Altucher Highlights Overlooked Media Signals Around Elon Musk's Starlink Ambitions
Austin, TX, July 20, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Author and entrepreneur James Altucher has published a new account detailing what he believes may be the most important development in Elon Musk's career since the founding of SpaceX and Tesla.
The development centers on Musk's satellite internet initiative, Starlink—and the possibility of a sweeping announcement expected on August 13, 2025. While the details of such an announcement remain undisclosed, Altucher says key pieces of information are already hiding in plain sight.
What's So Special About August 13?
Altucher references August 13, 2025 repeatedly, calling it a 'pivot point.'
'After this date, the window could slam shut—and you may never have this same chance again,' he warns .
He adds: 'I believe this is the moment—when everything Elon's been building toward with Starlink finally goes public… at a level most people simply aren't prepared for'.
Why Starlink Holds a Unique Position in U.S. Infrastructure
Musk's vision for Starlink includes a global network of over 42,000 satellites beaming internet access directly to earth.
'Starlink is not just a tech company,' he writes. 'It's a private satellite grid that could one day serve as the backbone of the global internet. And right now, most Americans are completely unaware of what that means' .
About James Altucher
James Altucher is a bestselling author, entrepreneur, and former hedge fund manager. He has founded or co-founded more than 20 companies, including ventures in technology, media, and finance. He's the author of over 25 books—including Choose Yourself , The Power of No , and Skip the Line . Altucher is a regular contributor to publications like The Wall Street Journal and Forbes and has been featured on CNBC, Fox Business, and other major networks. He currently hosts a top-ranked podcast and newsletter followed by millions worldwide.
Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same.
Ahmedabad Plane Crash
GlobeNewswire provides press release distribution services globally, with substantial operations in North America and Europe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
18 minutes ago
- The Hill
Paramount, Skydance expected to close deal on Aug. 7
Paramount and Skydance announced Friday that, with the Trump administration's approval, the highly anticipated merger between the entertainment giants is expected to take place next month. The Aug. 7 date, unveiled in a press release, comes after the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on Thursday allowed Skydance's acquisition of Paramount to move forward after the merger was first proposed last year. FCC Chair Brendan Carr in announcing the decision said he welcomed Skydance's commitment to remaining 'unbiased' in its journalism and willingness to promote 'a diversity of viewpoints across the political and ideological spectrum.' 'Americans no longer trust the legacy national news media to report fully, accurately, and fairly,' Carr added. 'It is time for a change.' The move caps off months of turmoil between Paramount Global, the parent company of CBS, and President Trump. Trump sued CBS's '60 Minutes' last year after he argued an interview it aired with former Vice President Harris was altered in her favor during the 2024 presidential election cycle. While the company fought the claims, including releasing a full transcript from the episode, it ultimately settled with the administration for $16 million. Those funds are set to go to Trump's eventual presidential library. The news outlet has also faced criticism in recent days after CBS made the decision to sunset 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert' next May, after more than 30 years on air. Paramount said the move was based on finances, but critics have argued the settlement and Skydance deal were likely involved — and bribery allegations have been floated. Comedian Stephen Colbert, who has hosted the show since 2015, has been openly critical of the merger. Colbert blasted the network earlier this week for choosing to axe the show and thanked those who have reached out in support, including Democrats, press freedom advocates and many of his late-night counterparts. He added that 'one key mistake' the network made when moving forward with the plan is that 'they left me alive.' Colbert also lashed out at Trump after the president said in a post online that he 'absolutely' loved that the comedian was getting 'fired.' 'How dare you, sir,' the host responded. 'Would an untalented man be able to compose the following satirical witticism: 'Go f‑‑‑ yourself.'' Under the terms of the $8 billion merger, the company will become 'New Paramount' and will be led by Trump-ally and billionaire David Ellison, the son of tech tycoon and Oracle founder Larry Ellison.
Politico
19 minutes ago
- Politico
Americans don't approve of Trump. But they don't like Democrats either.
While voters still have significant concerns over the president's and the Republican Party's handling of the economy, inflation, tariffs and foreign policy, the majority of respondents nonetheless say they trust Republicans more to handle those issues in Congress. Despite criticism of the administration's handling of inflation — disapproval outweighed approval by 11 points in the poll — the Republican Party, by 10 points, is trusted more than Democrats to deal with inflation. That's the same case when it comes to thoughts on the president's drastic tariffs policy. By 17 points, voters disapproved of Trump's handling of tariffs, while still trusting Republicans more on the issue to Democrats by 7 points. Health care and vaccine policy are the only two policy issues in which respondents favor Democrats to Republicans on. Both Trump and the Republican Party at large are also disliked by more Americans than liked, but by far lower margins than Democrats in this survey. The president has a -7 point net unfavorability, while the GOP is at -11 in the WSJ survey. The Journal poll has found Trump's favorability rating to be relatively stable through the beginning of his second term. But other recent surveys have found far lower approval ratings for Trump. 'The Democratic brand is so bad that they don't have the credibility to be a critic of Trump or the Republican Party,' Anzalone told the newspaper. 'Until they reconnect with real voters and working people on who they're for and what their economic message is, they're going to have problems.' Despite widespread irritation of Democrats, voters still said that if an election was held today, they would back a Democrat for Congress over a Republican by 3 points, 46 to 43 percent. It's still a drop from this time in 2017, six months into Trump's first term, when Democrats held an 8-point advantage in that category. The Journal polled 1,500 registered voters, conducted from July 16-20 by landline and cellphone. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percentage points.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Delaying Social Security Leads to Bigger Benefits Payments. 3 Ways to Help Make It Happen
Key Points You don't need to start your Social Security benefits and IRA withdrawals at the same time. You may wish to work more years -- and so consider what kind of work you can reasonably do. Adding a few more years of wage-producing work could also bolster your calculated benefits. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook › You probably already know that postponing your Social Security retirement benefits will make your eventual payments bigger. Specifically, as things stand right now, for every month after reaching your official full retirement age (or FRA) that you wait to claim, your future payments grow to the tune of 2/3 of 1%. That's 8% per year, for a little more meaningful perspective, which isn't a bad little pay bump. And the program will continue adding this credit every month you postpone your payments all the way until you turn 70. With the average monthly Social Security check now worth $1,976, waiting this long to file for benefits can mean a few hundred extra bucks per month. It's easier said than done, however. Life's realities -- like health issues or expenses -- can get in the way. With that as the backdrop, here's a look at three things you can do to help yourself delay claiming Social Security's retirement payments for as long as possible, beefing up the size of your checks once you do decide to initiate these well-earned benefits. Start your IRA distributions before your Social Security payments Many retirees begin collecting Social Security payments and start living on their retirement savings right after they retire. They often have to, in fact -- life requires it. Even if the mortgage is paid off, groceries must still be bought and utility bills need to be paid. You're certainly not required to tap both sources of retirement income immediately after you stop earning a work-based income. If you only need one or the other, only utilize one and let the other continue growing for at least a little while longer. But why not claim Social Security benefits first and let your retirement savings continue to grow in the interim? There's certainly a case to be made for this alternative. For instance, if health issues create a better-than-average chance of shortening your life span, you may be better served by collecting as much Social Security as you can while you can. In this same vein, when you initiate your Social Security benefits can potentially impact your spouse's Social Security income later in life. Conversely, if you've got a sizable stash of money in an ordinary (non-Roth) IRA or 401(k), taking more but smaller taxable distributions from these accounts by starting withdrawals at a relatively early age might reduce your total lifetime tax bill resulting from these distributions. Withdrawals from retirement accounts are also flexible, meaning you can take more, or less, as needed. That's not the case with Social Security. What you get is what you get, and with one time-limited exception, once you start collecting Social Security you don't have the choice of stopping. Unfortunately, the only way to know for sure which of these plans makes the most sense for you is by pulling out a pencil and paper and doing a side-by-side comparison. This will require a bit of data-gathering just to make sure you've got all the information you'll need to do the math. But it would be time well spent if you've feasibly got the option of only tapping one source or the other when starting your retirement. Consider the practicalities of working for more years That being said, if delaying Social Security benefits for as long as possible means you'll also need to work -- at least part time -- to make ends meet in the meantime, some strategic career planning may be in order. Namely, you'll want to make sure you're able to continue working past an age when many other people are calling it quits. And it's not just a matter of making sure your age doesn't translate into health-related reasons for leaving the workplace, although this is certainly something to consider. (For example, handling heavy equipment, tools, and materials can take a sizable toll on an older body. If the option to move to a more administrative role materializes, take it.) Later in your career also isn't a time to sacrifice job security for a chance to work at a start-up that might be out of business within a year, for instance. The point is, you want to give yourself the very best chance of continuing to work well past your earliest eligibility for Social Security benefits. Make as much money as you (reasonably) can for at least 35 years Finally, not only will holding off on the initiation of your Social Security benefits make your eventual payments bigger, but postponing these payments could also give you more time to pay more Social Security taxes that bolster your future benefit. Many people may not realize it, but when the Social Security Administration determines how much it owes you in retirement benefits, it looks at your 35 highest-earning (adjusted for inflation) years. Not working a total of 35 years doesn't mean you won't get anything -- the Social Security Administration simply credits you zero dollars' worth of income for every year less than 35 that you worked. This, of course, results in a smaller benefit. Even if you're not "maxing out" your taxable work-based income, though, something is better than nothing if you'd otherwise have fewer than 35 years' worth of taxable wages. But what if you've already worked a full 35 years? There may still be an upside to continuing to work. If you happen to be earning relatively more now than you did earlier in your career, these higher-earning years will replace any lower-earning ones when Social Security determines which of your work years are your 35 best in terms of taxable work-based wages. Of course, working for longer also allows you to tuck more away into a retirement savings account. Just be realistic. If you physically shouldn't continue to work or if you're miserable while you're working, don't do it. No amount of money is worth lowering your overall mental and physical well-being at any stage of your life. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Delaying Social Security Leads to Bigger Benefits Payments. 3 Ways to Help Make It Happen was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
