logo
Adams' $115B ‘Best Budget Ever' is chocked full of freebies fit for an election year — but critics say it doesn't prepare NYC for the worst

Adams' $115B ‘Best Budget Ever' is chocked full of freebies fit for an election year — but critics say it doesn't prepare NYC for the worst

New York Post01-05-2025

The 'Best Budget Ever' may not prepare for the worst.
Mayor Eric Adams served up a $115 billion election year spending plan Thursday that's stuffed with voter-pleasing goodies, but that was still slammed by critics for squirreling away relatively little for a rainy day.
Hizzoner, who faces an uphill re-election battle, unveiled his 2026 executive budget during a campaign-like event from his alma mater Bayside High School in Queens, rather than City Hall, from which such announcements have traditionally been done.
Advertisement
'This is not a budget that favors the few. It is budget for all of you,' Adams said, while flanked by students. 'In fact, it is no exaggeration to say that our fiscal Year 2026 executive budget is the best budget ever.'
The budget lavishes $1.4 billion on programs and services that had faced cuts — such as libraries, early child education and the City University of New York.
It also launches a universal after-school program and increases education funding by $376 million.
Advertisement
The spending plan is the largest Adams has proposed since taking office in 2022, with last year's executive budget proposal coming in at $111.6 billion.
'Welcome to the election year!' said veteran campaign strategist Hank Sheinkopf, adding that incumbent mayors usually throw caution to the wind when seeking a second term.
'An election year means living in the moment. Tomorrow, next year is a long time away,' Sheinkopf told The Post. 'It's 'spend whatever we can now.' It's like a bank robbery.'
3 Mayor Eric Adams unveiled his proposed 2026 budget during a campaign-style event Thursday.
Stephen Yang
Advertisement
3 Adams held the event in Bayside High School, his alma mater.
Stephen Yang
Critics quickly pounced on Adams seemingly failing to plan for the possibility of tough economic times in the near future, from President Trump's tariffs, a widely anticipated upcoming recession and potential federal funding cuts.
'Despite being flush with cash, Mayor Eric Adams' Fiscal Year 2026 Executive Budget fails to address the dual threats of looming federal budget cuts and a possible recession,' said Andrew Rein, president of the nonpartisan fiscal watchdog group Citizens Budget Commission.
'Instead of wisely adding $1 billion in next year's General Reserve to soften the first blows of federal cuts and $2 billion to the Rainy Day Fund, the budget increases spending to an unaffordable level.'
Advertisement
Rein said the city should have between $8 and $10 billion in reserves for potential choppy economic waters — a sum that city budget Director Jacques Jiha agreed would be needed, if the Big Apple were in a 'doomsday' scenario.
'We're not looking at doomsday, we're looking at a slowdown in the economy,' he said.
'We believe we have adequate reserves.'
Adams' preliminary budget, released in January, was blasted by opponents, including in the progressive City Council, for needlessly cutting services.
But his administration maintained those slashes were necessary due to skyrocketing costs from the migrant crisis — which Jiha said has now cost the city more than $7 billion.
The mayor had begged Albany lawmakers in February for $1.1 billion to deal with the migrant crisis, contending then that the city needed it in 12 weeks.
City Hall officials offered nary a peep about the ask since then — and the supposed shortfall apparently has been covered by savings, with Jiha saying only 'Money is fungible' as an explanation.
The budget announced Thursday is Adams' first since the crisis largely subsided, and includes these spending increases and reversed cuts:
Advertisement
$15.7 million for libraries
$96 million restoring CUNY savings
$298 million for school nurses
An overall near-$18 million increase to the parks budget
$92 million in annual funding for citywide 3-K
$20 million for new universal after-school programs
A $3 billion contribution for the MTA's capital plan
'Adams is using this budget to promote his re-election. He doesn't want to have much of a fight with the council,' said Nicole Gelinas, senior fellow at the conservative think tank the Manhattan Institute.
'It's pre-emptive capitulation to the council,' she added, noting Adams was proposing $1.7 billion more in spending compared to his preliminary budget.
'Adams is blowing out the agency spending,' Gelinas said. '[He] is squandering the last of his budget credibility.'
Advertisement
Not all programs and departments saw a funding increase. The following budget cuts were included in the plan:
$308 million for NYPD
$111 million for FDNY
$1.57 billion for Department of Social Services
$1.19 billion for Health + Hospitals
$840 million for Department of Homeless Services
$801 million for Administration for Children's Services
Talks with City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, who is not related to Hizzoner and is running for the Democratic mayoral nomination, will continue until the June 30 deadline to pass the budget.
Adams' plan offered plenty of fodder from candidates hoping to boot him from Gracie Mansion, such as City Comptroller Brad Lander — who claimed the mayor was 'failing to protect New Yorkers' by not putting more cash in reserves.
Advertisement
Former city comptroller and current mayoral candidate Scott Stringer also blasted Adams for failing to prepare for a potential 'extraordinary loss of funding for New York City.'
Adrienne Adams offered less gloom and doom — though she still cautioned against getting too comfortable.
'I think that the budget right now is good, but we can never be too certain about what is coming around the corner with this Trump administration,' she said.
Adams, who boasted of confronting then-President Joe Biden for migrant funding, hasn't been nearly as vocal about his growing ally Trump.
Advertisement
3 Adams brushed off concerns about economic turmoil.
Stephen Yang
He said he hasn't been in contact with the White House, even as he acknowledged that the current global climate was creating 'uncharted waters.'
Adams' top deputy, however, was quick to put a positive spin on the potential financial woes.
'We are best positioned to address with Washington those issues going forward,' said First Deputy Mayor Randy Mastro. 'Even asking a question about a doomsday scenario is to be with those pessimistic and political opportunists who don't bet on New York, who are saying, 'The sky is falling.'
'The sky isn't falling.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kentucky leaders see change in voter registration trends: ‘Candidates should take note'
Kentucky leaders see change in voter registration trends: ‘Candidates should take note'

Yahoo

time15 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Kentucky leaders see change in voter registration trends: ‘Candidates should take note'

FRANKFORT, Ky. (FOX 56) — State leaders are seeing a spike in voter affiliation shifting away from Republicans or Democrats. Secretary of State Michael Adams announced on Friday in a news release that Kentuckians registered under 'other' political affiliations have outpaced Republican and Democratic registrations combined for three straight months. 'As the Democrats move further left and the Republicans move further right, more voters are registering as Independent,' said Adams. 'Kentucky has a large and growing political center; candidates should take note and court this growing bloc of voters.' Owensboro's blue bridge to close for up to 3 months Kentucky gas tax to see reduction next month Kentucky health officials urge vaccines after infant deaths State officials said in a news release that Republican voter registration made up 47% of the electorate in Kentucky, with 1,582,699 voters, gaining an increase of 1,026 voters for an increase of 0.07%. Democratic registration makes up 42%, with 1,391,172 voters, seeing a decrease of 838 registrations. Adams wrote that by comparison, voters registered under other political parties saw an increase of 0.38%, or 1,352 voters. Secretary Adams' office wrote in a news release that 4,157 voters were removed in May, including 3,173 who died, 440 who moved out of state, 402 convicted felons, 65 who voluntarily de-registered, 49 voters adjudged mentally incompetent, and 28 duplicate registrations. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Our politicians are the least serious in history – and that includes you, Nigel
Our politicians are the least serious in history – and that includes you, Nigel

Yahoo

time18 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Our politicians are the least serious in history – and that includes you, Nigel

This week an appalling case reminded us just how broken Britain is. We learnt that a 15-year-old boy killed elderly dogwalker Bhim Kohli while a female friend, aged 12, filmed it on her mobile phone. Both were laughing as the beloved grandfather lay dying in the street. How on earth can it have come to this? The case is emblematic of everything that has gone wrong – and continues to go wrong – in our fragmented, seemingly lawless society. We are led by complete incompetents: from police administering two-tier justice right the way up to our Prime Minister. It is little wonder there is a university course running in France on why the UK is such a failure. And Mayor of London Sadiq Khan's answer to our capital's woes, despite knife and other crimes soaring? Decriminalising cannabis. We knew Labour were not fit for purpose before they even took office, but this latest example of idiocy from City Hall really does sum up the problem with having hapless, careerist socialists anywhere near the levers of power. And now Reform UK appears to have imploded. Having abandoned the Conservative Party after an inept 14 years of governance, which left us with higher bills, higher taxes, higher NHS waiting lists and higher immigration, voters had hoped that Nigel Farage and his motley crew might bring the salvation Britain so desperately needs. Reform was meant to represent the alternative to 'uniparty' politics by ripping up the political rule book and restoring good old fashioned common sense. What we have learnt in the past 24 hours, however, is that the one thing uniting all four major parties in the UK (and I'm including the ludicrous Liberal Democrats in this, with their clown of a leader Sir Ed Davey) is just how thoroughly unserious they all are. Westminster currently resembles a cross-party circus act; what has the electorate done to deserve this? Let's take them one by one. We currently cannot believe a word slippery Starmer says after a string of Labour lies on tax, winter fuel, defence spending, relations with the EU, the Chagos Islands, immigration – you name it. They promised 6,500 more teachers with their vindictive VAT raid on private school fees and this week it was revealed teacher numbers are actually down since they took office. Millionaires are leaving, businesses are folding, more tax rises are on the way. We've got an Attorney General who wants to defend terrorists like Osama bin Laden's right-hand man while the justice system imprisons mothers like Lucy Connolly for 'hurty words' on the internet. The Left accuses Reform of being amateurs – and then run the country as if it's a university student union staffed by drop-outs. Yet the Right-wing opposition appears equally as childish. This week, we have had the shadow chancellor Mel Stride denouncing Liz Truss's premiership with some weasel words about the Tories 'never again undermining fiscal credibility by making promises we cannot afford'. The former prime minister – once famously compared to a lettuce – hit back with an excoriating statement on the political playground that is X, accusing Sir Mel of being a 'creature of the system' by siding with 'failed Treasury orthodoxy'. In what world does this blue-on-blue infighting help Kemi Badenoch as she struggles to cut through? Equally infantile was the typically boyish intervention of her former leadership rival Sir James Cleverly with a demand that the Conservatives stick to net zero – despite it being among the main reasons the party is now facing its own climate emergency. He's been invisible for months and then emerges with this sort of unhelpful Ed Milibandesque claptrap? Read the room, for pity's sake. All credit to Robert Jenrick for trying to find some grown-up solutions to some of the country's problems – like fare dodging, notwithstanding the self-serving nature of his attention-grabbing social media endeavours. Badenoch is trying her best to be a serious politician, with thoughtful rather than knee-jerk interventions on issues like our membership of the ECHR – only to have MPs in her ranks like Kit Malthouse spreading anti-Israel slanders like his declaration this week that Gaza is 'an abattoir where starving people are lured out through combat zones to be shot at'. Along with other Tories, he's also been calling for the Prime Minister to recognise a Palestinian state. Harebrained student politics are clearly not just confined to the Labour Party. We had hoped Reform, led by streetwise Nigel Farage, a man of political wisdom and experience, might rise above all this. But even he has been dogged by infantilism. If Rupert Lowe's 'more people watch my X videos than Nigel's' bravado wasn't bad enough, Reform now has been badly damaged by the similarly petulant flouncing out of party chairman Zia Yusuf. I like Zia and think he deserves credit for all the hard work he has put into professionalising the party over the past 11 months. But what on earth was there to be gained from such a public tantrum? Just leave quietly, don't blow the whole thing up with spiteful talk of working to get the party elected 'no longer being a good use of my time'. Similarly juvenile was the language he used to describe Reform MP Sarah Pochin's Commons call to ban the burka (which provoked laughter from the front bench: that's the state of public discourse in this country, folks). Responding to Katie Hopkins, of all people, on X, he wrote: 'Nothing to do with me. Had no idea about the question nor that it wasn't policy. Busy with other stuff. I do think it's dumb for a party to ask the PM if they would do something the party itself wouldn't do.' At the age of 38 and having worked at Goldman Sachs and established his own hugely successful business, he should know this is not the way to behave in the public eye. Reform remains a party that cannot even govern itself, let alone the country. This simply isn't good enough. The Government is useless, the Tories are a busted flush; if Reform seriously wants to break the doom loom of despair then it cannot be part of the problem. The party must get its act together – and fast. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Mailbag: Fighting back against Huntington Beach City Council
Mailbag: Fighting back against Huntington Beach City Council

Los Angeles Times

time20 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Mailbag: Fighting back against Huntington Beach City Council

It's hard to fight City Hall. Yet here we are again. The Huntington Beach City Council would have you believe two things. First, for 50 years, our city librarians have been secretly providing pornography to your kids, and nobody ever noticed it. Second, that a 0.02% savings on the city budget will somehow prevent a budget crisis. When put in this factual context, the arguments against Measures A and B are utter nonsense. To debate City Council on the facts is a losing strategy; they have unlimited time and resources and the public gets one minute. They will get the last word and that's often all that is heard or reported. It is not a fair fight. What you need to know is this — our city's libraries are no longer safe. The City Council's tactics have enabled and rallied their supporters to attack our citizens. Our neighbors. Your friends. Don't believe me? You've seen the signs put out by the City Council. But you probably don't know: This is what our city has become. The City Council is hurting real people — librarians, volunteers and kids — these are not images placed on a sign. What I do not understand is why we accept this — why do our citizens allow the City Council to do these things? How can we fight back? The City Council encourages these things to happen. In their malicious attempt to control the city they show no mercy to those innocent people who serve our community. Ask yourself — what's next? I am asking you for help. It's simple, really. You have your ballot; just check both boxes 'yes' and drop it in the mail. It takes two minutes but would mean so much to those who participate in this community. The City Council is counting on your apathy to allow their agenda to continue. Stop the lies. Stop the hate. Stop City Council. 'Yes' on Measures A and B. Larry HershHuntington Beach When I was a girl growing up in Brooklyn, my mother and I would visit our nearby library at least once a week. A special time, though, was when we went to the huge (in my child eyes at least!) Arlington branch of the Brooklyn Public Library near Highland Park or the New York Public Library. These libraries, with their imposing size and thousands of books, became almost sacred places to me, much like a church. If I wanted to find books about topics that interested me, a kind librarian could always point me in the right direction. This experience instilled in me a great love of libraries and I was so thrilled to move to Huntington Beach in 1973, where there was an award-winning city library system. This is why what is occurring with our wonderful libraries has touched me so very much and what is at stake is so much more than book banning. It is a matter of control, control over what we can read and taking that control from parents and giving it to an appointed committee. I was very disheartened to learn that Texas just passed Senate Bill 13, which gives public school boards or parent review groups control over banning books that contain 'harmful' or 'indecent' material according to 'community values.' Librarians would have no say in the matter. This could lead to broad censorship banning 'Romeo and Juliet' (citing premarital sex) or even the Bible (if you ask what could be considered 'indecent,' look no further than the story of how King David lusted after Bathsheba when he saw her bathing!). And this is just the beginning... That is why I urge you to vote 'yes' on Measures A and B to protect our beloved libraries from privatization and the appointment of a review committee. Let's vote to keep our libraries in the sacred place they hold in our hearts! Kathleen BungeHuntington Beach Municipal codes are laws that take priority over resolutions, which can be rescinded. Huntington Beach Resolution #2025-45, is more smoke and mirrors under the guise of 'protecting the children.' In the event a majority of the City Council votes to outsource any services provided by HBPL to a private contractor, or to sell the library, a 'yes' vote on Measure B requires a majority vote of H.B. residents before outsourcing or sale of the library can happen. If the city declares a fiscal emergency, a vote of H.B. residents will not be required. The resolution fails to state that library services will not be outsourced. The idea promoted by opponents of Measure A, that just one person will make procurement decisions, is a false narrative. Several individuals are, have been, and will continue to be involved in the procurement process if Measure A passes. There is a policy in place to request reconsideration or removal of library materials, and Municipal Code Section 2.66.110. gives the Book Review Board the authority to relocate existing books or reject purchase of children's books deemed inappropriate for children, based on 'community standards.' Seven 'inappropriate for children' books have been relocated to the adult section, and several others have been identified. It is curious that neither reconsideration policy was expedited to protect children from the additional 'inappropriate books identified by 'residents.'' Municipal Code Section 2.66.110 creates a Book Review Board consisting of no more than 21 political appointees with the authority to review and relocate any books children have access to, based on undefined 'community standards' to be defined by the board. Their decisions are unappealable and not limited to materials with sexual content. This is book banning. It is censorship. The resolution stating books shall not be banned fails to include the City Council's definition of book banning. 'Inappropriate' children's books can be removed and sold or donated to other city libraries. How does this protect children? 'Yes' on Measure A will allow parents, not politicians, to choose reading materials for their own children, and to protect children from being used as pawns to promote political extremist agendas. Judy MorrisHuntington Beach Huntington Beach Public Library will hold its annual all-ages Summer Reading Kickoff Carnival in front of the Central Library on June 24 from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. There will be games, crafts, activities, shows and plenty of food. Participants can also register there for the 2025 Summer Reading Challenge. Last year, about 3,000 participants signed up for the reading challenge and about 15,000 people attended the events throughout the summer! This program would not be possible without support from a team of dedicated volunteers from the Friends of the Children's Library of Huntington Beach. If our public library is outsourced to a for-profit corporation, there's a good chance this long-standing program will end. Why? The library volunteers who donate time and money to support this program will not make similar contributions to a for-profit corporation with wealthy investors. If you want the Huntington Beach Public Library to be free from corporate outsourcing as it has been for over 100 years, vote 'yes' on Measure B. And if you want the Huntington Beach Public Library to be free from political interference regarding book selection, vote 'yes' on Measure A. Election Day is June 10. Carol DausHuntington Beach For several election cycles, Huntington Beach has been plastered with large political signs by both sides of the political spectrum. It is a political sign war aimed at low information voters. Thousands of residents are over it, especially the signs for the June 10 special election that included the word 'porn.' Those signs exposed more young children to porn than any book in our public libraries. Parents were forced to have unplanned and, for most adults, uncomfortable conversations with their children. Let's start a campaign to create a new political sign policy. It is time to limit political signs both in size and where they can be displayed. Other cities manage to hold successful elections without the sign blight that overtakes Huntington Beach for several weeks for each election. Let our elected officials know that you want a change to our current sign policy. Your vote shouldn't be based on a political sign. Read the ballot. Read the political statements. Make an informed vote. Most know my vote for the June 10 special election. It will be 'yes' and 'yes.' Cathey RyderHuntington Beach As a reproductive rights advocate and Orange County resident for more than 20 years, I want to thank my Congressman, Rep. Dave Min, for voting 'no' on the recent budget reconciliation bill. Rep. Min's vote, along with the votes of Orange County Representatives Linda T. Sanchez, Derek Tran, Lou Correa and Mike Levin, accurately represent their constituents' desire to maintain Medicaid funding and keep Planned Parenthood health centers open. Representative Young Kim's vote, however, does not. By voting 'yes,' Rep. Kim voted to gut Medicaid and cut access to vital healthcare for tens of thousands of people in Orange County. That's 130,000 people in our communities relying on Planned Parenthood for healthcare, and for many of them, Planned Parenthood is the only provider they see. Over half of Planned Parenthood patients use Medicaid to get services like birth control, cancer screenings, STI testing, regular checkups and abortion care. This bill puts 200 health centers nationwide at risk of closing and millions of Americans at risk of losing access to essential care. The attack on Medicaid and Planned Parenthood health centers is an attack on any Californian's ability to choose their own healthcare provider. Everyone deserves affordable, high quality care from providers they trust. Do you really want your elected officials to make that decision for you? There is still a chance to help protect Medicaid and access to Planned Parenthood. Call Young Kim and urge her to vote 'no' on any bill that cuts Medicaid or 'defunds' Planned Parenthood. Jenna RossIrvine Pardon me if this comes across strongly, but I am deeply concerned by the rationale offered for supporting Andrea McElroy's election as a Newport-Mesa Unified School District trustee — namely, the endorsement by the mayor of Newport Beach and the endorsement of the Newport Beach Police Department. As a former NMUSD board president, I can say with confidence that school resource officers (SROs) were never a point of contention during my time on the board. There was broad support from all trustees I served alongside, making this a non-issue. Equally irrelevant is Ms. McElroy's involvement in the high school drama program her daughter participated in. While community involvement is important, this alone does not qualify someone to serve on a school board responsible for decisions that impact all students. What's notably absent from her background is meaningful PTA leadership involvement or broader community service. The claim of being a 'businesswoman' also raises concerns, considering the outcomes of her association with several ventures. This appears to be a poor vetting decision by her backers, driven more by political influence than by genuine focus on student needs. It's disappointing to see a former trustee and others seemingly prioritize political alignment over educational leadership. Our students deserve board members committed to serving their best interests, not the mayor's agenda. Vicki Snell, former NMUSD trustee presidentCosta Mesa There's a tiny little local election on June 10 and it is costing the Newport-Mesa Unified School District more than $400,000!!!! You only have to check one box, and you don't have to think about national politics to do so, but because candidate Andrea McElroy forced a special election after she didn't earn a board appointment we all have to vote for that temporary seat, which will have to be contested all over again next year. That makes me mad. That is NOT fiscally conservative, and that's why I'm out canvassing for Kirstin Walsh, the candidate who was appointed by the board in the first place. I met Ms. McElroy and she's lovely, but when I asked her why she didn't just wait until next year to run, she said, 'It's not that expensive to run the special election.' What? More than $400,000 is not expensive? That money could have been spent on education, infrastructure, art supplies, books and much-needed equipment for our kids. I was blessed to raise my boy and girl twins here on Balboa Island where they attended Lincoln Elementary and Corona del Mar Middle and High School. They were provided with an amazing education. As a PTA volunteer, I can tell you it was always a privilege to help out, but always a battle to raise funds for our kids. With more than $400,000 coming out of the school budget for this election, it reminds me of how hard PTA members have to work for every single dollar. Speaking of PTA, the other reason I'm out talking with my community about Kirstin Walsh, is she is one of those special people that steps up to service. She comes from a long line of those who have served in the military and taught her that giving back matters. She is currently Newport Harbor PTA president, served that same high position at Ensign, and has spent years on Harbor Council. That experience matters. Please vote for Kirstin Walsh because she is a doer, a volunteer, a public servant and, on a personal note, a water polo mom like me. Summer BaileyBalboa Island As our community approaches the school board election, I urge voters to see through the desperate tactics of the Walsh campaign and support Andrea McElroy, the only candidate who stands for parents' rights and school safety. The Walsh campaign continues to claim that she's not partisan and won't get involved in statewide issues in our schools. That prompts a few questions though: Would a non-partisan candidate be backed by the progressive teachers union to the tune of nearly $10,000 and a progressive women's group to the tune of $5,000? Would a non-partisan candidate proudly accept endorsements from state and local progressive elected officials? I'd like to know what the Walsh campaign is afraid of. Are they afraid to admit that she's an agent of a liberal agenda in a voting area with a decades-long history of electing conservative school board members? In contrast, Andrea McElroy has been clear from the start. She is a conservative, determined to stop the leftist majority on our school board. She is not afraid to say it because it reflects her values and the values of our community. Andrea McElroy is endorsed by our police and fire associations because they trust her commitment to school safety. Community leaders have endorsed Andrea McElroy because they trust her commitment to stand up to the leftist majority on the school board. If you value school safety, parental trust and fearless leadership, vote for Andrea. Let's protect our schools and reject the tactics of a desperate campaign. Mary Sue PediciniNewport Beach

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store