Vanguard to add four more funds to investor proxy choice program
Vanguard will expand its program allowing investors to choose individualized investment and engagement policies to four more funds in the second half of 2025, the company announced last week.
The nation's second-largest asset manager said the program will include four index funds, allowing nearly 10 million investors to participate if they so choose, according to a May 29 release. The expansion will 'nearly quadruple' the assets under management to nearly $1 trillion in program eligible funds and bring the total number of funds eligible funds to 12.
The program's expansion comes after an April Vanguard survey of more than 1,000 investors found 83% of respondents believed it was important for asset managers to consider investor preference when casting proxy votes, and 57% of respondents expressing interest in participating in proxy choice programs.
Vanguard first launched its proxy voting choice pilot in February 2023 with three eligible equity funds, before including two additional index funds for the 2024 proxy season and adding three more in November to bring the total to eight eligible funds. The program gives participating investors five different policy options, allowing participants to align their votes with company boards, Vanguard's recommendations, Glass Lewis' ESG policy, a 'wealth-focused' anti-ESG policy from Egan-Jones or vote in proportion with other shareholders.
Vanguard expanded its policy options for the 2025 proxy season to give investors the Egan-Jones policy option and replaced a former 'not voting' with the mirror voting policy. Additionally, November's expansion was the first time that retirement plan sponsors were allowed to participate if they have program eligible funds in their portfolio.
Vanguard's Global Head of Investment Stewardship John Galloway said in last week's release that the program's continued expansion 'underscores [Vanguard's] confidence that a range of independent perspectives contributes to a healthy corporate governance ecosystem and well-functioning capital markets.'
The expansion will add Vanguard's Value Index Fund, Growth Index Fund, Mid-Cap Index Fund and Large-Cap Index Fund to the program.
The May 29 program expansion will also broaden its eligibility to 529 plan sponsors, according to the release. Two-thirds of investors who participated in Vanguard's April study (66%) said they would opt in to such a program if offered by their employer's retirement plan.
However, the expanded eligibility does not guarantee expanded participation.The asset manager reported having 40,000 participants in the program after the 2024 proxy season, which Morningstar Sustainalytics' Director of Investment Stewardship Research Lindsey Stewart said at the time was a 'decent start,' but 'not a large proportion' of Vanguard's investors.
Last September, Vanguard reported a plurality of participants — 43% — aligned their voting policy with the asset manager's recommendations in the 2024 proxy season and another 30% aligned their votes with company board recommendations. Under a quarter of participants (24.4%) chose the Glass Lewis ESG policy.
Recommended Reading
Vanguard's updated investor proxy choice program includes anti-ESG voting option
Errore nel recupero dei dati
Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio
Errore nel recupero dei dati
Errore nel recupero dei dati
Errore nel recupero dei dati
Errore nel recupero dei dati
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Immigrants seeking lawful work and citizenship are now subject to 'anti-Americanism' screening
Immigrants seeking a legal pathway to live and work in the United States will now be subject to screening for 'anti-Americanism',' authorities said Tuesday, raising concerns among critics that it gives officers too much leeway in rejecting foreigners based on a subjective judgment. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said officers will now consider whether an applicant for benefits, such as a green card, 'endorsed, promoted, supported, or otherwise espoused" anti-American, terrorist or antisemitic views. 'America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies,' Matthew Tragesser, USCIS spokesman, said in a statement. 'Immigration benefits—including to live and work in the United States—remain a privilege, not a right.' It isn't specified what constitutes anti-Americanism and it isn't clear how and when the directive would be applied. 'The message is that the U.S. and immigration agencies are going to be less tolerant of anti-Americanism or antisemitism when making immigration decisions," Elizabeth Jacobs, director of regulatory affairs and policy at the Center for Immigration Studies, a group that advocates for immigration restrictions, said on Tuesday. Jacobs said the government is being more explicit in the kind of behaviors and practices officers should consider, but emphasized that discretion is still in place. "The agency cannot tell officers that they have to deny — just to consider it as a negative discretion,' she said. Critics worry the policy update will allow for more subjective views of what is considered anti-American and allow an officer's personal bias to cloud his or her judgment. 'For me, the really big story is they are opening the door for stereotypes and prejudice and implicit bias to take the wheel in these decisions. That's really worrisome," said Jane Lilly Lopez, associate professor of sociology at Brigham Young University. The policy changes follow others recently implemented since the start of the Trump administration including social media vetting and the most recent addition of assessing applicants seeking naturalization for 'good moral character'. That will not only consider 'not simply the absence of misconduct' but also factor the applicant's positive attributes and contributions. 'It means you are going to just do a whole lot more work to provide evidence that you meet our standards,' Lopez said. Experts disagree on the constitutionality of the policy involving people who are not U.S. citizens and their freedom of speech. Jacobs, of the Center for Immigration Studies, said First Amendment rights do not extend to people outside the U.S. or who are not U.S. citizens. Ruby Robinson, senior managing attorney with the Michigan Immigrant Rights Center, believes the Bill of Rights and the U.S. Constitution protects all people in the United States, regardless of their immigration status, against government encroachment. 'A lot of this administration's activities infringe on constitutional rights and do need to be resolved, ultimately, in courts,' Robinson added. Attorneys are advising clients to adjust their expectations. 'People need to understand that we have a different system today and a lot more things that apply to U.S. citizens are not going to apply to somebody who's trying to enter the United States," said Jaime Diez, an immigration attorney based in Brownsville, Texas. Jonathan Grode, managing partner of Green and Spiegel immigration law firm, said the policy update was not unexpected considering how the Trump administration approaches immigration. 'This is what was elected. They're allowed to interpret the rules the way they want,' Grode said. 'The policy always to them is to shrink the strike zone. The law is still the same.'
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Spurs CEO breaks silence amid new arena negotiations
The post Spurs CEO breaks silence amid new arena negotiations appeared first on ClutchPoints. As the City of San Antonio moves forward with new arena plans for the San Antonio Spurs, recently elected mayor Gina Ortiz-Jones is still calling for a strategic pause in search of more information. The potential Spurs home is tied to what's been dubbed Project Marvel – a proposed sports and entertainment district that would prominently sit downtown. Spurs, Sports & Entertainment CEO R.C. Buford released a statement ahead of a scheduled vote by City Council on whether to negotiate within a framework of terms. 'We're pleased to take this next step in the process, which will ultimately give the voters the opportunity to decide on the arena project this November,' Buford continued while alluding to an eventual possible citywide vote. 'As part of the proposed term sheet, the Spurs' total commitment will be $2.1 billion. What has been consistent throughout this process is our commitment to ensure no tax impact on San Antonio families and our assurance to cover 100% of any and all construction cost overruns.' The term sheet is at the heart of the debate led by Mayor Jones-Ortiz, who was elected via runoff in early June. 'From our very first conversations with city leaders, this has always been about more than a venue,' Buford added. 'It's about building a place that fosters opportunity, creates lasting memories and ensures San Antonio continues to thrive for generations to come.' The contents of the Spurs' terms Mayor Ortiz-Jones continues to adamantly state that the city does not have enough data for an initial vote among elected local representatives, citing that the firm that conducted the economic analysis has ties to a Spurs ownership partner. Amid those claims, the Spurs, who've called the Alamo City home for more than 50 years, released details on their commitments included in the proposed nonbinding agreement. Among them: -$500 million Spurs direct contribution toward the $1.3 billion arena cost -Spurs cover 100% of any and all cost overruns -$1.4 billion Spurs guarantee, alongside private developers, in private development projects to create jobs and enhance family entertainment opportunities -$75 million Spurs Community Benefits Agreement over the 30-year lease term -$2.1 billion total Spurs commitment all-in (arena contribution, overruns, private development guarantees, and community benefits) -No cost to San Antonio homeowners or renters – because the financing structure doesn't rely on property taxes or even sales taxes -No money diverted from the city's general fund -$489 million City contribution -$311 million County contribution The Spurs organization added that their commitments have grown in a few areas and that they're excited to reinforce the strength of their investment in San Antonio and Bexar County. The five-time NBA champions add that the changes reflect the progress made once all parties, including themselves, City staff, and the County had the opportunity to work together at the negotiating table. The franchise maintained that it's a collaborative process that's allowed each group to contribute in earnest and with due diligence to shape the framework of the term sheet. It's a project going on three years in the making. The Spurs state they look forward to continuing a transparent process with City Council and community and view the term sheet as an important step toward the shared goal of creating a vibrant downtown that will benefit the entire community. 'We're grateful to the San Antonio City Council, City Manager Erik Walsh, Judge Peter Sakai, and the Bexar County Commissioners for the time and commitment they've invested in this process,' Buford concluded. 'Their leadership has been invaluable in helping us reach this milestone, and we look forward to continuing this work together on behalf of the people of San Antonio and Bexar County.' Related: Key piece of 2014 Spurs title team officially retires from basketball Related: San Antonio Spurs 2025-26 season predictions after NBA schedule release
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Georgia Republicans, against backdrop of 2026 election, push to eliminate state income tax
Georgia Republicans, against backdrop of 2026 election, push to eliminate state income tax ATLANTA (AP) — As the 2026 election looms, Georgia Republicans seeking higher office met Tuesday to begin exploring plans for Georgia to eliminate the state's personal income tax. The Republican contenders for lieutenant governor sat on the committee spearheaded by Republican Burt Jones, who currently holds the role and is running for governor with U.S. President Donald Trump's endorsement. 'If we want to continue to stay competitive in the state of Georgia and continue to be the number one state to do business, we've got to be looking for ways to keep us competitive and make it where we have a competitive advantage over states that we are competing with all the time," Jones said. Most of the lawmakers on the panel praised the idea as one that would help working families and small businesses after hearing from Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform and a prominent conservative lobbyist for tax cuts. Currently, eight states, including Florida and Tennessee, don't tax individuals' income, according to the Tax Foundation, a tax policy think tank. Other states, including North Carolina and Louisiana, have reduced income taxes or are on their way to eliminating them. In Georgia, Democrats oppose the idea, saying it would benefit the wealthy rather than low-income people, who would face other levies. Atlanta Democrat Sen. Nan Orrock said Tuesday that eliminating the income tax would hurt vital services across the state by reducing state revenue, especially amid federal cuts to programs such as food stamps, education grants and disaster relief. 'I can go on and on with needs that we have now in many areas that would argue for having a robust revenue to meet the needs of our citizens," said Orrock. Norquist said states still generate revenue after cutting income taxes. One reason is that when businesses know states are on track to eliminate income taxes, he said, they start investing there, and residents flock over too. 'When you attract more people into the state and more investment into the state, you end up with both more money for individuals but also more tax revenue at lower rates,' said Norquist. Georgia income taxes are expected to bring in $20 billion for the state in 2026, accounting for almost half of state revenue, according to the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute Georgia Republican Gov. Brian Kemp signed into law this year income tax rebates of up to $500 and a reduction in taxes to 5.19% in January for all income earned in 2025. That's part of a long-term plan to cut Georgia's income tax rate to 4.99%, which could happen as early as next year. The law already took Georgia's former system of tax brackets and created a flat income tax. The state has also paid rebates on income taxes to taxpayers in recent years, thanks to billions in surplus cash, Higher-income taxpayers collect the most benefits from income tax reductions. The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy found two-thirds of the income tax cut benefits would flow to the highest-earning 20% of Georgians. Republicans said that was only natural because most Georgians in the lowest 20% of the income distribution are mostly exempt from state income taxes. Democratic gubernatorial candidates haven't ruled out tax reductions. Former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms has suggested eliminating the state income tax for public school teachers, but said eliminating income taxes altogether would hurt funding for schools and raise costs for lower-income families. Republicans are still forging ahead. 'While the mechanics are up for debate, I think it's clear that the end goal is not,' said Sen. Appropriations Committee Chairman Blake Tillery, a Vidalia Republican who is running for lieutenant governor. ___ Kramon is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues. Charlotte Kramon, The Associated Press
