
‘Repulsive'; ‘obscene'; ‘genocide': Dáil voices rise in unison over Israel's slaughter in Gaza
Slaughter, streaming now on your chosen platform.
'Innocent children, they don't know what's going on, starving with the hunger ... This is reality, this is what's happening in front of our eyes and we can see that on the news every morning, noon and night, and worse and worse it's getting,' said Danny Healy-Rae.
Annihilation, as it happens.
'We are witnessing a genocide being live-streamed on our hand-held device,' said Labour's Eoghan Kenny.
READ MORE
The destruction is undeniable. We see it every day.
'One of the greatest crimes against humanity is playing out before our eyes in real time,' said Sinn Féin's Mairéad Farrell.
Speaker after speaker, making the same point during three hours of Dáil statements on the unfolding catastrophe in Gaza.
How can this be happening when the obscene reality is there for all to see?
How can the Israeli government escalate its eradication crusade in Gaza while the big western powers hang back and look on?
In angry, heartfelt contributions, TDs held out little hope that this week's harrowing scenes of children starving to death would deflect Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu from his remorseless campaign against the Palestinian people.
If the world's increasingly flaky bulwarks of democracy won't act, this doesn't mean that Ireland cannot make a stand.
There was understandable consensus when it came to condemning Israel for its campaign of genocide in Gaza. Nobody quibbled with the use of the word.
The differences came in the interpretation of what has been done and what should be done to force Netanyahu to end the war. The Government pointed to the lead it has taken internationally when most of its EU partners have been dragging their heels.
The Opposition, while acknowledging the actions taken by Taoiseach Micheál Martin and Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Harris, accused them of doing too little too late.
But given the sheer horror of what the suffering innocents are enduring in Gaza, the lengthy Dáil session didn't descend into the usual political tit-for-tat. Apart, that is, from an unnecessary swipe at the Taoiseach early on from Sinn Féin's Mary Lou McDonald, who talked about her party's Bill to end the sale of Israeli war bonds through the Central Bank.
It's an 'obscenity' completely at odds with Ireland's position on humanitarian standards and international law.
'And yet, when I raised this with the Taoiseach yesterday, his response was to call our legislation repulsive,' said Mary Lou. 'That's the word he used.'
Micheál Martin swiftly intervened to reject the assertion.
'What is truly repulsive is allowing the Irish Central Bank to oversee the sale of Israeli war bonds that are funding this genocide,' she replied.
Micheál wasn't letting this go.
'The Deputy is misleading the House. That's not right, now.'
Mary Lou moved on. If his Government is really sincere and serious about 'ending the clear barbarism we watch every day in Gaza', it will back their Bill.
Micheál repeated his objection.
'I said no such thing,' he said, in a quiet, level voice. Given the seriousness of the debate it was not good enough for her to 'falsely make that assertion. I did not say that and you know I did not say that. I would ask you to withdraw it.'
The Leas-Cheann Comhairle turned to Mary Lou. Well?
'I cannot withdraw it because the record of this House will reflect the fact that the word that was used across the Chamber to me was the word 'repulsive'.
Check back on it, persisted the Taoiseach.
'Because you said the Government was funding a genocide and I said that phrase was morally repugnant. At no stage did I say the tabling of legislation in respect of the Central Bank was repulsive,' he said, addressing Mary Lou slowly, asking her again to withdraw her words.
'You know that. Why did you conflate the two to make a false statement?'
She turned to the chair.
'Sorry. Why is the Taoiseach using our speaking time with this nonsense?'
Micheál wanted that withdrawal.
'I am not withdrawing it,' insisted the Sinn Féin leader.
'It was a smear, it was a smear against me.'
'I am not withdrawing a remark that you made.'
The Leas-Cheann Comhairle moved on. 'We'll leave it at that.'
'No sincerity,' murmured the Taoiseach.
So, what happened the previous day?
During Questions on Policy or Legislation, Mary Lou spoke about the slaughter in Gaza and her party's forthcoming legislation about Israeli war bonds.
'What people might not know is that the Irish Government has made Ireland complicit in funding this genocide,' because the Central Bank oversees the sale of these bonds which are directly used to fund Israel's war against Hamas.
'Taoiseach, work with us. Ireland cannot be complicit any longer in genocide.'
[
Air strikes kill dozens in Gaza as international criticism of Israel grows
]
He said what is happening to innocent civilians in Gaza 'is beyond any moral compass' and it was 'very regrettable' that she would say the Irish Government is funding genocide.
'I can't really comprehend why you say things like that. I would argue you do it for politics but it smacks of that only. It lacks sincerity ... But I think it's fundamentally wrong of you actually to take the tack that you're taking.
'I find it morally repulsive as well.'
Mary Lou was right in one thing – he did use the word 'repulsive'. But it was fairly clear that Micheál was angered by the suggestion his Government was facilitating genocide as opposed to Sinn Féin tabling a Bill.
But for the most part, this lengthy session was memorable for a strong show of unity from across the political spectrum against the reprehensible war crimes being perpetrated on defenceless babies in Gaza.
Yes, there were strong speeches from the Taoiseach and Tánaiste, but the depth of feeling from TDs of all stripes was compelling.
All of them, including Coalition TDs, called for more action from Ireland as they denounced the Israeli government – not the Israeli people. There were many passionate speeches.
Netanyahu 'has shown himself to be a monstrous leader and his government a monstrous authority', said the former ceann comhairle Seán Ó Fearghaíl.
Not only have they slaughtered women and children in Gaza, but they have done much damage to their own country.
'The State of Israel has a right to exist. I respect and love the Jewish people but I deplore, detest and reject Netanyahu and his people.'
Deputies condemned the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas for the unspeakable atrocities it committed on Jews in a raid on Israel two years ago which led to the war.
But, as Fine Gael TD Barry Walsh said, their 'barbaric and disgusting' action does not justify what is happening in Gaza now.
'It is murder, pure and simple,' said Independent TD Paul Gogarty, shouting the number 'fourteen thousand' at the top of his voice.
That awful figure, repeated time and again in the House. The number of babies who may die from malnutrition by the weekend.
'It appears that things have got so horrific that even the EU may be waking up,' he said.
It was late in the afternoon, a good two hours into the statements, when Galway-based Independent Catherine Connolly rose to speak.
'I've attended many, many protests, as all my colleagues have done, and there was a time when I was most uncomfortable with the chant that Israel is a terrorist state ... I have no such reluctance now, and I'm ashamed that I wasn't comfortable with that, because Israel is a terrorist state.
'It's out of control. It's a rogue state, and it's got that far because it has done everything with immunity from the big powers that be, including Europe, America and many, many other countries,' she said.
But what she heard in the chamber was heartening.
'You know, the speeches that were made today by the backbenchers were wonderful. They were absolutely wonderful. I was near to tears with the passion,' she said. 'I wish they had made those speeches earlier when we were appealing to you to stop Israel with getting away with impunity.
'And we're here today, now, and we're looking at 14,000 children about to die in the next 48 hours.'
Unimaginable.
'And words. What words will we now use? We have set the lowest bar for telling ourselves we're very good.'
She talked of troops allowed through Shannon. Of increased trading. Of the failure to enact the Occupied Territories Bill. 'And we learn now tomorrow, in the face of 14,000 children about to die, that a memo is going to go to Government.
'Shame comes to mind, embarrassment, but most of all, let's act and show leadership.'
During her speech, she held up a printed statement.
'And we're here today, and we've just learned that a delegation from 22 countries in the EU over looking at the refugee camp in West Bank has been shot at, and we're told that the delegation deviated from the route. The only deviant here is Israel. They have deviated from international law.'
Then word came that two of those delegates – the State's representative in Palestine Feilim McLaughlin and his deputy Sorcha Lowry – are Irish.
And the real time everyone was talking about came just that little bit closer.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Drivers put a brake on Tesla sales,
Irish drivers have put a brake on buying Tesla electric cars, says The Sunday Times. The company run by billionaire Elon Musk, whose split with US president, Donald Trump, dominated headlines this week, has suffered a 13 per cent drop in Irish sales so far this year. Chinese rival BYD has overtaken Tesla, increasing its sales by 48 per cent, the newspaper reports. 'In Ireland Tesla's year got off to a good start with sale of his cars doubling year on year in early 2025, driven by the arrival of the cheaper Tesla Model 3,' it says. 'But sales plunged by 62 per cent last month.' READ MORE Housing policy chasing developers away Government policy is driving investment in housing to other countries, according to the Sunday Independent. Developers including Claire Solon, managing director of the Irish arm of international player, Greystar, tells the newspaper that the Government needs to tackle 'planning, infrastructure, rent caps and viability'. The company warns that 'problematic policy changes' are pushing housing investment to other countries. Michael O'Flynn, chief executive of O'Flynn Group, says additional taxes on the building industry in the middle of a housing crisis are 'actually holding back the delivery of new homes'. He maintains that the residential zoned land tax has become a development tax. Hotelier's Heathrow runway pitch Billionaire hotelier, Surinder Arora is joining forces with US engineering giant Bechtel, to pitch an alternative third runway plan for London's Heathrow airport , reports The Sunday Telegraph. Mike Kane, Britain's aviation minister, says the country's government is open to alternative bids for the hub's third runway. Mr Arora told the newspaper that his bid could no doubt 'build it cheaper than Heathrow airport Ltd'. The hotels mogul previously led an alternative bid in 2018, saying he could do it one third cheaper than the airport company. Renewables' biogas call Renewables developer Bia Energy says data centres and large energy users should be obliged to use biogas to aid kick-starting the industry here, the Business Post writes. The firm, backed by businessman Eamon Waters, who sold Panda Recycling to Macquarie Infrastructure Fund for €1.2 billion, warns that the Government will not meet its climate plan biogas targets. Bia Energy is calling for a 'renewable heat obligation policy' which legally binds large energy users, such as data centres and pharmaceutical manufacturers, to buy renewable energy. The Republic faces penalties of up to €28 billion by 2030 if it fails to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 51 per cent.


Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Rent controls to be eased for new builds in planned ‘pressure zones' reform
Restrictions on rent increases are to be eased for newly-built homes but the current caps would remain in place for existing tenancies under plans to be considered by the Government this week. Decisions on the major overhaul of the Rent Pressure Zone (RPZ) system are expected to be made by the Coalition over the next 48 hours. Any easing of the RPZ system is likely to be politically contentious and will be closely scrutinised by Opposition parties. The reforms are being considered following a review of RPZs which was introduced in 2016 to cap rent increases in areas where there is a high demand for housing and rental homes. READ MORE Under the current system, rent increases in locations designated as RPZs cannot be greater than the rate of inflation or 2 per cent – whichever is lower. There has been some concern that the RPZ system has negatively impacted on the level of private investment in new housing developments. Under the proposals being considered by Government, the current RPZ annual caps would not apply to new buildings constructed after a certain date – a measure aimed at increasing private sector investment to deliver more housing. The Irish Times understands that rents in the new-builds would instead be tied to inflation. The current rent increase cap of 2 per cent annually would remain in place for existing tenancies, though landlords would be able to change the rents between tenancies, something they currently are not allowed to do. The changes to the RPZ system would be accompanied by enhanced protection for renters in relation to security of tenure amounting to a minimum of six years. There would be a restriction on no-fault evictions during this six year period – a measure that will require legislation. The landlord would be allowed to reset the rent every six years to the market rate. The Coalition leaders and senior Government ministers are expected to discuss the plans during a meeting on Monday evening. Ultimately the proposals would then go to Cabinet on Tuesday morning for a final decision. A Housing Commission report, published last July was critical of RPZs and proposed changing them to a 'reference rent' system that pegs rent increases to nearly homes of a similar quality.


Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Despite the politics, Ireland is Israel's second biggest export market for goods
Perhaps the most surprising statistic to tumble out of the ether in recent days – and into Ireland's increasingly fractious debate on the Occupied Territories Bill – relates to Israel 's exports to Ireland. Figures from the UN's trade database, Comtrade, reveal that Ireland, despite its outspoken stance on Israel, is Tel Aviv's second most important export market for goods behind the US. The Comtrade figures show Israel exported $61.7 billion worth of merchandise in 2024. The biggest importers of those Israeli products were the US with $17.3 billion, followed by Ireland with $3.3 billion and China with $2.9 billion. This makes Ireland, Israel's most important European market for goods exports ahead of the Netherlands ($2.7 billion), Germany ($2.4 billion), the UK ($1.6 billion), Belgium ($1.5 billion) and France ($1.4 billion). READ MORE The figures provide a curious counterpoint to the frayed diplomatic relations between Dublin and Tel Aviv. The Central Statistics Office (CSO) provisionally estimates that Ireland imported €3.83 billion ($4.4 billion) of goods from Israel last year, which is even higher than Comtrade's estimate. Over 95 per cent of this trade (€3.65 billion) falls into the 'electrical machinery, apparatus, and appliances' category, the CSO said.. In Comtrade's categorisation, the bulk of the trade is covered by the 8542 category which applies to 'electronic integrated circuits and microassemblies'. Anecdotal evidence suggests this – in the main – relates to chip manufacturer Intel in Leixlip importing inputs from its sister Intel plant in Kiryat Gat, Israel, which would not be affected by the Occupied Territories Bill provisions. Ireland's dialled-up rhetoric against Israel (Taoiseach Micheál Martin now explicitly accuses it of genocide, having previously accused it of 'genocidal acts') sits uneasily with the economy's links to corporate America. However, apart from a warning from former US ambassador to Ireland, Claire Cronin, last year that Ireland's proposed Occupied Territories Bill (banning the sale or import of goods from illegally occupied Palestinian territory) would have 'consequences', both the US and Ireland have largely ignored their potential point of division, perhaps to Israel's annoyance. Government sources claim Ireland's business ties with the US 'aren't overly strained' by the Government's stance on Israel and that tariffs are the main focus at present. With Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu now lashing out at allies France, Britain and Canada, accusing them of being 'on the wrong side of history' and 'emboldening Hamas' for criticising Tel Aviv, Ireland's stance has more political cover. Shifting global opinion Last month, EU foreign ministers from 17 member states (a majority) backed a Dutch proposal to review the EU-Israel Association Agreement, the free trade agreement that allows Israel sell some €15 billion a year of arms, wine, cosmetics and other items to Europe on preferential terms. This marked something of a turning point in the bloc's attitude to Israel. A year ago, when Ireland and Spain, the European governments most vocal about Israel's actions in Gaza, pushed for a review, they garnered little support. But Israel's three-month blockade of Gaza, stopping food and aid getting into the Palestinian enclave, has burnt through the political capital Israel traditionally has with the EU and with EU Commission president Ursula von der Leyen who has – until now -sought to preserve EU-Israeli ties. In a marked difference in tone last week, she described Israel's attacks on civilians as 'abhorrent' and something that 'cannot be justified under humanitarian and international law'. The EU's review will examine whether Israel is in breach of article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, which defines respect for human rights as an 'essential element' of the agreement. Given the scale of Israeli atrocities in Gaza, backed by findings from the UN, international courts and other agencies, it's hard to see how Israel could not be found to be in breach. The review might be complete before the next EU foreign ministers' meeting on June 23rd, creating a potential flashpoint in EU-Israeli relations. How EU sanctions against Isreal – if it comes to that – will wash with the US and impact delicate trade negotiations is impossible to say. The EU as a bloc is Israel's largest trading partner, accounting for 29 per cent of its trade in goods in 2022, so trade sanctions would be consequential for Tel Aviv. But insiders suggest that while the review will be critical of Israel, the EU will resist going down the sanctions route given the opposition to those in some quarters. Hungary, which intends to leave the International Criminal Court (ICC) in protest at its issuing of an arrest warrant for Netanyahu, recently hosted the Israeli prime minister on a state visit despite of and in defiance of the warrant. 'I don't think EU sanctions will be forthcoming in the short term. There isn't unanimity for this,' a Government source said, albeit noting that negative noise among EU member states is growing.