Study: Consent law change led to earlier abortions
BOSTON (SHNS) – Certain teenagers managed to access abortions earlier in their pregnancies following passage of a 2020 law that scrapped the requirement for parental consent or a judge's approval for 16- and 17-year-olds, according to new research from Massachusetts reproductive care providers.
Citing that improved access to care, providers highlighted their support for legislation pending this session that would allow all young people under age 16 to also self-consent to receiving an abortion.
The gestational age, or length of pregnancy, for 16- and 17-year-olds getting an abortion dropped by an average of five days compared to before and after the Roe Act took effect in December 2020, according to a Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts study published in the American Journal of Public Health. Former Gov. Charlie Baker, who said he supported reproductive health care rights but didn't agree with scrapping parental consent for minors, vetoed that section of the law, which took effect following a legislative override.
Isabel Fulcher, the study's principal researcher, said delays in accessing care can increase abortion costs and limit patients' options.
'A few days' delay can mean the difference between a patient being able to access medication abortion, which is often the preferred method for young people, or requiring a procedural abortion,' Fulcher said in a statement Monday. 'By demonstrating that eliminating the parental consent requirement for some young people improves access to time-sensitive care, we hope these finding[s] will encourage lawmakers to remove this barrier for all young people.'
Mary Ellen Siegler, spokesperson for the pro-life Massachusetts Family Institute, told the News Service that 'easier access to abortions for minors is nothing to celebrate.'
'Excluding parents from a life-altering decision like abortion for their minor daughter is indefensible,' Siegler said in response to PPLM's new study. 'A still-developing teen cannot fully comprehend the emotional and physical toll of ending her unborn child's life. Abortion not only ends an innocent life but also jeopardizes the physical, mental, and emotional well-being of young women.'
PPLM promoted a Sen. Liz Miranda bill (SD 2575) that would eliminate parental consent or the alternative court approval process for 'all young people' to access abortions.
Invoking the lack of federal abortion protections, PPLM called Miranda's bill 'the next step for Massachusetts to make our reproductive health laws equitable by ensuring young people have equal right to decide their reproductive health decisions, no matter their family circumstances.'
Siegler called Miranda's bill 'reckless' and said it 'will only further hurt minors and enable abusers and traffickers to exploit vulnerable girls while silencing the very people who love and protect them most.'
The Judiciary Committee last session sent bills lowering the age of self-consent for abortions, plus other measures to reduce barriers to abortion access, to study. Anti-abortion groups argued removing parental consent would improperly leave parents uninvolved in their children's major medical decisions.
PPLM contends Miranda's bill would protect a 'small but highly vulnerable' group of minors who are worried about the possibility of 'dangerous retaliation,' including violence, from their parents if they disclose their pregnancies. In 2023, state data show 77 Massachusetts minors under age 16 got abortions.
Previous research from PPLM found minors who did not secure parental consent for an abortion were twice as likely to become disqualified from taking medication abortion, which can be used up to around 10 weeks of pregnancy. Minors who needed to seek a judge's approval experienced an average two-week delay in receiving an abortion, with that delay disproportionately felt among individuals of color and those with low incomes.
PPLM's new study analyzed the gestational age that teenagers ages 16-19 received abortions from 2017 to 2022. Minors ages 16-17 received 749 abortions during the study, while the control group of those ages 18-19 had 2,773 abortions.
'Timeliness of care is a key quality metric in health care. By enabling young people to access abortion more quickly, the ROE Act improved quality of care for this group of young people,' Elizabeth Janiak, director of social science research at PPLM, said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
In memo, Trump targets health care payments that 'game the system'
BOSTON (SHNS) – As the U.S. Senate prepares to take its own crack at legislation that includes hundreds of millions of dollars in cuts to Medicaid, the president late last week made his thoughts on one provision clear and it could impact how Massachusetts and other states finance public health care. Late on Friday, President Donald Trump issued a memo ordering U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert Kennedy Jr. to 'eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse in Medicaid, including by ensuring Medicaid payments rates are not higher than Medicare.' The move targeted state directed payments, a Medicaid financing mechanism that gives states flexibility to require managed care organizations to pay providers specific rates or to implement rate increases to advance delivery system or state policy objectives, most commonly improving access to care. State directed payments came about as a result of a 2016 Medicaid reform, but they have grown significantly in popularity since then. There were 250 unique directed payment arrangements approved between July 1, 2021 and Feb. 1, 2023, according to the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission (MACPAC). The commission said the number increased by almost 21% to 302 unique arrangements approved between Feb. 1, 2023 and Aug. 1, 2024. The arrangements approved as of Aug. 1, 2024 were projected to spend a total of $110.2 billion a year, a 59% increase over the $69.3 billion in projected spending identified by the commission's analysis of arrangements approved as of Feb. 1, 2023. 'This trajectory threatens the Federal Treasury and Medicaid's long-term stability, and the imbalance between Medicaid and Medicare patients threatens to jeopardize access to care for our seniors,' Trump wrote in the memo. Trump said states and health care providers have used state directed payments 'to game the system,' echoing concerns previously raised by experts. The president outlined the scheme: states charge assessments on health care providers in order to nudge up reported state spending to score higher federal reimbursements, but then send 'the same money back to them in the form of a 'Medicaid payment,' which automatically unlocked for healthcare providers an additional 'burden-sharing' payment from the Federal Government.' 'Instead of paying Medicare rates, many States that utilize these arrangements now pay the same healthcare providers almost three times the Medicare amount,' the president said. The U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service has approved 63 such arrangements for Massachusetts since March 2023, according to CMS data. The budget reconciliation bill passed last month by the U.S. House and expected to be taken up this month by the U.S. Senate would, among many other things, extend Trump's first-term tax cuts and reduce Medicaid spending by nearly $700 billion to help pay for it. Officials at MassHealth, which combines Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program, have said the Bay State could be in jeopardy of losing more than $1 billion annually, with hundreds of thousands of residents at risk of losing coverage. Health policy nonprofit KFF said the bill directs U.S. Health and Human Services to revise state directed payment regulations so that the total payment rate for inpatient hospital and nursing facility services is capped at 100% of the total published Medicare payment rate. The 100% limit would apply to Massachusetts and other states that have adopted the Medicaid expansion, and the limit would be 110% for the 10 states that have not adopted the expansion. But the U.S. House version of the bill would grandfather in any state directed payments submitted for approval and approved prior to the legislation's enactment. MassHealth has previously said that so-called safety net providers could sustain cuts of hundreds of millions of dollars annually if Congress or the president blocks renewal of Massachusetts's existing state directed payments. MassHealth and the Mass. Executive Office of Health and Human Services did not respond over the weekend or Monday to a request for comment on the president's memo on state directed payments. Manatt Health Senior Managing Director Patricia Boozang said in March that Massachusetts uses state directed payments 'extensively' and that the Trump administration was likely to act on its own to address them if the president's favored policies don't advance as part of the reconciliation package. The Congressional Budget Office said last month that the bill as passed by the U.S. House will mean $698 billion less in federal subsidies for Medicaid, $267 billion less in federal spending for SNAP, $64 billion less in net spending for all other purposes, and a $3.8 trillion increase in the federal deficit all over the next decade. The CBO also said it expects the reductions in federal spending to lead to about $78 billion in additional spending among the 50 states 'accounting for changes in state contributions to SNAP and Medicaid and for state tax and spending policies necessary to finance additional spending.' The office said it was still analyzing 'expectations of the states' responses to changes in federal funding.' The budget plans that House and Senate negotiators are attempting to reconcile into a final fiscal 2026 state budget assume about $15.76 billion in federal revenues, an increase over the $14.3 billion in the current budget, including $14.2 billion in federal MassHealth reimbursements alone. Most of the cuts in the U.S. House bill would hit in federal fiscal year 2027, which begins Oct. 1, 2026 (three months into Massachusetts' fiscal year 2027). Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Axios
a day ago
- Axios
SF takes to the streets to protest ICE raids, demand Huerta's release
Amid escalating anti-immigration efforts, labor unions are warning San Franciscans that no one is safe from the Trump administration. Driving the news: David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union-United Service Workers West, was arrested in Los Angeles Friday while serving as a community observer at a worksite immigration raid. He has been charged with conspiracy to impede an officer for allegedly blocking a law enforcement vehicle. The latest: Over 100 people packed the street in front of the Hiram W. Johnson State Building at noon Monday, calling for Huerta's release and an end to raids by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The rally was among over 30 spearheaded by local unions across the country. What they're saying:"It's so painful to know that this can happen to any one of us," SEIU Local 87 president Olga Miranda, who organized the protest, told Axios. "All he was doing was standing there to make sure enforcement wasn't brutal." Between the lines: Immigrants have played critical roles in California unions over the last few decades, especially in the Bay Area, which has seen success organizing janitors, health care workers and fast food employees. "Everybody should be worried ... . They're offended by our mere existence," Miranda said, referencing her identity as a brown Chicana woman. She noted that many people are increasingly scared to show up to work because of potential raids. Yes, but: Miranda emphasized that while exercising First Amendment rights is important, she does not condone "anything being set on fire" in light of Sunday's protests, where multiple Waymos were set on fire.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Fluoridation fight marks new pain point for dentists
BOSTON (SHNS) – Dr. Derek Song took the day off from his dental clinic in Burlington on Wednesday to urge Beacon Hill to support dentistry amidst threats to fluoridation and dental care coverage. 'Water fluoridation has been around for a number of years at a safe level, which is seven parts per million, which has been proven by science to be safe and effective,' Song said at a State House advocacy event. Song and other dentists with the Massachusetts Dental Society oppose a bill presented by Rep. Justin Thurber (H 2548) that would ban Massachusetts from putting fluoride in municipal water systems through fluoridation water additives. 'This is going to lead to rampant cavities everywhere. And you know who this is going to hit the most? Those in underserved communities, unfortunately, especially children,' Song said. Voters at Town Meeting in Somerset in May passed an article to remove fluoride from the town's drinking water. The article instructs the Board of Selectmen to petition the state for a home rule exemption so the town can enact a fluoride ban. On a national scale, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in April he plans to tell the Centers for Disease Control to stop recommending fluoride in drinking water. Song said that federal messaging is causing his patients to doubt what he called 'scientific and factual' dental health tools like fluoride. He added that the underserved communities that would be most impacted by fluoride bans are also the ones having challenges accessing dental care, which would be exacerbated by proposed Congressional cuts to Medicaid funding. 'This is really alarming. This is a public health crisis, and as a dentist, I just cannot sit idly by and let this happen,' Song told the News Service. The 'chief complaint' among Massachusetts dentists over the last three months has surrounded Medicaid reimbursements, according to Dental Society President Abe Abdul. 'The new vendor that has been hired to handle Medicaid is failing, and doctors, dentists, practices are not being paid, essentially, for the work that's being done, simply because they transitioned vendors and there's an issue with the transition,' Abdul said. Dentists continue to face a shortage of dental hygienists, Abdul said, despite a 2024 law that allows foreign-trained hygienists to get a license in Massachusetts. 'It's law now, but it's still stuck in the regulatory phase. They need to create the regulations. I guarantee you, you ask any office, you go to any dental practice, people can't get in because they can't get a hygienist,' Abdul said, adding that he has not heard of a regulatory or implementation process timeline. Dentists say a different bill (H 1262) the Society opposes creates 'loopholes' in a 2022 voter law that created a dental loss ratio, mandating dental insurance companies spend 83% of their revenue on direct patient care. Dentists pointed to a Sen. John Cronin bill (S 704) as a way to form a more transparent relationship between practices and insurers by disclosing virtual credit card payment fees. 'We don't know about these fees until we type them into the computer through our Merchant Services and then find out, 'Oh, great, we're going to lose 5% of that income,'' Dr. Tej Shah said. 'We have to pay ridiculous fees just to get paid for the services that we did.' 'A check for $100 is $100. In a credit card, $100 — they get as much as maybe 3% cash back. So they only pay $97. And then, because of the overhead of using a virtual credit card, we might get as much as a 5% fee. So then it's only $95 to us,' Shah, who runs Zen Family Dental in Ashland, said. Every time that happens, Shah said, he has to make a phone call to get that switched. The overhead fees only add to 'skyrocketing' inflation for the price of dentistry materials. 'We don't know how much our composites are going to cost in the next couple months, because, tariffs, inflation, everything else. Patients are also feeling the pinch. So they're less likely to pay for things, because they're also uncertain… so maybe they won't even [get] certain treatments.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
