logo
How Israel's 'decapitation campaign' could usher in escalation with Iran

How Israel's 'decapitation campaign' could usher in escalation with Iran

The National7 hours ago

In less than 48 hours, Israel killed a tranche of Iran 's top military brass in its multipronged attack. They included the heads of the commander in chief of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Iran's most powerful military force, the IRGC's aerospace commander, responsible for missile and drone programmes, and the chief of staff of the armed forces.
Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei swiftly announced replacements, likely wishing to avoid a power vacuum and establish a chain of command for Iran's retaliatory attacks, which began hours after Israel's first strikes on Friday morning.
Israel trumpeted the killings as a major blow against Iran and its alleged nuclear ambitions. However, the deaths of experienced leaders who were believed to have urged caution behind the scenes could also push more aggressive voices to the fore in Iranian military circles.
IRGC chief Hossein Salami was replaced by Brig Gen Mohammad Pakpour, another long-standing senior Revolutionary Guard. Sayyid Majid Mousavi, already deeply involved in Iran's ballistic missile and drone programmes, became the group's aerospace chief, replacing Amir Ali Hajizadeh.
Army chief of staff Mohammad Bagheri was replaced by Major General Amir Hatami. Lieutenant General Gholamali Rashid, formerly commander of Iran's Khatam al-Anbiya combatant command headquarters, was replaced by Major General Ali Shadmani.
Israel also killed nine scientists involved in Tehran's nuclear programme, including Fereydoon Abbasi, a former head of the country's Atomic Energy Organization.
Some of the military leaders are of a similar age and experience to those they replaced. Like his predecessor Salami, Mohammad Pakpour is a veteran of the Iran-Iraq war, the 1980-1988 conflict that killed over one million people in both countries, leaving an indelible mark.
The deaths of so many senior military commanders in such a short space of time was 'not without effect,' but also said they were replaceable, a senior Iranian government official said.
'You saw that in less than 24 hours, new officials started their work in these areas, which shows the existence of capable people,' the official told The National.
Their thinking is not hugely different from those they replaced, he believes. 'The intellectual field of the new people is entirely similar to the people we lost.'
Israel's attacks were aimed at degrading and destroying Iran's nuclear programme, which is believed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government to be aimed at quickly producing a weapon. Iran has always denied it seeks nuclear armament, saying it wants to continue uranium enrichment for what it says are peaceful agricultural and scientific purposes.
It will take weeks to gauge the effectiveness of Israel's continuing campaign, which has also targeted ballistic missile launch sites to curb the impact of Iran's retaliation, which is also continuing.
According to the Washington DC-based Institute for the Study of War, Israel conducted a, 'decapitation campaign,' targeting Iran's military leadership. Khamenei's appointment of successors means the disruption is 'temporary and limited,' the institute said in an analysis note on Friday, although it added that continued Israeli strikes on missile infrastructure may limit their abilities to carry out retaliation.
Rashid and Bagheri etc were among the main Iranian commanders who believed that direct military conflict and tension with Israel should be avoided as much as possible,'
Tehran-based political observer
Rhetorically, the new military commanders have swiftly come out with statements vowing revenge on Israel similar to remarks made by their predecessors after previous strikes on Iranian interests and counter-attacks last year.
'This series of operations will continue on a larger scale and more devastatingly than before until the criminal and aggressor Zionist enemy completely regrets [its actions],' Ali Shadmani said on Sunday.
So far, that response has been more devastating than previous direct Iranian attacks on Israel. At least 13 people have been killed as of Sunday afternoon, and hundreds injured, Israeli authorities have said.
Buildings in Tel Aviv and other areas of central Israel have been destroyed. Both the intensity of the continuing Israeli operations against Iran, and the loss of commanders who advocated for so-called 'strategic patience' could lead to more intense escalation, analysts believe.
According to a political observer in Iran, those killed in the past 48 hours were among commanders who prevented a previous operation that another part of the military wanted to organise against Israel a few months ago.
'Rashid and Bagheri, etc, were among the main Iranian commanders who believed that direct military conflict and tension with Israel should be avoided as much as possible,' he told The National. 'For example, that Iranian counter-attacks should be more symbolic as much as possible, and deterrence should be demonstrated rather than enforced.'
More widely, as waves of killings forces replacement and promotion of younger men in Iran's military, a new generation without the experience of the Iran- Iraq war, and its devastating consequences, will come to the fore.
A war involving Iran could give less experienced leaders the same sort of clout that older war veterans have, according to Serhan Afacan, director of the Istanbul-based Iranian Studies Centre.
'Although this does not necessarily mean that they will drag the country into war if they take power, it can be said that they will be less flexible in finding common ground with the US and the West in general,' he told The National.
The impact on Iran of Israel's continuing strikes could deepen if attacks on energy infrastructure that started overnight escalate. On Saturday night, the Israeli military struck a refinery at the giant offshore South Pars gasfield, and Tehran's Shahran oil depot, in an escalation of its operations from military and nuclear sites to the energy sector.
Iran is already unable to produce enough electricity to prevent rolling power cuts in the summer months, or sufficiently supply gas for winter heating. Any further erosion of its energy supplies could have a dramatic impact and stoke anger among the population.
Even Iranians who oppose their government have condemned the Israeli attacks on their country, seeing them as attacks on Iranian sovereignty and resulting in civilian fatalities. Many Iranians circulated pictures of Parsa Mansour, a padel player, and Parnia Abbasi, a poet in her 20s, both killed in the strikes.
Parvaz Park in the north of the Iranian capital was filled with more people than usual on Saturday night, as crowds gathered to watch missiles being launched from Iran to Israel, the political observer in Tehran told The National.
People there 'had various different feelings,' the man said, on condition of anonymity. 'The part that is against the Islamic Republic was even upset about the Israeli attack on Tehran. In their contradictory feelings, they would not mind if Iran targeted Israel with force that night.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Egypt: Madbouly reviews fuel supply plans amid summer demands, regional tensions
Egypt: Madbouly reviews fuel supply plans amid summer demands, regional tensions

Zawya

time29 minutes ago

  • Zawya

Egypt: Madbouly reviews fuel supply plans amid summer demands, regional tensions

Arab Finance: Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly held a meeting to review Egypt's readiness to secure sufficient supplies of petroleum products and natural gas, particularly for the electricity sector, ahead of peak summer consumption and amid heightened regional tensions following the Israeli military operation in Iran, as per a statement. The meeting was attended by the Governor of the Central Bank of Egypt (CBE) Hassan Abdalla, the Minister of Electricity and Renewable Energy Mahmoud Esmat, and the Minister of Petroleum and Mineral Resources Karim Badawi. Madbouly confirmed that the government has a clear action plan to ensure uninterrupted fuel and gas supplies to all sectors, with a focus on meeting the rising demands of power generation during the summer. He stated that Egypt aims to have three floating storage and regasification units (FSRUs) operational by early July with a combined capacity of 2,250 million cubic feet per day, more than double last year's capacity. Plans are also underway to secure a fourth FSRU as a strategic reserve. He directed the Ministry of Petroleum to expedite the commissioning of the three FSRUs, referring to existing contracts for gas shipments and mazut fuel reserves as part of the broader strategy to stabilize the supply of petroleum products. Moreover, Esmat affirmed ongoing coordination with the Ministry of Petroleum to ensure adequate fuel supplies for power plants. As part of these efforts, Badawi conducted an inspection visit to the national control Center at GASCO to review the status of the national natural gas grid and assess its ability to meet summer electricity demand. During the visit, the officials reviewed operational plans, available gas volumes, and supply scenarios to maintain stable gas pressure and provide sufficient fuel for expected electricity loads. Esmat also met with electricity sector leaders to ensure grid stability, optimize fuel use, and direct distribution companies to maintain high alert levels and 24-hour monitoring in coordination with national and regional control centers. Meanwhile, Badawi reviewed current gas production and strategic stocks of gasoline, diesel, butane, and mazut. He also reported on the arrival of the third LNG regasification vessel at Ain Sokhna Port and confirmed that its integration into the national grid is underway. The vessel is a key addition to Egypt's regasification infrastructure, aimed at enhancing the flexibility and security of gas supply. The petroleum sector continues to monitor fuel availability in real time, working closely with the electricity sector to ensure sustained supply and prevent service disruptions. The minister stressed the importance of maintaining a robust strategic stockpile of fuel during this period of regional uncertainty. © 2020-2023 Arab Finance For Information Technology. All Rights Reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (

Netanyahu's war on Iran is perilous on so many levels
Netanyahu's war on Iran is perilous on so many levels

The National

time31 minutes ago

  • The National

Netanyahu's war on Iran is perilous on so many levels

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has launched a high-stakes military campaign against Iran – an initiative that not only undermines US President Donald Trump's stated objective of negotiating a diplomatic resolution to Iran's nuclear programme, but also risks entangling the Americans in another protracted conflict in the Middle East. This escalation imperils regional energy infrastructure, reinforces Tehran's rationale for nuclear deterrence and inadvertently could legitimise the Islamic Republic's long-standing narrative portraying Israel as the existential adversary of Iran and Iranians. Mr Netanyahu's calculus is strategically comprehensible. Deprived of its most capable non-state proxy, Lebanese Hezbollah, and with auxiliary Iran-backed militias across Syria and Iraq demonstrating operational ineffectiveness, Iran finds itself unable to impose credible deterrent costs on Israel. Its indigenous missile capabilities remain largely incapable of penetrating multi-layered and integrated air defence systems of Israel and its allies. Furthermore, Iran's own air defences are porous, leaving it vulnerable to precision strikes. From Mr Netanyahu's perspective, this moment presents a rare opportunity. Should Iran escalate matters – by targeting regional energy assets to internationalise the crisis or retaliating against US forces in the region – Israel hopes for direct American involvement. Thus, it is plausible that Mr Netanyahu's war aims extend beyond the degradation of Iran's nuclear infrastructure. His objectives may include leadership decapitation, regime collapse and perhaps even the fragmentation of the Iranian state through civil strife. Indeed, Mr Netanyahu has goaded the Iranian public to stand up against Tehran's ruling class. And although Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar later insisted that regime change is not his government's goal, US officials have since leaked information that Mr Trump vetoed an Israeli plan to assassinate Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. In any case, Israel's high-risk strategy against Iran could end up becoming an open-ended conflict beyond its control. Mr Netanyahu may have persuaded Mr Trump that sustained Israeli military pressure would compel Tehran to give greater concessions in the nuclear negotiations with the US. Yet Iran has suspended all talks, and Mr Khamenei – while notably omitting criticism of the US in his initial reaction – appears to be recalibrating his government's strategic posture. Mr Trump, for his part, praised the Israeli strikes as 'excellent', but there is no clear indication that he intends to commit US forces to a full-scale regional war. More significantly, Israel's pre-emptive strike may have fundamentally shifted Iran's nuclear doctrine. In the aftermath of Iraq's invasion of Iran in 1980 and Baghdad's use of ballistic missiles against Iranian population centres, Tehran launched its missile development programme as a deterrent. Today, the inability to deter or respond meaningfully to Israeli aggression could catalyse a similar doctrinal evolution. This trajectory involves adopting a policy of nuclear latency or outright breakout, akin to North Korea's path. Pyongyang's acquisition of a rudimentary nuclear arsenal – despite global isolation and sanctions – enabled it to deter foreign intervention and preserve regime continuity. Iran's probable goal will be to assemble – and potentially test – a nuclear device to alter the regional strategic balance. A dual-capacity arsenal, capable of both signalling and retaliation, would enable Tehran to deter future existential threats. However, this would mean absorbing sustained Israeli strikes, overcoming technical blows to its nuclear programme, surviving leadership decapitation attempts, navigating potential ethnic insurgencies backed by external actors, and enduring severe economic attrition for a prolonged period – potentially six to 12 months. This scenario recalls the incremental degradation of the Iraqi state in the 1990s, which ultimately culminated in a full-scale US ground invasion to remove Saddam Hussein. Barring a comparable deployment of US ground forces in Iran, the Islamic Republic's coercive apparatus may be sufficient to retain control over any potential domestic unrest. In parallel, Iran may adjust its asymmetric deterrence doctrine by shifting focus from hardened Israeli targets to vulnerable energy and commercial assets in the Arabian Gulf. Regional hydrocarbon infrastructure could be targeted as part of a coercive strategy to compel de-escalation. Tehran may be willing to absorb reciprocal attacks against its own oil infrastructure in exchange for imposing strategic and economic costs on its Arab neighbours and the global energy market in the hope of mobilising international pressure on Israel to stop the war. Moreover, Mr Netanyahu may have inadvertently resolved a core ideological problem within the Islamic Republic's anti-Israel narrative. Iran and Israel, historically non-contiguous and without direct territorial disputes, have long had a pragmatic history of co-operation – both under the Pahlavi monarchy and even during the early years of the Islamic Republic, when Israel supplied Iran with US-origin arms during the Iran-Iraq War from 1980 to 1988. The Islamic Republic's anti-Zionist posture often rang hollow with ordinary Iranians, who struggled to identify a direct threat from Israel. Now, with Israeli munitions striking Tehran, killing civilians and targeting critical infrastructure, Israel's role as an adversary has acquired visceral legitimacy among the Iranian populace. Ultimately, Iran's decision-making in the coming weeks will be driven by regime survival imperatives in an increasingly precarious operating environment. Mr Netanyahu's gamble may have thrown Israel, Iran and the entire region in an open-ended conflict beyond Israel's control.

Iran-backed Iraqi militia threatens to attack Israel and its allies
Iran-backed Iraqi militia threatens to attack Israel and its allies

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Iran-backed Iraqi militia threatens to attack Israel and its allies

A Tehran-backed armed faction in Iraq has threatened to join the war between Israel and Iran, heightening concerns that the conflict, now in its fourth day, could spread across the region. The True Promise Corps, part of a shadowy coalition calling itself the Islamic Resistance Iraq, said on Monday that it would launch attacks against Israel and its interests in the region. 'We declare that all the sites and camps of the entity [Israel] and anyone who supports it in the region are targets for us,' its leader, Mohammed Al Tamimi, said in a statement on X. The threat marks a sharp shift in tone by Iran-backed Iraqi militias, who said previously that they would enter the conflict only if US forces based in the country intervened to support Israel. The Islamic Resistance in Iraq has previously claimed responsibility for drone and rocket attacks against Israel and US forces in the region over Israel's war in Gaza. Mr Al Tamimi also threatened action against 'Israeli agents' in Iraq. He singled out the capital of Iraq's autonomous Kurdistan Region, Erbil, as a potential target, calling it a hub for 'training agents and spies'. Iran and its Iraqi proxies have long accused the Kurds of hosting a station of Israel's Mossad spy agency in the region. They have launched several attacks on Erbil, including with ballistic missiles launched from Iran. On Sunday, the powerful Kataib Hezbollah group said it was monitoring movements of US troops in the region. 'If America intervenes in the war, we will act without any hesitation against its interests and bases,' the group said. Other Iran-backed groups such as Hezbollah Harakat Al Nujabaa, Kata'ib Sayyid Al Shuhada and Asaib Ahl Al Haq have taken the same position. Tehran holds significant sway through political and paramilitary proxies in Iraq, and their involvement in the conflict could destabilise the country's recovery from years of war and sectarian violence. The Iraqi government has asked both Iran and US, its two most important allies, to stop it being caught up in the conflict, Iraqi officials have said. Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al Sudani told Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian in a phone call on Sunday that 'Iraq is keen to prevent the war from expanding', according to a statement from his office. Mr Pezeshkian 'urged the Iraqi government to take measures to protect its airspace and prevent its territory from being exploited by adversaries', according to an Iranian statement. In a move to alleviate Iranian concerns, Iraq deployed air defence systems in several 'sensitive areas' around the country on Sunday, mainly near the borders with Iran. Iraq has also lodged a formal complaint with the UN Security Council regarding Israel's violation of its airspace after it began attacking Iran on Friday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store