
Times letters: Labour's plan to get the railways back on track
Sir, Tony Lodge's market-led vision sits uneasily alongside the principle underpinning the state's rail renationalisation effort: that rail should be a public service, co-ordinated in the national interest, and not fragmented for private gain ('How to make Great British Railways a success', Jul 28). Open-access operators can target only the most commercially viable routes, without any obligation to serve loss-making areas or maintain a service during downturns. They do not receive subsidies but nor do they contribute to the cross-subsidy model that helps to sustain wider network coverage.
This raises a fundamental tension. A publicly owned railway aims to prioritise universal access, cohesion and public benefit. Open access, by contrast, is selective, profit-driven and potentially undermines the very structure intended to serve the whole travelling public, not just those on high-yield corridors. The challenge for Great British Railways is to reconcile efficiency and innovation with equity and public accountability; a coherent national rail service cannot afford to be cherrypicked.Michael RobinsonRet'd civil engineering consultant, Onston, Cheshire
Sir, Your editorial ('Heritage Railway', Jul 29), and Tony Lodge's dream of multiple open-access operators competing on the rail network, overlook the shortage of capacity on the tracks. After years of growth the rail network consists of bottlenecks joined up by pinch points. It is now impossible to add another train to the service without making multiple trade-offs and compromises with the requirements of other operators, social objectives and performance. In the absence of sufficient supply for a free market in capacity to operate, the choice is either centralised management doing its best to address all needs, or a seller's market.William BarterFellow, Chartered Institution of Railway Operators
Sir, Tony Lodge's Thunderer and Alistair Osborne's column (Jul 29) on the rail renationalisation programme are welcome critiques of it. There may be a number of factors militating against a benign outcome for Great British Railways, but one thing seems evident. The different 'sectors' that became established in British Rail's overall structure could point to a future where, for example, commercially oriented sectors (think of InterCity and Railfreight) operated as private-sector competing organisations, while natural monopolies (those providing shorter-distance commuter and suburban journeys) were held in public-sector, democratically accountable organisations.David Cooper-SmithBletchley, Bucks
Sir, Further to Tony Lodge's article, services may have grown during the privatisation era but reliability and punctuality have not. Plus, fares are too complex and too high. Open-access applications have tended to concentrate on providing additional services to/from London, where the approaches consist of the routes most under strain from lack of capacity. Innovative open-access applications linking provincial towns and cities, eg Carlisle to Bristol or Liverpool to Leicester, seem scarce. Not everyone wants to travel just to London. Co-ordination between operators over timetables remains, it seems, a distant goal with the latest attempt to revitalise east coast services this coming December fraught with difficulties and disagreements.
Great British Railways may have a number of issues still to address, but at least with public ownership there is an attempt to bring together track and train and to co-ordinate in the public's interest services that run essentially over one network.Anthony BoldenRustington, W Sussex
Sir, Further to William Hague's excellent column 'Push for peace now or two-state dream is dead' (Jul 29), and particularly the points he makes towards the end, I hope that all concerned will not neglect the wise advice of the late Aharon Nathan that a three-state solution, with Israel, the West Bank and Gaza as three separate states, would be far more likely to bring peace, stability and happiness to the Middle East than a two-state solution that tries artificially to link two separate territories and groups of people with significantly differing interests and cultures in a federated Palestinian state cut in two by Israeli territory.
There are surely lessons to be learnt, as he also suggested, from the short-lived attempt to create a single state of West and East Pakistan, with India in between.Andrew EdwardsLondon SW19
Sir, I have considerable respect for William Hague but waiting for 'the existence of a viable state' before recognising Palestine would serve only to provide Hamas and other terrorist organisations with a continued casus belli, and the Israelis with every incentive to continue their acquisition of Palestinian lands.
A Palestinian state should be recognised as soon as possible by the UN, conditional only on Hamas (and all other organisations representing the Palestinians) acknowledging the right of the state of Israel to exist. Israel for its part needs to undertake not to allow any further encroachment on Palestinian lands as defined by the Palestine Mandate, and agree to the principle of independent Palestinian states both on the West Bank and in Gaza. Without such reciprocal acknowledgement and recognition there can be no solution to this problem; the responsibility of the western powers, especially the US, is to do all they can to persuade both sides of this.Robert ChalmersNorwich
Sir, Further to Dr Arun Baksi's comments on the progressive decline in the working conditions of NHS staff (letters, July 28 & 29), at Frenchay Hospital in Bristol more than 50 years ago my husband, a surgeon, and I would enjoy Sunday lunches provided free in the mess served by waiting staff wearing uniform and white gloves. This was followed by relaxing in the swimming pool and a cream tea. The doctors would then play croquet on the lawn outside, having the time to discuss treatment plans for their patients. It was recognition from the hospital for the time, dedication and care given by nurses and doctors.Gill OrnsteinHarrow
Sir, Before the government gets too excited about restricting virtual private networks ('Online child safety law 'threatens free speech' ', Jul 29), it should be aware that almost every university in the UK (and Europe) uses VPNs for authentication to university services for remote working. Similarly, VPNs are used in finance, banking, commerce and just about everywhere else where secure connections are required.
Incognito access to the dark web is perfectly possible, without using a VPN, using systems such as the Tor Browser, which is specifically designed for that purpose. Restrictions on Tor, I2P and dark-web plug-ins for Chrome and Firefox is where the government might be better directing its focus to tighten online safety and security.Dr Anthony HarrisDirector of studies for computer science, Emmanuel College, Cambridge
Sir, Melanie Phillips's article ('Ayn Rand is no figurehead for conservatism', comment, Jul 29) focuses on Rand's book, Atlas Shrugged, as the definitive example of all purportedly wrong with her work, which must therefore be 'dumped'. However, she offers a simplistic understanding of Rand's contribution to literature, underscored by the continuing relevance of arguably her best work, The Fountainhead. The devotion of the novel's protagonist, Howard Roark, to the application of true innovation and integrity in the field of architecture has inspired countless budding architects and aspirational individuals.
In light of the continuous shape-shifting of conservatism through the decades, Phillips would do well to mark Roark's words: 'I inherit nothing. I stand at the end of no tradition. I may, perhaps, stand at the beginning of one.'Darius Latham-KoenigLondon SW1
Sir, Professor Rob Gross (letter, Jul 29), the director of the UK Energy Research Centre, repeats the erroneous mantra about levelised costs of wind energy being cheaper than gas. Wind energy, of course, is naturally unpredictable and unreliable. Today, wind energy only produced between 3 per cent and 5 per cent of the country's electricity needs, and natural gas back-up was needed. Wind energy adds considerably to the required infrastructure needed to ensure grid stability; these factors are always omitted from such levelised cost 'guesstimates'.
Moreover, Professor Gross does not mention that the critical issue of the disposal of turbine blades has not been solved. A reliance on wind energy will always reduce our energy security; he must surely know that the key components of generators are wholly imported from China, so his claim that this is a 'homegrown' source of energy is misleading.Professor Peter J DobsonUniversity of Oxford
Sir, The outburst by the Bishop of Fulham does the Church of England and us clergy little credit ('Bolshy bishop gives choir a dressing gown dressing down', Jul 28). It is an indication of too many self-important bishops who collectively hold back parish life (of which many of them know little) and fail to encourage vocations to increase the number of much-needed parochial clergy, without whom the Church will not grow and many ordinary people will be denied support when they need it.The Rev Toddy HoareDanby Wiske, N Yorks
Sir, The loss of fingers at work is not restricted to the metal-bashing industry (letter, Jul 29). At the Britannia Royal Naval College at Dartmouth in 1969 there was a staff officer who had lost two fingers in two incidents. The first was caused by a submarine periscope sinking into its well when his hand was in the way. The second reportedly came about when he demonstrated, later, how the first injury had occurred.Lieutenant Commander Geoffrey Carr (Royal Navy, ret'd)Melksham, Wilts
Sir, As a woman in her seventies, I must rather ruefully inform Mariah Carey that, while she may not know time, time will certainly get to know her ('Ageing won't happen to me — I won't allow it', news, Jul 29).Natalie BogodWest Bridgford, Notts
Sir, Jo Elvins's piece left me with more questions than answers about myself ('Is your husband a Whole Man like mine?', Times2, Jul 29). I fulfil all 14 of the criteria listed to identify myself as a gentler man but also enjoy red meat, football and competition.Does this make me more or less than a Whole Man?Michael DickOngar, Essex
Sir, In his scone recipe in Times2 ('Save our scones', Jul 29), Paul Hollywood suggests the use of 'a generous helping of jam'. Not any jam will do, however — the right choice is of great importance. I suggest damson, a good, tart raspberry or, best of all, chuckleberry. The cream, of course, must be Cornish clotted.Clare BeardSheffield
Write to letters@thetimes.co.uk
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
15 hours ago
- Metro
Train fares could rise even higher than we thought - here's how much
Rail fares in England could increase by 5.8% next year after new government figures showed inflation remains stubbornly high. Regulated ticket prices are usually set based on July's Retail Prices Index (RPI), one of the UK's main inflation measures. This year's hike of 4.6% was one percentage point above the RPI figure for July 2024. But this morning, it was announced that last month's RPI was 4.8% – meaning if the same approach is taken, prices would rise by 5.8%. The cost of a season ticket from Woking in Surrey, south-west of London, to the centre of the capital would increase by £247 to £4,507 as a result. Last week, campaigners blasted a potential 5.5% rise in fares, based on a prediction of July's RPI, as 'outrageous' – but the true inflation figure has proved to be 0.3% higher. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here. Bruce Williamson, spokesman for campaign group Railfuture, told the PA news agency: 'What would be the justification for jacking up fares above inflation? There isn't any. 'It's ripping off the customer, driving people off the trains and onto our congested road network, which is in no-one's interest.' The Department for Transport said an update on changes to regulated fares would be coming later this year. A spokesperson said: 'The government is putting passengers at the heart of its plans for public ownership and Great British Railways (GBR), delivering the services they deserve and driving growth. 'No decisions have been made on next year's rail fares but our aim is that prices balance affordability for both passengers and taxpayers.' The news comes as rail punctuality in the UK fell to its lowest level in five years. More Trending Statistics from the Office of Rail and Road show trains pulled into station within a minute of their scheduled arrival just two-thirds of the time in the year to July 19. That's the worst performance since the year leading up to May 30 2020. Rail travel may be about to get even more expensive, but there are often cheaper options out there if you know where to look – and are willing to be flexible. Here are a few of the simplest ways to cut the costs: Check if you qualify for a railcard. Among the groups who get discounts are people aged 16-25 or 26-30; seniors; disabled people; and those serving in the armed forces. Split ticketing. This is often offered automatically by many rail operators and ticket sellers on websites and apps. Be flexible with your times. If you are able or willing to travel at a less convenient or popular time, off-peak tickets are often considerably cheaper. Book in advance. The best time to start looking for a ticket is typically 12 weeks ahead of the journey time, and you may even be able to find affordable first-class tickets. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Virgin Atlantic air hostess 'stopped from boarding a flight after car smash' MORE: Outrage in Italy as exclusive clubs 'take over coast' and 'steal' beaches from locals MORE: I saw a kaleidoscopic light after drinking free shots in Laos – then I went blind


North Wales Live
a day ago
- North Wales Live
Rail fare hike looms with potential 5.5% increase sparking outrage among passengers
Transport can be expensive whether that's air fare, petrol money or train travel. With the latter, passengers in the UK are being warning that ticket prices could rise by as much at 5.5% in the next round of price hikes. The July Retail Prices Index (RPI) figure, which is frequently used to calculate the annual rise in rail travel costs, will be revealed on Wednesday, August 20, and that could mean higher fares for passengers in England. Meanwhile, Transport for Wales are offering £1 rail fares for a short period of time, you can read more here. Transport organisations have been left furious by the potential rise in next year's railway fares, which they have condemned as "outrageous". Just last year the Department for Transport confirmed costs would rise by 4.6%, but it looks like they may rise again. RPI is an inflation measure - released monthly - which is utilised to gauge the change in the price of retail goods and services. For money-saving tips, sign up to our Money newsletter here. It wasn't employed in 2022 or 2023, but it was in 2024, when the Department for Transport confirmed costs would rise by 4.6% - one percentage point above last July's RPI figure. These alterations to fares took effect on March 2 this year. The Government has yet to announce how it will calculate next year's railway fare increase, although banking firm Investec has predicted this year's July RPI figure at 4.5%, meaning costs could leap by 5.5% in March 2026. Bruce Williamson, of campaign group Railfuture, raged there was "no justification" for the massive increase. He said: "What would be the justification for jacking up fares above inflation? There isn't any." He continued: "It's ripping off the customer, driving people off the trains and on to our congested road network, which is in no one's interest. "One would hope that there would be some efficiency savings and economies of scale that you get from having a more integrated railway. "But I strongly suspect that if there are any savings to be had, they'd be swallowed up by the Treasury and not passed back to passengers, which I think is wrong." Around 45% of fares across Britain's railway network are regulated by either Westminster or the Scottish and Welsh governments. This encompasses season tickets for most commuter routes, certain off-peak return fares and flexible tickets for journeys around major urban areas. Railway operators determine increases for unregulated fares, though these are expected to closely mirror changes in regulated ticket costs. Ben Plowden, chief executive of Campaign for Better Transport, argued that costly fares were "putting people off" using trains. He continued: "Rising fares are not just burdening passengers, they are putting people off rail travel. "Our survey found that 71% of people would be more likely to take the train if fares were cheaper. Public support for nationalisation plummets if fares continue to rise. "As the Government progresses plans for Great British Railways, it must take the opportunity to reform fares and make rail travel more affordable." An open return ticket from Cardiff Central to Edinburgh will set you back a whopping £239.50 (with a booking fee) if you buy the ticket in advance on Trainline. However, you can find return flights from Cardiff airport to Edinburgh airport with Ryan Air for over half of the price at £108 on Skyscanner. The Department for Transport has confirmed that "no decision" has been made regarding fares for the upcoming year. A spokesperson stated: "The Transport Secretary has made clear her number one priority is getting the railways back to a place where people can rely on them. "No decisions have been made on next year's rail fares but our aim is that prices balance affordability for both passengers and taxpayers."


Scottish Sun
3 days ago
- Scottish Sun
Rail passengers face 5.5% fare hike in MONTHS as furious critics blast ‘outrageous rip off'
Critics fumed that expensive tickets were "putting people off" rail travel Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) RAIL passengers could be stopped in their tracks as ticket prices are set to increase by 5.5%. Transport groups have been left steaming by the potential increase in next year's rail fares, which they have slammed as "outrageous". Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Transport groups have been left steaming by the potential increase in next year's rail fares Credit: Getty The July Retail Prices Index (RPI) figure, which is often used to determine the annual increase to rail travel, will be announced on Wednesday. RPI is a measure of inflation - published monthly - which is used to measure the change in the cost of retail goods and services. It was not used in 2022 or 2023, but it was in 2024, when the Department for Transport confirmed prices would go up by 4.6% - 1 percentage point higher than last July's RPI figure. The Government has not yet said how it will determine next year's rail fare rise. And banking group Investec has forecast this year's July RPI figure at 4.5%, meaning prices could jump by 5.5% in March 2026. Bruce Williamson, of pressure group Railfuture, fumed there was "no justification" for the monumental increase. He said: "What would be the justification for jacking up fares above inflation? There isn't any. "It's ripping off the customer, driving people off the trains and on to our congested road network, which is in no one's interest. "One would hope that there would be some efficiency savings and economies of scale that you get from having a more integrated railway. "But I strongly suspect that if there are any savings to be had, they'd be swallowed up by the Treasury and not passed back to passengers, which I think is wrong." Rachel Reeves confirms bus fare cap WILL rise to £3 after MPs slammed 'betrayal of working people' About 45% of fares on Britain's railways are regulated by either Westminster or the Scottish and Welsh Governments. This includes season tickets on most commuter journeys, some off-peak return tickets and flexible tickets for travel around major cities. Train operators set rises in unregulated fares, although these are likely to be very close to changes in regulated ticket prices. Ben Plowden, chief executive of Campaign for Better Transport, said that expensive fares were "putting people off" using trains. He added: 'Rising fares are not just burdening passengers, they are putting people off rail travel. 'Our survey found that 71% of people would be more likely to take the train if fares were cheaper. 'Public support for nationalisation plummets if fares continue to rise. "As the Government progresses plans for Great British Railways, it must take the opportunity to reform fares and make rail travel more affordable.' In March 2024, rail fares went up by 4.9%. How to save money on your train ticket HERE are some top tips to help you save cash on rail fares. Split tickets If you're taking a lengthy train journey then you could save hundreds of pounds by splitting your tickets. You won't need to change trains and National Rail lets you split your ticket as long as the train calls at the station you buy the tickets for. One site that works this out for you is Buy a season ticket Regular travellers should be able to save by purchasing either a seven day, monthly or annual season ticket, which will allow them to make the journey an unlimited number of times as long as it's valid. If you're making the same journey on three or more days a week, then a seven-day season ticket is likely to save you money, compared to buying a new one every day. You can check to see if a season ticket will save you money on your trip with National Rail's season ticket calculator. Consider Carnet tickets for London travel If you often travel back and forth to London on the train but you don't go regularly enough to buy season ticket, you might save with a Carnet ticket. They offer a 10% discount on plenty of routes. Tickets are valid for three months and you can buy books of peak (anytime) or off-peak tickets. Book at least 12 weeks in advance Network Rail releases its timetable 12 weeks in advance, so ticket firms usually make their fares available at this time. Just like plane tickets, the earlier you book the lower the price you'll pay for your seat. You can sign up to the Trainline's ticket alert service and it will tell you when cheap advance tickets go on sale for a particular journey. Also, the National Rail's future travel chart shows the furthest advance date that you can buy tickets. Save money with a Railcard If you're a regular traveller then a railcard should shave a third off the price of your ticket. Just make sure you'll make more in savings over a year than the price of the Railcard. See for more information. And in Rachel Reeves' Autumn Budget last October, it was confirmed that travellers would be forced to pay up to 4.6% more for trains. These changes to fares came into effect on March 2 this year. Following the increase, a yearly ticket from Rugby to London rose by £496.62 to £11,292.62. And the commute from Milton Keynes to London leapt by £357.33 to £8,125.33. The budget document said it would be 'the lowest absolute increase in three years". The Department for Transport confirmed "no decision" had been made on next year's fares. A spokesman said: "The Transport Secretary has made clear her number one priority is getting the railways back to a place where people can rely on them. "No decisions have been made on next year's rail fares but our aim is that prices balance affordability for both passengers and taxpayers."