Adam Interviews RG&E President Patricia Nilsen
Editor's note: The full interview can be found in the video player at the bottom of the page.
ROCHESTER, N.Y. (WROC) — Windstorms, billing issues and increasing energy costs.
It's been a turbulent few years for Rochester Gas and Electric, or RG&E, and its sister company, New York State Electric & Gas, or NYSEG, both of which are subsidiaries of Avangrid, which is controlled by Spain-based Iberdrola, S.A.
Almost two years ago, Patricia Nilsen took over as RG&E's president and CEO.
Friday, she sat down with Adam Chodak to answer a variety of question regarding the company's past, present and future.
Adam Chodak: So where do we stand with RG&E these days? How's the health of the company in our community?
Trish Nilsen: We're on our 176th year, so we continue to be a strong partner in the Greater Rochester area. So, the company has its financial challenges. We have a high level of customer arrears. We have a significant amount of investment that we've been making in the infrastructure, but we are on the right path in terms of making those investments. And the last rate case that was put into place helped to really right the direction for the company financially. We still have work to do. It's old infrastructure. It's needing investment in time. Coming out of the pandemic, everything was in a pause, so we're on the right path, but we still have work to do.
AC: Obviously, March made me think of the windstorm that we had a few years ago when RG&E got to work, trying to get the infrastructure ready for another hit. How has that project, that effort come along?
TN: I think about that windstorm too. I was deep in emergency management both here at RG&E and then working with the county Emergency Management agency to work on prioritizing what got restored first. What we're doing is not an attitude of if the same pole breaks, we install the same pole in, in a storm. Obviously in some cases it's going to be the same equipment, but what we've been doing since then is really looking at building a more resilient grid. So, what can we do in terms of equipment trips that can flicker three times. If a branch falls on a wire, it'll flicker three times because it's opening and closing, hoping that branch will clear. And then if the branch falls to the ground and the device says, wait a minute, we're absolutely fine. Now the customer has power. So sometimes when your lights flicker three times, that's a good thing because it's avoiding a longer outage. Installing tree wire, installing more resilient infrastructure, whether it's a stronger pole or even looking at using fiberglass for the cross arms or any of the things on the pole that we can make more resilient as well as really a vegetation management approach. We've had a cycle trim for vegetation management, which means every six years or so we're going back in. Now we're adding a prescriptive element to that. It's about $40 million of additional focus on throughout our Gen E service territory. Where are the areas that have danger trees? Those we'll see them as the spring comes. The ones that aren't getting leaves because they're not alive. The Emerald Ash Borer, and all those ash trees that are out there, which one of those trees, even outside of our right of way, could be causing a problem. And also, our traditional trimming space is 10 feet around our wires, which the wires at the top of the pole. So, we're looking at areas where we can do ground to sky vegetation management, because often it's not just the 10 feet around our wires that are the problem, but if we're not trimming above those 10 feet, that's the branch that's going to fall. That's part of our resilient vegetation management program that we're implementing here in Rochester.
AC: We're seeing a lot of the bus fleets starting the conversion to electric buses. If this were to move to all the school districts, RTS, would that put a stress on the system?
TN: It's a matter of, I think even more than that. Can the buses support the school systems? So that's the first question I know a lot of districts are asking is, is it sensible for us to have an all-electric bus for the routes that they have to run? In some cases where those bus garages are, is for out on our infrastructure where we don't have the capacity to serve them. So, we then have to look at is there a customer owned equipment upgrade or a company owned equipment upgrade that has to take place? So, it's really a case-by-case basis whether those buses can be electrified. And it's really a decision. We're working with the state and we're working with the local school districts really on a one-on-one basis. What do they need to do? What are their plans and how can we help support them through that process?
AC: The smart meters, you've been rolling those out. How has that campaign been so far? What's been the impact or results so far?
TN: Well, I have more than 700,000 customers between our two companies that have downloaded our app and over 500,000 of them are using the Energy Manager tool. The Energy Manager tool is on the app, but it's also online. If people don't want to download an app, they can log in online. They can see their energy use by the hour, about a day or two after they've used energy. So, they don't have to wait until they get a bill based on an actual read. They can actually look at things in real time. We're seeing people look at that and hopefully making some energy decisions based on that. Maybe they're solving some family disputes about if we turn all the lights off, you know, what impact does that have? Or if I plug in an electric vehicle, what does that do? So, we're seeing customers look at that. The other thing that it's doing for us is it's helping us enter into a new level of ability to support our customers. We're starting to investigate whether a smart meter can help us identify when there's a problem. So more to come on that. I'd love to talk to you about it as we develop it further. But I just had an example where we learned there was a home that wasn't being occupied, that actually had a problem with their hot water heater, and it kept coming on. Well, we noticed that because we were getting data through the smart meter that was showing usage that was outside of the norm for that place. So, to me, that's what a smart meter can do. It is not something that we're planning to use to control load in a customer's home. We have programs today, a thermostat program that a customer can opt into that we can ask them to lower their temperature in their home or raise the temp, you know, depending on the time of year raise or lower the temperature. That's an opt-in program. The smart meter is really a way for customers to get their own energy use to make decisions and for us to be able to build them on their actual use, which has been really beneficial for those customers who've had months and months of estimated reads. It does sometimes create that first bill with the smart meter that is higher than normal, but we ask customers to reach out to us and we can make payment arrangements. We can confirm the reads for them, do whatever we need to do to make them comfortable with that meter.
AC: We got some reports on high bills into our newsroom. What might account for that kind of increase this year?
TN: We've been going through a lot of issues together. So, supply costs, a reminder for people, your bill is essentially three parts. It's delivery, which is set by rates. That doesn't change unless there is an approved rate change by the state. So, we had a rate increase in October of 2023, and then it stayed the same until May of 2024. And then May of 2025 will be the last of that cycle. So those are approved and they're highly regulated. There are taxes and fees that are part of what we have to collect on behalf of customers that are in your delivery fees. There are also the supply costs. Supply is a market price pass through. We're a delivery company, so we're essentially like your FedEx or your UPS. The cost of supply is based on what the market price is for supply, which comes from the state, from the New York independent system operator. So, it's basically an energy trading. It's based on what generators are able to get or it's what a customer might have agreed to with an energy services company other than us. So, there are suppliers that purchase the supply on behalf of a customer. That all was going on at the same time that we were putting smart meters in energy. Prices were going up, those supply prices were increasing. Additionally, it got a lot colder this winter and a lot hotter this summer than we were used to. About 10% colder depending on where you live. So, customers were calling and saying to us, why is my bill high? I kept my heat set at 68 or 67, whatever they kept it at. But if it's 10 degrees colder or nine degrees colder outside, that heating system's working harder. That hot water heaters even working harder if the water's colder coming into the house. All of that was happening while a smart meter was getting installed. And customers, in many cases, I hear it with my own, you know, my own colleagues here. They'll say, I caught a smart meter. And then I looked at my bill and I'll ask, well, when did you look at your bill before this? Oh, I haven't looked at it in a long time. So sometimes with smart meter, it's the first time a customer's even looking at their bill.
AC: When it comes to potential tariffs, how could this impact energy costs for us in upstate New York?
TN: There aren't any tariffs in place now, it really is something that will be new for all of us in the state. The New York independent system operator will be making a decision of how a tariff would be passed on. Would it be only for the company that's obtaining the supply? So, if a supplier obtains a supply, are they responsible for the tariff or will it be spread across all the residents of the state? It's to be determined. We'll see what the state does, and all the utilities are waiting to see, because we'll then have to communicate to our customers what that outcome is.
AC: The large-scale billing issues we reported on a couple years ago. You largely blamed understaffing in customer service and promised to bring that department up to full staff. Are you there?
TN: We have completed (our recruitment plan). We're always looking to hire because it is an, it's either often an entry level to the company. People come and they learn, they're a customer rep and then they say, let me try something new and they advance within the company. Also, what happens is we're also training our customer reps. So, in order to train a customer rep, you need to have enough staff, they can pull them off the phone. So, we're at where we need to be with staffing, but if somebody wants a career with us, I'd say check out our website. There's always some opportunities there.
AC: Henrietta capacity. There was the announcement recently that that project is going move forward. I had a business owner email me shortly after asking why should the taxpayers pick up a bill for a company when they could make the money from the potential revenue. What would be your response to that business owner?
TM' So at RGEE, we file a five-year capital plan and we file a rate case and all of our capacity growth or investment in infrastructure, anything. We invest in the infrastructure either to make it more resilient or to bring capacity and has to be approved by the Public Service Commission. And because of that, we're very careful in terms of if we're going to do a capacity improvement that only benefits an individual customer, then that customer needs to make that payment. If it's a capacity growth that develops, that increases opportunity for an entire community, we would put that through for approval. And the public service commission is either part of a rate case or a capacity plan. The Henrietta project was outside of a rate case. It was an opportunity for the state and for the community to see some growth and development. So really, it's the state's decision to say if they see value for that community to be able to do this, um, to make an investment. I think it's actually a positive sign for that business owner to know that the local and state government values that community and sees an opportunity for development because I'd like to think that that individual business owner will benefit by having more business in the community in which they work.
AC: Anything you'd like to add?
TN: Call us, because you mentioned, you know, you're seeing less of those customers who are reaching out to you, but it's important that they reach out to us first because we won't know there's a problem until they we hear from them.
Full interview:
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
See Purdue's 50-year plan to transform downtown Indianapolis campus with high-rises
Over the next 50 years, Purdue University plans to transform its downtown Indianapolis campus into an urban hub with high-rise buildings hosting up to 15,000 students, according to a new master plan. Today, Purdue's 28-acre sliver of land wedged between Indiana Avenue and Michigan Street on downtown's west side — roughly the same acreage as the parcel on which Lucas Oil Stadium and its south parking lot sit — is home to three parking garages and five expansive parking lots. A conceptual master plan approved by Purdue's Board of Trustees June 6 envisions 16 new buildings on that site, featuring 4.5 million square feet and about 3,500 student beds. With leasing agreements at nearby apartments, Purdue expects to offer students more than 5,300 beds downtown. The plan foresees an increase in Purdue's student enrollment in Indianapolis from about 2,800 in fall 2024 to 15,000 by fall 2075. Despite the dense development, the plan sets aside about 60% of the downtown acreage for open spaces where students can gather and walk, according to Maryland-based architecture firm Ayers Saint Gross, which designed the 50-year master plan. Construction on the campus' main building, the 15-story Academic Success Building near the intersection of West and Michigan streets, began this April. The $187 million facility with classrooms, lab space, dining halls and student housing will be complete around May 2027. The long-term plan comes as Purdue and Indiana University in Indianapolis jostle for position on the west side of downtown following the 2024 split of the two schools' joint urban campus, IUPUI. As Purdue updates its plans, IU has allotted hundreds of millions of dollars to build multiple major facilities, including an 11-story School of Medicine building and a 4,500-seat athletics center, on its downtown campus in the next few years. IUPUI split: Indiana Ave. fell as IUPUI rose. After Purdue and IU split, can they help renew the Avenue? After the IUPUI division, IU retains most of the 536-acre downtown campus and enrolled more than 25,000 students in fall 2024. IU also owns the 28-acre wedge of land where Purdue will expand between Indiana Avenue to the north, Michigan Street to the south and Blake Street to the west. Purdue has signed a 100-year lease to use the property. Purdue is expanding into Indiana's capital city in part to ease the strain on housing and other facilities at the West Lafayette campus, which now enrolls an all-time high of more than 55,000 students. University leaders have also announced partnerships with Indianapolis-based science and engineering firms like animal health company Elanco and race car manufacturer Dallara. 'Rather than a single hub, Purdue is weaving into the fabric of the city's innovation and industry corridors," David Umulis, Purdue's senior vice provost for Indianapolis, said in a statement, "expanding from downtown all the way to the northwest side of Indianapolis." Email IndyStar Reporter Jordan Smith at JTsmith@ Follow him on X: @jordantsmith09 This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: What's in Purdue's 50-year plan for downtown Indianapolis campus

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Debate heats up as Ocean City wind farm moves forward
The Maryland Department of the Environment has made a final determination to approve permits for Baltimore-based US Wind Inc. to build the first large-scale offshore wind project near Ocean City. According to MDE, 'The proposed construction and commissioning of the offshore wind project would not cause violations of any applicable air pollution control regulations.' The decision, issued Friday, is the latest move in a multi-year, controversial effort to bring the plan to fruition. U.S. Wind has proposed 114 turbines that would be about 11 miles from shore at their closest, according to documents filed by the company with the Maryland Public Service Commission. The project would deliver 1,710 megawatts with turbines about 10 miles from Ocean City, according to its Maryland PSC application. The build-out would occur in several phases, with the first turbines intended for operation in 2028, according to the commission document. Opponents of the project, who include Ocean City Mayor Richard Meehan, argue that the wind farms could harm the environment and wildlife, degrade air quality and damage the region's tourism economy by marring the beach view. 'It is unconscionable to believe that the Maryland Department of Environment is ignoring pre-established permitting deadlines and fundamentally ignoring every shred of feedback offered by those who will be directly involved if this poorly conceived and potentially disastrous offshore wind project is allowed to move forward,' Meehan said in a statement Friday, following the MDE decision. 'The entire economy of our coastal resort town is dependent on tourism, our eco system, and commercial fishing, all of which will be significantly impacted if hundreds of these giant eyesores are constructed 10 miles from our beaches.' In October, the town of Ocean City filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging the wind farm that is closest to beginning construction along its shoreline. The ongoing suit alleges that the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management violated federal law when it approved the construction plan for US Wind's project. There are several groups circulating petitions against the wind farms, including nonprofit Save Ocean City and Indian River High School Engineering Students Class Of 2025 & 2026. Ocean City resident Spencer Rowe said he is concerned about the environmental impact of the wind farms. 'In my experience, more and more people are starting to question the proposed wind farms, although many of them are not motivated enough to sign [petitions],' Rowe said in an email to The Baltimore Sun. 'Traveling [around] town, one sees a lot of bumper stickers and restaurant signs displaying opposition messages. I talk to a lot of people about this, and nearly everyone is opposed now that they are learning more about all the detrimental impacts, both to the offshore environment and to our priceless viewshed.' Maryland has made significant investments in wind energy in recent years. The US Wind project is projected to create 13,000 jobs and net more than $6 billion in economic benefits. For fiscal year 2025 alone, $5 million was allocated to build a wind energy workforce and supply chain. Under state law, Maryland must reach net-zero carbon emissions by 2045. The state also aims to develop up to 8,500 megawatts of offshore wind energy by 2031. Despite some expressing environmental and economic concerns, others continue to support the development of offshore wind farms. In a letter to The Sun, Berlin resident Larry Austin Ryan outlined 10 reasons why people should not sign a petition recently sponsored by the Town of Ocean City to push wind turbines more than 26 miles off Maryland's coast. 'Wind power is the fastest growing energy industry in the world! Jobs in wind turbine technology are also one of the fastest growing areas of employment in living wage jobs,' Ryan wrote. 'The Ocean City area is guaranteed 60 jobs and there will be many more jobs in Salisbury and Baltimore in the manufacture and distribution of wind turbines and their components. With the addition of this many jobs, more visitors will have more discretionary income allowing them to enjoy the fruits of their labor in Ocean City.' 'Electricity produced by offshore wind will supply more than 750,000 homes and businesses on the Eastern shore,' Ryan added. 'It will ensure a large-scale improvement of our already inadequate electrical grid here on the shore and avoid a surcharge to Maryland ratepayers for having to import electricity from out of state. This will allow continued economic growth for all the shore in the 21 st century.' A petition to review MDE's decision must be filed by July 14 in the circuit court for the county where the permit application indicates the proposed activity will occur. 'The permits were issued after a thorough review of US Wind's application and following a public process,' an MDE spokesperson said in an email Saturday. 'Due to significant public interest, the Department of the Environment extended the time for the public to provide input. All feedback was carefully reviewed.' Aside from public debate, US Wind's project is facing legal and political hurdles. On May 5, Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown sued President Donald Trump's administration for freezing the development of offshore wind energy projects. Brown and a coalition of 17 attorneys general allege that the executive order threatens states' abilities to secure affordable energy sources, meet the increasing electricity demand, meet climate goals and disrupt billions of dollars in infrastructure and supply chain investments, according to the lawsuit. 'The president's actions violate federal law and will make it harder for us to help Marylanders keep the money they make. One of the best strategies for driving down utility costs is ramping up clean energy production through wind power,' Gov. Wes Moore said in a statement at the time. 'At a moment when families are feeling the strain of high energy bills, we should focus on cutting red tape, not halting critical infrastructure projects.' Have a news tip? Contact Todd Karpovich at tkarpovich@ or on X as @ToddKarpovich.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Road near bottlenecked I-77 Lake Norman exit to close for highway widening
Crews will temporarily close a road near a Lake Norman-area retail center anchored by Belk, Kohl's and Big Lots for the $249 million N.C. 150 widening project, state highway officials said Friday. Portestowne Way in Mooresville will be closed 8 a.m.-4 p.m. Monday, June 9, through Thursday, June 12, so crews can safely install a storm drain at the N.C. 150 intersection, according to the N.C. Department of Transportation. That's just east of Interstate 77 exit 36. Drivers will be detoured from Portestowne Way to Forester Street and Corporate Center Drive, and back onto N.C. 150. Crews plan to widen 15 miles of N.C. 150 from just west of the U.S. 21/N.C. 150 interchange in Mooresville to N.C. 16 Bypass in Catawba County. A 5.5-mile stretch from Greenwood Road in Terrell on the lake to U.S. 21 in Mooresville is under construction. Charlotte-based contractor Blythe Development LLC is expanding the highway from four to six lanes, officials said. Part of the stretch includes the old two-lane bridge over the lake. An additional bridge will carry westbound traffic, from Mooresville into Catawba County. Improvements to the bottlenecked I-77/N.C. 150 exit 36 interchange are planned.