logo
A Calgary woman was unable to complete a breathalyzer test. Now, she can't drive

A Calgary woman was unable to complete a breathalyzer test. Now, she can't drive

Yahoo5 days ago
A Calgary woman says she had her driver's licence suspended after being unable to complete a breathalyzer test — and some experts say the situation is more common than you might think.
Pam Lacusta, 58, was driving on Stoney Trail in April when she was pulled over by Calgary police, who administered a breathalyzer test.
Lacusta attempted the test 30 times and couldn't complete it. The officer handed her an administrative penalty for failing to provide a proper breath sample — a penalty that carries the same consequences as driving while impaired.
Now, Lacusta must complete a driver's education course and install an interlock device in her car before she can drive again. Her prior insurance now refuses to cover her.
"I feel like I'm being punished for something that I never did," said Lacusta, who said she doesn't drink for religious reasons.
Later on the day she was ticketed, Lacusta took a urine test at a private clinic at her own expense to prove she wasn't drinking. She sent CBC News a copy of the negative results.
Edmonton-based paralegal Sandra Weber said she hears of situations like Lacusta's fairly regularly. Weber said people may struggle to complete a roadside test due to medical conditions like lung cancer or asthma, compounded by the stress of completing a test in front of an officer.
Once someone has received a penalty for failing to complete a breathalyzer, she said, it can be difficult to fight.
"It's up to the recipient … to prove that there was something wrong with the machine or something that the police had done wrong," said Weber, who works with Moreau Law. "It's a very challenging situation and without any medical evidence it's very difficult to overcome these types of tickets."
Lacusta did appeal her penalty with a provincial adjudicator, who turned her down.
Lacusta said her difficulty with the test may have been due to a recent Botox injection that kept her from making a proper seal with her mouth. She also later learned that she had two suspected rib fractures, but not in time to include that information in her appeal.
'Not enough puff'
Recent research out of the University of Sheffield in the U.K. suggests there may be people without severe lung or breathing problems who nevertheless struggle to complete breathalyzer tests.
"There is a small, but significant, subset of people who just don't have enough puff to be able to operate the machine successfully," said lead researcher Galen Ives, who noted that older people, short people and women are more likely to struggle.
Ives said police should be more willing to offer blood or urine tests as an alternative to people who try and fail to complete breathalyzer tests, though he acknowledged there would be practical hurdles to testing at a second location.
A spokesperson for the Calgary Police Service said she couldn't comment on Lacusta's situation, but said anyone who believes they are medically unable to complete a breathalyzer test should tell the officer at the scene.
A spokesperson for the provincial minister of justice said if people can't provide breath samples they may be asked to provide blood or urine samples "where certain legal requirements are met."
Lacusta said blood and urine tests were not offered in her situation, and she believes they should be more widely available to people who can't provide a breath sample.
For now, she's relying on her friends and her bicycle to get around the city, but still hopes to fight her penalty and have her clean driving record restored.
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ontario labour federation urges more worker protections as air quality concerns grow
Ontario labour federation urges more worker protections as air quality concerns grow

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ontario labour federation urges more worker protections as air quality concerns grow

An Ontario labour group says it is advocating for more robust worker protections amid growing health concerns over poor air quality as wildfire smoke blankets the province with increasing frequency. The Ontario Federation of Labour, which represents more than 55 unions across the province, says the push is part of a broader heat stress strategy looking at how climate change is impacting working conditions. Its president Laura Walton says provincial regulations outline winter temperature benchmarks to protect workers from the cold, but there are no such protections from the heat or poor air quality. She says the federation is working with the provincial New Democrats to introduce a motion to the legislature in November advocating for better worker protections amid increasing extreme weather events. Michael Lynk, professor emeritus of law at Western University and a former labour lawyer, says the more frequent air quality warnings should require unions to be more 'aggressive' in asserting workplace rights in the coming years. He says workers have the right to refuse work if they feel unsafe in extreme heat or smoke, which can send a powerful message to employers to re-examine working conditions. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 6, 2025. Natasha Baldin, The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Waterloo says 'high likelihood' unapproved LiveBarn streams were active since May
Waterloo says 'high likelihood' unapproved LiveBarn streams were active since May

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Waterloo says 'high likelihood' unapproved LiveBarn streams were active since May

The City of Waterloo says there is a "high likelihood" that unscheduled LiveBarn streams at the Waterloo Memorial Recreation Complex (WMRC) ran from May 1 to July 23. City staff were first made aware of the issue on July 23, when it was discovered that a LiveBarn camera meant for streaming minor hockey games was active outside scheduled times, livestreaming footage of children taking part in summer camp activities within view of the camera. A release from the city on Wednesday says the stream is only available to subscribers but, according to LiveBarn, none of the footage was downloaded or shared. The city says the WMRC was the only facility affected in Waterloo. It says other groups, outside of children's summer camps, may have been recorded during the extended period, too. The city says it has contacted all relevant renters of the space and the guardians of campers who may have been impacted. LiveBarn cameras remain offline in all Waterloo arenas while the city works with the Waterloo Minor Hockey Association and the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. LiveBarn confirms unauthorized livestreaming A LiveBarn spokesperson confirmed livestreaming cameras filmed summer camp programs at: The Waterloo Memorial Recreation Complex in Waterloo. Hespeler Arena and Dickson Arena in Cambridge. The Lions Arena and Grand River Arena in Kitchener. The City of Waterloo says according to its contract with LiveBarn, the livestreaming company is responsible for any information recorded through the camera. "The agreement states that LiveBarn has all responsibility for the cameras and associated equipment, including the operation and use, and signage," the city said in an emailed statement sent to CBC last month. The Ontario Information and Privacy Commissioner has been notified of the livestreaming issue. "We are in the early stages of gathering information to determine next steps and cannot share additional details at this time. We can follow up with you when there are further developments," said an emailed statement from the privacy commissioner's office to CBC in July. The commissioner said it's not necessary for those impacted to file a complaint, but they can if they want to.

Air quality alerts issued in 10 states as wildfire smoke from Canada lingers in the Midwest and Northeast
Air quality alerts issued in 10 states as wildfire smoke from Canada lingers in the Midwest and Northeast

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Air quality alerts issued in 10 states as wildfire smoke from Canada lingers in the Midwest and Northeast

This year is shaping up to be one of Canada's worst wildfire seasons on record. Smoke from ongoing wildfires across Canada continued to drift into parts of the United States on Wednesday, causing hazy skies and triggering air quality alerts in multiple states across the upper Midwest and Northeast. Air quality alerts were in effect Wednesday morning from the National Weather Service in parts of the following states: Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, New York, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania and Delaware. As of Aug. 6, there are about 750 active Canadian wildfires, with at least 190 labeled 'out of control,' according to the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre. More than 16 million acres (6.8 million hectares) of land have been scorched this year, making this one of Canada's worst wildfire seasons on record. The Air Quality Index map The Air Quality Index is used nationwide to measure how severe the air pollution is within a given area and has these six ratings: Good Moderate Unhealthy for sensitive groups Unhealthy Very unhealthy Hazardous An Aug. 6 map of the Air Quality Index indicated 'moderate' ratings in parts of the Midwest and Northeast, as well as 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' around the Great Lakes region. What to be aware of during an air quality alert The NWS advises the following during an air quality alert: If it's possible, stay indoors, particularly for seniors, children and those with respiratory concerns or other health problems. If you must go out, try to limit the amount of time outside to essential activities. Minimize the use of cars, gas-powered lawn mowers and other vehicles that can increase pollution. Don't burn debris or other items at this time. Why is wildfire smoke a health concern? Wildfire smoke is a health concern, particularly for sensitive groups, because it contains tiny and dangerous pollutants that can 'affect the lungs and heart and cause serious health effects,' according to the Environmental Protection Agency. Short-term exposure to wildfire smoke can lead to respiratory effects, such as bronchitis or reduced lung function, or cardiovascular effects like a heart attack or stroke, as outlined by the EPA.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store