
Expert says Canadians ready for increase in military funding
This interview has been edited for clarity and length.
Michael Higgins: This is being described as the biggest increase for Canada since the Second World War. How would you describe this as a turning point for the Canadian Armed Forces?
Jean-Christophe Boucher: It's long overdue. For several years now, experts and even allies have suggested that Canada's defence spending was too low for the kind of commitments we wanted to make in the world. The Trudeau government increased those budgets a little bit, but now this is a major inflection point where we're moving into an environment where there's going to be a lot of dollars put on defense spending, a lot new platforms, a lot of transformation in the forces and how we think about defense policy in Canada. I think this is a significant increase.
MH: Obviously the military is at the centre of this, but how far do you see this extra funding extending? Where could all of these dollars end up going?
JCB: The Government of Canada said they're going to spend 3.5 per cent on defence spending and 1.5 per cent on capital spending associated with national security. There hasn't been a lot of detail on what that 3.5 per cent has been for.
A suggestion, for example, was that we would fold the Coast Guard into that funding — the Americans do this. So, there's some moving budget lines between Excel spreadsheet columns. I don't think some of it will not be new money, but there's indications that we're going to start to increase funding for platforms or for different kinds of things, maybe new submarines.
There are also conversations in Ottawa about cloud sovereignty, AI sovereignty, and that would be part of the funding. So there's a lot of new things that we want to do in the defence environment that will be part of that funding.
MH: But it could extend beyond defense, though, could it not?
JCB: Absolutely. So maybe we won't really see this, but right now in Ottawa, everything that touches foreign policy is on the draft block. The Carney government right now wants to push a new foreign policy document, which hasn't been done since the (Paul) Martin years, so that's 20 years ago.
There's also a new national security document that's coming in. So although the 3.5 per cent on defence is really kind of the first big announcement on defence policy, we're going to see investment on national security conceived largely in borders, infrastructures, A.I. All across the board, all departments that touch national security or international security in a certain fashion will see their spending increase.
That means public safety and a lot of other actors in that ecosystem. So we're going to see a massive change in foreign policy, in our posture and how we're doing things, but also a lot of new money into those capabilities.
My sense is that, in the next couple of years, we'll see a much more competent Canada, but also a more assertive one.
MH: How do you see Canadians responding to such an expansive change?
JCB: For a long time, the common wisdom was that Canadians didn't like defence spending. What I find interesting is that at the University of Calgary, we have had a seven-year look at public opinion on national defence, and what we've seen consistently for the last five years is that Canadians are ready to spend more on defence.
In fact, when we're asking Canadians, 'Would you be willing to increase defence spending a lot more?' People would say yes, even more in Quebec than elsewhere. I think when we're looking into this, it also is tied to how Canadians are perceiving the international system.
The last couple of years we've seen actors like Russia, like China, like Iran, a lot more aggressive in international space and challenging Western rule-based order. We're seeing right now the United States is less willing to sustain that environment, and somehow Canada now is stuck in an environment where it has to fend for itself.
So Canadians have been responding to this, and we've seen this in the polls. I'm not seeing a lot of opposition to that spending. I think most Canadians are ready for that.
MH: Does the rest of the world, friend or foe, respond in kind with military buildup to match NATO?
What kind of global defence or threat environment could all of this create?
JCB: Everywhere in the world there's increased defence spending, not just in Russia or in China, but also amongst NATO allies. Some of the neighbours of Russia for example, Poland or the Baltic states are spending almost four per cent of their GDP on defence. It makes sense because they're bordering Russia, but even in Germany, and France and Japan. Everywhere in the world, people are increasing their spending.
It's important for Canada too, because when we go abroad and when we try to co-operate and collaborate with these actors, the first question is always, 'Canada's here. What can you do?' If we have no money or no capabilities, then our capacity to shape these relationships is limited.
People are saying, 'Canada is nice, but they can't commit anything'. Whereas now, because our capabilities will increase and because our allies will also increase their capabilities, it means that we'll have a more assertive Western alliance. It also means that we're going to be able to move away from a U.S.-centric environment into a much more multilateral world.
MH: The military obviously has a significant presence in our province, CFB Edmonton, Camp Wainwright — maybe most notably Fort Wayne Cold Lake, Canada's busiest fighter base.
What is this NATO commitment going to mean for military installations in Alberta?
JCB: A couple of things. There are indications that salaries within the Armed Forces will grow. I think that's good news. There's a lot of indications that those didn't match Canadian wages.
There's also a lot of these installations and capabilities that are still lagging behind, or they need to be improved, so I think we're going to see spending all across the board, not just on defence or bases but also in our industry. When we listen to the Carney government, they're talking about A.I. cloud computing, they're talking about all sorts of investment in all areas of our defence industry from satellites to bullets and ammunition.
So all across the spectrum, across the defence industry, we're going to see a lot of investment into those environments and some trickle down right into our province.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Globe and Mail
19 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
‘Honestly, it's gotten a lot worse': Teen girls on the Hockey Canada trial and life after #MeToo
Eight years ago, at the peak of the #MeToo movement, it seemed, for a brief moment, like progress was imminent. Women from around the world were sharing their extensive – and oftentimes painful – experiences of sexual abuse and violence, and lawmakers and corporations alike were pledging to make change. But in the years since, that progress has been stuttered. Harvey Weinstein, the film mogul whose case served as the rallying cry for the #MeToo movement, saw one of his convictions overturned. Donald Trump, who in 2023 was found liable for rape, was re-elected as President of the United States. And here in Canada, the recent Hockey Canada trial has reignited a conversation around what constitutes consent. The Globe and Mail spoke with a group of five teenaged girls, all of them 12th-graders from Kitchener, Ont., to get their thoughts on the current state of things: what it's like to be a young woman growing up in the post-#MeToo era, what sexual harassment looks like today and what they wish they'd been taught about consent. Have you all been following the Hockey Canada trial? [All of them shaking their heads no] Samira Nur, 17: It wasn't on my radar. But it does sound similar to a lot of stories I've heard, whether it's from people I know, or stories from the news. The case centres around consent – whether the young woman at the centre of it felt pressured and coerced into a situation she couldn't handle. How does that land with all of you? Have any of you had experiences where you felt pressured into uncomfortable situations? Samira: I work at a grocery store, so I encounter a lot of creepy men. There are a lot of older guys who are like, 'Oh, how old are you?' 'Let me take you home.' Or comment on my body while I'm picking something up from the floor. I've had a couple guys follow me home. I had another man ask me my ethnicity. When I said I was Somali, he was like, 'Oh, girls your age are married with kids by now. I'm going to ask your mom for your hand in marriage.' Technically speaking, I'm at work, and under the expectation that I still have to treat these people with kindness, despite the fact that I'm being, like, fully disrespected. Anna De Sousa, 18: I've been working since I was 12 at a bakery. There's this one [older male] customer I encounter every year. He comes in every summer, and asks me my age. And he always says, 'Oh, don't worry, I'll wait until you're 18.' Last year, he was like, 'You're 17 now. Next year, I'll be back. We're gonna go out.' I know he's going to show up this summer. Every time I see his face, my body literally starts shaking. As a teenager in the 1990s, I don't remember learning about consent or body safety in high school. What kind of sexual education were you given? Nishtha Tomer, 18: In Grade 9 health class, I think we only had, like, one or two classes about sex ed, and that's about it. It was mostly just sexual health – pregnancy, STDs and a lot about that. I also heard we learned a lot more than the guys did. A mistrial, jury dismissal, excluded evidence: Key moments in the Hockey Canada trial What about consent? Loyd Gebreselassie, 18: I know that they mentioned briefly things about consent – like what are your personal boundaries? And how do we make sure that's expressed? But it wasn't very in-depth. Samira: I think they used the 'tea' scenario. Like, if you don't want tea, you say you don't want tea. [Everybody laughs] It was like a YouTube video. It wasn't really treated very seriously. What do you wish you'd been taught? Samira: I wish we could have learned more about how much of a grey area consent can be. Consent can be removed. It can be coerced. It can be [the result of] abuse. Consent isn't as simple as yes or no. Not in terms of sexual situations, but I think a lot of us have said yes [to things] because of pressure, and not because we felt freedom or liberation to choose. I think that can apply in a lot of young women's sexual encounters – like because they're scared of losing someone. Anna: That's one thing I wish we explored more at school: Being able to say no in a way where you feel protected, you feel safe, but it's also respectful. So where do you turn to for advice on handling these situations? Shantelle Carrion, 18: I learned more from my mom. But it's kind of scary knowing that my knowledge of consent and relationships – everything comes from my parents. Thankfully, I'm in a very loving family, but that's not the case for everyone. Nishtha: I do have a close relationship with my parents. But it's still a brown household, and an immigrant household [Nishtha's parents are immigrants from India]. So it is a very stigmatized topic. So I mostly learned, like, from my amazing friend group about these things – and online as well. What about the role of alcohol or other substances when it comes to consent? What kinds of conversations are you girls having with your friends and families about that? Shantelle: Underage drinking is so normalized. I've had a personal experience where I went to a party [inebriated] my very first time – my only time. I regret it a lot. Thankfully I had a bunch of my girls with me. I bring this up because this is what happened in the Hockey Canada trial. It gives me chills, imagining the situation I could have gotten into if nobody else was there. It's so scary. We've been talking about it a lot [as friends], because we're going to be freshmen soon – how there's going to be a big party culture at university. As a teenager in the 90s, sexual harassment meant, for the most part, harassment on the street, or at school. What does it look like for you today? Nishtha: Honestly, I think it's gotten worse. With Instagram and Snapchat, it gives guys the ability to be anonymous when they're saying things. It switched from, like, being in the hallways to, like, texting your account, adding you to group chats. They will not say a word to you in real life, but online, it's the meanest things. And what does it look like when you try to have conversations about this stuff with your male peers? Loyd: I think this trend is growing with younger men – this Andrew Tate, red-pill sort of mentality. 'You have to be jacked. Your woman has to be submissive.' All these ideologies they've gathered and almost try to force onto women – and especially teenagers. Samira: It's gotten more hostile with the digital era. A lot of men do take women speaking out about these situations as hatred. I see that a lot. At the height of the #MeToo movement, many of us had hoped that things would be better, and safer for the next generation of young women. Has that been the case? Shantelle: I feel like the #MeToo era was amazing in the sense of spreading awareness, and bringing solidarity between women. More so that than actually really solving anything. Nishtha: It removed a lot of stigmatization, and helped to destigmatize conservations around sexual assault. And it helped remove a lot of shame that women carry. But I feel like legally, or even politically, there hasn't been real recognition or actual change for victims. Women did learn to cope with that together, and did build more of a sense of community. But also, it's something we shouldn't be having to cope with. There should be consequences.


National Post
28 minutes ago
- National Post
Alberta and Ontario environment ministers call for repeal of Trudeau era climate policies in letter
OTTAWA — The environment ministers of two of Canada's biggest provinces are calling on the Liberal government to scrap a host of Trudeau-era environmental and climate policies, saying the policies are holding the country back from meeting its economic potential. Article content Alberta Environment Minister Rebecca Schulz and Ontario Environment Minister Todd McCarthy said in a letter to federal counterpart Julie Dabrusin that the new, Mark Carney-led Liberal government will need to ditch Justin Trudeau's net-zero agenda if it hopes to meet its promise to make Canada an energy superpower. Article content 'We are hopeful that (the Carney government) will move away from policies and legislation that undermine competitiveness, delay project development, and disproportionately harm certain (regions) without any quantifiable benefit to the natural environment,' read the letter. Article content 'Canada is poised to become an economic superpower, but achieving that potential depends on strong, constitutionally grounded provincial authority over resource development and environmental management.' Article content Schulz shared a copy of the letter on social media on Wednesday, just as a two-day meeting between federal, provincial and territorial environment ministers kicked off in Yellowknife. Article content The letter calls for a repeal of the federal Impact Assessment Act, as well as a full repeal of the legislation authorizing the consumer carbon tax. Carney set the tax to zero shortly after becoming prime minister in March. The recently passed Bill C-5 allows projects deemed by Ottawa to be in the national interest to bypass some parts of the federal impact assessment process. Article content Article content Alberta has repeatedly called for this process to be either massively streamlined or eliminated altogether. Article content The letter also calls for Ottawa to cede more power to the provinces in the areas of clean electricity, carbon reduction and ecological protection. Article content 'Provinces have proven to be the best stewards of such decisions, as leaders of electrification, industrial innovation, public transit and other low-carbon initiatives,' write Schulz and McCarthy. Article content The two environment ministers also called for the reversal of the incoming federal emissions cap and clean electricity regulations.


CTV News
36 minutes ago
- CTV News
AGF Management says CEO Kevin McCreadie has died, Judy Goldring named successor
The logo of AGF Management Ltd. is shown. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Handout - AGF Management Ltd. (Mandatory Credit) TORONTO — Investment firm AGF Management Ltd. says Kevin McCreadie, the firm's chief executive officer and chief investment officer, has died. He was 64. AGF executive chairman Blake Goldring says the company was devastated by the loss and that McCreadie's impact on the organization was profound and will be lasting. The company say McCreadie will be remembered for his passion for investment management and his focus on developing and nurturing talent for the future. AGF named Judy Goldring, AGF's president and head of global distribution, as CEO, effective immediately. Judy Goldring joined AGF in 1998 as general counsel and has held several roles with increasing responsibility across the firm. AGF has over $53 billion in total assets under management and fee-earning assets for more than 815,000 investors. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 3, 2025.