Apple iPhone 17 Series Launch: Is Your iPhone Eligible For iOS 26 Update? Check Expected Release Date
The iOS 26 update will give iPhone users a chance to try out new features and the refreshed interface before the official release. Meanwhile, the stable iOS 26 build is expected to roll out in September, alongside the launch of the iPhone 17 series. Those interested in accessing the new features can prepare to download and install the iOS 26 public beta on their eligible iPhones.
Adding further, iOS 26 introduces a new Apple Games app designed to simplify game discovery and management. CarPlay is also getting enhanced with features like pinned conversations, widget support, and a compact view for calls.
iOS 26 Public Beta Release: Is Your iPhone Eligible For Update?
The iOS 26 update will be compatible with iPhone 11 and newer models this year. If you're still using an iPhone Xs or Xr, it's time to consider upgrading within the next 12 months, as these older models will no longer support the latest software.
The iPhones eligible for the iOS 26 public beta include: iPhone 11, 11 Pro, and 11 Pro Max; iPhone 12, 12 Mini, 12 Pro, and 12 Pro Max; iPhone 13, 13 Mini, 13 Pro, and 13 Pro Max; iPhone 14, 14 Plus, 14 Pro, and 14 Pro Max; iPhone 15, 15 Plus, 15 Pro, and 15 Pro Max; and the upcoming iPhone 16, 16 Plus, 16 Pro, and 16 Pro Max.
How To Download iOS 26 Public Beta
Step 1: Open Settings on your iPhone, then go to General > Software Update.
Step 2: Tap on Beta Updates to view available beta versions.
Step 3: Select iOS 26 Public Beta, and your iPhone will begin checking for the update.
Step 4: Tap Download and Install, then follow the on-screen instructions.
Step 5: After the download completes, choose to install the update immediately or later as per your preference.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Elon Musk's AI accused of making explicit videos of Taylor Swift, Sydney Sweeney without being prompted after enabling NSFW ‘Spicy Mode'
Elon Musk's new AI video tool, Grok Imagine, is under fire for churning out explicit fake videos of celebrities like Taylor Swift, even without being prompted for sexual content. According to a BBC report, this new feature is making 'a deliberate choice' to create NSFW clips of the singer and other stars, including Scarlett Johansson, as flagged by an online abuse researcher. The outrage exploded after The Verge tested Grok's 'spicy' mode. 'This is not misogyny by accident, it is by design,' said Clare McGlynn, a law professor working to make pornographic deepfakes illegal. The update has been slammed online, with many warning about the dangerous territory these models could lead users into if left unchecked. Also read: Elon Musk reacts as Indian-origin partner Shivon Zilis turns son's drawing into animated video using Grok: 'That's museum art' Grok Imagine rolled out this week for Apple users and went viral within minutes. According to Musk, the first launch racked up around 34 million images in just 48 hours. Available through the $30 SuperGrok subscription, the tool lets users create still images from text prompts, which can then be turned into videos using four options: 'Custom,' 'Normal,' 'Fun,' and 'Spicy.' While testing the feature, Verge's Jess Weatherbed prompted, 'Taylor Swift celebrating Coachella with the boys,' expecting harmless party shots. Grok delivered an image of the singer in a dress, standing behind a group of guys. But when she tried generating an animated video, the AI made explicit content instead. She stressed she never asked for nudity, only clicked the 'spicy' setting. 'It was shocking how fast I was met with it. I never told it to remove her clothing — all I did was select 'spicy.'' Also read: Jimmy Fallon mocks Donald Trump's tariffs on India; jokes about Putin meeting POTUS: 'Building a ballroom to meet Sydney Sweeney' The real problem with this tool is that in countries like the UK, the law now requires platforms hosting explicit content to carry out proper age verification, and Grok didn't. All it asked for was a date of birth. No proof. No checks. That's a direct violation. Professor Clare McGlynn stressed this wasn't some random glitch. She pointed out Musk's team could have removed the feature entirely, particularly after the January 2024 incident when sexual deepfakes of the Cruel Summer singer went viral online, racking up millions of views before X finally stepped in and temporarily blocked searches for her name. And it's not just Taylor Swift, Deadline and Gizmodo tested Grok with other stars. Scarlett Johansson, Sydney Sweeney, Jenna Ortega, Nicole Kidman, Kristen Bell, Timothée Chalamet, and even Nicolas Cage, all could be shown undressing or posing suggestively in 'spicy' mode. In some cases, attempts were blocked with a 'video moderated' message, but worked for others. Johansson, who has long warned about deepfake abuse and threatened legal action against AI companies before. Kristen Bell has spoken about her experience of being used in fake videos.
Time of India
12 minutes ago
- Time of India
Electronics makers enter standby mode
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills Several electronics makers are reconsidering local expansion and scouting alternative overseas markets as the latest US tariffs negate India's earlier pricing edge over China, although key items – such as smartphones, tablets and laptops – remain exempted from the 50% levies announced so Industries, which makes lithium-ion cells for power banks in India, had inked a definitive agreement in January with US-based Anker to supply cells for power banks to be sold in the US. Munoth had earmarked a fourth of its capacity to supply 500,000-1 million cells a month to the US.'Currently, lithium cells are exempted from tariffs, but if Donald Trump puts tariffs on them, our US business may very well move out to other companies,' Jaswant Munoth, vice chairman, Munoth Industries, told said the US business offered a higher margin, almost double that at home, besides higher quality controls.'Losing the US would be a big loss for our financial projections, even if capacity remains utilised for domestic supply. Future revenue will surely come under question,' he US administration has levied a total of 50% (25%+25%) tariffs on imports from be sure, smartphones, laptops, tablets, servers, certain telecom equipment, integrated circuits, and flat panel display modules are among 17-18 HS codes exempted from the current tariffs. Industry estimates suggest exports of these items could be worth about $50 all other electronics products, including electric inverters, battery chargers, parts of transformers, etc., are among the 14 HS codes facing 50% leading local contract manufacturer Dixon Technologies , which had earlier said it expects a surge in mobile phone exports to the US by FY27 for its customer Motorola, is now in a wait-and-watch mode, a person familiar with the developments told ET.'Currently, there is nothing Dixon can do, honestly, but to wait,' said the person cited above. 'Nobody has an answer to this problem and companies cannot approach the government for help unless the tariff situation is definitively defined.'The person added, however, that once the US government announces its tariffs on mobile phones and other semiconductor-based products — likely by the third week of August — they will go to the government for at the Motherson group, which recently entered Apple's supply chain via a joint-venture with Hong-Kong based BIEL Crystal Manufactory, heaved a sigh of relief after they learnt that the additional $100 billion investment by Apple's partners in the US would not take away Motherson's orders.'Apple's supplier Corning will be making the cover glasses for iPhones and Apple Watches in the US going forward. We do the machining on the glass to fit the dimensions of the product. That part of manufacturing is not affected,' an executive aware of the developments told contract manufacturers, such as Amber Enterprises , said they are holding back on exports for now, and may target other regions in future.'The tariff action that is happening has obviously changed the outlook for the industry. Companies with significant export aspirations would be worried at this point due to the current geopolitical situations and tariffs,' said Jasbir Singh, chairperson, Amber said manufacturing would be needed in India with or without tariff arbitrage due to the massive domestic consumption.'The primary appeal for large multinational companies to come to India is its huge consumption potential, which is expected to continue for the next 15-20 years,' Singh said. 'Exports will be a bonus on top of the domestic market.'But industry associations, which represent the top manufacturer and electronics brands in India, remain concerned.'About 80% of our electronics export to the US is mobile phones-related, primarily fueled by Apple. They may not have to face the tariff impact after setting up manufacturing in the US,' said Ashok Chandak, president, India Electronics and Semiconductor Association (IESA). 'But other electronic products, such as medical electronics, telecom equipment, and industrial products would get significantly impacted by the duty. Optic fiber cables are also expected to attract tariffs.'Chandak said a key strategy among electronics companies involves looking for alternative markets and recalibrating export plans beyond the US. This could include Asia, Europe, and even Russia.'The overall picture is not going to be positive even after the semiconductor tariffs are announced. It will be a troublesome scenario for our sector,' he India Cellular and Electronics Association (ICEA) has projected electronics exports to touch $46-50 billion by the end of the current fiscal, from $12.4 billion in the June quarter.'The export projections do not take into account the impending sector-specific tariffs on semiconductor goods imports into the US. That said, India is unlikely to be specifically impacted with the semiconductor tariffs because imports from every other country will face the same tariffs,' said Pankaj Mohindroo, chairman, ICEA.
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
OpenAI's GPT-5 Met With Mixed Reviews, Confusion in First Day
(Bloomberg) -- For months, OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman has been hyping up the capabilities of GPT-5, setting up the launch as a seminal moment for the company. But in the first 24 hours after its release, the new model was met with mixed reviews. In its announcement Thursday, OpenAI said GPT-5 was better at coding and reasoning through complex problems, and touted it as advanced enough to turn chatbot ChatGPT into a Ph.D.-level expert. Some with early access praised the model, with caveats. 'It's my new favorite model,' developer Simon Willison wrote in a blog post, calling it 'competent' and 'occasionally impressive.' He added: 'It's not a dramatic departure from what we've had before.' On various social media platforms, however, ChatGPT users expressed frustration that GPT-5 continued to make up information and trip over simple math and spelling questions. Noah Giansiracusa, an associate professor of mathematics at Bentley University, said he felt the launch was 'underwhelming.' While there were 'some improvements,' he said, 'they were much more marginal than I would've hoped.' At least some of the reaction may come down to confusion over what's happening under the hood. Unlike OpenAI's prior software, GPT-5 automatically switches between models of varying levels of sophistication depending on the query. This approach can help maximize the company's computing resources, but it also means users may not always be engaging with the most powerful version of OpenAI's technology. Asked to identify how many times the letter 'b' shows up in 'blueberry,' for example, GPT-5 initially said 'three' in one test. When told to 'think harder,' however, GPT-5 appeared to engage its more advanced reasoning model and came up with the correct answer. On Friday, Altman responded to some of the feedback and said there was an issue with the system. 'GPT-5 will seem smarter starting today,' he said. 'Yesterday, the autoswitcher broke and was out of commission for a chunk of the day, and the result was GPT-5 seemed way dumber.' The stakes are high for the rollout. OpenAI is vying to keep ahead of growing AI competition from rivals in the US and China. The company is also fighting to convince businesses and individual users to pay up for its premium services to help offset the enormous amount it's spending on talent, chips and data centers to support AI development. The San Francisco-based company kicked off the generative AI boom nearly three years ago with the release of ChatGPT, which was originally powered by an earlier model called GPT-3.5. Since then, the company has released a series of increasingly sophisticated systems, including multiple options that mimic the process of human reasoning. As AI systems advance, it's become harder to say definitively how various services stack up. As of midday Friday, GPT-5 had risen to the top of various categories on LMArena, a popular leaderboard for AI models based on user rankings. But a different benchmark, ARC-AGI-2, puts GPT-5 behind the latest version of Grok from Elon Musk's xAI. In the absence of more definitive assessments, the model wars sometimes come down to vibes. And with nearly 700 million people now using ChatGPT each week, some are bound to disagree over how the model feels. It also takes longer than a day to gauge the value of a new AI system in someone's personal and professional life. Ethan Mollick, a professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania who frequently experiments with AI models, marveled at GPT-5's ability to do research, come up with clever written responses and make programming simple, even for a novice. 'GPT-5 just does stuff, often extraordinary stuff, sometimes weird stuff, sometimes very AI stuff, on its own,' he wrote in a blog post. 'And that is what makes it so interesting.' On Reddit, however, the reactions were very different. During an 'Ask Me Anything' session Friday on the platform, Altman fielded pushback from users who were frustrated not to have more say and visibility into which model responds to their queries. Altman said OpenAI would take some steps to address these complaints, including making it 'more transparent.' At one point, Altman responded to a Reddit user's question by noting that OpenAI thinks the 'writing quality' in one version of GPT-5 is better than GPT-4.5. Then he asked: 'Do you find it to be worse?' One user after another were quick to respond: yes. More stories like this are available on
