Study: Consent law change led to earlier abortions
Citing that improved access to care, providers highlighted their support for legislation pending this session that would allow all young people under age 16 to also self-consent to receiving an abortion.
The gestational age, or length of pregnancy, for 16- and 17-year-olds getting an abortion dropped by an average of five days compared to before and after the Roe Act took effect in December 2020, according to a Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts study published in the American Journal of Public Health. Former Gov. Charlie Baker, who said he supported reproductive health care rights but didn't agree with scrapping parental consent for minors, vetoed that section of the law, which took effect following a legislative override.
Isabel Fulcher, the study's principal researcher, said delays in accessing care can increase abortion costs and limit patients' options.
'A few days' delay can mean the difference between a patient being able to access medication abortion, which is often the preferred method for young people, or requiring a procedural abortion,' Fulcher said in a statement Monday. 'By demonstrating that eliminating the parental consent requirement for some young people improves access to time-sensitive care, we hope these finding[s] will encourage lawmakers to remove this barrier for all young people.'
Mary Ellen Siegler, spokesperson for the pro-life Massachusetts Family Institute, told the News Service that 'easier access to abortions for minors is nothing to celebrate.'
'Excluding parents from a life-altering decision like abortion for their minor daughter is indefensible,' Siegler said in response to PPLM's new study. 'A still-developing teen cannot fully comprehend the emotional and physical toll of ending her unborn child's life. Abortion not only ends an innocent life but also jeopardizes the physical, mental, and emotional well-being of young women.'
PPLM promoted a Sen. Liz Miranda bill (SD 2575) that would eliminate parental consent or the alternative court approval process for 'all young people' to access abortions.
Invoking the lack of federal abortion protections, PPLM called Miranda's bill 'the next step for Massachusetts to make our reproductive health laws equitable by ensuring young people have equal right to decide their reproductive health decisions, no matter their family circumstances.'
Siegler called Miranda's bill 'reckless' and said it 'will only further hurt minors and enable abusers and traffickers to exploit vulnerable girls while silencing the very people who love and protect them most.'
The Judiciary Committee last session sent bills lowering the age of self-consent for abortions, plus other measures to reduce barriers to abortion access, to study. Anti-abortion groups argued removing parental consent would improperly leave parents uninvolved in their children's major medical decisions.
PPLM contends Miranda's bill would protect a 'small but highly vulnerable' group of minors who are worried about the possibility of 'dangerous retaliation,' including violence, from their parents if they disclose their pregnancies. In 2023, state data show 77 Massachusetts minors under age 16 got abortions.
Previous research from PPLM found minors who did not secure parental consent for an abortion were twice as likely to become disqualified from taking medication abortion, which can be used up to around 10 weeks of pregnancy. Minors who needed to seek a judge's approval experienced an average two-week delay in receiving an abortion, with that delay disproportionately felt among individuals of color and those with low incomes.
PPLM's new study analyzed the gestational age that teenagers ages 16-19 received abortions from 2017 to 2022. Minors ages 16-17 received 749 abortions during the study, while the control group of those ages 18-19 had 2,773 abortions.
'Timeliness of care is a key quality metric in health care. By enabling young people to access abortion more quickly, the ROE Act improved quality of care for this group of young people,' Elizabeth Janiak, director of social science research at PPLM, said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
29-07-2025
- Boston Globe
Massachusetts, others sue Trump over Medicaid cuts to Planned Parenthood
Plaintiff states -- which also include California, New York, and Rhode Island, among others -- claim that the provision defunding Planned Parenthood's Medicaid is unconstitutional and violates Planned Parenthood clinics' freedoms of speech and association. Advertisement The states asked the court to block enforcement of the Medicaid provision. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up In response to the lawsuit, a spokesperson for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said states should not be forced to fund organizations that prioritize political advocacy. 'It is a shame that these Democrat attorneys general seek to undermine state flexibility and disregard longstanding concerns about accountability,' the spokesperson said in a statement. On Monday, a federal judge in Boston Advertisement In that case, Judge Indira Talwani found that the law likely violated the Constitution by targeting Planned Parenthood as punishment and likely violating the right of clinics that don't provide abortions to associate with the national Planned Parenthood organization. 'We're encouraged by [Monday's] ruling, which protects access to care for Medicaid patients in Massachusetts while this case moves forward,' said Dominique Lee, chief executive of Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts. 'At a time when reproductive health care access is under constant attack, this decision is a powerful reminder that patients, not politics, should guide health care.' The weeks since the law went into effect on July 4 have been filled with confusion and uncertainty for Massachusetts Medicaid patients. Front desk staff, health care providers and even clinic escorts have been inundated with questions about whether Planned Parenthood's four Massachusetts clinics can accept their insurance, known here as MassHealth. Originally, Talwani issued a preliminary injunction that applied only to Planned Parenthood clinics that don't provide abortions or receive less than $800,000 from the government insurance program. That ruling left out the Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, which billed Medicaid for $14 million, or roughly half of the health care provider's operating budget, last year. Planned Parenthood clinics in Massachusetts continued to provide care to patients free of charge while they were prohibited from accepting Medicaid funds. About 40 percent of those clinics' patients are insured by Medicaid. Most patients who go to Massachusetts Planned Parenthoods aren't going for abortions but are instead seeking primary care services like checkups, birth control and testing for sexually transmitted diseases. MassHealth patients who are seeking abortion care have not been affected by the rollercoaster of changes to federal law. States are already prohibited from billing Medicaid for abortions. Massachusetts uses its own money to cover abortions for those insured by MassHealth. Advertisement Marin Wolf can be reached at
CNN
28-07-2025
- CNN
Judge widens block against federal funding ban on Planned Parenthood
A federal judge in Boston has widened her block on the Trump administration's ability to enforce a provision of President Donald Trump's sweeping domestic policy law that would defund Planned Parenthood's health care services. US District Judge Indira Talwani ruled last week that the administration couldn't enforce the funding ban against some Planned Parenthood organizations. In a new preliminary injunction issued Monday, the judge blocked enforcement of the law nationwide, saying it applied to the dozens of state and local Planned Parenthood member organizations. 'Patients are likely to suffer adverse health consequences where care is disrupted or unavailable. In particular, restricting Members' ability to provide healthcare services threatens an increase in unintended pregnancies and attendant complications because of reduced access to effective contraceptives, and an increase in undiagnosed and untreated STIs,' Talwani, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, wrote in the 58-page ruling. The measure, part of Trump's domestic policy bill that was signed into law July 4, bars Medicaid users from coverage with a health care provider that also provides abortion services. The judge said that the plaintiffs in the case – the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, along with Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts and Planned Parenthood Association of Utah – were likely to succeed on their claim that the law had singled out the health care provider for adverse treatment. 'The legislative history and context confirm that the law's purpose is to single out Planned Parenthood Federation and its Members for punishment,' Talwani wrote, going on to note that comments by individual lawmakers 'support the conclusion that Congress's intent was punitive.' While the legislation did not explicitly mention Planned Parenthood, it prohibits federal funding for providers 'primarily engaged in family planning services, reproductive health, and related medical care' that also provide abortion services.'
Boston Globe
28-07-2025
- Boston Globe
Planned Parenthood is still seeing MassHealth patients. Confusion is keeping them away
Advertisement 'I've been here for almost 10 years now,' said Anne McGovern, chief operating officer of the Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, 'and this is easily the hardest thing we've had to deal with.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The situation has only become more confusing. A federal judge in Boston ruled early Monday that the Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts can continue to accept Medicaid payments as they challenge the cuts in court, a shift from an earlier decision. Last week, the same federal judge, Indira Talwani, Advertisement That ruling left out Planned Parenthood of Massachusetts, which last year billed Medicaid for $14 million, or roughly half of the health care provider's operating budget. About 40 percent of the patients at Massachusetts clinics are insured by Medicaid, according to Planned Parenthood. 'We're encouraged by [Monday's] ruling, which protects access to care for Medicaid patients in Massachusetts while this case moves forward,' said Dominique Lee, president and CEO, Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts. 'At a time when reproductive health care access is under constant attack, this decision is a powerful reminder that patients, not politics, should guide health care.' A sign for more information about Medicaid was displayed in the patient waiting area at the Greater Boston Health Center location of Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts. Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff For the week it was banned from accepting MassHealth, the Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts continued to see patients for free, although it was unclear how long the organization would have been able to cover that care. 'This is the first time that something is really shaking our foundation,' said Dr. Luu Ireland, chief medical officer of the Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts. Most patients at Massachusetts' Planned Parenthood locations — in Boston, Worcester, Marlborough, and Springfield — are not seeking abortions, but rather primary care such as annual check-ups and testing for sexually transmitted diseases. Recently, Ireland said, a teenager came in with her mother to get birth control for the first time. Birth control, Ireland noted, 'is trial and error,' and patients might need to try several brands of the medication before finding the right prescription. Because the teen is insured by the state's Medicaid program, called MassHealth, Ireland couldn't promise her that she would be able to come back to Planned Parenthood for follow-up visits. Another MassHealth patient who has come to Planned Parenthood for years for STD testing was 'at a loss' when Ireland told him about changing policies. Advertisement 'Where am I going to go to get tested?' Ireland recalled him asking. 'What if I need treatment? How much will that cost?' The Massachusetts Planned Parenthood offices are typically able to get patients into the office within seven days, which is much faster than other gynecology and primary care providers in the region. Research by ECG Management Consultants in 2024 found that, on average, new patients in the Boston metro area had to wait 85 days for an obstetrics and gynecology appointment. Many of the patients who go to Planned Parenthood for routine care have seen the same providers for years. Shaking up that care can be jarring, said Irem Girmen, who leads the team that answers patient questions at the Boston clinic. 'They like coming here. They prefer to come here,' said Girmen. 'Gynecological exams are vulnerable, and they trust us.' Dr. Luu Ireland is the chief medical officer at the Boston Health Center location of Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts. Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff MassHealth patients seeking abortion care are not affected by the changes in federal law. States have long been prohibited from using federal Medicaid money to cover abortions, but Massachusetts uses its own funds to cover abortion care for patients insured by MassHealth.
