Money & Me: 'Investing in Dubai property is great to beat inflation'
Dutch national Kristan De Graaf dismisses the idea of saving money in the bank. Instead, he is willing to take big risks and believes in the compounding power of investments. The 30-year-old, who lives with his wife and one-year-old son in Dubai Hills, earns money through two main sources. He is the co-chief executive and founder of Elite Rentals Dubai, a supercar rental and luxury yacht charter service. However, he makes big profits through property investments in which he and his brother buy plots of land to develop or acquire mansions and renovate them. They then sell them on at 'record values'. For instance, Mr De Graaf bought the land for the Dubai Hills property he now lives in three years ago for Dh16.5 million ($4.5 million), built a villa for Dh17.5 million and believes it is now worth Dh82 million. He says his most cherished purchase is a Lamborghini Tecnomar 63 yacht in Dubai, for which he paid €4.6 million ($4.8 million) last year. He has lived in the UAE since 2019 when he arrived on holiday and never left, and has a master's degree in international business management at the University of Amsterdam. My first job was selling apartments to expatriates in Amsterdam and I earned €2,500 per month in 2015. In 2019, my brother and I took over a yacht management and supercar luxury rental in Dubai. My friends were already managing the business very successfully and we took over. We initially earned around €10,000 to €15,000 net profit, or approximately Dh40,000 to Dh45,000, per month. We do big numbers now as the business has scaled a great deal. But luxury car and yacht rentals are just one part of what we do. Our real business is to buy land for development or mansions for renovations, and sell them. For instance, we bought a 13,500 square feet plot in Dubai Hills in 2022 for Dh16 million, spent Dh18 million on developing it and sold it for Dh82 million in 25 months. So, we made a profit of Dh48 million on this project alone. We put all our money in real estate and cryptocurrencies. I started investing in crypto in 2019 and in property three years ago. Most of my property investments are in the UAE. No, I don't take any form of debt. I have strong partners behind me to support my real estate investments. No, I come from nothing. My father was an architect for superyachts. I learnt everything about money myself. We faced a big tax issue in the Netherlands, which put us down very hard. But we came back from it and the incident made us very strong. My standard expenses come up to around €50,000 per month. These are on my basic needs such as clothes, food, drinks and going out socially. I don't save. Instead, I believe in benefiting from the power of compounding investments. I don't plan to retire because I do what I like. Yes, it's saved in a safe crypto wallet that can be liquidated anytime. Yes, when we need money or cash flow for new real estate projects. That's the only thing we worry about. I want to create more awareness about the real estate projects that we undertake. I don't have a personal financial goal per se. To be able to go wherever I want when I want and not stay in one place. I have already achieved financial freedom. Investing in property in Dubai is great to beat inflation. Never put your money in the bank, put it in the right instruments so it will keep compounding.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
3 days ago
- Arabian Post
Willem Blijdorp: Building a Global Business Empire
Willem Blijdorp initially set his sights on a career in tourism. From 1970 to 1975, he studied at the Hotel Management School in Maastricht, the Netherlands. However, upon graduation, he chose an unexpected path. He decided to become the organizer of the now-legendary 'Butterfahrten'. This marked the beginning of an entrepreneurial journey that continues to this day. The Butterfahrt Concept During a business trip to Germany, Blijdorp was struck by how popular Butterfahrten were among Dutch tourists. These day trips involved boarding a ship that quickly sailed beyond national waters. Once in international territory, passengers could shop duty-free to their heart's content. ADVERTISEMENT Sensing a unique opportunity, Blijdorp introduced the concept to the Dutch market in 1975. Operating out of Eemshaven, he launched daily Butterfahrten for Dutch tourists. Blijdorp's success lay in offering more than just tax-free shopping. His cruises delivered a memorable experience, blending commerce with entertainment. Passengers were encouraged to shop, but they also enjoyed a full day of games, music, quizzes, and small lotteries. This unique combination of retail and entertainment struck a chord with the Dutch public. In 1976, Blijdorp began working part-time for shipping company Kamstra, whose mini-cruises were booming. That same year, he received a full-time offer from Marriott Hotels in the United States. Simultaneously, Kamstra also offered him a permanent role. Although he originally intended to pursue a career in the hotel industry, he took the leap into entrepreneurship. On the condition that he could acquire shares in the company, he accepted Kamstra's offer and came on board full-time. Blijdorp's talent for business soon became evident. He built strong relationships with German suppliers, securing exclusive deals available only to Butterfahrt passengers. These arrangements not only kept customers coming back but also laid the groundwork for his later venture: B&S. The Rise of B&S In 1985 Blijdorp founded B&S, a company focused on the distribution of duty-free products. What began as a clever cruise concept soon transformed into a serious business. While the European unification brought significant economic advantages, it also marked the end of duty-free sales within the EU. As a result, the Butterfahrten ceased in 1999. Nevertheless, B&S remained focused on the duty-free market, which meant that B&S continued to grow. What began as modest boat trips from Eemshaven evolved into a global tax-free distribution empire. The experience, relationships, and business acumen developed during the Butterfahrten years became the foundation of B&S's growth into a market leader. Expanding the Business Today, he is also an active investor with a particular interest in startups and social ventures. He is involved in companies such as Mercatum Medical Care – a medical wholesaler, SocialDatabase – a data-driven marketing platform, and Advion -a distributor of cleaning and sanitary addition, he is committed to social initiatives like the Papageno House, a residence that supports children with autism. He also contributes to international projects that provide clean water and sanitation in underserved communities, such as those in Ghana. Also published on Medium. Notice an issue? Arabian Post strives to deliver the most accurate and reliable information to its readers. If you believe you have identified an error or inconsistency in this article, please don't hesitate to contact our editorial team at editor[at]thearabianpost[dot]com. We are committed to promptly addressing any concerns and ensuring the highest level of journalistic integrity.
Arabian Post
29-05-2025
- Arabian Post
Morgan Stanley Rejects Dutch Tax Evasion Claims
Morgan Stanley has firmly denied accusations from the Dutch Public Prosecution Service alleging the financial giant evaded tax on dividends worth nearly $1 billion more than ten years ago. The dispute centres on complex tax structures employed by the bank that Dutch authorities contend were designed to avoid paying the appropriate tax on substantial dividend income. Dutch prosecutors assert that the investment bank engaged in schemes dating back to the early 2010s to shelter dividend earnings from taxation in the Netherlands. The case focuses on transactions routed through multiple subsidiaries in various jurisdictions, including the Netherlands and Luxembourg, which allegedly facilitated aggressive tax avoidance. Authorities argue this deprived the Dutch treasury of hundreds of millions in revenue. However, Morgan Stanley insists all tax planning adhered strictly to local laws and international tax treaties, and that any dividends received were correctly reported and taxed in compliance with regulations. The bank's legal team describes the allegations as unfounded, emphasising that the dividend structures in question were part of legitimate financial arrangements utilised widely in the industry during the period under review. Morgan Stanley highlights that similar structures have been scrutinised by tax authorities across Europe, often resulting in disputes but also numerous rulings affirming their legality when applied transparently and within the framework of existing laws. ADVERTISEMENT This case emerges amid growing scrutiny by European tax authorities over multinational corporations' use of intricate financial arrangements to minimise tax liabilities. Governments across the continent have intensified efforts to clamp down on perceived tax avoidance schemes, adopting stricter regulations and seeking to recover revenues from earlier years. The Dutch Public Prosecution Service has increasingly targeted financial institutions and large companies suspected of employing aggressive tax strategies, making Morgan Stanley's situation part of a broader enforcement trend. At the heart of the dispute is the interpretation of Dutch tax rules governing dividend withholding taxes and the application of international treaties intended to prevent double taxation. Prosecutors allege that Morgan Stanley's structures artificially reduced withholding tax obligations by exploiting mismatches between different countries' tax systems. The bank, however, argues these mechanisms reflected legitimate treaty benefits designed to avoid taxing the same income multiple times across borders, a standard practice in international finance. Legal experts point out that cases involving alleged tax evasion or avoidance by multinational banks are often complex, hinging on fine distinctions between lawful tax planning and illicit evasion. Courts must consider whether transactions have genuine economic substance or serve primarily to obtain tax advantages without corresponding business purpose. Morgan Stanley's defence underscores the presence of legitimate business rationale behind the dividend arrangements, including the efficient management of capital and investor returns, which challenges the prosecutors' claims. The proceedings have attracted attention from industry observers and tax specialists who note that the outcome could influence future tax enforcement strategies. Given the substantial sums involved and the prominence of the parties, the case is likely to set a precedent in how tax authorities tackle dividend-related tax disputes in the financial sector. The situation also reflects ongoing tensions between governments' efforts to secure tax revenues and corporations' rights to structure their affairs in tax-efficient ways under the law. Morgan Stanley operates as one of the world's leading investment banks, with extensive international operations that often necessitate complex financial and tax arrangements. The institution maintains a strong commitment to compliance and corporate governance, asserting that its policies meet or exceed regulatory standards globally. The bank's response to the allegations emphasises transparency and cooperation with tax authorities to resolve the matter through legal channels. ADVERTISEMENT While the Dutch case targets transactions from over a decade ago, it resonates with broader global trends in tax regulation. Countries are increasingly collaborating to close loopholes and enforce tax transparency, supported by initiatives such as the OECD's Base Erosion and Profit Shifting project and the implementation of stricter reporting requirements. This evolving landscape poses challenges for multinational corporations that must navigate a patchwork of national laws and international agreements. Morgan Stanley's legal defence highlights that the dividend payments at issue were subjected to appropriate taxation in other jurisdictions, thus complicating claims of outright evasion. The bank notes that the complexity of cross-border tax rules often leads to differing interpretations between taxpayers and authorities, which can only be resolved through judicial or administrative review. The institution remains confident that the facts will support its position once all evidence is thoroughly examined. The Dutch Public Prosecution Service, which spearheaded the investigation, has intensified its approach towards large-scale tax cases, signalling a willingness to pursue aggressive enforcement to deter corporate tax avoidance. The allegations against Morgan Stanley form part of a series of cases targeting financial institutions that allegedly structured their operations to reduce tax bills. Authorities have emphasised that pursuing these cases is essential to uphold the integrity of the tax system and ensure a level playing field for all taxpayers. Morgan Stanley's challenge to the allegations includes detailed legal arguments about the interpretation of tax treaties and domestic tax laws. The bank contends that it fully complied with disclosure and reporting obligations and that any tax benefits received were legitimate under existing rules. The defence also points to rulings from tax courts in other countries that have upheld similar structures, suggesting a degree of legal uncertainty that complicates prosecutors' claims. The case is expected to proceed through the Dutch judicial system, with possible appeals and negotiations that could extend over several years. The financial sector closely watches developments, recognising the case's implications for tax risk management and compliance strategies. Morgan Stanley's insistence on its innocence highlights the broader debate around the balance between tax optimisation and the boundaries of lawful conduct.
Dubai Eye
08-05-2025
- Dubai Eye
Salvage to begin in Italy for Lynch's yacht after fatal sinking
The recovery of British tech tycoon Mike Lynch's superyacht from the waters of northern Sicily is expected to begin in the coming weeks to help shed light on how a supposedly unsinkable vessel disappeared into the sea last August. The 56-metre-long (184-foot) Bayesian, with its majestic single 72-metre mast, was moored off the small port of Porticello when it was likely hit by a downburst, a very strong downward wind, in the early hours of August 19. The Bayesian capsized and sank from the stern in the space of 16 minutes, killing seven people, including Lynch and his daughter Hannah. Since then, the ship owned by the Lynch family has been lying on its starboard side at a depth of 49 metres. The other six passengers, including Lynch's wife Angela Bacares, and nine crew members survived. The tragedy has attracted international attention because of the fame of Lynch, known as "The Bill Gates of Britain". The shipwreck has also puzzled naval marine experts. The 534-tonne Bayesian, built in 2008 by yacht manufacturer Perini Navi, now owned by the Italian Sea Group should have withstood the storm and, in any case, should not have sunk as quickly as it did, experts say. Italian prosecutors, who are investigating the yacht's captain and two other crew members for potential manslaughter, said their investigation will not be completed before the ship is lifted and inspected. They summoned lawyers for all parties involved and technical advisers to Porticello on Wednesday to oversee a salvage operation expected to take 20-30 days. "I don't think (the lifting) is going to be decisive for the investigations, but it's certainly important," said Mario Bellavista, a lawyer for the family of Recaldo Thomas, the onboard cook who died in the shipwreck. He told journalists in Porticello that raw data from on-board equipment that has already been extracted from the wrecked yacht, including video surveillance cameras and navigation systems, will be shared with lawyers in June. The consortium picked to salvage the yacht, led by UK-based consultancy TMC Marine and featuring a joint venture between Dutch companies HEBO Maritiemservice and Smit Salvage, plans to cut the mast before raising the vessel. Preparatory works are already being conducted offshore from a 700-square-metre floating platform. An underwater robot is surveying the Bayesian, whose tanks contain 18,000 litres of diesel. The vessel is expected to be brought to the surface by HEBO Lift 10, one of Europe's most powerful floating cranes, and then taken to Termini Imerese, about 40 km east of Palermo. The CEO of Italian Sea Group, Giovanni Costantino, blamed the sinking on a series of "indescribable, unreasonable errors" by the crew, and ruled out any design or construction flaws. "The impossible happened on that boat ... but it went down because it took on water. From where, the investigators will tell," he said in an interview with Reuters in August. According to a prosecutors' document seen by Reuters, the night watch crewman, Matthew Griffiths, is suspected of failing to notice the worsening weather conditions, while the other sailor under investigation, Timothy Parker Eaton, was allegedly late in spotting that the boat was taking in water from the back. Both did not promptly warn Captain James Cutfield, who, in turn, is suspected of not taking all the necessary measures to deal with the emergency and not adequately warning passengers of the danger. The three suspects have not commented publicly on the allegations. Another yacht that was anchored near the Bayesian survived intact. Karsten Borner, the captain of that vessel, said the Bayesian flipped on its side and sank within minutes.
