Te Pūkenga disestablishment continues despite $16.6m surplus
Savings came from winding down its Te Pūkenga's head office and regional campuses.
Photo:
supplied
The New Zealand Institute of Skills and Technology, Te Pūkenga, finished last year with a $16.6-million surplus and $382m in the bank.
The super-institute's annual report was tabled in Parliament on Thursday, showing a profit just as work
accelerates to disestablish the organisation
and return to a
system of stand-alone polytechnics
and work-based learning organisations at the start of next year.
The report showed income increased $68.4m or five percent last year, much of it from growing international student enrolments, but it attributed much of its surplus to cost-cutting rather than increased earnings.
"The financial result, showing a 144 percent improvement on the previous year, is the outcome of focusing on addressing financial performance through an intensive cost savings exercise across all divisions, structural changes, vacancy management, lease reduction, property sales and programme rationalisation," chief executive Gus Gilmore said in the report.
Gilmore told RNZ the surplus was "a fantastic result" for the institute just two years after it was created to take over 16 polytechnics and nine industry training organisations.
He said Te Pūkenga had budgeted and was on target for a break-even result this year.
Vocational Education Minister Penny Simmonds.
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
Last week, Vocational Education Minister Penny Simmonds told the Education and Workforce Select Committee that Te Pūkenga's
result did not prove it was viable
, and was possible because it had wound down spending on a centralised head office.
Gilmore told RNZ some of this year's savings came from winding down its head office, but a lot also came from its regional campuses.
"We had some 200 FTE's two years ago. That number is down to 52 during 2024, which is the period in focus.
"We made a $6.5 million cost saving in the national office and overall we've seen steady reductions across a number of our business divisions as we reviewed the demand for some of the less profitable programmes," he said.
"Yes, there was some cost reduction in the national office but there was also cost reduction within the the 25-odd business division. So we took a holistic approach right across the whole network. It wasn't simply about the national office. The national office isn't the greatest proportion of our cost. The greatest proportion of our cost is the delivery across the country."
Gilmore refused to be drawn on whether the report showed that Te Pūkenga would have been financially viable had it been allowed to continue.
"I don't have obviously those numbers in a hypothetical situation. What I can say is we've been really focused on revenue growth and cost reduction, obviously the two most important ingredients of returning to surplus," he said.
He also would not comment on the scale of cuts recommended by financial advisers and how much remained to be axed.
"In the low hundreds was the number of of redundancies in our 2024 report, we reported 288 redundancy payments, that is $9.5 million, which is similar to the number in 2023," he said.
"There will be more this year, although I can't give you an exact number, but it's going to be in the magnitude of low hundreds."
Asked if Te Pūkenga had sufficient reserves to recapitalise its polytechnics, Gilmore said that was a decision for government and last year's Budget had included a contingency for that purpose.
The report included a $9.6m provision for an "onerous lease" on the Weltec and Whitireia downtown Wellington campus.
It showed "impairment" of the Taradalde campus due to flood damage of $21.3m in 2023, $13.8m in 2024 and elsewhere showed a $15.5m insurance payment for work on Taradale campus.
The report said the institute had ring-fenced cash reserves totalling $63.4m from five former polytechnics and eight former ITOs, as well as $51m in other financial assets from four former polytechnics and two former ITOs.
It said Te Pūkenga's top-tier management of 5.1 FTE were paid $3.99m last year.
However remuneration information elsewhere in the report said one employee was paid in the range of $470-479,999, three in the range of $380-389,999, and one in the range of $370-379,999.
"Cessation payments" were made to 353 staff and totalled $10.77m, an average of $30,497.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
28 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Woman had to beg to pay hefty Watercare bill in instalments after issue with faulty smart meter
The faulty meters means some customers had been getting zero use bills for months. Photo: Nunnicha Supagrit A Watercare customer says she had to beg to pay off a huge catch-up bill in instalments after a faulty smart meter gave her zero-use bills for months. The issue stemmed from Watercare's smart meters, which it told Checkpoint more than 13,000 of were not working . The water supplier had known about problems with one type of smart meter since October last year, and the fault had so far affected about one third of the 40,000 meters installed since 2022. Hamideh, from West Auckland's Henderson, told Checkpoint, she had complained to Watercare more than once about an issue with her smart meter which began in November last year, but while waiting for the issue to be fixed she was sent a bill to the amount of $219. "It was shocking - I was not prepared for it." She had lost her job a few months ago and knew she wouldn't be able to afford to pay off the bill in one go. "I called Watercare and asked to pay in instalments and they said no, not possible. I explained I lost my job and was told that I should have saved for it." After about 25 minutes on the phone, Hamideh said it was accepted she could pay in instalments. "But there's still no reading on my water meter. I was quite pissed off when she told me I had to save for it. "They told me the meter just stopped syncing data... they didn't communicate the problem with their customers. It's been seven months and no solution." Watercare chief financial officer Angela Neeson told Checkpoint she was really sorry to hear about Hamideh's experience and said it needed resolving. "That it's taken seven months to resolve does sound unusual." Neeson said when Watercare realised there was an issue with the smart meters processes were put in place to identify when the meters started to become faulty. "The process does take a couple of months because the first month of a zero read could just be someone on holiday or out of the house but after the second month we move the customer to a manual read," she said. She acknowledged there was nothing on the Watercare website about the faulty meters and said Watercare had "been focused on liasing with the customers". "We watch for month two to identify when there is potentially a faulty meter." Watercare had now stopped installing that particular meter, Neeson confirmed but she did not give a timeline on how long it would take to replace the faulty ones. "We will always look and how we can do better and we're considering whether we don't wait that one month after a zero read to investigate so that it shortens that period for customers. "We are always looking at how we can do things better". Neeson confirmed water bills would increase 7.2 percent at the start of July which she said reflected the cost of running the operations and becoming financially independent. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Music licenser chasing up hundreds of businesses for playing music in the workplace
All commercial businesses, including offices and trade sites, are required to pay a licencing fee, with any music played for non-personal use. (File photo) Photo: Eric Nopanen / Unsplash A music licensing organisation is chasing up hundreds of businesses a week asking them to pay-up for the tunes they are using, so that artists get what they are owed. OneMusic licences certain music for use in commerical settings like pubs, club, offices, hairdressers, gym and factories, nearly anything outside of personal use. Charges vary, playing the radio in a factory with 72 workers would cost $49 a month for licence, a gym with 500 members would pay about $104 dollars a month. OneMusic Director, Greer Davies told Checkpoint music licencing had been around for a while, and the company saw a huge lack of awareness from businesses. "It comes down to a lack of education and so our team are continually contacting businesses to educate them about the use of music and their legal requirements for music creators." "OneMusic's been around for 13 years but music licencing existed prior to that as well, and it's an it's an education that we need to take people on." Davies said they were speaking to hundreds of different businesses a week, aiming to educate them about the licencing programme. One of those business owners was a Hawkes Bay florist who told Checkpoint she was called by OneMusic to see if she was paying licence fees , which she wasn't. Francie Croy said she listened to the radio on her phone out the back of her Waipukurau shop, but the music licensing organisation told her she must buy a licence or turn the music off. "No one out front of the shop can hear it, but she said to me that I would still have a licence to have to do that because sometimes Newstalk ZB plays music." She said after the phone call she was sent another email from OneMusic. "It was a certificate thing, saying this is confirmation that you have advised us that you do not play music in your business and will not play music represented by this place. "It includes television, radio stations, apps, digital music services, Spotify, Apple, YouTube, CD's, DVD's, Blu-ray, vinyl and cassette tapes, and the list goes on." Croy said she had no idea that being charged for playing music at her business was even a possibility. All commercial businesses, including offices and trade sites, were required to pay the licencing fee, with any music played for non-personal use. Although the licence covered a large variety of circumstances, Davies said they had a specific focus on a group of businesses. "Our current focus is educating business owners across hospitality, retail, service providers and exercise." Croy said she was shocked by the request from OneMusic, which a few other businesses in the area also received. She said it seemed unlikely that someone from OneMusic had visited her small store in Waipukurau, and thought they must be sending random emails. Davies said the company had representatives visiting shops to vet whether they were playing music unlicensed. "These representatives carry out a range of tasks for us, some verifying music that's being played and identified the source of that music. They also check new businesses that may have opened in vacant locations that we've been unable to reach." She said the fees from the licence go towards artists to ensure they are paid for their music and OneMusic was partnered with APRA AMCOS and Recorded Music NZ, who pass the costs onto the artists. "Each of those organisations distribute the revenue that OneMusic earns on their behalf, but about 85 cents every dollar is distributed." Davies said for those that fail to pay for a licence there could be consequences, often resulting in fines. "Generally a business owner will understand the legal obligation and obtain the relevant licence, but reluctantly, if they don't, we will pursue and potentially end up in court." "The most recent court cases were in 2018 and 2019, and the damages were around about $15,000, $18,000." The Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment said OneMusic licensed copyright works and MBIE did not have oversight of the scheme. It said businesses that play music for their staff and/or customers need a licence and the licensing fees paid are distributed to producers and recording artists. "If a business does not wish to pay any licensing fee to play music, they should not play music. To do so without a licence means the copyright owner may sue the business and award damages. "A business who wishes to dispute the terms and conditions of the scheme may make an application to the Copyright Tribunal. If the Tribunal determines that the licensing scheme is unfair it may order changes," it said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Moana Pasifika funding under threat
Moana Pasifika may have had their best season on the field to date, but off field financial dramas are plaguing the franchise. Reports have emerged that Moana have been larely reliant on tax payer funds to survive, and that funding is now under threat of being pulled. Sports reporter Jonty Dine spoke to Lisa Owen. Tags: To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
