
Ukraine ceasefire: how might an end to fighting be enforced?
Ending a war is seldom straightforward. Even agreeing to a ceasefire comes with complications. Though Ukraine signed up to a 30-day ceasefire proposal after discussions with the US in Jeddah this week, the joint statement between the two does not begin to explain how a halt in fighting might be enforced.
'Monitoring has to begin immediately,' says John Foreman, a former British defence attache to Moscow and Kyiv. 'If there's meant to be a 30-day ceasefire, the big question is whether it is adhered to.' Given Russia has a record of violating ceasefires and peace agreements, a robust process is critical.
Recent history in Ukraine underlines the challenge. A dedicated Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) mission of as many as 1,000 people running dozens of unarmed vehicle patrols a day was responsible for monitoring the end of hostilities in Ukraine's eastern Donbas on both sides of the frontline as part of the Minsk agreements of 2014 and 2015.
The OSCE, which represents 57 states in Europe, North America and central Asia, was chosen because Russia and Ukraine are both members. But it struggled to keep a lid on tensions, counting 486 civilian casualties and 400,000 ceasefire violations in 2017. Though that dropped to 91 casualties and 93,902 violations in 2021, it was less than two months later that Russia launched its full scale invasion.
Samir Puri, an analyst with the Chatham House thinktank and a former OSCE monitor with the Ukraine mission, says the task is much greater now: 'In 2015, the OSCE was largely monitoring a shorter frontline in the Donbas, where the Ukrainian army was mostly facing separatist militias. Now the frontline is far longer, with two full militaries each with significant weapon systems at their disposal.'
Modern technology – drones, airborne and satellite reconnaissance – makes ceasefire monitoring easier in 2025. Puri recalls that a decade ago, the OSCE mission had only four drones, which Russia-backed separatists 'would use for target practice now and again'. But while that may reduce the number of observers needed, it does not help with enforcement if a ceasefire is breached.
A similar point was even made by the Russian president on Thursday. Who will control the ceasefire, Vladimir Putin asked rhetorically at a press conference in Moscow, when the front is 2,000km (1,243 miles) long? It could require several thousand monitors, able to communicate and deconflict across both sides of the contact line
Though European countries, led by the UK and France, have talked about creating a 'reassurance force' to guarantee Ukraine's security in the event of a lasting peace, its organisers are emphatic that they are not troops who will enforce quiet at the front. 'They are not peacekeepers,' one said, describing instead a force that will secure Ukraine's airspace, sea lanes and critical infrastructure.
Yet monitoring, Foreman argues, is essential for restraining and building confidence between once warring parties. 'You have to trust – and verify,' he says, adding: 'The problem is that, for Ukraine, ceasefire monitoring has very bad associations because of what happened after the Minsk agreements'. A poorly enforced ceasefire could easily lead to an outbreak of renewed fighting, he says.
Given the history, it is probably unlikely that the OSCE will host a repeat monitoring initiative. The 2014 mission ended as a result of Russia's February 2022 invasion and its withdrawal of cooperation shortly after. An alternative might be for monitoring to take place under UN auspices, but that would require Russia to agree to a security council resolution to set it up.
Puri wonders if there is another practical possibility, where a demilitarised zone is established on both sides of the current frontline (in Korea, where there has never been a peace agreement after the 1950 to 1953 war, it is 4km wide) and where Russia has its own parallel reassurance force composed of troops from 'broadly friendly countries' such as China, able to communicate with counterparts in Ukraine.
Ultimately a lasting peace will only be possible if neither side tries to undermine it with acts of provocation and aggression. Some ceasefires, such as in Korea or Cyprus, have endured because neither side ultimately wanted to restart fullscale fighting. But Russia's hostility to Ukraine has been so great, and many believe Putin's long-term goal of dominating his country's neighbour remains unchanged.
Despite that backdrop, it is not yet clear how the ceasefire proposed by the US would even be monitored to prevent or restrain violations. As Foreman concludes: 'There are so many obstacles that need to be dealt with before we can get to peace.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Elon Musk bows to Trump: Tesla boss admits posts attacking the president 'went too far' in humiliating climb down after their spectacular feud
Elon Musk has said that he regrets some of the posts he made last week about Donald Trump in a humiliating climbdown from his online feud with the president. 'I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far,' Musk wrote in a message on his social media platform X on Wednesday. He did not say which specific posts he was talking about. Tesla shares in Frankfurt were up 2.44% after Musk's post. Trump and Musk exchanged insults last week after the former DOGE boss described the president's sweeping tax and spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination.' A full spat exploded in public as Trump said his relationship with Musk was over, threatening to take away government funding from Musk's SpaceX company. But Musk doubled down, escalating with a now-deleted post that claimed the president appears in documents related to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Trump rejected the allegations and told ABC News that Musk had 'lost his mind', making clear he has no immediate plans to reconcile. Musk has also since deleted a post signaling support for impeaching the president. Sources close to Musk had said his anger has started to subside, and that they believe he may want to repair his relationship with Trump. The abrupt volte-face comes after Trump threatened 'serious consequences' for Musk if he sought to punish Republicans voting in favour of the controversial spending bill. Some lawmakers who were against the bill had called on Musk to fund primary challenges against Republicans who voted for the legislation. Musk bankrolled a large part of Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. Trump named Musk to head an effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that,' Trump, who also branded Musk 'disrespectful,' told NBC News on Saturday, without specifying what those consequences would be. There were reports that said Trump planned to sell off the Tesla he purchased earlier this year. 'I haven't heard that, I mean, I may move the Tesla around a little bit,' Trump told reporters Monday. Musk's father said on Monday that the spat was triggered by months of intense stress on both sides, and that it needed to stop. Asked whether he thought his son had made a mistake by engaging in a public clash with the president, Errol Musk said people were sometimes unable to think as clearly as they should 'in the heat of the moment.' 'They've had five months of intense stress,' Musk told Reuters at a conference in Moscow organised by conservative Russian tycoons. Elon Musk was asked about The New York Times story during his May 30th going away event in the Oval Office alongside the president. He pushed back and mocked the newspaper for its 'Russiagate' coverage, but later denied the Times' report on his social media site, X 'With all the opposition cleared and two people left in the arena, all they have ever done is get rid of everything and now they are trying to get rid of each other - well that has to stop.' Asked how it would end, he said: 'Oh, it will end on a good note - very soon.' Musk's father told reporters he was standing by his son. 'Elon is sticking to his principles but you cannot always stick to your principles in the real world,' Musk's father said. 'Sometimes you have to give and take.' Trump has, in recent days, held back on criticising Musk and publicly wished him the best. On Monday, the president was asked about a New York Times report that said while campaigning for Trump, Musk had been doing so much ketamine it was affecting his bladder, while also taking Ecstasy and psychadelic mushrooms. Trump said: 'I really don't know, I don't think so, I hope not.' He then added, 'I wish him well ... I just wish him well, very well, actually.' He also said he'd keep Musk's Starlink system in place. Trump also said he never saw Musk get physical with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, which had also been alleged. 'No I didn't,' the president answered. 'They did have an argument, but I didn't see a lot of physicality there,' Trump said. Musk had roundly denied the allegations of drug use.

Western Telegraph
6 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
More than 55,000 Palestinians killed in Israel-Hamas war, health officials say
The ministry does not distinguish between civilians and combatants, but has said that women and children make up more than half the dead. It is a grim milestone in the war that began with Hamas' attack into southern Israel on October 7, 2023, and shows no sign of ending. Israel says it only targets militants and blames civilian deaths on Hamas, accusing the militants of hiding among civilians, because they operate in populated areas. Israeli army vehicles inside the southern Gaza Strip (Ohad Zwigenberg/AP) The ministry says 55,104 people have been killed since the start of the war and 127,394 wounded. Many more are believed to be buried under the rubble or in areas that are inaccessible to local medics. Israeli forces have destroyed vast areas of Gaza, displaced about 90% of its population and in recent weeks have transformed more than half of the coastal territory into a military buffer zone that includes the now mostly uninhabited southern city of Rafah. A two-and-a-half-month blockade imposed by Israel when it ended a ceasefire with Hamas raised fears of famine and was slightly eased in May. The launch of a new Israeli and US-backed aid system has been marred by chaos and violence, and the UN says it has struggled to bring in food because of Israeli restrictions, a breakdown of law and order, and widespread looting. Israel accuses Hamas of siphoning off aid, but the UN and aid groups deny there is any systematic diversion of aid to militants. Hamas has suffered major setbacks militarily, and Israel says it has killed more than 20,000 militants, without providing evidence. The militants still hold 55 hostages — less than half of them believed to be alive — and control areas outside of military zones despite facing rare protests earlier this year. The war began when Hamas-led militants killed around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, in the October 7 attack and abducted 251 hostages. More than half the captives have been released in ceasefires or other deals. Israeli forces have rescued eight and recovered the remains of dozens more. Israel's military campaign, one of the deadliest and most destructive since the Second World War, has transformed large parts of cities into mounds of rubble. Hundreds of thousands of people are living in squalid tent camps and unused schools, and the health system has been gutted, even as it copes with waves of wounded from Israeli strikes.


Glasgow Times
10 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Government to end use of hotels for asylum seekers
Unveiling her spending review on Wednesday, Rachel Reeves set out how funding will be provided to cut the asylum backlog and save taxpayers billions of pounds. A total £200 million of transformation funding will be used to speed up the overhaul of the asylum system, documents show. Ms Reeves told MPs: 'I can confirm today that led by the work of my right honourable friend the Home Secretary, we will be ending the costly use of hotels to house asylum seekers in this Parliament. 'Funding that I have provided today, including from the transformation fund, will cut the asylum backlog, hear more appeal cases and return people who have no right to be here, saving the taxpayer £1 billion a year. 'That is my choice, Mr Speaker, that is the Labour choice, that is the choice of the British people.' It comes as findings from the National Audit Office revealed the cost of asylum accommodation is expected to be more than three times higher than previously estimated at £15.3 billion over 10 years. Hotel accommodation accounted for 76% of the annual cost of contracts – £1.3 billion of an estimated £1.7 billion in 2024-25. Chancellor Rachel Reeves delivers her Government's spending review to MPs in the House of Commons (House of Commons/UK Parliament/PA) On Tuesday, Home Office minister Dame Angela Eagle told MPs the department is piloting different ways to provide asylum accommodation ahead of break clauses for major contracts coming up next year. One of the ideas is to move away from hotels to medium-sized sites such as old tower blocks and student accommodation, she said. Labour has previously said it is 'committed to end the use of asylum hotels over time'. Latest figures show 32,345 asylum seekers were being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March, down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079. That is also 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Mihnea Cuibus, researcher at the Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford, speculated at the time that a 'stubbornly high' backlog of asylum appeals is a challenge for Labour as it works to end the use of hotels. Elsewhere, the Chancellor also announced a further up to £280 million per year for the Border Security Command by the end of the spending review period, which leads on the UK's strategy to crack down on people smuggling and small boat crossings. This follows an initial £150 million to establish the unit last year. The announcements come as Channel crossings continued on Wednesday. A group of people thought to be migrants are brought in to Dover on Wednesday (Gareth Fuller/PA) Pictures show new arrivals wearing life jackets being brought to shore in a Border Force boat in Dover, Kent and being driven away from the port. They are the first to make the journey to the UK so far this month after a record first five months of the year bringing the provisional total so far to 14,812 arrivals. This has also surpassed the highest total recorded for the first six months of the year, which was previously 13,489 on June 30 last year. In 2024, the number of arrivals did not reach more than 14,000 until July 9 (14,058). Following Wednesday's arrivals, shadow home secretary Chris Philp said now 15,000 migrants have crossed the Channel in the 'worst year ever for small boat crossings so far', adding 'this is a total collapse of border control'. The official figures of the number of arrivals will be published on Thursday by the Home Office.