Ohio Library Day brings fight for library funding right to the Statehouse
Calls from the Ohio Library Day gathering of about 350 library staff members from across the state were possibly heard from the Ohio Statehouse atrium on Tuesday, because the newest House version of the budget walks back plans to eliminate the Public Library Fund.
If it wasn't the advocacy gathering on Tuesday, it could have been the calls and emails legislators received amid the budget process, according to some that attended the event.
'I have never in my entire time in the Statehouse received more emails and phone calls from individuals … advocating for their libraries,' said House Minority Leader Allison Russo, D-Upper Arlington, to cheers from the crowd.
Republican House Speaker Pro Tempore Gayle Manning also said she's 'been receiving a lot of emails lately,' as has state Sen. Jerry Cirino, R-Kirtland.
'It is very clear what your interests are,' said Cirino, who will face budget negotiations head-on as the budget discussion heads for the Senate Finance Committee, of which he is the chair.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Cirino made no guarantees about funding, partly because the House had not finished their discussions of the omnibus bill as of Tuesday morning when he spoke to the crowd.
'No guarantees, don't know what it's going to end up as,' Cirino said. 'But trust me, you've got a lot of us that really believe in libraries and what you do and what you bring to the communities.'
A summary of the omnibus bill released on Tuesday afternoon states that the current distribution of state funds to public libraries was put back, instead of a proposed 'population-based formula' initially written into the House budget draft. The omnibus bill is set to be put to a vote on Wednesday.
The new budget amendment appropriates $490 million in fiscal year 2026 for the Public Library Fund, and $500 million in fiscal year 2027.
The House budget proposal, even with the restoration of the PLF, comes in at a lower allocation than Gov. Mike DeWine proposed in his executive budget, which had an increase to the fund from 1.7% to 1.75% of tax revenue in the General Revenue Fund.
According to the Ohio Library Council, DeWine's proposal would have allocated $531.7 million in 2026 and $549.1 million the year after.
DeWine praised libraries at Tuesday's event, and said, of funding public libraries as it has been done for the last century, 'I think that's probably something that really should be continued.'
'Our libraries are really at the center of each community,' DeWine said. 'It doesn't matter whether it's in an inner city, it doesn't matter whether it's in Harrison County or any of our smaller counties.'
Asked for tips on advocating as the budget moves on to the Senate, the governor said engaging directly with the senators in individual districts would make the most impact, and give them the perspective of those in their communities.
'We all react to people and we react to stories,' he said. 'Statistics are interesting, stories are people.'
Anne Rhodes and Allison Howell, of the Mansfield/Richland County Public Library, were more than happy to give DeWine and others the story of their library, which not only provides reading services, but also a 'library of things' where residents can rent items such as power tools and board games. The library can help convert old VHS tapes and other old recording types for free, and brings their bookmobile to nursing homes and assisted living facilities.
Rhodes said a community member told her his mother gets books from the bookmobile monthly, looking forward to the delivery every time.
'He said it has just changed her world,' Rhodes said. 'It gives her something to do and keeps her interested, and she's excited to see what she gets every month.'
The 'library of things' not only saves people the cost of buying a power tool or musical instrument that they may only need temporarily, but helps enrich lives without the burden of cost, Howell said.
'We have kids come in and they get so happy that they can get a board game that they can play with their parents because they may not be able to afford a board game,' she said.
Library patrons were panicked when they heard news that state funding might be at risk, according to Rhodes.
'When they started talking about these budget cuts, I don't know how many phone calls we got in our office, pretty much immediately with people, their hair was on fire,' Rhodes said. 'I've had people call in tears that they're worried about the cuts.'
Russo, Manning, Cirino, and state Sen. Beth Liston, D-Dublin, all spent some of their time at the library advocacy event explaining how their local libraries benefitted them, from reading help when they were children, to helping their own children, and giving them space to hear from constituents on the issues of the day. Now, more than ever, legislators said libraries are in need of support.
'I think everyone will agree that in our changing times, there has been a huge need for places where people can come together and gather and feel part of things,' Liston said. 'I would agree that it is critical that we maintain the funds for the library system through our public library funding.'
Cirino didn't question the value of libraries, but as the budgeting process goes forward into his committee and the Senate, he said a big question will be: 'How much can we afford to support it?'
'I think like everybody else that we appropriate, it should be a biennial appropriation process that's justified based on input and feedback that we get, not an automatic number,' Cirino told media after he spoke to the library group. '… I think the way that the House presented it in their sub bill (with a population-based formula) … I think will actually be better off for libraries.'
Russo said changes to the Public Library Fund that would reduce the monies going to those entities, even more so than the $27 million public libraries lost over the last year, would bring the costs back to the residents. Without state funding, libraries are forced to ask for property tax levies to supplement the costs of business and performing what Russo said are 'critical needs in our communities.'
'When we take money away from those efforts that are being done very well in our communities, that actually costs us money in the longterm,' Russo told the Capital Journal. 'The reason that our communities have to keep going back to local residents is because we are not doing our share here at the Statehouse.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
Newsom says special election on California redistricting planned for November
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) said on Friday they were moving forward with plans to hold a special election in November for voters to approve a ballot measure that would ultimately allow Democrats to pass a new House map ahead of 2026. 'We have till Aug. 22. With the leadership behind me, they will get this on the ballot. We're calling for a special election, that will be the first week of November,' Newsom said. The governor — flanked by several California lawmakers, as well as Texas Democrats who fled their state — said they did not want to eliminate the independent redistricting commission in charge of drawing the map. 'We are talking about emergency measures to respond to what's happening in Texas, and we will nullify what happens in Texas,' Newsom vowed. The move comes in response to Texas Republicans who are looking to create five pick-up opportunities in a new House map.


Boston Globe
13 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Smithsonian restores Trump to impeachment display in American history museum
The statement said that the interim sign, which had been in place from September 2021 until this July, was removed because it was not consistent with other sections of the exhibit and blocked the display case. 'We removed it to make way for a more permanent update to the content inside the case,' the Smithsonian said. The removal drew swift outcry from some members of the public as well as several Democratic leaders. The Smithsonian Institution has faced growing concerns about political interference at the education and research complex amid the Trump administration's efforts to exert more control over its work. Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer called the removal 'pathetic' during Senate floor remarks last week. 'You can't make this up,' he said. 'This is a man rewriting history - or thinking he can rewrite history. He can't, but he thinks he can.' Advertisement The Smithsonian said last week that no government official asked them to remove content from the exhibit. It also said that no other changes had been made at the museum. In a statement, Lindsey Halligan, a White House official charged with scrutinizing 'improper ideology' at the Smithsonian, reiterated that the White House wasn't involved with the revision. 'That said, it's encouraging to see the institution taking steps that align with President Trump's Executive Order to restore truth to American History. As part of that truth, it's important to note that President Trump was acquitted twice by Senate, fully and on every count - a fact that belongs in the historical record.' Some edits to the display's text are evident, including the addition of the word 'alleged' in the placard's description of the conduct that led to Trump's first impeachment. The display's main panel was also updated to reflect include Trump's name alongside Andrew Johnson, Richard M. Nixon and Bill Clinton. Of Trump's first impeachment, the impeachment display now reads: 'On December 18, 2019, the House impeached Donald Trump for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The charges focused on the president's alleged solicitation of foreign interference in the 2020 presidential election and defiance of Congressional subpoenas. Trump was acquitted in January 2020.' The temporary placard had read: 'On December 18, 2019, the House impeached Donald Trump for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress. The charges focused on the president's solicitation of foreign interference in the 2020 presidential election and his defiance of Congressional subpoenas. President Trump was acquitted in January 2020.' Advertisement Trump is the only president to have been impeached twice. In 2019, he was charged by the House with abuse of power and obstruction of Congress for his attempts to withhold military aid meant for Ukraine and pressure its government to investigate his political rival Biden. He was acquitted by the Senate in 2020. Then, just over a year later, Trump was impeached again, on a charge of incitement of insurrection following the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack. He was acquitted a second time, after leaving office. Of his second impeachment, the display reads: 'On January 13, 2021, Donald Trump became the first president to be impeached twice. The charge was incitement of insurrection based on his challenge of the 2020 election results and on his speech on January 6. Because Trump's term ended on January 20, he became the first former president tried by the Senate. He was acquitted on February 13, 2021.' The temporary placard had read: 'On January 13, 2021, Donald Trump became the first president to be impeached twice. The charge was incitement of insurrection, based on repeated 'false statements' challenging the 2020 election results and his January 6 speech that 'encouraged - and foreseeably resulted in - imminent lawless action at the Capitol.' Because Trump's term ended on January 20, his acquittal on February 13 made him the first former president tried by the Senate.' Since returning to the White House in January for his second term, Trump has attempted to exert influence over prominent cultural institutions, including by taking over the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, making drastic changes at the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities and imposing budget cuts on the National Park Service. Advertisement In March, Trump signed an executive order to eliminate 'divisive narratives' across the Smithsonian museums and 'restore the Smithsonian Institution to its rightful place as a symbol of inspiration and American greatness.' Months later, he attempted to fire Kim Sajet, the director of the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery, for being a 'highly partisan' person - though he had no authority to do so. The White House provided a list of 17 instances it said supported the president's claims about her, including the caption for the museum's presidential portrait of Trump mentioning his two impeachments and 'incitement of insurrection.' Early Friday afternoon in the 'American Presidency' exhibition, visitors milled about the display case. Some had been aware of the Trump text's removal. 'I heard it was taken out, and I came here to see it,' said Jodi Lindstrom, 49, visiting from Minneapolis. 'I don't think it's a good idea for the president to have a say over what is history. … You can't erase it. It's what happened. So I'm very happy to see it back in.' Following The Post's reporting about the change, the Smithsonian said it would restore Trump to the impeachment display 'in the coming weeks.' 'It does say four now,' said Ed Burk, 75, of Washington, D.C., leaning in to examine the display. But he wasn't satisfied by the alterations. 'Clinton gets a little more attention. Why not something as big for Donald Trump?' Mindy Kiser, 52, visiting from Wichita, had not previously heard about the exhibition's alterations. Advertisement 'It's disappointing to know that the museum may have caved to outside influences but also reassuring to know that they did the right thing and restored whatever they took away,' Kiser said. Her eyes lingered on the other items in the display case, and then the Trump text, displayed low with two small artifacts: admission to the Senate gallery for impeachment proceedings. 'The fact that he's been impeached twice, it does seem to be a little bit smaller, in my opinion,' she said. But 'in these days, we should just be happy that it's represented at all.'


New York Times
14 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Suggests a Russia-Ukraine Peace Deal Would Include ‘Swapping of Territories'
President Trump suggested Friday that a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia would include 'some swapping of territories,' signaling that the United States may join Russia in trying to compel Ukraine to permanently cede some of its land. 'We're going to get some back, and we're going to get some switched,' Mr. Trump said while hosting the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan for a peace summit at the White House. 'There'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both, but we'll be talking about that either later, or tomorrow.' Mr. Trump provided little additional detail about what territory could be swapped or about the broader contours of a peace deal, saying he did not want to overshadow the peace pledge between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Ukrainian leaders have been adamantly opposed to relinquishing any of their land to Russia, and the country's constitution bars President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine from ceding any territory. There would also be numerous political and military hurdles for Ukraine in turning over land to Russia. Earlier this week, Mr. Trump told European leaders that he planned to meet with Mr. Putin as soon as next week, and would follow up shortly afterward with a meeting between himself, Mr. Putin and Mr. Zelensky. Beyond the question of territory, there are a number of equally thorny issues that would need to be settled. Among them is whether Mr. Zelensky would get security guarantees from Europe, the United States or NATO to keep Russia from pausing, then resuming, a war to try and take the rest of the country. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.