
Electric cars are not the only green solution, says Porsche
European leaders need to look beyond electric vehicles to avoid being at odds with car manufacturers in achieving climate goals, according to Porsche's head of procurement, Barbara Frankel.
Speaking at the Financial Times Future of the Car Summit in London this week, Frankel said that while Porsche supports the EU 'intensely pursuing' the Paris Agreement's goals, doing that only through electric cars is risking a divide with the car industry. Advertisement - Article continues below
'For them, the only solution is going into electromobility, and when you also try and promote other technical solutions which can be sustainable, but also are to consumer's liking, does the industry follow the overall goal of the EU?' she said.
Porsche has been a leading pioneer of sustainable eFuels that could power combustion engines without the tailpipe emissions, but they are yet to gain traction or widespread political support.
'This is something where we have to build bridges,' said Frankel. 'We are not losing sight of our ultimate goal, but in between we need to stay competitive and we need to work on our existing technical portfolio because this is what consumers are buying.'
Porsche is involved in a pilot synthetic fuel plant in Chile, in collaboration with others including German tech firm Siemens. It's part of a move to show that the fuel, which can cut tailpipe emissions by up to 90 per cent but use the existing refuelling network, could allow internal combustion engines to live on. For now, it's on a small scale, fuelling Porsche Cup racing cars, but plans are being developed for more plants. Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below
Frankel also said the reliance on Asia for battery technology is handicapping European brands in the move to EVs, and building European supply chains for EV powertrains is crucial to avoid leaving the continent no better off politically than when it relied on oil.
'If you push us in one direction without building the supply chain, we come to the next dependency,' she said. 'We have been in a strong dependency on energy, we suffered a lot recently and we all know why, and now we have a high dependency when it concerns batteries.'
Frankel said she 'would not give up' on a European battery supply chain to rival the Asian dominance. 'We have tried various situations and found out what does not work, but we have learned a lot. It costs billions to build a battery manufacturing plant and you have to scale it. We can do it, but you need to have the boost for electric cars so we have the market share.
'We need it if we want to have a strong industry, and this is important for Europe because our social welfare is highly dependent on the car industry; we need to have a robust and healthy supply chain in Europe,' she concluded. 'This is a super-important goal for me and what I'm fighting for when I speak to politicians."
Tell us what you love (and hate) about your car. Take the Driver Power survey now and you could win a £1,000 John Lewis voucher
Find a car with the experts Not bothered by MoT advisories? That may be about to change
Not bothered by MoT advisories? That may be about to change
The number of MoT failures caused by worn tyres is on the rise, and experts are calling for mandatory follow-ups on advisories Mazda MX-5 goes electric: the iconic roadster's radical future
Mazda MX-5 goes electric: the iconic roadster's radical future
The next Mazda MX-5 roadster is set to be offered as a pure EV, and our exclusive images preview how it could look Confirmed: New VW Golf GTI will be electric – and it's a 'monster'
Confirmed: New VW Golf GTI will be electric – and it's a 'monster'
VW is taking the iconic hot hatchback brand into the electric era with the new Golf GTI EV already in development…
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
13 minutes ago
- The Sun
‘Son of Concorde' jet that could fly from London to NYC in 3.5 hours steps closer to reality as major ban is lifted
CONCORDE-STYLE flights capable of blasting passengers from London to New York City in 3.5 hours have edged closer to reality after a major ban was lifted. "Son of Concorde" maker Boom Technology has welcomed President Trump 's executive order that effectively lifts the 52-year ban on civil supersonic flight over land in the US. 4 4 4 Tight restrictions on supersonic flights have been in place due to the loud sonic boom created by the shock waves from a flying object travelling faster than the speed of sound. "America once led the world in supersonic aviation, but decades of stifling regulations grounded progress," the White House said. "This Order removes regulatory barriers so that U.S. companies can dominate supersonic flight once again." To hit supersonic speeds, an airplane needs to travel at 768 miles per hour. But Boom Technology has been working on a jet that has no audible sonic boom. The firm managed to make its XB-1 test jet fly faster than the speed of sound for the first time in January this year. Writing on X, the company welcomed the latest move, saying: "Thank you, President Trump, for unlocking the future of faster and quieter travel. "This presidential action comes after a bipartisan group of key Congressional leaders introduced the Supersonic Aviation Modernization Act on May 14, 2025. "The legislation calls on the FAA to revise the regulation prohibiting supersonic flight over land." After finishing tests with XB-1 in January, Boom is now focused on building a plane suitable for passengers called Overture. Boom 'son of Concorde' flies supersonic for first time Some 130 aircraft pre-orders have already been made by the likes of American Airlines, United Airlines, and Japan Airlines. The executive order does come with a set of rules that the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has been directed to impose. An interim "noise-based certification standard" must be established that considers "community acceptability, economic reasonableness, and technological feasibility". Why did the Concorde fail? CONCORDE was the supersonic passenger jet considered the ultimate luxury in air travel. Air France and British Airways announced they would be retiring their fleet of Concorde planes on April 10, 2003. The plane had its first commercial flight on January 21, 1976, so was retired after 27 years of service and 50,000 flights. Several reasons led to the decision to retire Concorde. Air France and British Airways cited low passenger numbers and high maintenance costs. By the early noughties, the planes were outdated and expensive to run, despite being incredibly advanced when they were first introduced almost three decades previously. The 9/11 terrorist attack in 2001 majorly impacted passenger numbers, as people opted not to fly. Passenger numbers also fell after an Air France Concorde crashed just minutes after taking off from Paris in July 2000. The disaster killed all 109 people on board and four others on the ground. The plane ran over a small piece of metal on the runway, which burst a tyre and caused an engine to ignite. It was also the only aircraft in the British Airways fleet that required a flight engineer. Image credit: Alamy Trump was presented with a miniature model of Overture earlier this year from Boom Technology's CEO. He suggested that Boom should manufacture Air Force One - the President's personal plane - and made a dig at China President Xi Jinping. "Air Fore Once should be supersonic. Xi [President of China] can keep his 747-8," he wrote. 4 Supersonic and Hypersonic Jets There are several types of hypersonic and supersonic jets. A breakdown of what's been happening in the industry and what's expected in the coming years. Talon-A Built by Stratolaunch Reported speeds of Mach 5 The first test flight conducted in 2024 X-59 Quesst Built by Nasa and Lockheed Martin Predicted max speeds of Mach 1.4 The first test flight in 2024 - but subject to delays Venus Stargazer M4 Built by Venus Aerospace and Velontra Predicted max speeds of Mach 6 First test flight in 2025 Quarterhorse MKII Built by Hermeus Predicted max speeds of Mach 2.5 First test flight in 2026 Halcyon Built by Hermeus Predicted max speeds of Mach 5 First test flight by 2030 Nanqiang No 1 Built by China's hypersonic plane programme Predicted max speeds of Mach 6 First test flight in 2025 DART Built by Hypersonix Launch Systems Predicted max speeds of Mach 7 First test flight in 2025


Telegraph
14 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Major lenders raise mortgage rates ahead of Reeves's spending review
Two major lenders have raised mortgage rates amid fears Rachel Reeves's spending spree will slow down interest rate cuts. Barclays has announced rate rises of around 0.1 and 0.15 percentage points across a range of fixed-rate deals right after HSBC announced similar increases. It comes as the Chancellor prepares to publish her £300bn spending review today, having already set out an £87bn increase in public spending over the next two years. Experts said it could spell pain ahead for mortgage borrowers, as economists warn Reeves had reduced the chances of a rate cut this year. Barclays increased the rate on its five-year fixed-rate deal for those remortgaging with a 60pc loan-to-value ratio from 3.86pc to 4.03pc, leading some brokers to declare the end of sub-4 pc deals. Five-year swaps are currently at 3.71pc up from around 3.6pc a few weeks ago due to a number of factors including uncertainty around US trade policy. The Bank of England cut rates from 4.5pc to 4.25pc in May, but a rate cut in June looks unlikely after data revealed higher-than-expected inflation. Adrian Anderson, of broker Anderson Harris, said: 'I'm not surprised some lenders have increased rates because the cost of borrowing has increased slightly. 'Markets will be looking closely at the spending review. Rachel Reeves needs to strike a delicate balance between not upsetting the bond market while also not upsetting voters. If it looks like she is going to have to borrow more, that will impact swap rates.' Nicholas Mendes, of broker John Charcol, said: 'Looking further afield, mortgage rate cuts are likely to slow. Much of the expected base rate movement from the Bank of England has already been priced in, so unless we see a sharp shift in swap rates or economic data, there's limited room for significant reductions. 'If anything, we could be in for a period of relative stability – a bit of sideways movement rather than any dramatic repricing.' Harry Goodliffe, of broker HTG Mortgages, said: ' We're definitely seeing the sub-4pc deals slip away, and fast. Barclays and HSBC hiking rates feels like a mix of reacting to rising funding costs and not wanting to be overwhelmed with demand. No lender wants to be too competitive in a market this uncertain.' However, other lenders have moved in the opposite direction, with NatWest cutting rates by up to 0.23 percentage points. Aaron Strutt, of broker Trinity Financial said: 'Some borrowers still believe we are in a rate-cutting environment where mortgages are getting cheaper, but this is generally not the case.' He added: 'While the cost of funding does seem to have stabilised, it would not be a surprise to see more lenders pushing up their prices over the coming days.' According to financial data provider Moneyfacts, the average rate on a two-year fix fell 0.06pc to 5.12pc last month, compared to a 0.14pc drop a month prior, in a sign that the mortgage price war we saw earlier this year is cooling off.


Reuters
16 minutes ago
- Reuters
Russian court postpones hearing in $2.9 billion Rosatom-Fortum dispute until March
MOSCOW, June 11 (Reuters) - A Russian court on Wednesday postponed legal proceedings by more than nine months in a $2.9 billion lawsuit filed by Russia's Rosatom against Finland's Fortum ( opens new tab and Outokumpu ( opens new tab, court filings showed. State-controlled nuclear energy firm Rosatom is seeking 227.8 billion roubles ($2.9 billion) in compensation for losses over the termination of a contract for the Hanhikivi-1 nuclear power plant in Finland, court documents and a Rosatom statement showed in May. A hearing scheduled at the Moscow City Arbitration Court for Wednesday morning was postponed until March 16, 2026, court filings showed, without giving further details. Rosatom, Fortum and Outokumpu had no immediate comment. Rosatom and its former Finnish partners have been locked in dispute over the cancelled contract since May 2022. The Finnish side terminated the project soon after Moscow launched the conflict in Ukraine, citing significant delays and political risks. Rosatom in May said it was seeking compensation for losses caused by what it called the unlawful termination of the EPC contract to build the plant, violations of the shareholder agreement and other contractual disputes. Outokumpu has said it was never a direct party to the EPC agreement or any other agreement with any Rosatom company related to the Hanhikivi-1 project. Fortum said in May that the International Chamber of Commerce's decision that Rosatom's subsidiary could not make Fortum a party to proceedings was final. The contract to build the 1.2 gigawatt plant with investments estimated at 6.5-7 billion euros was signed in 2013 with Fennovoima, a joint consortium in which Finnish stakeholders including Fortum, Outokumpu and SSAB originally controlled two thirds through a joint venture, and the Russian side held one third. After the project's termination, Fennovoima ceased all its operations and is only engaged in legal disputes. ($1 = 78.6000 roubles)