General Motors reports a 35% profit drop as tariffs weigh on car industry
GM's results released on Tuesday still topped analyst estimates, but the US carmaker cautioned that profits in the second half of 2025 would be lower than in the first. list of 4 items list 1 of 4 list 2 of 4 list 3 of 4 list 4 of 4 end of list
The company pointed to sales growth in North America, where new and revamped trucks and sport utility vehicles sold briskly with solid pricing. GM was among the carmakers that benefitted from a surge in demand this spring from consumers who wanted to beat the US tariffs and their higher prices.
Profits overall fell 35.4 percent to $1.9bn year-on-year while revenues dipped 1.8 percent to $47.1bn.
The US imposed 25 percent tariffs on imported finished cars in early April, a move that affected major GM manufacturing operations in Mexico, Canada and South Korea. Car companies have also faced tariffs on imported steel, aluminium and auto parts.
The tariff hit in the second quarter reflected that there were 'minimal mitigation offsets', GM said in a slide presentation.
The Detroit, Michigan-based company's outlook for a weaker second half of 2025 reflects 'seasonally lower' volumes, increased spending on vehicle launches and the presence of two quarters with a tariff hit compared with just one in the first half of the year.
GM expected annual operating income of $10bn to $12.5bn after notching $6.5bn in the first half of the year.
Chief Financial Officer Paul Jacobson described the hit to profitability in the first quarter as 'the peak of the tariff impact for us', telling CNBC in an interview that mitigation efforts should enable a partial recovery in profit margins later in the year. Shifting manufacturing
GM expected to mitigate 'at least' 30 percent of the tariff hit through 'manufacturing adjustments, targeted cost initiatives and consistent pricing', according to a slide.
Jacobson said it would take 18 to 24 months to implement capital projects to adjust GM's manufacturing footprint.
In June, GM announced spending of $4bn over two years to expand production at plants in Michigan, Kansas and Tennessee, making use of unused capacity in its home market as President Donald Trump's tariffs penalise imports of finished vehicles.
The June announcement included steps to produce the Chevrolet Equinox and Chevrolet Blazer in the US. The two vehicles are currently assembled in Mexico.
GM has so far not shifted manufacturing from South Korea, home to production for the Chevrolet Trax, a popular compact SUV that is priced affordably.
Jacobson told CNBC the Trax has stayed profitable even with the hit from the tariff on imported autos.
'We haven't made any long-term decisions about Korea yet, mainly because there is a lot of uncertainty about that,' Jacobson said.
Trump has set an August 1 deadline to reach broad trade deals with numerous countries, including South Korea, which faces a 25 percent tariff if there is no deal.
'We're optimistic that the US and Korea can find common ground,' Jacobson said. 'We know the auto industry is important to both sides in those conversations.'
GM's stock tumbled on the lacklustre earnings report. It is down 6.6 percent for the day as of 11:30am in New York (15:30 GMT).
GM's newly reported hit comes a day after carmaker Stellantis announced it expected a $2.7bn loss in the first six months of the year because of Trump's imposed tariffs. Stellantis, the owner of brands including Fiat and Jeep, will disclose its final results for the first half of the year on July 29.
Stellantis stock is down 0.3 percent since the market opened on Tuesday and had increased more than 2.4 percent over the past five days.
Source: News Agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
13 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump says four candidates in running for Fed chair, rules out Bessent
United States President Donald Trump has ruled out Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent as his pick to replace Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. Trump, who has repeatedly criticised Powell for not moving faster to lower interest rates, said on Tuesday that Bessent wished to continue in his current role. 'I love Scott, but he wants to stay where he is,' Trump said in an interview with CNBC, adding that Bessent was doing a 'great job' and had told him as recently as Monday that he did not want the position. Trump said he had four candidates in mind to replace Powell, whose term expires in May, including Kevin Warsh, who formerly served on the Fed's seven-member board of governors, and Kevin Hassett, the director of the White House National Economic Council. He said he could use the opportunity to replace Adriana D Kugler, who last week announced her early resignation as one of the seven governors, to put his pick for chair on the board in advance of Powell's departure. 'I'm going to make the decision soon,' Trump said. Trump's repeated attacks on Powell, whom he has mockingly dubbed 'too late', have stoked concern about the US central bank maintaining its independence, which investors view as crucial to the health of the US economy. Following reports last month that Trump had asked Republican lawmakers whether he should fire the Fed chair, the benchmark S&P 500 tumbled 0.7 percent. US stocks swiftly recovered after Trump denied that he had any intention to remove Powell early. Under legislation and US Supreme Court precedent, the president may only remove the Fed chair 'for cause', widely interpreted to mean proof of corruption or malfeasance.
Al Jazeera
9 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
US lawmakers criticise possible AI use in personalised flight ticket prices
United States Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy says there are concerns about the use of artificial intelligence to set personalised airline prices, echoing red flags brought up by three Democratic senators. Duffy on Tuesday promised to investigate any airline that uses the technology to set prices. 'To try to individualise pricing on seats based on how much you make or don't make or who you are, I can guarantee you that we will investigate if anyone does that,' Duffy said. 'We would engage very strongly if any company tries to use AI to individually price their seating.' Duffy noted Delta clarified that it would not use AI for pricing individual tickets, 'and I'll take them at face value.' Last week, Delta Air Lines told lawmakers it will not and has not used AI to set prices for individual consumers. Late last month, Democratic Senators Ruben Gallego, Mark Warner and Richard Blumenthal said they believed the Atlanta-based airline would use AI to set individual prices, which would 'likely mean fare price increases up to each individual consumer's personal 'pain point''. Delta previously said it plans to deploy AI-based revenue management technology across 20 percent of its domestic network by the end of 2025 in partnership with Fetcherr, an AI pricing company. Fetcherr on its website said its technology is 'trusted by the world's leading airlines' and lists Delta, WestJet, Virgin Atlantic, Viva and Azul. American Airlines CEO Robert Isom said last month that using AI to set ticket prices could hurt consumer trust. Democratic lawmakers Greg Casar and Rashida Tlaib have introduced legislation to bar companies from using AI to set prices or wages based on Americans' personal data and would specifically ban airlines from raising individual prices after seeing a search for a family obituary. Delta said airlines have used dynamic pricing for more than three decades, in which pricing fluctuates based on a variety of factors like overall customer demand, fuel prices and competition, but not a specific consumer's personal information.
Al Jazeera
11 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump accuses banks of discriminating against his supporters
United States President Donald Trump said he believes that banks discriminate against him and his supporters, adding that Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase had previously refused to accept his deposits. 'They totally discriminate against, I think, me maybe even more, but they discriminate against many conservatives,' he told CNBC in an interview on Tuesday. 'I think the word might be Trump supporters more than conservatives.' Trump made the comments when asked about a report by the Wall Street Journal that said he planned to punish banks that discriminated against conservatives, but did not address the order specifically. The order instructs regulators to review banks for 'politicized or unlawful debanking' practices, according to a draft reviewed by the Reuters news agency. 'Well, they did discriminate,' Trump said of actions taken by JPMorgan Chase after his first term in office. 'I had hundreds of millions, I had many, many accounts loaded up with cash … and they told me, 'I'm sorry sir, we can't have you. You have 20 days to get out.'' Trump said, without providing evidence, that he believed that the banks' refusal to take his deposits indicated that the administration of former US President Joe Biden had encouraged banking regulators to 'destroy Trump'. Trump said he subsequently tried to deposit funds with Bank of America and was also refused, and eventually split the cash among a number of smaller banks. 'The banks discriminated against me very badly,' he said. In a statement, JPMorgan did not address the president's specific claim that it had discriminated against him. 'We don't close accounts for political reasons, and we agree with President Trump that regulatory change is desperately needed,' JPMorgan said. 'We commend the White House for addressing this issue and look forward to working with them to get this right.' Bank of America declined to comment. 'Reputational risk' During Biden's administration, regulators could have asked the banks why they were providing banking services to Trump because of the 'reputational risk' issue, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters news agency. Another source said that banks were under intense scrutiny and pressure with regards to what qualified as a reputational risk for banks and they needed to be careful due to Trump's legal entanglements. The source also added that at present JPMorgan continues to have a banking relationship with members of the Trump family that dates back to years ago and that they also bank a number of campaign accounts related to Trump. After Trump took power, the Federal Reserve announced in June it was directing its supervisors to no longer consider 'reputational risk' when examining banks, scrapping a metric that had been a focus of industry complaints. The Wall Street Journal reported late on Monday that the expected executive order would instruct regulators to investigate whether any financial institutions breach the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, antitrust laws or consumer financial protection laws by dropping customers for political reasons. It said the order could be signed as early as this week, authorising monetary penalties, consent decrees or other disciplinary measures against violators. The White House had no immediate comment on the reported order. Trump in January said the CEOs of JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America denied services to conservatives. At the time, the two banks denied making banking decisions based on politics. 'This seems to be rhetoric that will likely be forgotten by lunchtime,' said David Wagner, head of equities at Aptus Capital Advisors. 'I don't see any material impact on banks, as there are many other drivers that will ultimately presage performance for banks, such as deregulation.' Both banks' stocks are taking a hit on Wall Street. As of 11am in New York (15:00 GMT), JP MorganChase is down 1.6 percent and Bank of America is down 1.4 percent. While Wells Fargo was not named in particular, the competing financial institution's stock is down 1.3 percent as well. Markets respond Banks have consistently argued that any complaints about 'debanking' should be aimed at regulators, as they argue that onerous rules and bank supervisors policing firms can discourage them from engaging in certain activities. 'The heart of the problem is regulatory overreach and supervisory discretion,' the Bank Policy Institute, an industry group, said in a statement. 'The banking agencies have already taken steps to address issues like reputational risk, and we're hopeful that any forthcoming executive order will reinforce this progress by directing regulators to confront the flawed regulatory framework that gave rise to these concerns in the first place.' In January, Trump claimed that Bank of America was debanking conservatives in a Q&A session at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland with Bank of America CEO, Brian Moynihan. 'I hope you start opening your bank to conservatives, because many conservatives complain that the banks are not allowing them to do business within the bank, and that included a place called Bank of America,' Trump said at the time. Separately, in March, the Trump Organization, a holding company for the Trump family's business ventures, sued Capital One Financial for closing accounts for what the Trump Organization alleged were political reasons.
