Calls for combined A&E for Ormskirk Hospital to continue
The issue is set to be debated at a full West Lancashire Borough Council meeting after a motion was put forward.It has been written by councillor Vickie Cummins, who is the lead member for health and wellbeing on behalf of the Labour group.
'Best provision possible'
Her motion states: "The current location of Ormskirk Hospital is almost precisely at the centre point of the wider catchment area, with almost all residents living within 10km. The current location of Southport Hospital means some residents live over 20km away."The motion asks that the council formally adopts a position that it says is "the best provision of services for residents of both West Lancashire and beyond" and is "the co-location of both adult and children's A&E services at Ormskirk Hospital".Finally, it also calls for an "urgent and extensive communications campaign to ensure all residents across are aware of the consultation".In a previous report to a meeting of the Shaping Care Together joint committee, led by Cheshire and Merseyside and Lancashire and South Cumbria Trusts, the NHS said it looking to "explore long-term solutions for high-quality, sustainable care".It said it currently "faces pressures from aging infrastructure, workforce shortages, financial challenges, and rising patient demand"."With increasing population aging and complexity in care needs, maintaining duplicate services across two sites is unsustainable," it added.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on BBC Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram and watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ask any Black woman – we get second-class NHS treatment
When I gave birth for the first time, my concerns were dismissed by my medical care providers. I put it down to my age, as I was only 18 at the time, rather than my skin colour. But as a new survey finds that a quarter of Black women experience discrimination in the NHS – how, in particular, on maternity wards, Black mothers are denied the pain relief, such as epidurals, routinely given to our white counterparts, and that we are up to four times more likely to die in childbirth – I'm not so sure. I'd wager that every Black mother I know has her own little NHS horror story. I remember a midwife telling me that I was putting on too much weight, and asking sarcastically if I had ever heard of salad. I already felt bad about myself, as I'd developed cankles for the first time. When I was later diagnosed with edema, which led to pre-eclampsia, my labour had to be induced several days early. Looking back, I didn't receive a lot of pain relief, even though I was in so much pain, I kicked the footboard at the bottom of the bed clean off. I was so traumatised by the experience that I never had another natural childbirth again, both other times opting for an elective C-section. The second time I gave birth, five years later, I had planned to have a general anaesthetic. I didn't want to be awake for any of it. Two hours before the operation, I had a visit from a member of the medical team who asked if I minded having an epidural instead, because the anaesthetist wanted to go home, and it was only me keeping him there. I felt horrible refusing, and spent the final two hours of my pregnancy scared that they would 'accidentally' give me too much medication, and I would die on the operating table. I still can't believe the maternity unit had the audacity to put that amount of pressure on me – but it seems I'm not alone. According to a survey of more than 1,000 Black and mixed-race women by Five X More – a grassroots women's health organisation which takes its name from the statistic that Black women are five times more likely to die during childbirth that their white counterparts – half of all Black women did not receive pain relief when they requested it. It all seems to stem from a misplaced – and let's call it what it is: racist – mindset among midwives and doctors that 'strong Black women' simply don't need as much help as other patients. I mean, our ancestors were happy pushing out their progeny without modern medicine – they gave birth on their own, while standing up, didn't they? Wouldn't we prefer to just get on with it without gas and air? A friend of mine, who is now a senior cardiologist, told me: 'At med school in the 90s, we were taught that Black women had a higher pain threshold during labour, so they didn't usually ask for pain relief.' There have long been serious concerns in the Black community about the treatment Black women receive during maternal health care. It was the subject of a Dispatches documentary in 2021, presented by Rochelle Hulme. The myth of the 'strong black woman' is also partly a legacy of slavery. Medical historians point a finger at Dr J Marion Sims, the 19th-century physician who became known as the 'father of modern gynecology', having invented the vaginal speculum – but whose pioneering surgical techniques were practiced on enslaved women. His statue in Central Park was pulled down in 2018. Even more shocking to me is that medical racism within the NHS doesn't just exist in maternity care, I believe it's pervasive across the entire service. I know a woman who has been battling the NHS – and been belittled by it – ever since she was a girl, when she was diagnosed with a chronic autoimmune disease that causes muscle weakness and tiredness. 'I used to fall asleep in lessons, but was told by teachers there was nothing wrong with me, that I was attention-seeking, that I was a liar and fake. At 11, I was diagnosed with Myasthenia gravis, symptoms for which I had shown since the age of 4.' Today, she needs regular plasma transfusions, so spends a lot of time receiving medical care. 'I've had so many bad experiences, panic attacks thinking I was going to die,' she tells me, 'and yet white people with the same condition tell me they have not suffered.' Once, while having antibiotics administered intravenously, she was left unable to speak – yet her nurses ignored her obvious distress. 'All I could do was point to the cannula and whisper 'Out…'. When two policemen walked past, they pointed and laughed at me, acting as though I was a mental health patient. The nurses joined in laughing and joking.' I know that the plural of anecdote isn't data, but Black people do have a rougher ride at the hands of our medical profession. Certainly, health campaigns for conditions that disproportionately affect the Black community, such as sickle cell anaemia and prostate cancer, don't seem to get the same profile as others. When it comes to ensuring the NHS is more attuned to the needs of Black patients, I won't hold my breath – because if I did, they might just leave me to suffocate.
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Taxpayers on the hook for ‘multi-million pound' bill after NHS pension delays
Taxpayers are on the hook for a multi-million pound bill after new delays to NHS pensions, an expert has warned. Pensioners have already waited months for vital paperwork to tell them how much they should be receiving, but many could now be due compensation for underpayments following a series of missed deadlines. The NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) was required to send 382,000 pension statements by March 31, but ministers had to announce a new timetable after just 21 were actually issued. Health minister, Karin Smyth, has now confirmed that another set of extensions is required after just 1,338 more statements were sent over the next three months. This has left more than 380,000 statements outstanding, despite the allocation of extra staff. She also confirmed that the Government would add 8pc interest to any underpayments, which Alec Collie of advisors Wesleyan, said 'could run into the millions'. Shadow health minister, Dr Luke Evans, warned the failure had 'real consequences', and said NHS patients had been left to pay for Labour's choices. The problems stem from the 2015 changes to public sector pensions, including the NHS scheme, amid fears they had become unaffordable. Workers were moved away from gold-plated final salary pensions and into schemes based on their average earnings. However, the implementation was ruled to be age discriminatory following legal action from members of the judges' and firefighters' schemes. As a result, retirees were offered a choice between both schemes for their service between 2015 and 2022 under the so-called 'McCloud Remedy', which was already expected to cost taxpayers £17bn. Those affected should receive a remediable service statement, which outlines the choice between both schemes, and gives them 12 months to decide. The original delivery date of March 31 was set out in legislation, but Ms Smyth has repeatedly appeared in the House of Commons to confirm that numerous deadlines had been missed. As a result, the retirees affected won't know the true amount of their pension until their statement arrives, and many could be receiving less than they're entitled to. Any funds owed will be back paid with an additional 8pc in interest – around double the current interest rate. Mr Collie said: 'These situations won't just need to be remedied by the Government – the 8pc interest will also need to be paid. 'We can't say for sure how much it's going to cost in total because the circumstances will be so unique to each person. But what's for sure is that the nature of the McCloud process means this is likely to roll on for many years to come – it's not going to be a 'one and done' settlement.' Ms Smyth said that she had met NHSBSA's chief executive, Michael Brodie, to express her disappointment, and ordered an independent review from Lisa Tennent, who serves as independent chair of the NHS Pension Board. The disarray comes amid repeated delays to remediable pension service statements, which outline how much staff may have actually paid into their pension once McCloud changes are taken into account. The statements help doctors, who often also work privately, to track their income and avoid a tax charge by exceeding the annual £60,000 limit on contributions. Just £1 of additional income can generate a £22,500 tax bill in some circumstances. The NHSBSA was supposed to send 137,000 statements to staff by October 6 last year, but at least 34,000 were still outstanding by June 2. It admitted that the true figure was not available because the data was still being collated. Experts have already warned that doctors are turning down work to avoid potential tax bills, with knock-on effects for frontline care. Dr Evans said the Government was continuing to miss legal and self-imposed deadlines, leaving patients to pay the price. He said: 'Labour admit that their plan is failing, but offer no serious way to resolve it. 'This failure has real consequences. Senior doctors are turning down extra work for fear of unexpected tax bills running into thousands. Vague promises and talk of 'conversations with the board' won't cut it. 'As a result of Labour's choices, patients will pay the price – especially if senior doctors won't step in during strikes. 'Labour must urgently set out a clear delivery plan to resolve both delays and hold the NHSBSA to account. With a summer of strikes looming, the complacency from Labour is both telling and dangerous.' An NHSBSA spokesman said: 'We appreciate that this news will be disappointing for NHS Pension Scheme members affected by the McCloud Remedy. 'We apologise for the delays and assure our members that we are working hard to deliver remediable saving statements as quickly as possible.'
BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
IVF cycles funded by the NHS could be reduced in South Yorkshire
The number of IVF cycles funded by the NHS in South Yorkshire could be cut from two to fertility treatment is funded by the South Yorkshire Integrated Care Board (ICB) but it is reviewing whether providing two rounds on the NHS is too 200 people a year in South Yorkshire access IVF services and about 20-30% of couples progress to a second South Yorkshire spent nearly £900,000 proving the treatment in 2021-22 but health chiefs said they need to "balance the books and focus resources on the services that matter to communities the most". An ICB report said: "We know that infertility is a very difficult issue for those affected by it. "We are faced with difficult decisions, including considering whether IVF services should continue to be funded as they currently are."Maintaining the current level of provision would mean we would need to consider our investments in other areas of healthcare to ensure we are using our resources efficiently."The NHS has been asked to prioritise access to care, such as GP appointments, elective treatment in hospitals and to improve waiting times for urgent and emergency care, such as the length of time waiting in an accident and emergency department."The NHS has a duty to break even each year and secure the best investment for the funds to provide high quality care for local people." 'Value for money' The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends offering up to three full cycles of IVF to eligible women under 40 and one full cycle for eligible women aged England, the number of NHS funded IVF cycles varies significantly - 67% of health boards only offer one cycle, 19% offer two and 10% offer three. The regions neighbouring South Yorkshire all offer report added: "A reduction to one cycle of IVF would bring us in line with most other parts of England and would be the best way to ensure value for money whilst maintaining a service that we know is important to people who are affected by it."The ICB will meet on Wednesday 23 July to discuss the proposals ahead of a five-week consultation. Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North
