Mirabel, Que., Mayor Patrick Charbonneau dies suddenly at age 46
Article content
The city said today that it appears Charbonneau died of natural causes.
Article content
Article content
Charbonneau had announced in late April that he intended to run in November for a second term in Mirabel, a suburb north of Montreal.
Article content
The city described Charbonneau as a well-respected leader whose dedication and passion marked the city.
Article content
Article content
Officials in the nearby cities of of Boisbriand and Mascouche also put out statements of condolences to Charbonneau's family and loved ones.
Article content
Article content
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
17 minutes ago
- CTV News
Expert says Canadians ready for increase in military funding
University of Calgary political science associate professor Jean-Christophe Boucher speaks with Alberta Primetime host Michael Higgins about Canada's commitment to increased defence spending. This interview has been edited for clarity and length. Michael Higgins: This is being described as the biggest increase for Canada since the Second World War. How would you describe this as a turning point for the Canadian Armed Forces? Jean-Christophe Boucher: It's long overdue. For several years now, experts and even allies have suggested that Canada's defence spending was too low for the kind of commitments we wanted to make in the world. The Trudeau government increased those budgets a little bit, but now this is a major inflection point where we're moving into an environment where there's going to be a lot of dollars put on defense spending, a lot new platforms, a lot of transformation in the forces and how we think about defense policy in Canada. I think this is a significant increase. MH: Obviously the military is at the centre of this, but how far do you see this extra funding extending? Where could all of these dollars end up going? JCB: The Government of Canada said they're going to spend 3.5 per cent on defence spending and 1.5 per cent on capital spending associated with national security. There hasn't been a lot of detail on what that 3.5 per cent has been for. A suggestion, for example, was that we would fold the Coast Guard into that funding — the Americans do this. So, there's some moving budget lines between Excel spreadsheet columns. I don't think some of it will not be new money, but there's indications that we're going to start to increase funding for platforms or for different kinds of things, maybe new submarines. There are also conversations in Ottawa about cloud sovereignty, AI sovereignty, and that would be part of the funding. So there's a lot of new things that we want to do in the defence environment that will be part of that funding. MH: But it could extend beyond defense, though, could it not? JCB: Absolutely. So maybe we won't really see this, but right now in Ottawa, everything that touches foreign policy is on the draft block. The Carney government right now wants to push a new foreign policy document, which hasn't been done since the (Paul) Martin years, so that's 20 years ago. There's also a new national security document that's coming in. So although the 3.5 per cent on defence is really kind of the first big announcement on defence policy, we're going to see investment on national security conceived largely in borders, infrastructures, A.I. All across the board, all departments that touch national security or international security in a certain fashion will see their spending increase. That means public safety and a lot of other actors in that ecosystem. So we're going to see a massive change in foreign policy, in our posture and how we're doing things, but also a lot of new money into those capabilities. My sense is that, in the next couple of years, we'll see a much more competent Canada, but also a more assertive one. MH: How do you see Canadians responding to such an expansive change? JCB: For a long time, the common wisdom was that Canadians didn't like defence spending. What I find interesting is that at the University of Calgary, we have had a seven-year look at public opinion on national defence, and what we've seen consistently for the last five years is that Canadians are ready to spend more on defence. In fact, when we're asking Canadians, 'Would you be willing to increase defence spending a lot more?' People would say yes, even more in Quebec than elsewhere. I think when we're looking into this, it also is tied to how Canadians are perceiving the international system. The last couple of years we've seen actors like Russia, like China, like Iran, a lot more aggressive in international space and challenging Western rule-based order. We're seeing right now the United States is less willing to sustain that environment, and somehow Canada now is stuck in an environment where it has to fend for itself. So Canadians have been responding to this, and we've seen this in the polls. I'm not seeing a lot of opposition to that spending. I think most Canadians are ready for that. MH: Does the rest of the world, friend or foe, respond in kind with military buildup to match NATO? What kind of global defence or threat environment could all of this create? JCB: Everywhere in the world there's increased defence spending, not just in Russia or in China, but also amongst NATO allies. Some of the neighbours of Russia for example, Poland or the Baltic states are spending almost four per cent of their GDP on defence. It makes sense because they're bordering Russia, but even in Germany, and France and Japan. Everywhere in the world, people are increasing their spending. It's important for Canada too, because when we go abroad and when we try to co-operate and collaborate with these actors, the first question is always, 'Canada's here. What can you do?' If we have no money or no capabilities, then our capacity to shape these relationships is limited. People are saying, 'Canada is nice, but they can't commit anything'. Whereas now, because our capabilities will increase and because our allies will also increase their capabilities, it means that we'll have a more assertive Western alliance. It also means that we're going to be able to move away from a U.S.-centric environment into a much more multilateral world. MH: The military obviously has a significant presence in our province, CFB Edmonton, Camp Wainwright — maybe most notably Fort Wayne Cold Lake, Canada's busiest fighter base. What is this NATO commitment going to mean for military installations in Alberta? JCB: A couple of things. There are indications that salaries within the Armed Forces will grow. I think that's good news. There's a lot of indications that those didn't match Canadian wages. There's also a lot of these installations and capabilities that are still lagging behind, or they need to be improved, so I think we're going to see spending all across the board, not just on defence or bases but also in our industry. When we listen to the Carney government, they're talking about A.I. cloud computing, they're talking about all sorts of investment in all areas of our defence industry from satellites to bullets and ammunition. So all across the spectrum, across the defence industry, we're going to see a lot of investment into those environments and some trickle down right into our province.
CBC
31 minutes ago
- CBC
New bike skills park in river valley gets green light from Edmonton city council
Social Sharing The Edmonton Mountain Bike Alliance has received the final approvals needed from city council in order to start building a skills park on the site of a former wastewater treatment plant in Queen Elizabeth Park. The EMBA has called the decision a big win for Edmonton riders. "Next stop: shovels in the ground!" the group said in a social media post Wednesday. The free park, intended to be a place where mountain bikers can learn and practise skills, will include trails, a looped asphalt track and an area for jumps. The $1.2-million project has been funded through donor contributions and grants from the municipal and provincial governments. Eleven council members voted to approve the skills park on Wednesday morning, with Jo-Anne Wright and Karen Principe, who represent Ward Sspomitapi and Ward tastawiyiniwak, respectively, voting against it. Principe said she thinks that the park will be a wonderful addition to the city but she was not convinced the location, southeast of the Walterdale Bridge, was the right place for it and Wright made similar comments during the council meeting. "Other locations really haven't been considered that might be actually even more accessible for people," she said. City council approved a master plan for Queen Elizabeth Park, which included a bike skills park, in 2013. Ward Anirniq Coun. Erin Rutherford said before the vote that council should respect the decision that was made then because pivoting at the last minute would create distrust and uncertainty for community members who have been working on the project. Cyclists and conservationists clash over skills park in Edmonton's river valley 2 days ago Duration 2:09 The Edmonton River Valley Conservation Coalition has argued the park would be destructive and launched a petition asking council to find a more ecologically sound location for it. As of Wednesday, the group's petition had more than 500 supporters. Kristine Kowalchuk told CBC News on Wednesday the coalition is extremely disappointed with the city council decision, calling it "another major blow to the river valley." A recent city report said an environmental impact assessment identified some potential environmental impacts from the project but estimated the cumulative impacts to be low to moderate. A site location study concluded the skills park would not cause significant environmental impacts. Rutherford said directing bikers to a specific area could help protect the river valley by reducing use on unauthorized trails. "There are areas I'd like to see completely blocked off from bikers so that there can be restoration and naturalization in other parts of the river valley, but I think in order to do that, you need to give people a space to go," she said.
CTV News
40 minutes ago
- CTV News
Ousted United Conservative MLAs resuscitating Alberta's once-dominant PC Party
This composite image shows former United Conservative Party MLA Scott Sinclair, left, at the Alberta legislature building in Edmonton on Monday, March 10, 2025, and former UCP infrastructure minister Peter Guthrie, in Edmonton, on Friday, June 9, 2023. The two are resuscitating the province's once-dominant Progressive Conservative Party. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jack Farrell, Jason Franson EDMONTON — Two former members of Alberta's governing United Conservative Party are resuscitating the province's once-dominant Progressive Conservative Party. Former infrastructure minister Peter Guthrie and legislature member Scott Sinclair were booted from caucus earlier this year for pushing back against the Premier Danielle Smith's government and now sit as Independents. Sinclair says the province's two-party system has become too divisive, and they want to galvanize support from Albertans who feel they don't have a political home. Former NDP premier Rachel Notley ended the PC's 44-year dynasty in 2015, prompting conservatives to merge the Wildrose and PCs into the United Conservative Party. Sinclair told the Ryan Jespersen podcast that Smith has morphed what was supposed to be a mainstream, big tent party into a separatist party. Guthrie said on the podcast that Smith has turned her back on accountability while spending too much money on a growing, bloated bureaucracy. The two are aiming to gather the 8,800 signatures needed to register as a political party with Elections Alberta. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 2, 2025. Lisa Johnson, The Canadian Press
