Teachers of New Jersey teachers, REVOLT!
Public-school teachers across New Jersey just got utterly robbed by their union, the New Jersey Education Association, to the tune of $40 million.
That's how much the NJEA-funded super PAC Garden State Forward dumped into into Working New Jersey, the independent expenditure group supporting Montclair Mayor Sean Spiller . . . whose other main job is running the NJEA.
Spiller's own campaign raised an anemic $438,000; he finished fifth in the six-person Democratic primary.
Advertisement
By the way, Garden State Forward also gave another 'independent' outfit, Protecting Our Democracy, $5 million over 2022-'23 promoting Spiller in advance of his gov run.
That's $45 million that the union boss spent on promoting himself.
And Spiller still had the chutzpah to claim that his loser had the backing of 'working folks.'
Advertisement
But it wasn't the voluntary backing, was it Sean?
The NJEA's own writeup of the results talked of a 'strong showing' from Spiller, 'a nontraditional candidate' whose 'people-powered' campaign the pundits dismissed.
Of course the pundits were right — and the teachers were robbed.
Advertisement
Whether or not NJEA teachers oust their boss in the next union vote, the new governor and Legislature should look to prevent any repeat of this outrage.
'Everything's legal in New Jersey,' goes the 'Hamilton' joke, but Spiller's outrageous self-dealing still sets a new low in Garden State political stench.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Military Crackdown Is Starting To Dent His Poll Numbers
As Donald Trump launched his militarized crackdown in Los Angeles, the president and many of his advisers were convinced that deploying troops to the streets of a major American city would be good politics for them. They maintain, three people familiar with the matter say, that immigration was one of Trump's strongest issues, that it helped get him back in the White House, and that his mass deportation program has polled well since the 2024 campaign. No matter the pushback to Trump sending in the troops (likely illegally) from Democrats, the media, or protesters, the administration's brain trust saw this as a winner for them — and something they wish to replicate. 'If it works out well in L.A., expect it everywhere,' a Trump administration official said of the president's desire for militarized Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids across the nation. (This official and the other three sources spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to discuss internal deliberations.) But just days into Trump's deployment of National Guard troops and Marines to quell anti-ICE protests in L.A., new public polling suggests that Trump's recent deportation operations, and his decision to use the military against his domestic enemies, are not boosting his approval ratings. In fact, Trump's latest power grab is tanking his latest numbers. Trump's general platform of federal immigration crackdowns polled well in the build-up to his election and second term; 2024 polling showed Trump's calls for grand-scale deportations of undocumented immigrants enjoyed majority support. (However, that majority support diminished when voters were pressed on specific policies and methods.) In April of last year — to the alarm of Democratic operatives and Biden officials — a Harris Poll survey showed 42 percent of Democrats warming up to the idea. According to a polling analysis by data journalist G. Elliott Morris, Trump entered office with a strong positive approval rating on immigration. But those ratings peaked in February at a high of +11.3 percent. Now, for the second time since April, Morris' polling average shows Trump's immigration approval rating in the negatives. It appears the militarized incursion into Los Angeles is not playing well with the public at large. A recent YouGov survey shows 47 percent of American adults disapprove of Trump ordering the Marines to L.A., compared to 34 percent who support it. In the same poll, 45 percent disapprove of the president's use of National Guard troops, with 38 percent of respondents backing it. This aligns with a Wednesday Quinnipiac poll that found 54 percent of respondents disapprove of Trump's handling of immigration, and that 56 percent disapprove of his handling of deportations. (This is a markedly negative turn from an April Quinnipiac poll that found only 50 percent of respondents disapproved of his handling of immigration issues.) Similarly, a Thursday AP/NORC poll found that 53 percent disapproved of Trump's handling of immigration, compared to 46 percent who approve. A text survey conducted by The Washington Post and George Mason University's Schar School found that the public rated Trump's immigration and deportation policies 'negatively by a 15 percentage-point margin, 52 percent to 37 percent.' A Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Thursday shows a stark disconnect between the public's general approval for strong action to restore order, and disapproval of what Trump is doing in Southern California. It found that 48 percent of respondents theoretically agree with the statement that the president should 'deploy the military to bring order to the streets.' But only 38 percent of respondents actually approved of how the president is responding to protests in Los Angeles. Those numbers are likely to continue trending downward as the Trump administration continues to behave badly in L.A. On Thursday — during a press conference in which Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem declared her department would be staying in Los Angeles to 'liberate this city from the socialist and burdensome leadership' of Democrats — Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) was tackled to the ground and handcuffed by FBI agents when he attempted to ask a question of Noem. Video of Padilla's detention quickly went viral on social media. After being released without charges, the senator told reporters that 'if this is how DHS responds to a senator with a question you can only imagine what they're doing to farm workers, to cooks, to day laborers out in the Los Angeles community and throughout California.' Without a doubt the videos and stories of teenagers, pregnant women, and everyday working people being chased and detained by ICE is reaffirming what polling and surveys have long showed to be true: Americans generally believe that undocumented migrants with criminal records should be deported, but they are generally put off by indiscriminate immigration raids and deportations that disregard the circumstances of the individual. There's a silver lining, perhaps, for Trump and his party in some of this data. Democrats in Congress are also wildly unpopular, driven by dissatisfaction from their own liberal voters. 'The public supports keeping America safe and secure, and they don't like the concept of people here illegally — the issue is how it's administered,' says Frank Luntz, a longtime pollster and a conservative Trump critic. 'They have an agenda the American people support; their problem is the way they execute it and articulate it.' Voters do want immigration laws enforced, he says, but they 'don't want senators beaten up at press conferences. This has been the challenge of the Trump administration from the beginning,' Luntz adds, 'because they think they are on the right track, but the way it's being administered right now, they're not.' Even the president himself — who wrote on Thursday that 'all' undocumented people 'have to go home' — seems to be oscillating on the issue, at least from a public-relations standpoint. Earlier in the day Trump posted on Truth Social that 'farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them. This is not good,' Trump wrote. 'We must protect our Farmers, but get the CRIMINALS OUT OF THE USA. Changes are coming!' For the time being, however, the Trump administration is barreling ahead on its vision of his very American police state. 'In November, the American people resoundingly rejected the Democrat vision for immigration — open borders and millions of unvetted illegal aliens — and endorsed President Trump's vision for immigration — deportations and enforced immigration law,' White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a statement to Rolling Stone. 'President Trump is keeping his promise to the American people and violent left-wing rioters won't stop that.' Asked about the recent slate of negative polls for Trump on immigration, John McLaughlin, a top Trump pollster, simply replies: 'You mean the fake polls?' He points to rosy results for Trump in his own surveys and conservative-leaning polls: 'We did a national poll for Club for Growth yesterday among 1,000 likely voters and Trump's approval was 53-44 Rasmussen Reports poll today is 53-45,' McLaughlin says. More from Rolling Stone Kim Gordon Has Words for Donald Trump on Re-Recorded 'Bye Bye 25!' Trump Calls on Iran to Agree to Nuclear Deal 'Before There Is Nothing Left' Is Trump's Troop Deployment to Los Angeles Illegal? Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Billionaire Michael Bloomberg opens his wallet for Andrew Cuomo's mayoral bid
NEW YORK — Billionaire Michael Bloomberg was no fan of Andrew Cuomo when the two served overlapping tenures as mayor and governor. But on Friday all appeared forgiven, with Bloomberg's $5 million donation to a super PAC boosting Cuomo's mayoral bid. It's the largest cash infusion yet to the entity and comes in the final 10 days of the Democratic primary to oust Mayor Eric Adams, once a Bloomberg ally. The former mayor — a party hopscotcher who is now a Democrat — is jumping in as Cuomo faces a threat from democratic socialist challenger Zohran Mamdani, whose views on hiking taxes on the rich and criticisms of Israel are anathema to Bloomberg. The donation dovetails with the former mayor's endorsement of Cuomo this week and arrives at a critical time for the ex-governor, as he tries to mount a comeback to lead the nation's largest city. Bloomberg and Cuomo, longtime rivals, now find themselves united by a mutual loathing of the Democratic Party's left flank. After conversations between their aides, the men met earlier this week following Cuomo's Bloomberg TV interview, someone familiar with the sitdown confirmed. The donation to the Cuomo-supporting super PAC Fix the City adds to Bloomberg's $2.6 million contributions this election cycle to groups supporting City Council candidates who back charter schools, long a pet issue for the former mayor. Mamdani represents the opposite of a Bloomberg-style ideal to lead the city: A 33-year-old state lawmaker with a thin resume, an upstart challenger once considered a long shot who wants to hike taxes on rich New Yorkers and has supported the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement targeting Israeli goods. And so Bloomberg set aside his long-standing animus toward the former governor and instead praised his extensive managerial experience — Cuomo's calling card in the race. The leading contender has stepped up his criticism of Mamdani in recent days by pointing to his paltry legislative record in Albany and questioning whether the young lawmaker has the chops to stand up to President Donald Trump. The Cuomo campaign on Thursday released a TV ad underscoring both points, and Cuomo raised them during a caustic debate Thursday night. Some polls show a tightening race in the crowded field, following months of double-digit leads for Cuomo. A poll conducted by Data for Progress for a super PAC backing Mamdani showed Cuomo would defeat him 51 percent to 49 percent after eight rounds of voting. A survey by Public Policy Polling showed Mamdani leading Cuomo 35 percent to 31, but did not include a ranked-choice voting simulation. Other polls, including one released by Cuomo's campaign and performed by Expedition Strategies, found the ex-governor handily defeating Mamdani. A public poll is expected to be released next week. Helmed by Steve Cohen, a longtime Cuomo confidant, the pro-Cuomo super PAC has received contributions from wealthy hedge fund managers, real estate developers and Trump supporters like Bill Ackman. Its largest donation until Friday was $1 million from the online delivery firm DoorDash. The group has spent more than $10 million on TV and streaming ads, according to the media tracking firm AdImpact. And with this donation, it has raised more than $18 million since forming in March. Bloomberg is accustomed to dipping into his considerable fortune to fund political campaigns and causes. He spent $1 billion on his 104-day 2020 presidential campaign and funds nationwide gun control efforts. His net worth, amassed through the founding of his eponymous media business empire, stands at more than $104 billion, according to Forbes. Spending by the super PAC against Mamdani has backfired in recent days, after a never-sent mailer criticizing the democratic socialist included a doctored photo of him with a darker, heavier beard. Mamdani accused the group of stoking 'the very fears of that division in this city." A spokesperson for the PAC said the mailer was 'rejected for production and subsequently corrected.' The entity has also attracted scrutiny from campaign finance regulators who are probing whether Cuomo's campaign improperly communicated with the super PAC through a practice known as 'redboxing' on the candidate's website. Spokespeople for Cuomo and Fix the City have insisted campaign finance laws have been followed.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Hampshire jury acquits consultant behind AI robocalls mimicking Biden on all charges
A political consultant who sent artificial intelligence-generated robocalls mimicking former President Joe Biden to New Hampshire Democrats last year was acquitted Friday of voter suppression and impersonating a candidate. Steven Kramer, 56, of New Orleans, admitted orchestrating a message sent to thousands of voters two days before the state's Jan. 23, 2024, presidential primary. Recipients heard an AI-generated voice similar to the Democratic president's that used his catchphrase 'What a bunch of malarkey' and, as prosecutors alleged, suggested that voting in the primary would preclude voters from casting ballots in November. 'It's important that you save your vote for the November election,' voters were told. 'Your votes make a difference in November, not this Tuesday.' Kramer, who would have faced decades in prison if convicted, testified that he wanted to send a wake-up call about the potential dangers of AI when he paid a New Orleans magician $150 to create the recording. He was getting frequent calls from people using AI in campaigns, and, worried about the lack of regulations, made it his New Year's resolution to take action. 'This is going to be my one good deed this year,' he recalled while testifying in Belknap County Superior Court. Prosecutors argued the calls amounted to an attack on the integrity of the primary, while Kramer's defense tried to direct outrage at the Democratic National Committee instead. At Biden's request, the DNC dislodged New Hampshire from its traditional early spot in the 2024 nominating calendar, but later dropped its threat not to seat the state's national convention delegates. Biden did not put his name on the ballot or campaign there, but won as a write-in. Kramer, who owns a firm specializing in get-out-the-vote projects, argued that the primary was a meaningless straw poll unsanctioned by the DNC, and therefore the state's voter suppression law didn't apply. The defense also said he didn't impersonate a candidate because the message didn't include Biden's name, and Biden wasn't a declared candidate in the primary. Jurors apparently agreed, acquitting him of 11 felony voter suppression charges, each punishable by up to seven years in prison. The 11 candidate impersonation charges each carried a maximum sentence of a year in jail. 'Our commitment to enforcing election laws remains steadfast," New Hampshire Attorney General John M. Formella said in a statement. 'We will continue to work diligently to address the challenges posed by emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, to protect the integrity of our elections.' Kramer also faces a $6 million fine by the Federal Communications Commission, but he told The Associated Press that he won't pay it. Lingo Telecom, the company that transmitted the calls, agreed to pay $1 million in a settlement in August. The agency, which did not respond to requests for comment, was developing AI-related rules when Donald Trump won the presidency, but it has since shown signs of a possible shift toward loosening regulations. And though many states have enacted legislation regulating AI deepfakes in political campaigns, House Republicans in Congress recently added a clause to their signature tax bill that would ban states and localities from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade.
