Long-shot NYC mayoral candidate sues to get onto final debate stage, claims donors ‘illegally' rejected
Mayoral long-shot candidate Michael Blake is suing the city's powerful campaign finance agency in a last-ditch bid to be allowed onto the Democratic primary debate stage later this week.
Blake — arguably the breakout star of last week's first debate — claims the Campaign Finance Board nixed hundreds of valid donations that would have made him eligible for the forum hosted by Spectrum on Thursday night.
'The CFB has acted arbitrarily, capriciously, illegally, and unconstitutionally in doing so,' claims Blake's Manhattan Supreme Court suit.
The CFB's 'antiquated' database wrongly rejected nearly 200 donations to Blake's campaign, including one by Public Advocate Jumaane Williams, according to the lawsuit, filed Sunday.
The contributions would have made Blake eligible for the city's generous eight-to-one public matching funds program, a threshold for entry into the second and final debate, the suit states.
5 Michael Blake is suing after he said he was 'illegally' booted from the second debate.
Pool/ABACA/Shutterstock
The former Bronx Assemblyman, during last Wednesday's NBC 4 New York-Politico debate, referenced the fact that he'd been barred from participating in the next forum when asked about his biggest political regret.
'The campaign finance board did not want to meet with us, they said go to court and that's what we are doing,' Blake, an associate pastor at a South Bronx church and former Obama White House aide, told The Post on Monday.
'It is the CFB who made the error and they still have time to fix it. All we are asking for is we deserve to be on the stage Thursday night, we deserve to get matching funds.'
The Blake donors were 'arbitrarily' disqualified due to address verification issues, including Williams — himself a candidate currently participating in the CFB matching funds program, the suit alleges.
Williams' $250 donation was rejected in the audit 'solely because his apartment was not included,' a field not required by the Campaign Finance Law, the suit claims.
5 Blake, considered a 'breakout' star at last week's debate, says the Campaign Finance Board messed up, and he has actually met the threshold to be on stage at the second and final mayoral debate.
AP
5 Public Advocate Jumaane Williams's $250 donation to Blake was nixed by the CFB because it claimed he entered 'a non-residental address.'
Stephen Yang
'This audit arbitrarily preliminarily disqualified numerous contributions,' the suit reads, adding that the 'vast majority of such failures are due to the inflexibility of CFB's database fields.'
'The sole reason given by the CFB in denying Michael Blake participation is their conclusory and inaccurate contention that the Blake Campaign did not meet their eligibility threshold based upon matchable dollars raised to date,' the suit claims.
5 'It's surreal,' Blake told The Post on Monday. 'The egregiousness of these errors and the ramifications.
Christopher Sadowski
Blake, who is polling at 1.5%, is asking for a judge to force the CFB to include him in the debate.
The board is required to host primary debates for citywide office elections, under the Campaign Finance Act, but is given broad discretion over who will be on the dais.
Candidates either need to raise and spend nearly $2.4 million or pull in more than $250,000 in public matching funds to participate in the second debate.
The threshold for the first debate was lower, with only $200,000 needed to be raised and spent to get on stage.When Blake sent in his May 19 contribution disclosure, the board at first seemed primed to give out matching funds, even asking for updated bank information.
5 Michael Blake was a former Obama aide and Bronx Assemblyman.
James Messerschmidt
But the CFB later sent the 'audit letter' claiming he was 78 donors short and included two conflicting contribution dollar totals, according to the suit.
The suit also says the CFB was using an arbitrary deadline for when the contribution threshold could be met.
'They are just making up a rule,' Blake said. 'It's surreal. The egregiousness of these errors and the ramifications.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
15 minutes ago
- Axios
Legal pressure mounts against Gov. Polis over ICE data disclosure
Legal pressure is mounting against Democratic Gov. Jared Polis after revelations that he ordered state officials to comply with an ICE subpoena and hand over personal data of undocumented children in Colorado to federal immigration agents. The latest: Colorado WINS — the union representing more than 27,000 state workers— civil rights group Towards Justice and labor organization Colorado AFL-CIOannounced Monday they're joining as plaintiffs on a whistleblower lawsuit filed last week by Scott Moss, a senior labor official in Polis' administration. The groups accuse the governor of "colluding" with ICE agents and violating multiple state laws that restrict cooperation with federal immigration enforcement in non-criminal matters. The intrigue: Polis has agreed not to act on the subpoena until after the judge rules on a request for a temporary restraining order and injunction, according to his attorney's court filing last week. The big picture: The backlash highlights growing fractures in Polis' support among labor leaders, civil rights advocates and Latino Democrats — many of whom viewed him as an ally. Just weeks ago, Polis signed a bill prohibiting state and local officials from collecting or sharing information about immigration status unless it directly involves a criminal investigation. What they're saying:"The actions that Gov. Polis has taken are undermining public trust in our state government," Colorado WINS president Diane Byrne said at a news briefing on the steps of Denver City Hall on Monday. "This action by the governor represents a betrayal to the immigrant community of our state," the Colorado Democratic Latino Caucus said in a statement Monday, adding that Polis has turned "his back on some of the most vulnerable residents." Catch up quick: On April 24, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security subpoenaed the state labor department for detailed records — including wage data, leave filings and home addresses — for 35 people sponsoring unaccompanied migrant children. According to the records, Polis initially resisted but later reversed, ordering staff to comply or face termination. The other side: The governor's office defends its action, saying it was a criminal matter. "We are committed to partnering on criminal investigations ... including to protect against human trafficking and child exploitation," Polis' spokesperson Eric Maruyama told us. Reality check: The subpoena reviewed by Axios Denver makes no mention of any open criminal investigation, nor is it court-ordered. Instead, the administrative request references broad "investigative activities" to ensure children released to sponsors were safe — citing general risks of trafficking or exploitation. Crucially, a checkbox on the subpoena that would formally classify the request as involving child exploitation was left blank. The bottom line: Polis' office appears to be casting a civil immigration enforcement request as a criminal matter — sidestepping state law to justify a politically risky decision of turning over immigrant data to ICE.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says it would 'great' to arrest Newsom. Their relationship and politics at play
President Donald Trump and California Gov. Gavin Newsom are sharply at odds as protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement continue in Los Angeles -- and both are framing their confrontation as not only about the protests but also in terms of politics, some of which are appearing in ways they've dealt with before. On Monday, the president said it would be a "great thing" if border czar Tom Homan arrested Newsom; in response, the California governor fired back that the comment is an "unmistakable step toward authoritarianism." Asked on Monday afternoon by ABC News what crime Newsom has committed to warrant his arrest, Trump said the governor's "primary crime is running for governor because he's done such a bad job." Newsom responded on X, "Donald Trump admits he will arrest a sitting governor simply because he ran for office." MORE: War of words between Trump and Newsom over LA protests escalates with arrest threat With the protests, Trump, who has characterized them as "violent, insurrectionist mobs" and "Gavin Newscum inspired Riots," has deployed National Guard members to Los Angeles. Newsom has asked the administration to rescind the deployment and said Monday that he is suing the Trump administration, claiming Trump illegally federalized the National Guard. But Trump is not only criticizing the protestors -- he has also criticized the leaders of the state and the city, framing their political leadership as failures. "The very incompetent 'Governor,' Gavin Newscum, and 'Mayor,' Karen Bass, should be saying, 'THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP, YOU ARE SO WONDERFUL. WE WOULD BE NOTHING WITHOUT YOU, SIR,'" Trump wrote on his social media platform on Monday. "Instead, they choose to lie to the People of California and America by saying that we weren't needed, and that these are 'peaceful protests.'" Trump has also long been critical of the leadership in most Democratic-run states, often focusing his ire on California. MORE: Johnson: Trump did 'exactly what he needed to do' in sending National Guard to LA The situation, separately, gives Trump the chance to take high-profile action on immigration enforcement -- a key issue for the president during his 2024 campaign and one that has remained a priority during the first few months of his administration. A recent poll from Marquette Law School taken in early to mid-May found that Trump had positive or around even job approval on border security and immigration. Newsom, on his end, has explicitly accused the White House of exacerbating the situation for political gain. "They want a spectacle. They want the violence," he said in an email to supporters sent through his political action committee on Sunday night. "They think this is good for them politically." ABC News has asked the White House for comment on Newsom's claim. MORE: What's in Trump's 'big' tax and immigration bill House Republicans are struggling to pass Newsom and Trump have long been at odds, although the two had a brief detente in their relationship in the past few months. In the aftermath of wildfires in January that devastated the Los Angeles region, Trump visited the city toward the end of the month and was greeted on the tarmac by Newsom with several handshakes and an embrace; Newsom also met with Trump in Washington in early February, and told CNN afterwards, "I have just all the confidence in the world that it's going to be a strong partnership moving forward." But Newsom, around that time, also approved $50 million for funds that could be used in legal battles against the federal government. And Newsom grew more critical of Trump in the months afterward -- attacking the president's tariff policy in an ad that aired on Fox News where he said the "tariffs punish families." The Trump administration has appeared to direct punishment at California as well. Earlier this month, Trump vowed to impose "large scale fines" on California after a transgender teen competed in a California state final competition in track and field. Last week, the Trump administration signaled that it would cut federal funding for a high-speed rail project in the state. Newsom, separately, has begun to build a national profile amid speculation that he could run for president in 2028, which included stoking more speculation through a buzzy podcast launch in March. Newsom is term-limited and cannot run for governor in 2026. While the Los Angeles situation is tied to Newsom's current work as governor and not to any current or future campaign, it puts him back in the national spotlight and at the center of one of the nation's highest-profile political issues. Newsom referenced what he framed as the national stakes in his response to Trump's comments on his potential arrest: "This is a day I hoped I would never see in America… this is a line we cannot cross as a nation." ABC News' Molly Nagle and Michelle Stoddart contributed to this report.
Politico
33 minutes ago
- Politico
Will GOP senators save Biden's energy tax credits?
Moderate House Republicans failed last month when the chamber voted to gut the clean energy tax credits that they had spent months urging their leaders to save. Now the fight is getting real in the Senate, where Republicans unhappy with the cuts have the leverage to reshape President Donald Trump's megabill — if they choose to, writes Kelsey Brugger. GOP Sens. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Environment and Public Works Chair Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia — to name but a few — all told Kelsey they will seek significant changes to the budget reconciliation package ahead of their party's self-imposed July 4 deadline. Senate Republicans can afford to lose only three votes without tanking the bill. The party-line bill that the House passed May 22 would dramatically roll back Biden-era incentives for wind, solar, hydrogen and other clean energy sources. The cuts are expected to render useless hundreds of billions of dollars in tax credits from Democrats' 2022 climate law, even though they benefit many Republican-held districts. 'Every one of [the credits] is going to have some sort of extension' in the Senate version, Tillis told Kelsey. GOP House members who tepidly and unsuccessfully opposed the tax rollbacks lent their support to the new effort. 'We believe the Senate now has a critical opportunity to restore common sense,' a group of 13 representatives wrote in a letter to Senate leaders urging them to 'substantially and strategically' fix the House-passed language. Conservatives were quick to respond. 'You backslide one inch on those [Inflation Reduction Act] subsidies, and I'm voting against this bill,' said Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), one of the far-right House Freedom Caucus' most vocal members. That could be fatal for the bill when it returns to the House, where the vote last time was 215-214. The conservative Club for Growth has been taking out ads against some Senate Republicans, accusing Murkowski and Jerry Moran of Kansas of falling for a 'big liberal mistake' in seeking to preserve some of the Biden-era policies, and even accusing Kevin Cramer of North Dakota of 'betraying' Trump. How senators ultimately treat Biden's clean energy tax credits will be included in the Senate Finance Committee's section of the bill, which might not emerge until next week. It's Monday — thank you for tuning in to POLITICO's Power Switch. I'm your host, Arianna Skibell. Power Switch is brought to you by the journalists behind E&E News and POLITICO Energy. Send your tips, comments, questions to askibell@ Tune in! At 8 a.m. ET Tuesday, White House officials, congressional leaders and energy experts will explore the strategic choices shaping America's energy future under the Trump administration at POLITICO's Energy Summit. You can find more details about the event here and watch live here. Today in POLITICO Energy's podcast: Matt Daily breaks down how Republicans' mega reconciliation bill would almost certainly hurt Tesla's lesser-known yet growing solar and battery division. Power Centers Trump purges federal heat expertsTop heat experts are no longer at their government posts at the start of what promises to be a brutally hot summer, raising questions about the nation's ability to cope with extreme temperatures, writes Ariel Wittenberg. The entire staff at the climate office within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was laid off. And across other agencies, heat specialists have accepted deferred resignation offers. Some were fired because their work involved racial equity issues. Still others, after being ordered to cut communication with the public about the health risks of heat, decided they could help more people if they retired early. Trump sits out ocean protection talks French President Emmanuel Macron announced Monday that implementation of an international agreement to protect the world's oceans can begin now that enough countries have 'formally committed' to ratifying the High Seas Treaty, writes Leonie Cater. The news came at the third United Nations Conference on the Oceans in Nice, France. The United States did not participate, an absence that did not go unnoticed. A State Department spokesperson said the conference is 'at odds' with positions held by the current U.S. administration. In Other News Public health: This group is the most vulnerable to heat-related illnesses by far. River life: How climate change is reshaping life on the Mighty Mississippi. Subscriber Zone A showcase of some of our best subscriber content. The Trump administration is poised to release the first two rules in a high-stakes series of proposed Clean Air Act rollbacks that aim to dismantle Biden-era controls on power sector pollution. Solar analysts are lowering growth estimates significantly for the U.S. industry over the next five years as a 'perfect storm' threatens projects. A crew member died last week while aboard a vessel working on Empire Wind 1, an offshore wind project near New York. That's it for today, folks! Thanks for reading.
