechargeable battery, with 12+ months between USB-C charges. When multi-pressed (six-plus presses), the Clip can trigger a siren alarm, flashing LED lights and automatically send an SMS text notification to one 'Safety Circle' contact that you've pre-saved in the Pebblebee app. It's simple to set up the contact in the app, and a long press on the device shuts off the siren and LEDs, though it's unlikely you'll fumble or accidentally set this one off. The Clip's siren isn't as loud and the lights don't cover as much radius as a dedicated personal alarm would, but they're enough to alert passersby when out walking at night. Plus, the Pebblebee website states: 'The Alert functionality including the siren, strobe, and first Safety Circle contact is and will always be completely free.' We tested out the SOS system and it worked without a hiccup. Our Safety Circle buddy received a text saying: 'URGENT: Sophie activated a Pebblebee Alert. Please check in immediately' with a link to the correct location via Google Maps. Clicking the 'Mark as safe' button in the app and/or long-pressing on the Clip sends a follow-up text to say 'Sophie cancelled their Pebblebee Alert' with the last location link. Now, however, Pebblebee is adding a paid-for subscription option, named Alert Live, which offers a Safety Circle of up to five contacts to receive the SOS text notification when triggered via the Clip, plus live location tracking for these contacts, for $3 a month or $26 a year. There's also a new Silent Mode, which sends the alert without the siren and LEDs, for both free and paid-for users: useful, though we haven't had the chance to test this or the new real-time location sharing out yet. 'Safety, specifically, has been on the roadmap, I'd say probably for three or four years, once we started implementing the DULT,' says Pebblebee's founder and CEO Daniel Daoura. 'So ever since then, we've wanted to do it but we just didn't have the bandwidth and ability. We wanted to make sure we've established ourselves as a trustworthy and dependable company.' The DULT specification, which is also supported by Apple, Google and the likes of Chipolo and is waiting on IETF ratification, is, says Daoura, 'very close to being perfect.' Safeguards including the tracker devices buzzing or chiming so as not to go undetected, and notifications to the user being tracked without the need for a dedicated app are ideas the IETF is considering. 'The number-one priority is the safety of people, whether they're customers or not,' Daoura says. 'We have received many reports from law enforcement, and we've provided feedback and told them exactly how to get the identification of the device so that they can go back to Apple or Google to trace the person that's misusing it.' Kicking off this trend for adding personal safety alerts to trackers, Tile announced a similar SOS system for its 2024 line-up of trackers, which start at $25 for the Mate, last September. This comes with the ability to add up to 99 people to a Circle via integration with the Life360 app. (Though no more than 10 per Circle is recommended.) Silent SOS alerts, via a triple-tap of a Tile tracker's button to trigger, are free for all Life360 users, with two days of location history. Its paid plans offer features like longer access to location history, unlimited 'place alerts' for family and friends and emergency dispatch for $8, $15 or $25 a month. On this competition with Tile, Daoura says that its SOS offering is 'smarter, more intuitive, faster to use, and we're building more features that they've never even considered', indicating that Pebblebee will add more personal safety-based functionality by the end of this year. As for the ubiquitous Apple AirTag, a second gen is rumored to launch this September with an Ultra Wideband (UWB) chip and Vision Pro integration as well as, on the safety front, a tamper-proof, anti-stalking built-in speaker. But Daoura worries that Apple won't go further than this unless users apply pressure for the company to do so. 'We know that it's not going to be blazing, crazy innovation, but we do know that people depend on Apple, they love the ecosystem,' he says. As for its core item-tracking functionality, after CES demos of embedded Pebblebee 'Pin' and 'Plate' modules inside Kuma bikes and Peak skis in Las Vegas this January, and the launch of its scannable QR code Link Label stickers, Daoura thinks the future is a world of pre-tagged products. 'We're embedding our tech into skis, bikes, golf gear, tools and many more items," he says. "Imagine buying something and it's already trackable, no stickers, no dongles… that's where this is going.' With this invisible, trackable future perhaps in mind, Pebblebee is also bolstering its approach to privacy and security. Daoura says privacy is the 'default' not an add-on. Pebblebee does not have access to location data for finding items, location sharing to chosen friends and family via Alert only occurs when the user initiates it (and ends when the user marks themself as safe) and 'we never sell any user data, unlike others, ever'. (Tile owner Life360 had previously sold precise user location data to up to a dozen data brokers, according to reporting from The Markup; it changed its data policy in 2022, shortly after it acquired Tile in late 2021.) 'With the rise of AI language models,' he says, 'data is really under threat and over the next year or two—we're going to see even more outbursts data scrubbing.' As for how to potentially counteract this, Pebblebee is developing an 'enhanced privacy layer', set to be released via the app later this year or early next year, to protect your location and identity from being 'scraped, sold or abused by anyone, even AI bots and trackers.' It seems trackers might be going beyond physical safety, and into providing peace of mind that your data and your identity is secure as well.
WIRED
a day ago
- WIRED
Apple Finally Destroyed Steve Jobs' Vision of the iPad. Good
Aug 16, 2025 7:00 AM Cupertino has done the thing it swore it never would: turn its tablet into a full-blown window-wrangling, compromise-abandoning computer. Yes, it's better, but lurking deep in the settings the ghost of Jobs remains. Photo-Illustration: WIRED Staff; Apple For years, Apple treated the idea of windows on the iPad as sacrilege. But with iPadOS 26 installed, today's iPads are doing macOS cosplay, becoming touchscreen Macs in all but name. And here's the thing: It's actually pretty good. So how did we get here? When did this fundamental shift occur that killed off Steve Jobs' vision of the iPad? When Jobs first revealed the iPad in 2010, it was pitched as a 'third category' of device—something between a phone and a laptop. For that category to justify its existence, Jobs said it had to be better at certain key tasks. He duly listed browsing the web, dealing with email, watching videos, listening to music, playing games, reading ebooks, and enjoying photos. Coincidentally, those were the exact things the iPad was really good at. Playing up the distinct nature of a tablet experience, the original demo found Jobs using his iPad not at a desk but while relaxing in a chair. 'Using this thing is remarkable,' he said of the iPad. 'It's so much more intimate than a laptop, and so much more capable than a smartphone with its gorgeous large display. Holding the internet in your hands is an incredible experience.' Assuming, of course, you didn't want to do much more than read. This, then, was a device that was focused. Elegant. Simple. Better than a phone or a laptop for lean-back media consumption. But even during that demo, there were hints of the tension that was to come. A Brush With the Future Brushes creator Steve Sprang appeared on stage and suggested the iPad could move beyond the consumption-first narrative: 'Artists have already done amazing things with the iPhone, and I think with this larger screen they're going to have a true portable paint studio.' And Apple itself introduced touch-optimized—if noticeably simplified—versions of its iWork office suite. The problems came when you started using these apps. Sprang's was fun. It looked gorgeous. The bigger canvas offered room to play. But artists were pining for input options beyond their own digits. That didn't align with Jobs' scornful comment about other tablet makers: 'If you see a stylus, they blew it.' And iWork? You could quickly sketch out the bones of a document or presentation while sitting on the sofa, then send it to your Mac to finish. But trying to be meaningfully productive solely on the iPad was a chore. In attempting to simplify computing and pare things back, Apple had cut things to the bone. Interaction was opinionated to a fault. And the lack of a system-wide file manager—a Finder for iPad—meant files were siloed in apps, duplicated as you moved between them, and impossible to track. Perhaps Apple underestimated how quickly users would demand more from the iPad than basic tasks and media consumption, or how frustrating it would be to not have access to computing norms like traditional multitasking or a file system exposed to the user. Apple soon found out. The iPad sold incredibly well—at first. But its position between two existing extremes began to unravel. Not to the point it became a flop. But the initial meteoric sales trajectory plateaued and went into decline. As Apple scrambled, experimenting to boost flagging sales, the focused iPad vision started to fade. Apple's Awkward Middle Child The problem was that the iPad sat between two existing critical device categories but couldn't replace either of them. Smartphones were becoming indispensable. The iPad? A nice-to-have. And Apple's laudable build quality meant iPads lasted for years. Most people rarely felt compelled to upgrade, because their first iPad still did everything they needed it to, which often wasn't much. But a noisy cohort—people who wanted to work on an iPad and who might favor a tablet over a laptop—grew frustrated. The iPad gained a reputation. It was sometimes great for doing one thing at a time. Useful when you wanted to focus. But when you needed more, it all fell apart. Apple responded with the iPad Pro, which brought more horsepower than anyone knew what to do with. The original iPad had debuted at $499, which Jobs argued would get it into many hands. The Pro was priced like a Mac but was still paired with an operating system designed for prodding web pages, flicking through photos, and finger-painting. Alongside it came the Apple Pencil—an Apple stylus. Had Apple therefore 'blown it'? Well, no, because the iPad didn't require a stylus, and it provided an answer for users who needed precision input. But it was a clear departure from the original vision, which Apple continued to chip away at over the years—a seeming admission that maybe users did want more than a supersized iPhone. Yet the company also held back, reluctant to risk cannibalizing Mac sales. So instead of allowing the iPad to become the device it wanted to be, Apple preferred to smooth the transition between devices, leaving casual and power users alike in a strange limbo. Between a Mac and a Hard Place Each year, the iPad strayed further from Jobs' vision and yet somehow managed to still leave people unsatisfied. Apple added complexity for typical users and kept reinventing the wheel in ways that always left power users wanting more. Focus was replaced by confusion. Apple insisted the iPad wasn't a laptop replacement, then shipped a magnetic keyboard that made it look like one. Mouse support was grudgingly added. M1 chips arrived in a blaze of glory to no crushing need, on devices that still couldn't even optimize second-screen output for external displays. Then Stage Manager showed up in 2022, a windowing model across iPad and Mac that nobody asked for and almost nobody liked. Clunky. Fiddly. An overdesigned answer to a problem Apple refused to fully grapple with: Why not just make the iPad more like a Mac? Now, Apple has done the thing it swore it never would. iPadOS 26 turns the iPad into a full-blown multitasking, window-wrangling, traffic-light-button-clicking, external-display-supporting, compromise-abandoning Apple computer. Windows can overlap. The cursor is pointy. There's even a menu bar. It's fluid, capable, and familiar. And while it's not quite a Mac—arguably, it in some ways should be more like one—it's definitely not a Jobs-era iPad either. It finally abandons the original pitch. Jobs' Ghost Still Haunts the iPad And yet. Buried in iPadOS 26 is a throwback mode: a Full-Screen Apps option that removes modern multitasking to a degree the iPad hasn't seen in years. No windows. Not even Split View. It's one app at a time, with all the purity of the original iPad. Which means the iPad no longer sits between two extremes—instead, you switch between them . The iPad is now two devices in one, the iPad that Steve Jobs imagined and the machine that pros have begged for. A touchscreen consumption slate and a windowed productivity machine. An Apple spork. So, yes, an iPad running iPadOS 26 may still contain the soul of the original iPad, lurking deep in Settings, waiting to be turned on. But the Jobs dream of a focused, elegant third device category between smartphone and laptop is effectively dead. Back in 2010, the man himself said: 'Do we have what it takes to establish a third category of products, an awesome product in between a laptop and smartphone? The bar is pretty high. It's gotta be better at doing some key things. We think we've done it.' Indeed you did. But it didn't last. And it's for the best because, if it had, the iPad itself might not have lasted either.
WIRED
a day ago
- WIRED
WIRED's Guide to Buying a Used Plug-In Hybrid
Aug 16, 2025 6:00 AM Right now is a great time to get a used plug-in hybrid car. Here's what to know about PHEVs before plonking down that cash. An MG HS plug-in hybrid SUV. Photo-Illustration: WIRED Staff; Photograph:With sales growth lagging, it's a weird time in the electric vehicles market. It's also, oddly enough, a good time to experiment with the plug. The Donald Trump administration put the kibosh on several US federal policies aimed at boosting the development, production, and purchase of new-energy vehicles. Still, $4,000 tax credits for used battery-electric cars and plug-in hybrids are available for qualified vehicles and buyers (more on that later) until the end of September. If you want to take advantage of this incentive, you should know that used plug-in hybrids, or PHEVs, are unique beasts. They're complicated vehicles, engineering-wise, containing both internal combustion engines and electric motors, and using two power sources—electricity and gasoline—to go. There's also a bunch of variation in the plug-in hybrid world. So there are tricks to picking out the best used one. WIRED asked car experts what to think about if you're going after a used PHEV. Shopping for a full electric? Check out our guide to buying the best used EV. Know Your Terms If you're after a plug-in hybrid, make sure first that you're getting the right sort of technology. Plain, old hybrid vehicles, sometimes called HEVs, also come with gas engines plus electric motors. But plug-in hybrids come with bigger electric batteries that can be plugged in and charged. Generally, that means that PHEVs drive on electricity until their batteries are depleted, at which point the gas engine kicks in. Though PHEVs by definition go both ways, some are more battery-powered than others. First, older PHEV models have very limited electric ranges. Those made before 2019 tend to get less than 17 miles of range per charge, and some closer to 10 miles. Also, some plug-ins are more 'gas-biased' than others, which matters if your goal is to save on fueling. The Ford Escape PHEVs' gas engine comes on when you accelerate or turn on the air-conditioning. The Kia Sorento's heat system is powered by gas. Other models tend to tap into gas when they're hauling heavier loads. These biases can change between model years. Investigate the details of your specific used PHEV before deciding on a purchase. As opposed to full battery-electric cars, PHEVs can't charge at 'fast chargers,' the sort you'll often find off highways, which can top up a car in around 30 minutes. Instead, PHEVs rely on standard 120-volt wall outlets, which can usually charge up a plug-in hybrid's electric battery overnight, or faster 'level 2' charging. Know Your Life Picking a used PHEV—or knowing if a used PHEV is for you, period—will require thinking about whether one can fit into your life. Lots of people think of plug-ins as EV-lites, a gateway drug to the battery-powered car. But that's not quite right, says Joseph Yoon, the head of consumer insights at Edmunds. Those who want to save money on gas need to make sure that their daily driving is covered by the PHEV's limited battery range, and that they have the ability to charge their car overnight at home, he says. If drivers can't meet those conditions, 'I don't think plug-in hybrids are as practical as people think they are.' In fact, PHEVs tend to be less gas-efficient than even some of their hybrid gas-powered counterparts. So if you're not able to charge one overnight regularly, it might actually cost you more to fuel. Consider a used hybrid instead. For those who really want to try a plug and have a slightly bigger budget, it's probably worth considering a newer used one, which can have battery ranges up to 50 miles per charge and tend to switch between electric and gas propulsion more smoothly. Know Your Battery Just as with full battery-electric vehicles, PHEV batteries can be expensive to replace. The good news is that, just as with full battery-electric vehicles, the PHEV batteries have proven more robust and reliable than automakers once feared. Still, make sure you ask the dealer to provide some kind of battery health test. It's also worth asking how the car was used. If the previous owner tended to forget to plug in their car and drove mostly on gas (really: don't do that), then the battery might be 'newer' and healthier than the car's age or mileage indicates. Know Your Warranty PHEVs come with the typical bumper-to-bumper and powertrain warranties you see in gas-powered cars. Most will also come with battery warranties, which can cover up to (though sometimes more than) eight years or 80,000 miles, whichever comes first. It's worth calling up the vehicle's automaker to make sure that those warranties are transferable between owners. Warranty coverage is especially important because PHEVs 'have an awful lot of moving parts,' says Sean Tucker, the lead editor for Kelley Blue Book. A Consumer Reports analysis of internal combustion engine, electric, and plug-in hybrid vehicles from the last three model years found that PHEVs have 70 percent more problems than gas-powered or hybrid vehicles. (By contrast, EVs have 42 percent more problems.) Tucker says he would be 'reluctant' to buy off-warranty PHEVs, especially from brands known for reliability issues. Consumer Reports' analysis found the least reliable brands to include Cadillac, Jeep, and Volkswagen; most reliable were Subaru, Lexus, and Toyota. Know Your Mechanic Because PHEVs are so mechanically tricky, you'll want a thorough understanding of a used one's service record. Make sure your dealer gives you access to that. And remember: Unlike an EV, plug-ins need regular oil, filter, and spark plug changes. Test the Charge It's worth testing out a used PHEV's charging and connecting cables before you take it home. The vehicles can be powered up using 120-volt and 240-volt chargers. Check both. Check Out Incentives Until September 30, some used PHEV buyers will have access to US federal tax credit incentives of up to $4,000 or 30 percent of the sale price, whichever is lower. You can find details here, but in short: Qualified vehicles must be priced at or below $25,000, and their batteries must have a capacity of 7 kilowatt-hours or higher (most PHEVs, even older ones, do). Buyers qualify if they've earned less than $150,000 a year filing jointly, or $75,000 as an individual. Keep in mind, too, that states, cities, and local power utilities sometimes offer their own new-energy-vehicle incentives programs, and some of those apply to plug-ins. Some also have programs to help new battery-powered-car owners install home charging. Do your research, and maybe you'll save.
