logo
Trump tariffs cost small Canadian firms as big business, oil enjoy exemptions

Trump tariffs cost small Canadian firms as big business, oil enjoy exemptions

CTV News06-08-2025
OTTAWA — Steve Mallia's Toronto-based telescope accessory business was thriving until March when the Trump administration imposed a 25 per cent tariff on U.S.-bound orders that do not comply with local content rules under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement.
The tariff, imposed soon after U.S. President Donald Trump took office in January, effectively stopped Mallia's StarField Optics from competing in its main market, as many of the components used in its products came from China.
'When we started to sell into the U.S., business was very strong. We were making money,' Mallia said. 'As soon as the tariff started to really take place, that disappeared.'
Mallia, who founded his company in 2018, quickly decided his company's best hope of surviving was to make his products compliant with USMCA, the 2018 trade deal that replaced the North American Free Trade Agreement.
Tough decisions small businesses like Mallia must now make highlight the uneven consequences of Trump's efforts to upend the global trading order.
While the existing trade deal means Canada and Mexico have so far been less impacted by Trump's tariffs than many other economies, there are hundreds of small and medium companies in Canada that face a direct hit for not being USMCA compliant.
Small and medium businesses represent almost 98 per cent of all firms in Canada and account for over 50 per cent of the economy, according to government data.
Mallia said production changes to accomplish compliance came at a heavy cost: six months of lost sales, along with additional expenses to set up the factory, alter his supply chain and ramp up production.
Even so, a cost-benefit analysis convinced Mallia that it was money well spent. The changes will allow him to regain access from October to a market that has accounted for about 60 per cent of StarField's sales, he estimates.
Mallia started the transition well before Thursday, when Trump hiked tariffs to 35 per cent from 25 per cent on goods imported from Canada that do not comply with the free trade deal.
Canada's steel, aluminum and auto sectors are particularly hard hit as they face separate tariffs between 25 per cent and 50 per cent. Adding to the uncertainty, USMCA is up for renegotiation next year.
To be compliant, companies such as StarField must prove that they generate a bulk of their products within the U.S., Mexico or Canada, or they have substantially altered an imported product in one of the three countries.
In Canada, a failure to comply with the trade deal means no or costly access to the world's biggest economy.
'Some companies are just not able to do that (comply), and some companies will not be able to do that in the short term,' said Clifford Sosnow, partner and chair of the international trade and investment group at Fasken, a Canadian law firm.
Oil exports duty free
About 92 per cent of Canadian exports by value entered the U.S. tariff-free in June because they were exempt, data from the U.S. Census Bureau showed. However, that figure is skewed by oil and gas shipments, Canada's top export by far, since almost 99 per cent of oil shipments entered the U.S. duty free in June.
Without oil and gas, total tariff-free imports into the U.S. from Canada fell by six percentage points in June on a yearly basis - to 89 per cent from 95 per cent.
Oil producers and other larger exporters have the resources to ensure USMCA compliance, unlike smaller firms such as Mallia's.
The amount of Canadian exports that are officially USMCA compliant jumped by 20 percentage points in April to 56 per cent, but has remained nearly unchanged since then, an analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data released on Tuesday showed.
The oil sector, which accounts for close to a third of Canada's exports to the United States, quickly adapted, with USMCA compliance rising to 84 per cent in June from 25 per cent in the same period a year ago.
Adding all other free trade provisions such as goods shipped directly to free trade zones or free trade bilateral agreements, more than 99 per cent of Canadian oil exports enter the U.S. duty-free, U.S. Census Bureau data showed.
But outside of the oil and gas sector, compliance has only moved three percentage points to 45 per cent in June from 42 per cent the same month last year, suggesting that companies are struggling to meet USMCA rules to evade tariffs.
The Bank of Canada assumes that over the next two years 95 per cent of Canadian goods exports are likely to be USMCA compliant, though lawyers and export consultants say the increase in compliance from the current level will not be quick.
Sectors struggling to comply with the trade deal and earn exemptions include exporters of live animals, meat, vegetables, cereals, chemicals and furniture, U.S. census data shows.
For many smaller companies, achieving compliance requires changing supply chains established decades ago, hiring legal counsel and documenting their production cycle for months or even years, said Sosnow from Fasken.
Barry Appleton, a professor at New York Law School and an international trade expert, said he expects more Canadian companies will become compliant, but very slowly and at a heavy cost that they will eventually pass on to customers.
'The low-hanging fruit has been picked,' he said.
Mallia is looking to ramp up sales to Europe and Australia, but knows he cannot ignore the U.S. market. He is resigned to paying the high cost to resume shipping duty-free.
'At the end of the day, they're the biggest economy in the world, and they're right there,' he said. 'You are foolish not to look at that.'
(Reporting by Promit Mukherjee; Additional reporting by Amanda Stephenson in Calgary and Fergal Smith in Toronto; Editing by Caroline Stauffer, Frank McGurty and Deepa Babington)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How CIRO's new guidance for DIY investing compares with proposals from U.K. regulator
How CIRO's new guidance for DIY investing compares with proposals from U.K. regulator

Globe and Mail

time8 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

How CIRO's new guidance for DIY investing compares with proposals from U.K. regulator

The growth of online investing has introduced millions of new investors to markets, but they're not always using the best information when making investment decisions. Regulators in Canada and elsewhere have raised concerns about do-it-yourself (DIY) investors relying on unregulated advice from social media and so-called 'finfluencers,' sometimes resulting in high-risk investments. Part of the issue is how advice is regulated. Online investing platforms are restricted from making recommendations, as self-directed investors haven't undergone suitability assessments. The Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization (CIRO) took a step toward changing that this week. As Kelsey Rolfe reported, CIRO's proposed guidance (which is out for consultation until Nov. 10) narrows the definition of 'recommendation' significantly to communication that 'endorses a specific investment decision for the client.' That means order-execution-only dealers will be allowed to provide 'decision-making supports' to DIY investors. These include tools to help find securities that align with an investor's strategies and goals, and sample portfolios that help with asset allocation (without mentioning specific investment products). The U.K. regulator is looking to go a step further. In June, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) released its own proposals that would allow firms to offer free, 'targeted support' to groups of investors with common characteristics. For example, firms are currently allowed to suggest to a consumer that they're in a position to invest; under targeted support, the firm would be allowed to suggest a specific investment product. For those already investing, firms would be able to not only flag risky investments and offer explanatory materials, but suggest an alternative product. Similarly, when an investor holds an expensive fund, firms would be allowed to suggest a product that costs less. As with CIRO, the proposed change revolves around online investing platforms making recommendations. To adopt the proposals, the U.K.'s Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001 would need to be amended to create a new specified activity of 'targeted support,' different from existing forms of advice. With investing becoming easier and cheaper, it makes sense for better information to be more available, too. But what does this mean for advisors? CIRO said in its initial consultation that it doesn't want to 'diminish the value' of the full-service advice channel. The FCA makes it clear that the targeted support proposal is a compromise: not as beneficial as more personalized advice, but a worthwhile tradeoff in the absence of support. And research has shown that most DIY investors want advice from a human at some point. Still, the proposed changes raise the bar ever so slightly, putting more pressure on advisors whose practices are built on investment recommendations without offering the personalized financial, tax and estate planning that isn't available cheaply and generically. A perfect storm: The wealth management industry is experiencing an unprecedented wave of consolidation. Combined with aging advisors behind on their succession planning, the result is a perfect storm of capital, urgency and opportunity, writes Joe Millott of Fort Capital Partners. What's in a name? In June, the Investment Industry Association of Canada (IIAC) changed its name to the Canadian Forum for Financial Markets (CFFiM). As Rudy Mezzetta reports, the move follows other rebrands from major industry organizations in the past two years, and the entrance of a new competitor. Sage advice: For money manager Paul Harris, investing is akin to meditation, especially when markets are as volatile as they've been lately. 'When you meditate, you're supposed to let things happen and not react. It's the same kind of philosophy I have with investing, which is to just absorb what's happening, because often it's only short-term,' says Mr. Harris, a partner and portfolio manager at Toronto-based Harris Douglas Asset Management Inc. Here's what he's buying and selling. Fraud risk: In early January, Megan Tong lost around $70,000 after hackers logged into one of her self-directed investment accounts, cashed in all her holdings and briefly bought and sold tens of thousands of dollars worth of two Chinese stocks. But Ms. Tong's discount brokerage, Questrade Financial Group Inc., has declined to reimburse her for most of the loss, saying it didn't result from a breach of its system, writes Erica Alini. Tax risk: Rental property owners should be aware of how the Canada Revenue Agency treats rentals to friends or relatives. As Tim Cestnick explains, a recent court decision highlights some potential red flags. Tariff risk: Canadians have been bracing for price hikes from U.S. tariffs. While some things have gotten more expensive, Mariya Postelnyak reports, not all the price spikes have been as high as anticipated, and some prices have held steady or fallen.

Trump's ‘safe and beautiful' move against DC homeless camps looks like ugliness to those targeted
Trump's ‘safe and beautiful' move against DC homeless camps looks like ugliness to those targeted

Winnipeg Free Press

time38 minutes ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Trump's ‘safe and beautiful' move against DC homeless camps looks like ugliness to those targeted

WASHINGTON (AP) — Ms. Jay didn't wait for the authorities to come before packing her tent and carrying what belongings she could across Pennsylvania Avenue on her way to whatever comes next. She'd been living her 'Girl Scout life,' she said, saving money and looking for work while homeless. When she got word that the law was on its way, she found herself living the scouting motto: Be prepared. 'Last night was so scary,' she said, recalling when federal law officers, in concert with local police, began fanning out across Washington to uproot homeless encampments. 'I don't want to be the one to wait until the last moment and then have to rush out.' President Donald Trump's housecleaning started with official Washington and the denizens of its marbled buildings, back in the bureaucracy-scouring days of the Department of Government Efficiency. Now he is taking on the other side of Washington, having sent some 800 National Guard troops to help local police go after crime, grime and makeshift homeless encampments. First came the spring cleaning Back in early spring, Trump's efforts upended the U.S. Institute of Peace, among other institutions and departments. On Thursday, authorities brought in an earth mover to clear out an encampment within sight of that hollowed-out institute's handsome Constitution Avenue headquarters. The mission to clean the capital of criminal elements and ragged edges comes under Trump's Making D.C. Safe and Beautiful Task Force. Some in D.C. believe a different kind of ugliness is playing out. 'From the White House, the president sees a lawless wasteland,' said leaders of the Episcopal Diocese of Washington. 'We see fellow human beings — neighbors, workers, friends and family — each made in the image of God.' For Andrew S., 61, the ugliness came Wednesday when agents he identified as being with the federal government treated him like an eyesore. They asked him to move from his resting place along the route where Trump would be driven to the Kennedy Center. 'You have to move because you're in eyesight of the president,' Andrew, originally from Baltimore, said he was told. He added, 'I didn't really take it serious until today, but the president really doesn't want us here.' He, Ms. Jay and some others interviewed and photographed by The Associated Press declined to give their full names in the midst of the heavy law enforcement presence in Washington. Saying goodbye to his belongings At the encampment near the peace institute, a man named George, 67, walked away Thursday carrying an umbrella in one hand and a garbage bag with some of his belongings in the other. City workers put his mattress and other possessions in a garbage truck idling nearby. He waved goodbye to it. It was that kind of day for others at the same site, too. 'I have known homelessness for so long that it is part of normal life at this point,' Jesse Wall, 43, said as he cleared his belongings Thursday from the site near the peace institute. 'What are you trying to prove here?' Wall asked, as if speaking with the law. 'That you're a bully?' David Beatty, 67, had been living at that encampment for several months. On Thursday, he watched as parts of it were roped off. Beatty and others were allowed to pack up what they could before the heavy machinery cleared remaining items from the area and dumped them into trucks and receptacles. What about the Golden Rule? He quoted a variation of the Bible's Golden Rule — 'Do unto others as you would have them do unto you' — and said, 'The idea that he's targeting us and persecuting us feels wrong to me.' Much of the clearing out Thursday was at the hands of local police. D.C. officials knew federal authorities would be dismantling all homeless encampments if local police didn't. Wayne Turnage, a deputy mayor, said the district has a process to do it 'the way it should be done.' The expectation was clear, if not overtly stated: Local police would go about the work in a more humane way than the feds. Jesse Rabinowitz from the National Homelessness Law Center said that, according to the briefing he received on the operation, people would be given the choice to leave or be detained at eight federal and 54 local sites. The intent, Rabinowitz said he believed, was to trash tents in the daylight (because authorities want the public to see that) and do the bulk of arrests in darkness (because they don't want that widely seen). Once penniless, he's now an advocate Born and raised in Washington, Wesley Thomas spent nearly three decades on the streets, struggling with drug addiction, until other homeless people and charitable organizations helped him get clean through therapy and back on his feet. Now he has had a place to live for eight years and works as an advocate for a nonprofit group that supported him, Miriam's Kitchen, where he's helped dozens find housing. 'The first day I was out there I was penniless, homeless, frightened, only the clothing on my back, didn't know where I was gonna sleep nor eat,' he said. 'Fortunately, there were some homeless people in the area, gave me blankets, showed me a safe place, St. John's Church, to rest my head for the night.' St. John's is across from Lafayette Park, which is across from the White House. It is known as the Church of the Presidents, because its sanctuary has seen all presidents since James Madison in the early 1800s. Thomas wanted the public to know that most of the people being moved off are not 'uneducated, dumb or stupid,' even if they are down on their luck. 'You got doctors, lawyers, businessmen, Navy SEALs, veterans, mailmen,' he said. 'Poor people come in all races, ethnicities and colors.' ___ Kinnard reported from South Carolina. Associated Press journalist River Zhang contributed reporting.

Tensions high at town hall as Alberta Next Panel faces polarized crowd in Edmonton
Tensions high at town hall as Alberta Next Panel faces polarized crowd in Edmonton

CBC

timean hour ago

  • CBC

Tensions high at town hall as Alberta Next Panel faces polarized crowd in Edmonton

A polarized crowd shouted at each other — and at Premier Danielle Smith — at the third Alberta Next town hall in Edmonton Thursday night. The 16-member panel, chaired by Smith, are holding 10 town halls across Alberta this summer to hear what people think about some proposals for how the province can reset its relationship with the federal government. The panellists found a skeptical and critical audience in west Edmonton. Some in the crowd laughed at Smith, when she said in her introductory remakes, "when Edmonton speaks, we listen. Many in the audience jeered at the videos that introduced each of the topics, particularly the section on leaving the Canada Pension Plan in favour of an Alberta plan. Some even pushed back at the premise of the panel. "Alberta doesn't really want you doing this right now," one man said. While people hostile to the proposals dominated the microphones, many supporters were in the crowd. The majority of people in the room were in favour of each of the six initiatives during the straw polls taken throughout the night. Kathryn Speck thanked Smith for being a truly democratic leader who is willing to listen to citizens. "I apologize on behalf of these rude Edmontonians," she said. The panel is asking people to weigh in on matters like switching to a Alberta Pension Plan, replacing the RCMP with a provincial police service, and reopening talks on the Constitution "to empower and better protect provincial rights." Bruce McAllister, the panel's moderator, lost patience with the crowd at a number of points in the evening. He yelled at one person in the audience telling him to "knock it off" and urged another to not "be a jerk." WATCH | Will Alberta Next panel result in a plan, or just another outlet for frustration? Will Alberta Next panel result in a plan, or just another outlet for frustration? 27 days ago Premier Danielle Smith's Alberta Next panel aims to hear about how the province can protect itself Ottawa while building a strong and sovereign Alberta within Canada. The CBC's Helen Pike talks to a conservative strategist and a political scientist about what the town hall format is for, and what value the province might see in hosting these discussions. Most of the people who spoke about the Alberta Pension Plan proposal were opposed to the idea. Several people told the panel that Albertans have rejected the idea so they didn't understand why Smith and her government wouldn't let it go. Two audience members criticized the province's new expense disclosure policy, which removes a requirement for the premier, ministers, deputy ministers and senior staff to publicly disclose receipts for expenses over $100. Smith said she was also confused by the policy. She said cabinet wanted to address the concerns of MLAs who didn't want the names of their favourite hotels disclosed publicly for safety reasons. "That was what the policy was supposed to be," Smith said. "It turned out to be something quite different. So we're going to see if we can maybe track down how that happened and do a reversal on that." Thursday night's event was the third town hall meeting. Earlier events were held last month in Red Deer and Edmonton. At those town halls, some Albertans offered support for the proposals, some protested at the gates and others dismissed the panel as a self-serving political exercise meant to stir up discontent and division. It is set to host events in Fort McMurray and Lloydminster in two weeks. The premier has said one of the reasons for the panel is to address concerns that are inspiring separatist sentiment in the province. Alberta public opinion pollster Janet Brown has said the government's effort is not a polling exercise but a public engagement exercise and that changing the survey questions midstream underscores that.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store