Exclusive: Grammarly secures $1 billion from General Catalyst to build AI productivity platform
May 29 - Grammarly has raised $1 billion in non-dilutive financing from General Catalyst to expand its artificial intelligence (AI) offerings, aiming to grow into a comprehensive productivity platform, the companies told Reuters.
Grammarly, known for its popular writing assistant tool, plans to use the capital to fund sales and marketing costs and strategic acquisitions. It looks to use AI to build more communication-based productivity tools and even hosts third-party tools on its platform by leveraging access to its 40 million daily users.
The investment, one of the biggest out of General Catalyst's Customer Value Fund (CVF), could help late-stage tech companies like Grammarly accelerate growth by using dedicated capital to acquire new customers. By reallocating funds typically tied up in sales and marketing, Grammarly can invest more in product development.
In return, General Catalyst doesn't receive an equity stake in Grammarly, but will get a capped return linked to revenue generated through using this capital. This is structured as a percentage of the revenue generated from the fund being used in customer acquisition.
Founded in 2005, Grammarly has an annual revenue exceeding $700 million and is profitable. In December, Grammarly appointed Shishir Mehrotra, previously CEO of the acquired productivity platform Coda, as its new leader, signaling a push into broader AI-powered workplace tools.
"As Grammarly is going through a huge transformation of going from being a what is mostly known as a single-purpose agent to being an agent platform, it just felt very important for us to be able to bet big in our product development and in M&A as well as in our growth strategies," Mehrotra said in an interview.
He added said the company has an eventual goal to go public, although no imminent plans.
"I'm right now just focused on making sure we're innovating with new products, growing as fast as we can. But when we feel ready, we'll go public," Mehrotra added.
The dedicated growth investment, if it pays off, could also benefit the valuation of Grammarly and General Catalyst's stake in the company, as it has also been an equity investor in Grammarly's series B funding in 2017.
San Francisco-based Grammarly has raised over $550 million in venture capital, according to PitchBook. It was last valued at $13 billion in 2021.
General Catalyst's Customer Value Fund operates by drawing capital from the firm's main investment fund, including a newly raised $8 billion. This approach is part of a strategic evolution for the investment firm, led by CEO Hemant Taneja, as it seeks to grow beyond the traditional venture capital model, including creating innovative funding mechanisms.
Its customer acquisition fund has invested in nearly 50 companies, including Lemonade and Fivetran, as it leads on growth metrics to a more predictable path to returns.
"Companies like Grammarly basically have a machine where they can invest dollars in sales and marketing and generate a very consistent return," said Pranav Singhvi, Managing Director at General Catalyst, "With this wave of AI, giving Grammarly the firepower to actually go and invest could land those customers beyond the 40 million."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
2 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Coffee shop approved for unit at Newport Road, Caldicot
Rookman Properties asked for change of use planning permission from A1 class, which covers retail uses, to a mixed A1/A3 which covers food including takeaways and eating in. Information submitted on behalf of the firm said it is increasingly hard to let shops in Caldicot. The unit is at number seven Wesley Buildings, Newport Road the main shopping precinct and has been advertised since September 2024 with a rent of £19,500 a year. Chepstow and Bristol-based property consultant Julian Bladen, who has had joint responsibilty for marketing the property, said in a letter provided to Monmouthshire County Council's planning department one unit in the town has been available to let for more than five years. Mr Bladen stated in his letter: 'Unfortunately, there is limited interest in the property and this reflects the general situation in Caldicot town centre. There are currently multiple vacant retail premises and a very low level of prospective occupiers for A1 use operators. 'Some properties in the town centre have been vacant for several years, which clearly illustrates the shortage of active requirements from A1 use operators to take space in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. This includes 43 Newport Road Caldicot, which we have advertised since November 2019.' The application stated the council had, in June last year, approved a change of use application from office use to retail. A previous application for A3 use was approved, in 2014, but wasn't implemented. The application stated the hot food will be limited to toasting, warming and reheating meaning no primary cooking requiring a commercial kitchen would be required or an extract, flue and duct. Permission for branding and adverts will be sought at a later stage. The council has approved the application with opening times of 6.30am to 7pm Monday to Saturday and 8am to 6pm on Sundays.
The Courier
4 hours ago
- The Courier
Brechin blinds factory on the market after collapse of famous firm
A buyer is being sought for the factory of collapsed Brechin blinds firms Stevens Scotland. The long-established family firm closed at the end of 2024. Around 50 local staff lost their jobs five days before Christmas. Bosses blamed a downturn in UK sales for the decision. They said the company had struggled against reduced consumer spending on homes due to the cost-of-living crisis. The company's Denburn Way factory is now on the market. Stevens moved into the purpose-built premises around 25 years ago. Commercial property agents Colliers say the 70,379 sq ft building sits on a 2.46 acres site. It includes a steel portal frame warehouse and two-storey office to the front of the main building. There is a reception and meeting rooms at ground level, with the main open plan office area on the first floor. A mezzanine level runs through the warehouse. A staff canteen is part of an extension added in 2006. The factory also includes car parking opposite and expansion land to the east of the unit. It is close to the original site of the now converted Denburn linen works, and beside Brechin's Lidl supermarket. Stevens was set up in 1968 and grew to become one of the biggest names in the UK window blinds market. In 2015, it was bought by Dutch-based industry giant Hunter Douglas. Company accounts showed the Angus operation remained profitable at the end of 2023. Turnover for the 2023 financial year was £8.1m, a reduction from £9.2m in 2022. Pre-tax profits increased to £1.2m from £1.1m in 2022. Around 80 staff were employed during that period. The accounts also revealed a dividend payment of more than £8 million was agreed before the closure decision. Brechin faces another economy and jobs blow with confirmation of a closure date for the Matrix International engineering factory. Operations there are set to cease before the end of 2025. It follows the decision of US owners to shut the 86-year-old firm after the factory was badly affected by Storm Babet in 2023.
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Why the failed Rangers fraud case has cost the taxpayer over £60m
Criticism over the 'state of inertia' has come nine years after judges in England said part of the investigation was an "abuse of state power". There are concerns that no actions have been taken to formally investigate criminal complaints arising from the conduct of the police investigation the first of which were understood to have been lodged nine years ago. And preparations for a promised judge-led public inquiry into the affair are considered by some to be in a state of inertia despite pledges to establish one - over four years ago. What was the Rangers fraud case about? The case revolved around the 2012 financial collapse and subsequent sale of Rangers Football Club, one of Scotland's largest and most historic football teams. ____________________________ READ MORE Cover up' over nine-year failure to probe Rangers fraud arrests & state power abuse ___________________________ It came in the wake of the purchase of the club by businessman Craig Whyte from from Sir David Murray for £1 in May 2011 and against a backdrop of the controversial nature of his nine-months in charge. Craig Whyte It became controversial because Mr Whyte supported the funding of the purchase through selling the rights to future season ticket sales to the London-based agency Ticketus to raise £24m and pay off bank debt as part of his share purchase agreement. It was alleged that Mr Whyte misrepresented the source of the funds and failed to pay taxes leading to the club falling into administration in 2012. Within four months, the company's business and assets were sold to the Sevco consortium fronted by former Rangers chief executive Charles Green for £5.5 million. Scotland's Crown Office subsequently initiated a series of fraud and financial crime investigations, accusing seven former club executives and financial advisors of criminal misconduct during the sale and administration processes. However, these prosecutions turned out to be fundamentally flawed. Multiple individuals were arrested and charged, but the charges were either dropped, dismissed by the courts, while prosecutions against four of the seven were found to be malicious. All four successfully won claims for compensation for damages. So there was a cost to the taxpayer? Yes. Latest government calculations seen by the Herald shows it amounts to over £60m. Administrative spending, including staffing and legal costs paid out to contest concluded civil cases arising from the failed fraud case amounted to £9.429m up to Oct last year The compensation costs paid out in the civil cases has amounted to a further £51.7m. Imran Ahmad (left) with former Rangers chief executive Charles Green But it is understood that a settlement payment of £528,615 to Imran Ahmad, the former Rangers commercial director who it was admitted was maliciously prosecuted is not included in this calculation, along with any costs being claimed by him. Who was wrongly prosecuted? David Whitehouse and Paul Clark, joint administrators of Rangers working for Duff and Phelps was arrested and charged in 2014, and the charges were dropped in 2016. They were later awarded damages and costs for malicious prosecution at more than £21m. David Whitehouse (left) and Paul Clark Charles Green, former chief executive of Rangers was arrested and charged in 2015 and had charges dropped in 2018 and was awarded £6.3m damages for malicious prosecution. Also gaining more limited damages of over £600,000 was Imran Ahmad, the former Rangers commercial director who it was also accepted was maliciously prosecuted. Kroll, which was formerly called Duff & Phelps, which began court action against the Crown Office for reputational damage came to a settlement with the prosecution service and thought to have received a £15.5m payout. Craig Whyte, the former Rangers owned was acquitted of all charges in 2017 after a high-profile trial but as of now has not received any damages. It is understood a claim for £500,000 against the Lord Advocate was dropped. Gary Withey, a solicitor at the London law firm Collyer Bristow, played a significant role in Craig Whyte's purchase of the club. But he passed away in 2019, at the age of 55. Former Duff and Phelps consultant David Grier who was arrested in connection with the sale and administration of Rangers and had charges dropped, pursued a £9m damages claim but the Court of Session decided there he had failed to prove he was victim of malicious prosecution but accepted that it "lacked reasonable and probable cause". He took the case to the highest court in the UK, the Supreme Court but permission to appeal was refused. Why were the prosecutions considered malicious? Scotland's senior law officer, the Lord Advocate admitted that they acted without probable cause and with malice when pursuing four of the men. It meant the legal actions should never have been brought forward. Courts found that there were no reasonable grounds for arrest or prosecution. There were failures in disclosure and misuse of court procedures. Evidence was not properly presented or was missing altogether. In 2016, High Court judges in London ruled police and prosecutors "abused state power" in a raid during an investigation by seizing privileged documents. James Wolffe Scotland's then Lord Advocate, James Wolffe, eventually issued formal apologies to some of the wrongly accused and he stepped down from his post three months after agreeing with the Scottish Government, in February, 2021 that there would be a public inquiry. Why does this case matter so much? It is one of the most expensive legal failures and some would say scandals in recent history in Scotland, not just in terms of cost, but also public confidence in the legal system. Key concerns have included abuse of state powers, a lack of transparency of prosecution processes, the use of public money and the role of legal accountability in high-profile cases. What consequences have there been for those responsible? There has been significant political and public pressure on the Crown Office and Lord Advocate's Office over their handling of the case but so far no-one has been brought to task over the failings in the prosecutions. Public apologies have been issued to those wrongly and maliciously prosecuted. The home of Rangers - Ibrox (Image: Archives) Mr Wolffe during key parts of the scandal, faced questioning by MSPs but stood by the professionalism of the Crown Office overall. There have been calls for systemic reform of how Scotland handles complex fraud cases. What next? The Scottish Government and the Crown Office are now under pressure to act on long-standing criminal complaints and the promise of a four-year-old promise of a judge-led public inquiry.
