logo
Rental investor numbers fall for only third time in 25 years, ATO data shows

Rental investor numbers fall for only third time in 25 years, ATO data shows

Thousands fewer investors declared rental income in 2022-23 than a year earlier — only the third time annual falls have occurred, according to Australian Tax Office (ATO) data.
The other occasions coincided with the 2008 global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic reaching Australian shores.
There were 7,081 fewer rental investors in 2022-23, equating to a modest 0.3 per cent reduction.
However, it was a noted reversal to the general trend in records going back to 1999-2000, when an average year saw the number of investors declaring rental income increase by about 47,000.
While the overall number of investors shrank, the decline was concentrated among those with multiple investment properties.
An ABC analysis of different groups of investors showed a general trend that the more rentals a group owned, the more the size of that group shrank between 2021-22 and 2022-23.
The number of investors declaring income from only one rental actually grew by 2,337, while the number with two or more fell.
Investor groups blame interest rates, less investor-friendly tax and policy settings, and increased tenants' rights for the drop-off of investors.
Landlord Glenn Langdon agreed with the assessment — similar factors had led to his decision to sell his only Victorian rental, in Greenvale, last week.
He was using the money to buy a third rental in Queensland, where he said taxes were lower and there were fewer demands on investors.
"There just seems to be constantly more and more cost to own a rental property in Victoria than in other states," he said.
A ban on no-fault evictions, hikes in land taxes for investors, and increased renter rights had all contributed to his decision to sell.
"There's no protection for the landlord, I feel," said Mr Langdon.
Eliza Owen, head of research for property data firm Cotality, told ABC News it might seem surprising investor numbers have fallen when residential real estate was "so often heralded as a safe investment".
It became less surprising when you considered that the 2022-23 financial year was characterised by falling home values and rapidly rising interest rates, she said.
"Between June 2022 and 2023, the average outstanding investor mortgage rate rose from 3.88 per cent to 6.6 per cent, increasing the repayment on a $500,000 loan by $830 per month.
"By comparison, median monthly rent values in Australia increased by $316."
Ms Owen said there were advantages and disadvantages to a smaller cohort of investors — one being that it might free up more stock for home owners to buy.
However, it was unclear if this had come to fruition, with no reliable home ownership rate data since 2021.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) lending data showed investors made up between 25 and 30 per cent of home borrowing between late 2019 and late 2021, before beginning a slow recovery to make up around 38 per cent of borrowing in the March quarter of this year, suggesting investors were returning to the market.
Ms Owen said it was hard to say whether the investor cohort has grown since 2022-2023 but, with housing values back to record highs and interest rates stabilising and now beginning to fall, it was possible investor numbers would grow again.
Property Investors Council of Australia chair Ben Kingsley said changes in the investor cohort were heavily influenced by government policy and interest rates.
He pointed to 1999, when the Howard government introduced the 50 per cent capital gains discount — triggering a period of investors buying in (which was also a period of rising house prices) followed by a blip around the global financial crisis, which followed a period of high interest rates, and then renewed growth from low interest rates after the GFC.
Then, in 2017, Mr Kingsley pointed to the ban on travel and depreciation claims on existing properties, followed by a raft of reforms to lending rules and state tenancy laws over subsequent years, which appeared to dampen investor interest.
He said over the five years to mid-2023, the average annual increase in investor numbers sat at around 10,600 — well below the 53,000-64,000 experienced during the three five-year periods preceding it.
"Add these numbers to the exodus we are seeing in Victoria, and it's blatantly clear we have a housing supply problem, partly because investors running their private rentals are tapping out," he said.
While the ATO data showed slowing but still positive growth in Victorian investors, more recent rental bond data indicated an investor sell-off, with the state losing more than 24,000 rentals during 2024 — or 3.6 per cent of the state's entire rental stock, which has proven a boon for first home buyers trying to get into the market.
Mr Kingsley said property building would suffer without willing investor money.
However, building investment is difficult to track.
Cotality's Ms Owen said it was "quite possible" subdued investor activity has resulted in less construction activity than otherwise.
"CBA has reported in a previous economic note that about half of off-the-plan demand in new apartment buildings comes from the investor cohort," she said.
Richard Temlett, national executive director of Research at Charter Keck Cramer, advises developers and government on housing policy.
He said he had never come across reliable data that showed whether domestic investment in new-builds had fallen, but investment figures from NAB showed foreign cash going into building had dropped since 2018.
"Foreign investors have a very bad wrap, people keep thinking they are buying established dwellings, driving up property prices, stealing properties from locals," Mr Temlett observed.
"That's not the case at all, especially with the legislation that mainly says it has to be for new supply of dwellings.
Urban Development Institute of Australia (UDIA) chief operating officer Peter Sherrie said flagging investor demand, driven by higher taxes and construction costs, had resulted in many approved medium density and high-rise developments around the country sitting unstarted.
UDIA represents the property development industry, with more than 2,500 member companies.
"When the feasibilities aren't working, the developers aren't able to achieve their construction funding, and the project doesn't start," he said.
While investors could once increase rent to make investments work, that option seemed to have dried up.
"It's reaching that ceiling now … tenants just cannot afford to pay more, it's just beyond their capacity," Mr Sherrie said.
He said building continued at greenfield developments, which had a lower entry cost and greater capital gain potential, the build-to-rent market, and developments that sold directly to home owners, where apartments were generally larger, finished to a higher standard, and more expensive.
Rayna Fahey, who is director of advocacy at pro-land tax non-profit research institute Prosper, said a fall in investors declaring rental income did not necessarily mean rentals were sold, and may mean investors simply left the property empty, satisfied with waiting for capital gain.
"Our tax system rules so heavily rewards speculation over production, speculation really distorts the property market," Ms Fahey said.
If investors did sell, she said it would likely be to a home owner, who would live in the home, or possibly to another investor who would rent it out.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Amazon's robotics, AI push not eliminating jobs, company says
Amazon's robotics, AI push not eliminating jobs, company says

Daily Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Daily Telegraph

Amazon's robotics, AI push not eliminating jobs, company says

Don't miss out on the headlines from Technology. Followed categories will be added to My News. Amazon warehouses are still a viable job option for unskilled and entry-level workers, executives of the e-commerce giant say, despite massive robotics and AI investments. Speaking to NewsWire in Japan this week, Amazon's global head of PR for robotics and AI, Xavier Chao, compared AI robots and sorting machines to offices having a coffee machine and snacks close to the desks. 'Retention is very, vitally important for us if we want to continue to manage and sustain our business and grow; we have to retain our workforce,' Mr Chao said. 'And so we think that innovation is part of the solution of creating a nice workplace that attracts people, and retains staff.' A worker in front of an item-by-item timer at their station inside Amazon's Chiba Minato warehouse in Tokyo. Picture: NewsWire / Blair Jackson Australia has eight Amazon 'fulfilment centre' warehouses; seven of these do not have Amazon's robots. The custom designed and built robots operate using AI, moving stacks of products for humans to pick and put into boxes. Australia's robotised Amazon warehouse is at Kemps Creek in Sydney, and employs about 2500 workers. With Australia's comparatively low-tech Amazon facilities - compared to warehouses in comparable countries - retraining Australian workers to fix and maintain Amazon's robots has stalled. In June, Amazon announced it would be investing $20bn in data centres in Australia, reiterating concerns about the e-commerce company's entrenchment in the Australian economy. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese joined Amazon Web Services chief executive Matt Garman in Seattle in June as AWS announced a $20bn investment into data centre infrastructure in Australia. Picture: NewsWire / PMO Anthony Albanese faces internal pressure from high-ranking Labor MPs, The Australian reports, over accusations Amazon undermines labour laws and employs tax avoidance tactics. These criticisms are echoed by unions - the ACTU, TWU and the SDA - who claim Amazon Australia's workplace practices are unethical. Asked if operating in countries with relatively strong workplace protections was tough for Amazon, Mr Chao said 'Right now, what we're really hyper-focused on is can these systems actually benefit our frontline workers, and getting feedback from them'. He argues wide-scale automation is good for workers. 'If we can create the most innovative workplace that we possibly can, we want to try to do three things. 'Safety … Ease - all of us want to have an easier job. 'And then three, it's exposure. So a lot of people who come and work at an Amazon facility, you know, there are people from all walks of life.' *Amazon paid for NewsWire's travel and accommodation in Japan Originally published as Amazon's robotics, AI push not eliminating jobs as tech giant continues automation wave

'More can be done': The knowledge gap Australians have with their retirement nest egg
'More can be done': The knowledge gap Australians have with their retirement nest egg

SBS Australia

time2 hours ago

  • SBS Australia

'More can be done': The knowledge gap Australians have with their retirement nest egg

The final increase to the superannuation guarantee has taken effect, meaning employers are now required to pay a minimum contribution of 12 per cent into their employees' super funds. But around a third of people are unaware where their retirement funds are invested — a similar proportion don't know their super balance, and one in 10 have never checked. These were the findings of a survey of 3,146 Australians conducted by the Commonwealth Bank, which suggested the knowledge gap about how super is invested was higher among gen Z and women, at 43 per cent. Jessica Irvine, the bank's personal finance expert, said people have more confidence in managing their day-to-day finances, but need more assistance to understand retirement options. Echoing her views, Wayne Swan, the former federal treasurer who oversaw the legislation guaranteeing the increase from nine to 12 per cent, told SBS News that more needed to be done to engage Australians with their retirement planning. Swan, now chair of Cbus, an industry super fund, said: "I think that all superannuation funds acknowledge and do their best to achieve [that], and there's always more that can be done." What is happening with superannuation? Thirty-four years ago, former prime minister Paul Keating shared his vision of an Australian future that included a 12 per cent target for compulsory super contributions. Now, he said, that system "finally matures". The superannuation guarantee has risen since 2012 to reach 12 per cent. In a statement to mark the 1 July increase to 12 per cent, Keating said it "will guarantee personal super accumulations in excess of $3 million at retirement" for someone entering the workforce today. "Superannuation, like Medicare, is now an Australian community standard, binding the whole population as a national economic family, with each person having a place," he said. How did we get here? Superannuation in Australia stretches back to the early 20th century, but there were no attempts to institutionalise universal compulsory contributions before the mid-1980s. In 1985, the Australian Council of Trade Unions, with the support of the then-Hawke government, presented a National Wage Case to the Conciliation and Arbitration Commission about a 3 per cent compulsory contribution for all Australian workers. The tribunal sided with the union in 1986 but ruled it as optional — subject to agreement between employers and employees. Five years later, in Keating's final federal budget as treasurer, the 3 per cent superannuation guarantee levy was made compulsory. It came into effect the following year, when Keating was prime minister, with the introduction of a superannuation guarantee charge to penalise employers who don't meet their contribution obligations. The mandatory rate then gradually increased to 9 per cent by 2002. It was supposed to reach 12 per cent by 2000, but, under the Howard government, there were no further increases until 1 July 2013. In 2010, two years after the Global Financial Crisis and in response to the findings of the Henry Tax Review, then-treasurer Swan unveiled a plan to incrementally lift the superannuation guarantee levy to 12 per cent. He said it would increase by 0.5 per cent each year between 2013 and 2019. In 2010, then-treasurer Wayne Swan (pictured right) announced a plan to gradually increase the superannuation guarantee levy from 9 per cent to 12 per cent. Source: AAP / Alan Porritt But two months after it rose to 9.25 per cent in 2013, Tony Abbott stormed to a landslide election victory — and followed through on an election promise to delay increases to the guarantee due to cost pressures on small businesses. The government failed to legislate the delay the following year, and the rate was lifted to 9.5 per cent — a level it remained at for seven years. It wasn't until Australia was in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic that the incremental increases began. Starting in 2021, it rose by 0.5 per cent each year. LISTEN TO SBS News 30/06/2025 08:22 English The 12 per cent milestone Australia's superannuation system now manages over $4 trillion in assets, ranking as the fourth-largest pension market in the world. The 12 per cent milestone is expected to propel Australia to second place within a decade — just behind the United States — despite its relatively small population. Swan said the superannuation guarantee levy not only delivers a secure retirement for all Australians, but "fundamentally alters the distribution of wealth in our community". "It gives access to growth assets to everyone in the community. From a building worker through to a professional in the office tower, everyone in Australia gets to own a piece of the wealth of this great country in a way that's never before been possible," he said. Swan said he's "absolutely proud to have been part of this story". "I always think of those pioneers, particularly the unionists, who fought to establish this scheme 40 years ago. What it really shows is that ordinary working people can effect change in a society like ours," he said. "What visionaries they were, and what they have done to make our country not only a bigger and more successful economy, but a fairer one as well." What is a 'comfortable retirement'? Swan said while the six-year delay in achieving a 12 per cent increase came at a cost to Australian superannuation balances, the benefits are greater from having finally reached that milestone. "For someone who's, say, 30 years old now, it's going to mean an extra $130,000 in their retirement," he said. That follows recent modelling by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA). The super peak body's retirement standard for June 2025 projects a 30-year-old today on the median wage of $75,000 and a $30,000 super balance would witness that figure rise to $610,000 by the retirement age of 67. This amount exceeds ASFA's estimate of the $595,000 needed to afford a comfortable retirement for singles and $690,000 for couples. ASFA defines a 'comfortable' retirement as someone who owns their home outright, is in good health, can afford top-level private health insurance, has a good car, and engages in a range of leisure and recreational activities, including taking one domestic trip a year and one international trip every seven years. Business concerns There are concerns that a string of 1 July changes , including the increase to the superannuation guarantee levy, could hit businesses and place further pressure on cash flow. Luke Achterstraat, CEO, Council of Small Business Organisations Australia, said: "The increase of the superannuation guarantee comes at a time when award rates have also increased 3.5 per cent, national productivity is in decline, and payroll tax and workers' compensation insurance will also increase." There are concerns that an increase to the superannuation guarantee levy and other changes that took effect on 1 July could negatively impact small businesses and further pressure their cash flow. Source: AAP "This puts small businesses between a rock and a hard place, needing to either absorb or pass on these costs to consumers," Achterstraat said. Beyond 12 per cent: Where to from here? The 0.5 per cent increase to 12 per cent is the last one legislated by the Australian government. However, with life expectancy improving, would we need more in our nest egg, and is there a case for raising the superannuation guarantee even further? "I think there's going to be a debate about whether we need to go above 12 per cent," Swan said. "I think 12 per cent can certainly guarantee quite a dignified retirement for all Australians, but that will be a discussion that will be had in the years ahead."

McDonald's rejected from affluent Sydney suburb
McDonald's rejected from affluent Sydney suburb

News.com.au

time3 hours ago

  • News.com.au

McDonald's rejected from affluent Sydney suburb

One of Sydney's affluent Northern Beaches suburbs has said no to the golden arches, with a contentious proposal to build a McDonald's in Balgowlah shut down amid concerns of anti-social behaviour and congestion on an-already bustling road. The plan to build the restaurant – which would operate from 5am to midnight – at 37 Roseberry Street, was unanimously rejected by the Northern Beaches Local Planning Panel (NBLPP) on Wednesday. In its decision, the panel highlighted existing congestion in the area – which is home to businesses, dwellings and the Manly Vale B-Line bus stop, stating: 'The application has not demonstrated the proposed development will not have unreasonable impacts on the already congested surrounding road network'. It also pointed out 'incidents of anti-social behaviour in the vicinity recorded by police' – who have raised concerns the restaurant could make matters worse. In its submission to Northern Beaches Council, police said they had 'some reservations' about the restaurant – which was originally proposed to be open 24 hours a day – stating it 'may contribute to an increase in crime and anti-social behaviour, particularly at night unless adequate security measures are implemented'. 'Given the 24-hour operating model, this development has the potential to attract increased levels of crime, anti-social behaviour, and public safety concerns, particularly during late-night and early-morning trading periods,' police said in the report. Police also noted a comparable existing 24-hour McDonald's located nearby recorded 58 incidents over the last 24 months, including assaults, burglaries and malicious damage. Within the vicinity of the proposed Roseberry Street site, police recorded a total of 112 incidents over the past 24 months. 'The introduction of a 24-hour fast-food venue at this location has the potential to exacerbate these incident categories, particularly in relation to assaults, anti-social behaviour, and property damage at night, if reasonable mitigation strategies are not implemented.' McDonald's had originally proposed redeveloping the site – which is currently occupied by the Seven Miles Coffee Roasters plant, head office and cafe – and opening the restaurant for 24 hours a day, seven days a week in an almost $4 million Development Application lodged to the council in February. However, the hours were later scaled back to 5am to midnight, seven days a week amid community backlash. A community petition calling on officials to 'Say NO' to McDonald's was launched in February. At the time of publication, it had attracted over 3,000 signatures, with supporters raising concerns about traffic congestion and potential crime, as well as noise and rubbish pollution. 'We are calling for a rejection of the application … and to consider the cumulative impact of fast-food outlets on our neighbourhood's environment and character,' Petition creator Sarah Garland said, as per The Courier Mail. Prior to the proposal's rejection, McDonald's told the publication last month, the restaurant would 'create more than 100 new local jobs and represents an investment of more than $3.9m into the community'. contacted McDonald's for comment however a statement was not provided prior to publishing. Plans for Redfern McDonald's scrapped It comes after plans for a 24-hour Macca's in the inner Sydney suburb of Redfern were scrapped following uproar from local residents and police earlier this year. The $3 million development plan for a two-storey restaurant on the area's main dining and shopping strip, Redfern Street, was blocked in a unanimous vote by the local planning panel at a City of Sydney council meeting in May. Police and local residents fought to stop the proposal, warning it would lead to a spike in theft and violent crime at night, and be a step backwards for the suburb. A request by a McDonald's representative for a six-week extension to try and resolve locals' concerns was also denied during the meeting, with one panel member suggesting those attempts would be like putting 'lipstick on what the community submissions largely believe to be a pig'. The local planning panel conceded that the development proposal 'has not adequately addressed crime prevention'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store