logo
The Trump administration's tariffs have taken effect worldwide, with Australia remaining at a 10 per cent rate

The Trump administration's tariffs have taken effect worldwide, with Australia remaining at a 10 per cent rate

Sky News AU3 days ago
President Trump's sweeping tariffs on imports into the United States came into effect on Thursday, after a deadline to strike a trade deal with the US passed.
Some countries have been able to strike a deal, such as the United Kingdom and the European Union bloc, however Australia has been unable to do so.
Various Australian goods have been exempted, but the White House has hinted that could change.
Posting on Truth Social, President Trump said that "billions of dollars" were now "flowing" into the United States, and confirmed separately that he had imposed additional tariffs on India due to the country's imports of Russian oil.
He wrote, "RECIPROCAL TARIFFS TAKE EFFECT AT MIDNIGHT TONIGHT! BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, LARGELY FROM COUNTRIES THAT HAVE TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF THE UNITED STATES FOR MANY YEARS, LAUGHING ALL THE WAY, WILL START FLOWING INTO THE USA. THE ONLY THING THAT CAN STOP AMERICA'S GREATNESS WOULD BE A RADICAL LEFT COURT THAT WANTS TO SEE OUR COUNTRY FAIL!"
He then posted: 'IT'S MIDNIGHT!!! BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN TARIFFS ARE NOW FLOWING INTO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!'
Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell has said previously that Australia will continue arguing for tariffs to be dropped to zero.
'America still has a significant advantage in terms of our trading relationship,' he said.
He also revealed in an interview with the Australian Financial Review last Saturday that he had invited US trade representative Howard Lutnick to visit Australia for further discussions.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Armenians caught between hope and distrust after accord with Azerbaijan
Armenians caught between hope and distrust after accord with Azerbaijan

News.com.au

time32 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Armenians caught between hope and distrust after accord with Azerbaijan

The streets were almost deserted in Yerevan Saturday because of the summer heat, but at shaded parks and fountains, Armenians struggled to make sense of what the accord signed a day earlier in Washington means for them. The leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan, two Caucasian countries embroiled in a territorial conflict since the fall of the USSR, met Friday and signed a peace treaty under the watch of US President Donald Trump. In Yerevan, however, few of the people asked by AFP were enthusiastic. - 'Acceptable' - "It's a good thing that this document was signed because Armenia has no other choice," said Asatur Srapyan, an 81-year-old retiree. He believes Armenia hasn't achieved much with this draft agreement, but it's a step in the right direction. "We are very few in number, we don't have a powerful army, we don't have a powerful ally behind us, unlike Azerbaijan," he said. "This accord is a good opportunity for peace." Maro Huneyan, a 31-year-old aspiring diplomat, also considers the pact "acceptable", provided it does not contradict her country's constitution. "If Azerbaijan respects all the agreements, it's very important for us. But I'm not sure it will keep its promises and respect the points of the agreement," she added. - 'endless concessions' - But Anahit Eylasyan, 69, opposes the agreement and, more specifically, the plan to create a transit zone crossing Armenia to connect the Nakhchivan region to the rest of Azerbaijan. "We are effectively losing control of our territory. It's as if, in my own apartment, I had to ask a stranger if I could go from one room to another," she explains. She also hopes not to see Russia, an ally of Armenia despite recent tensions, expelled from the region." Anahit also criticizes Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan for "making decisions for everyone" and for his "endless concessions to Azerbaijan". "We got nothing in exchange, not our prisoners, nor our occupied lands, nothing. It's just a piece of paper to us," she fumes. Shavarsh Hovhannisyan, a 68-year-old construction engineer, agrees, saying the agreement "is just an administrative formality that brings nothing to Armenia." "We can't trust Azerbaijan," Hovhannisyan asserted, while accusing Pashinyan of having "turned his back" on Russia and Iran. "It's more of a surrender document than a peace treaty, while Trump only thinks about his image, the Nobel Prize." - 'More stability... in the short term' - According to President Trump, Armenia and Azerbaijan have committed "to stop all fighting forever; open up commerce, travel and diplomatic relations; and respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity." For Olesya Vartanyan, an independent researcher specializing in the Caucasus, the Washington agreement "certainly brings greater stability and more guarantees for the months, if not years, to come." But given the long-lasting tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan, "I fear that we will have to plan only for the very short term," she said.

Australia edges closer to recognising Palestinian state
Australia edges closer to recognising Palestinian state

Perth Now

time35 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

Australia edges closer to recognising Palestinian state

Australia appears to be gearing up to follow several major Western powers in recognising a Palestinian state at an upcoming United Nations meeting, a top international law expert says. G7 nations France, the UK and Canada have committed to recognising Palestine at the United Nations General Assembly in September amid growing pressure for Israel to end the war in Gaza. Australia looks set to join them after a significant shift in rhetoric in recent weeks, Australian National University professor Donald Rothwell said. "Everything at the moment is pointing towards Australia positioning itself to make an announcement of the recognition of Palestine by the time of the (meeting)," he told AAP. The Albanese government had been "softening" its position on recognising Palestine in the past two weeks, Prof Rothwell noted. "The prime minister is also actually going to the United Nations General Assembly and it's a very long time since the Australian prime minister has gone there," he said. "I'm sure that the prime minister is going there wanting to make an announcement of some significance and this will clearly be a significant announcement." Prof Rothwell also pointed to Foreign Minister Penny Wong's recent stark comments about the humanitarian situation in Gaza and Israel's plan to occupy the territory. "The two-state solution is really just slipping away as a result of Israel's campaign, and Australia doesn't want to lose that opportunity," he said. In a joint statement with several other nations on Saturday, Senator Wong said the countries were committed to implementing a two-state solution to ensure peace for the Israeli and Palestinian people. "A political resolution based on a negotiated two-state solution requires the total demilitarisation of Hamas and its complete exclusion from any form of governance in the Gaza Strip, where the Palestinian Authority must have a central role," the statement said. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke appeared on Sunday to soften the government's stance on the future role of Hamas, a listed terrorist organisation in Australia, in a Palestinian state. He noted terrorist forces had occupied other countries that Australia continued to recognise, citing Syria and Iraq as examples. Prof Rothwell said Syria and Iraq were different from Palestine because Australia had recognised them long before ISIS emerged and took control of large parts. "The minister is making the point … at some point in time, Hamas might play a role in that Palestinian state but that would not see Australia revisit its recognition," he said. Mr Burke might also have been signalling further nuance in Australia's developing position - that it might be prepared to move towards recognition of Palestine while Hamas continued to have a role in Gaza, Prof Rothwell said.

Hopes RBA won't repeat shock rates hold as board meets
Hopes RBA won't repeat shock rates hold as board meets

Perth Now

time35 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

Hopes RBA won't repeat shock rates hold as board meets

Markets are almost certain the Reserve Bank of Australia will cut interest rates at its August meeting despite the board facing an increasingly uncertain environment. Benign quarterly inflation figures released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics in July should convince the board to cut the cash rate in a two-day meeting that starts on Monday, AMP deputy chief economist Diana Mousina said. In fact, a cut of 25 basis points to 3.6 per cent should have happened already, Ms Mousina said. Mortgage holders will be hoping lighting doesn't strike twice after the central bank's board voted in a 6-3 decision to leave rates on hold in July, despite markets pricing in a near-certain chance of a cut. The majority of economists also expect a cut this time around, including 31 out of 34 experts surveyed by comparison website Finder. But with markets predicting another two cuts following this one, RBA governor Michele Bullock is likely to try to pare back expectations in her post-meeting communications after the meeting wraps up on Tuesday. "We think that the RBA will still sound cautious on giving too much forward guidance and remain of the view that interest rates do not need to be aggressively cut for now, given their concern that upside inflation risks may occur again in Australia," Ms Mousina said. Another potential concern for Ms Bullock could be developments at the US central bank. Ms Mousina said we could be seeing the "Trumpification" of the Federal Reserve after the US president's appointment of ally Stephen Miran to replace departing governor Adriana Kugler. Mr Miran's appointment heralds a more dovish Fed board, which could mean lower US interest rates if Donald Trump gets his way. "Stephen Miran's appointment to the Federal Reserve board will likely increase pressure for deeper rate cuts while broadening concerns around Fed independence," JP Morgan chief economist Bruce Kasman said. While the RBA has been more focused on domestic developments in recent months, the Fed's outsized influence on global borrowing costs can set the tone for International monetary policy. When the Fed cuts, central banks around the world have tended to follow. And a dovish turn could have consequences for the Australian dollar, investor expectations and the broader economy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store