Wisconsin, Milwaukee's biggest landlord Berrada settle suit. How tenants can find answers.
The frequently asked questions page created by the state Department of Justice and the Department of Agriculture Trade and Consumer Protection can be found at https://datcp.wi.gov/Pages/Programs_Services/BerradaSettlementFAQ.aspx . The page includes answers to questions including how to get rent assistance and how the eviction diversion program works.
The state settled its 2021 lawsuit against Berrada and his companies in Decemeber when Berrada agreed to pay $1.7 million and and take several other actions including creating $1.3 million account to pay rent assistance.
The suit charged that Berrada and his companies routinely trampled on the rights of tenants through a variety of actions, including confiscating renters' property and illegally forcing some out of their rental units.
"The resolution of this case establishes programs that will provide support to many Berrada Properties tenants," Attorney General Josh Kaul said in a statement.
Berrada is Milwaukee's largest landlord. The state has said Berrada controls more than 200 limited liability companies, which combined own more than 9,000 rental units in Milwaukee and Racine.
The resolution includes agreements calling for the Berrada companies to:
Create a $1.3 million account to pay rent assistance to qualified tenants.
Vacate and seal eviction judgments against tenants who were illegally charged late rent fees or attorney fees.
Repay tenants who did not get full credit for their security deposit, had property confiscated, were subjected to evictions without a court order, or who paid late rent or attorney fees that should not have been charged.
The resolution came after a three year court battle between the state and Berrada. The state suit was filed after the Journal Sentinel posted numerous stories about Berrada's treatment of tenants and his companies' aggressive filing of eviction suits.
For example, in February 2022 Berrada companies filed at least 270 eviction action in less than one day.
The settlement also requires Berrada to vacate and seal eviction judgements resulting from late rent fees or attorney fees that DOJ charged were illegally imposed on tenants.
"Illegal business practices that harm consumers are not tolerated in Wisconsin," Randy Romanski, secretary of the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Tenants of Milwaukee's largest landlord Berrada can find help at site
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
5 hours ago
- Newsweek
Woman Not Prepared for Ex's Demands Over Wedding: 'Pay My Portion'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A woman is in disbelief that her ex-boyfriend expects her pay another $125 on top of her "good-faith" $400 reimbursement towards a wedding they are no longer attending as a couple. The 30-year-old woman opened up on Reddit as user ptothedubs this week to appeal for opinions about the situation involving her 31-year-old ex-boyfriend, Joe, and his monetary demand. 'Likes to spend money' The original poster (OP) said she first met Joe in May of this year and the two began dating shortly after. Early on in their relationship, Joe was invited to a wedding for his friend Meg and asked the OP to be his plus-one. "I have never met Meg, but I agreed to go. We RSVP'd and Joe booked plane tickets and a hotel room," she wrote. However, a few days ago, the OP said she ended her relationship with Joe, noting that personal finance was one aspect of their relationship that caused many arguments. The OP described herself as being "very frugal," while Joe, "likes to spend money on creature comforts and trips." Stock image: Woman reading a wedding invitation. Stock image: Woman reading a wedding invitation. Rawpixel/Getty Images The wedding is about five weeks away. User ptothedubs partly ended their relationship when she did because she didn't want to be in photos at the ceremony. The OP said she returned all of Joe's things and offered to pay him back for her plane ticket and her share of the hotel for the wedding, which came to a little over $400. 'I shouldn't have to pay' "Today, Joe contacted me and asked if I could pay another $125 on top of all of that to offset Meg's costs for my plate and everything at the reception," the woman told Redditors. "He says it's so close to the wedding and since deposits have gone to vendors, I should pay my portion. "I think that more than a month's notice is ample time for Meg to either fill the seat, or for Joe to find another plus-one, who would also be benefitting from my paying half of the hotel stay. "I also think that since I wouldn't pay that money if I was attending, then I shouldn't have to pay now that I'm not." Users React The Reddit post has provoked about 500 comments within a day online, with most contributors in support of the OP and critical of her ex. "You should pay for the cost of your flight and nothing more," a typical pundit agreed. "This fellow will still need the hotel room and the bride and groom absolutely can remove you from the count. You dated this man for all of 12 minutes." Another person chipped in to declare that, "The bride and groom can also either reallocate the seat to someone else, or the ex can get a new date. Either way, they aren't owed hotel or the cost of dinner." A newlywed pointed out that their vendors required a final tally two or three weeks in advance, not more than a month before the big day. "If Joe is truly worried about offsetting Meg's costs, he'll let her know that you're not coming and she'll just adjust her spreadsheets, no big deal," the newlywed continued. Wedding Conflicts On the sometimes contentious matter of wedding costs, Newsweek reported about a bride who was criticized for asking her guests to help pay for her nuptials. In that case, the bride mentioned to her friends that she would be sending out her Venmo details so that they could, "'pitch in' for the wedding." Newsweek reported about an incident where a woman refused to attend her friend's wedding, after they asked the woman not to bring her current partner as her plus-one since her ex-girlfriend would be there. Pocket the Money? In a message to Newsweek via Reddit, ptothedubs said she wanted to clarify that she disagreed with many responses who believed that Joe was going to pocket the money she paid back to him. "We are on good terms after the breakup," the woman noted. "I did give him the money for the plane ticket and my half of the hotel, but we agreed that he would pay me back if he could get the ticket refunded/credited. "I know people were upset that I was paying for the hotel, but I don't mind because it meant he could buy a nicer gift, and because he had purchased some stuff for my apartment that he was OK with me keeping. "So, in a way, it's like I was paying him back for that." To read how Newsweek uses AI as a newsroom tool, click here.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bruce Berkowitz's Strategic Moves: Bank OZK Takes Center Stage with 1.09% Portfolio Impact
Exploring the Investment Philosophy of Bruce Berkowitz (Trades, Portfolio) Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with JOE. Bruce Berkowitz (Trades, Portfolio) recently submitted the N-PORT filing for the second quarter of 2025, providing insights into his investment moves during this period. Bruce Berkowitz (Trades, Portfolio) is the founder and the Managing Member of the Fairholme Fund (Trades, Portfolio). Prior to forming Fairholme Capital Management, Mr. Berkowitz was a Managing Director of Smith Barney, Inc. from December of 1993 to October of 1997. Bruce Berkowitz (Trades, Portfolio) concentrates his investments in a relatively small number of companies. He thinks that the more diversified the portfolio, the more likely the performance will be average. He likes companies with great managers, and deeply undervalued stocks. Benjamin Graham's "The Intelligent Investor" serves as the inspiration for Berkowitz' investment strategy. He focuses investments on companies that have exceptional management, that generate free cash, and that are cheaply priced. Berkowitz will also invest in mediocre companies that are trading at a significant discount to intrinsic value where there exists a catalyst event that makes it likely the gap between market price and intrinsic value will narrow in a reasonable amount of time. Key Position Increases Bruce Berkowitz (Trades, Portfolio) also increased stakes in a total of 2 stocks, among them: The most notable increase was Bank OZK (NASDAQ:OZK), with an additional 285,150 shares, bringing the total to 916,752 shares. This adjustment represents a significant 45.15% increase in share count, a 1.09% impact on the current portfolio, and a total value of $43,142,360. The second largest increase was Occidental Petroleum Corp (NYSE:OXY), with an additional 14,800 shares, bringing the total to 69,100. This adjustment represents a significant 27.26% increase in share count, with a total value of $2,902,890. Key Position Reductions Bruce Berkowitz (Trades, Portfolio) also reduced positions in 2 stocks. The most significant changes include: Reduced Berkshire Hathaway Inc (NYSE:BRK.B) by 120 shares, resulting in a -0.25% decrease in shares and a -0.01% impact on the portfolio. The stock traded at an average price of $508.26 during the quarter and has returned -4.80% over the past 3 months and 5.72% year-to-date. Reduced The St. Joe Co (NYSE:JOE) by 2,700 shares, resulting in a -0.01% reduction in shares and a -0.01% impact on the portfolio. The stock traded at an average price of $44.75 during the quarter and has returned 12.38% over the past 3 months and 13.55% year-to-date. Portfolio Overview At the second quarter of 2025, Bruce Berkowitz (Trades, Portfolio)'s portfolio included 12 stocks. The top holdings included 78.54% in The St. Joe Co (NYSE:JOE), 13.77% in Enterprise Products Partners LP (NYSE:EPD), 3.52% in Bank OZK (NASDAQ:OZK), 1.92% in Berkshire Hathaway Inc (NYSE:BRK.B), and 1.57% in WR Berkley Corp (NYSE:WRB). The holdings are mainly concentrated in 4 of all the 11 industries: Real Estate, Energy, Financial Services, and Technology. This article, generated by GuruFocus, is designed to provide general insights and is not tailored financial advice. Our commentary is rooted in historical data and analyst projections, utilizing an impartial methodology, and is not intended to serve as specific investment guidance. It does not formulate a recommendation to purchase or divest any stock and does not consider individual investment objectives or financial circumstances. Our objective is to deliver long-term, fundamental data-driven analysis. Be aware that our analysis might not incorporate the most recent, price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative information. GuruFocus holds no position in the stocks mentioned herein. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
USA Today
21 hours ago
- USA Today
UnitedHealth stock is having its worst year since 2008. Can it recover?
The healthcare giant's value has been in free fall this year as bad news continues to pile up. For years UnitedHealth Group (NYSE: UNH) has normally been a reliable dividend stock. But an abysmal start to 2025 has wiped out many of the gains that investors have achieved in recent years, with its five-year return now in negative territory. Year to date, the stock has fallen by nearly 45%, which is by no means normal for the healthcare stock. In fact, this is the worst it has performed since the Great Recession, when it tumbled by more than 54% in 2008. The big questions many investors are likely asking today are: Can it recover? Or is there more of a downfall to come for this once seemingly unstoppable stock? Big declines aren't the norm for UnitedHealth The past few years haven't been all that great for UnitedHealth, but by and large, this has been a fairly strong stock to own. It has typically outperformed the market. And outside of 2024 — when it was down 4% — the last time it finished a year in the red was (as noted) back in 2008, when the U.S. economy was in the midst of the Great Recession and the stock lost more than half of its value. Not only has UnitedHealth normally been a safe stock, it's also been a tremendous growth stock. Consider that if you invested $10,000 into its shares at the end of 2003, then 20 years later your investment would have been worth $181,000. But if you hung on until now, that investment would have fallen to a value of $101,000. While that's still a good return, it spotlights just how significant the decline has been this year, for a stock that's typically known for being a solid long-term investment. Still, the past doesn't predict the future. Why the company might face a tough road ahead The problem with UnitedHealth right now is that it's facing many challenges. Medical costs are up, and there's a lot of uncertainty in healthcare as the federal government looks to cut costs. Meanwhile, the Department of Justice is reportedly looking into UnitedHealth's billing practices. The danger is that the company may face financial repercussions and other headwinds, such as having to change its practices — or at the very least, incurring higher-than-typical costs due to greater utilization rates. The latter, however, may be a shorter-term trend. Either way, this is a business known for consistently growing its operations, and that may not be a sure thing anymore. While UnitedHealth generated a healthy profit of more than $14.4 billion on revenue of $400.3 billion in 2024, investor concerns about long-term growth appear to be weighing on the stock. In May, the company suspended its outlook for the year; it also announced a change in CEO, with Andrew Witty stepping down for personal reasons and former CEO Stephen Hemsley taking over. Should you buy UnitedHealth stock today? While UnitedHealth stock has done well in previous years, that doesn't mean that it's a surefire bet to rebound soon. The good news is that it still has solid fundamentals. Since it's a key health insurer in the U.S., I'd be hesitant to count it out in the long run. There's some near-term risk and even some long-term uncertainty about how all the changes in the healthcare industry might pan out. But the stock is trading at levels it hasn't been at since 2020, and its valuation is just 12 times its trailing earnings. I think that gives it a good enough margin of safety at its current price, and that buying it today might prove to be a solid move. As long as you're willing to be patient, this can be a good stock to buy and hold. David Jagielski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends UnitedHealth Group. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY. Should you invest $1,000 in UnitedHealth Group right now? Offer from the Motley Fool: Before you buy stock in UnitedHealth Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and UnitedHealth Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks »
