Israeli strikes in Gaza kill 93 Palestinians, including several families, health officials say
One strike in the northern Shati refugee camp killed a 68-year-old Hamas member of the Palestinian legislature, as well as a man and a woman and their six children who were sheltering in the same building, according to officials from Shifa Hospital, where the casualties were taken.
One of the deadliest strikes hit a house in Gaza City's Tel al-Hawa district on Monday evening and killed 19 members of the family living inside, according to Shifa Hospital. The dead included eight women and six children. A strike on a tent housing displaced people in the same district killed a man and a woman and their two children.
There was no immediate comment from the Israeli military on the strikes.
Gaza's Health Ministry said in a daily report Tuesday afternoon that the bodies of 93 people killed by Israeli strikes had been brought to hospitals in Gaza over the past 24 hours, along with 278 wounded. It did not specify the total number of women and children among the dead.
The Hamas politician killed in a strike early Tuesday, Mohammed Faraj al-Ghoul, was a member of the bloc of representatives from the group that won seats in the Palestinian Legislative Council in the last election held among Palestinians, in 2006.
Hamas won a majority in the vote, but relations with the main Fatah faction that had long led the Palestinian Authority unraveled and ended with Hamas taking over the Gaza Strip in 2007. The legislative council has not formally convened since.
The Israeli military says it only targets militants and tries to avoid harming civilians. It blames civilian deaths on Hamas because the militants operate in densely populated areas. But daily, it hits homes and shelters where people are living without warning or explanation of the target.
The latest attacks came after U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu held two days of talks last week that ended with no sign of a breakthrough in negotiations over a ceasefire and hostage release.
Israel has killed more than 58,400 Palestinians and wounded more than 139,000 others in its retaliation campaign since Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attack, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Just over half the dead are women and children, according to the ministry, which does not distinguish between civilians and militants in its tally.
The ministry, part of the Hamas-run government, is led by medical professionals. Its count, based on daily reports from hospitals, is considered by the United Nations and other experts to be the most reliable.
Israel has vowed to destroy Hamas after its attack 20 month ago, in which militants stormed into southern Israel and killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians. They abducted 251 others, and the militants are still holding 50 hostages, less than half of them believed to be alive.
Israel's air and ground campaign has destroyed vast areas of Gaza and driven some 90% of the population from their homes. Aid groups say they have struggled to bring in food and other assistance because of Israeli military restrictions and the breakdown of law and order, and experts have warned of famine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Should Canada have warned the U.S. about recognizing Palestinian statehood?
OTTAWA — When Prime Minister Mark Carney was asked if he consulted with the United States prior to announcing Canada's intention of recognizing a State of Palestine, he did not offer a clear 'no' but his response pointed in that direction. Carney clearly mentioned speaking this week with France President Emmanuel Macron and U.K. Prime Minister Kier Starmer — both of which have announced their intention to recognize a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September. Carney said he also had conversations with the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, and Canada's Ambassador to the UN, Bob Rae. U.S. President Donald Trump was apparently not given the same heads up, and he promptly expressed his displeasure on his social media platform hours later. 'Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine,' he wrote on Truth Social. 'That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them. Oh' Canada!!!' After meeting with his cabinet Wednesday, Carney told reporters that the recognition was conditional on the Palestinian Authority, which governs the West Bank, going forward with significant reforms which include demilitarization and holding a general election in 2026. He added Canada's longstanding hope for a two-state solution negotiated between the Palestinian Authority and Israel was 'no longer tenable' because of the war in Gaza. Carney called the U.S. an 'essential partner' for peace in the Middle East, among many areas of the world, but made it clear Canada would be moving without its neighbour. 'We make our own independent foreign policy positions,' he said, later clarifying 'independent of the United States.' Louise Blais, who was Canada's Deputy Permanent Representative to the United Nations in New York from 2017-2021, said this announcement marks a significant change of position for Canada, which has been more or less aligned with the U.S. on Israel for years. 'At minimum, I think it would have been prudent … to have had a conversation. It's possible it took place. But it certainly doesn't seem that way,' said Blais in an interview. 'It is always a good idea not to take allies by surprise,' she added. A source close to Carney's thinking, speaking on a not-for-attribution basis to speak more freely, said there has been a sharing of views between Canada, France and the U.K., but their subsequent announcements on Palestinian statehood were not a co-ordinated effort. 'This is an example of like-minded countries acting like-minded,' said the source. Carney explained on Wednesday that 'it does matter that others are moving … because it increases the prospect of success.' But he added that the 'rights of people to self-determination' are at the core of this decision for the Canadian government. 'We have long … felt that this should come later in a process and that our recognition … of the State of Palestine, should come a point of maximum impact during a peace process,' he said. 'We're now at a position … where, in our judgment and the judgment of others, the prospect of a Palestinian state is literally receding before our eyes,' he added. Blais said Carney is clearly signalling that Canada is aligning itself with its European partners more closely, but warned he has to weigh that decision 'very carefully.' 'Geography matters, and our neighbour is a superpower,' she said. 'And last time I checked, we still very much depend on them for our national security, and it will be so for a while, and so we have to be fairly balanced and careful about that.' It is also a question of timing. Blais said Trump definitely voiced 'a level of annoyance' that was not preferable as Canadian negotiators were trying to get to a trade deal by Friday. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump 'expressed his displeasure and his disagreement' with the leaders of France, the U.K. and Canada on that decision. 'He feels as though that's rewarding Hamas at a time where Hamas is the true impediment to a ceasefire and to the release of all of the hostages,' she said. But Trump is also dealing with growing displeasure towards Israel within his own ranks. This week, Marjorie Taylor Greene became the first House Republican to publicly refer to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza as 'genocide.' U.S. special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, and U.S. ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, will be travelling to Gaza on Friday to inspect food aid distribution sites in the area and hear first-hand from Gazans about their living conditions, said Leavitt. Following their visit, they are expected to secure a plan to deliver more food. Canada, for its part, partnered with Jordan to arrange airdrops of aid in Gaza on Thursday. 'Much more aid is needed and Canada will continue to do all it can to ensure it is delivered to the Palestinians in Gaza who so desperately need it,' said Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand in a post on X. — With files from Christopher Nardi. National Post calevesque@ John Ivison: Carney's Palestinian recognition emboldens terror, not peace Michael Higgins: Mark Carney abandons Canadian principles for pinky promises on Palestine Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our newsletters here.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
35% tariff on Canada still in the cards, Lutnick says
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Thursday that a 35% tariff on all Canadian goods not covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement is still "surely in the cards," ahead of an Aug. 1 deadline imposed by President Donald Trump. Lutnick said in an interview on Fox Business Network's "Kudlow" that Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney could still convince Trump to back down. "If he makes that call, and if he starts turning on the charm, and if he takes off his retaliation ... and stops the silliness, maybe the president will let it down a bit," Lutnick said. "But right now, 35%, that letter he sent, is surely in the cards." Trump sent a letter to Carney in July saying the U.S. would impose a 35% tariff on Canadian goods as of Aug. 1. The two sides have been working on negotiating a trade deal by that deadline, but Trump said last week they may not be able to reach a negotiated deal, suggesting the unilateral tariff rate could be imposed. Earlier this week, Carney said talks were at an intense phase, while reiterating that a deal that would remove all U.S. tariffs was unlikely. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNN
22 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: What did Trump know about Virginia Giuffre and when? Breaking down what we know
President Donald Trump disclosed this week that part of his falling out with Jeffrey Epstein two decades ago stemmed from how Epstein 'stole' a woman from her employment at Trump's Mar-a-Lago club. That woman, Virginia Giuffre, would later accuse Epstein of sex-trafficking her. Trump was quick to try to insulate himself from the idea that those comments raise questions about his own knowledge of Epstein's misconduct. 'And by the way, she had no complaints about us, as you know – none whatsoever,' Trump told reporters on Air Force One on Tuesday when traveling back from Scotland. But Giuffre's family has complaints and questions now, as does a lawyer who represented other Epstein victims. And their decision to speak out casts a spotlight on the potentially troublesome timeline for Trump raised by his own comments. It's now evident that not only did Epstein hire a minor away from Mar-a-Lago to ostensibly serve as a traveling masseuse – something that had been the subject of court proceedings – but that Trump was aware Epstein had poached her and others and was concerned, for one reason or another. The big question now is whether Trump was truly just upset because Epstein 'stole' a low-level employee or employees, or he suspected something more nefarious about Epstein's actions. Family members of Giuffre, one of Epstein's most well-known accusers who died by suicide earlier this year, signaled for the first time Wednesday that they want answers to these kinds of questions. 'It makes us ask if he was aware of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's criminal actions,' said the statement from Giuffre's two brothers and her sisters-in-law, which was first reported by the Atlantic, 'especially given his statement two years later that his good friend Jeffrey 'likes women on the younger side … no doubt about it.' ' A lawyer who has represented Epstein's accusers, Spencer Kuvin, also told 'CNN News Central' on Thursday that he wants more disclosure of the Epstein files and that Trump's answers appeared evasive. 'Notice that when he is first asked about it, he says, 'I don't know.' And then he realizes, his brain starts working and thinking through it, thinking they're going to be able to figure this out and I don't want to look stupid, so I better tell them,' Kuvin said, adding: 'That happens when someone's trying to hide the truth.' Kuvin added: 'We now know from the words of the president himself that Virginia was right all along and that she was trafficked out of Mar-a- Lago.' To be clear, Trump has not been accused of any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein. In response to the Giuffre family's statement, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told CNN that the president was 'directly responding to a question posed by a reporter about Ms. Guiffre — he did not bring her up.' That's true, but it doesn't make his answer any less revealing. 'I think she worked at the spa,' Trump told reporters. 'I think that was one of the people, yeah. He stole her.' And while the 2002 Trump quote that Giuffre's family cited about Epstein and 'women on the younger side' is the most oft-cited one, it's not the only evidence that Trump might have encountered red flags about him. A Florida-based businessman told the New York Times in a 2019 interview that he raised concerns about Epstein's conduct ahead of a 1992 'calendar girl' event. 'I said, 'Look, Donald, I know Jeff really well, I can't have him going after younger girls,' ' the businessman, George Houraney, said. (The first Trump White House did not comment on that report.) Longtime Trump adviser Roger Stone wrote in his 2016 book about a scene in which Trump talked about how Epstein's 'swimming pool was full of beautiful young girls.' 'How nice, I thought,' Trump said, according to Stone, 'he let the neighborhood kids use his pool.' But aside from the reported Trump conversations about Epstein and young women or girls, there's the timeline of his Giuffre disclosure. There was some dispute during legal proceedings in the Epstein and Maxwell cases about whether Giuffre was 16 or 17 years old when she said Maxwell recruited her from Mar-a-Lago for Epstein. Giuffre said she was 16 and it was a summer job, while Maxwell's lawyers claimed Giuffre was 17 and she was hired in the fall, after her August birthday. But Mar-a-Lago records cited in court documents suggest Giuffre's employment was terminated in 2000, when she would have been a minor. And Giuffre said Maxwell's approach came shortly after she began working at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 – only about two or three weeks. This exchange comes from her 2016 deposition: Q: How did it come to pass that you were no longer working at Mar-a-Lago in two to three weeks? GIUFFRE: I was approached by Ghislaine Maxwell. Q: Okay. And how long had you been working at Mar-a-Lago when you were approached by Ghislaine Maxwell? GIUFFRE: Roughly two to three weeks. Another key question is about the job Giuffre was ostensibly poached for: Did Trump know Epstein recruited her to become a masseuse? In 2019 comments to the Washington Post, former Trump aide Sam Nunberg described asking Trump about his ties to Epstein as Trump was gearing up for his 2016 presidential campaign. Nunberg said Trump had told him he had objected to Epstein recruiting a young woman who worked at Mar-a-Lago to give Epstein massages – a description that sounds similar to Giuffre's situation. 'He's a real creep, I banned him,' Nunberg said Trump told him. Nunberg told CNN in an email Thursday that he didn't know whether Trump was referring to Giuffre, specifically. 'I do not recall any name being mentioned nor would it have been a concern vis-a-vis any discussion with President Trump, as he was not involved in any way with the Giuffre lawsuit which was active at the time,' Nunberg said. To the extent Trump knew Epstein recruited Giuffre for massages, that would be problematic. Giuffre, after all, wasn't just a minor at the time; she also wasn't even a masseuse. She served as an attendant in the Mar-a-Lago spa, according to her testimony. Her legal team also noted that she wasn't even qualified for a massage license under Florida law, which required one to be 18 years old or have a high school diploma or equivalent. All of which raises the prospect that Trump might have been aware of not just an employee being poached, but a minor employee being poached for a specific type of job that didn't seem appropriate for her. And beyond that, there are the reported Trump conversations about Epstein and young females that bookend all of this. Houraney's account indicates he raised concerns about Epstein 'going after young girls' eight years before the Giuffre episode. If Houraney's account is correct, Trump would seemingly have had reason to be suspicious about Epstein recruiting a minor Mar-a-Lago employee in 2000, whether for massages or anything else. And Trump would go on, two years after he suggests he was alienated by this episode, to praise Epstein as a 'terrific guy' and cite how Epstein 'likes women on the younger side.' Trump, the White House and Nunberg have also repeatedly referenced the idea that Trump fell out with Epstein because Trump learned he was a 'creep.' That includes Leavitt saying it was because Epstein was 'being a creep to [Trump's] female employees.' But there's no real clarity on what 'creep' refers to. And Trump on Tuesday balked at providing clarity on that point. When asked by a reporter what he meant by 'creep,' Trump attacked the reporter's media outlet while declining to answer the question. 'NBC? NBC, fake news,' Trump said. 'I don't care. NBC's one of the worst. What else do you have?' Somewhat similarly, when Trump was asked after Epstein's 2019 arrest about the reason the two of them had a falling out, he avoided a direct answer. 'The reason doesn't make any difference, frankly,' Trump said at the time. None of it is a smoking gun. But the timeline and the president's slow disclosures certainly suggest the questions about what he knew and when are legitimate and relevant. And it doesn't seem as though those questions are going away, now that those close to Epstein's victims are pressing them.
