logo
The Sex-Workplace Novel Has Arrived

The Sex-Workplace Novel Has Arrived

The Atlantic01-07-2025
Twenty years ago, a reader looking for taboo sex in print had to slink to the back of the bookstore and make whispered inquiries. Today, kinky books make up an established genre, one that shares front-table space with other major releases and possesses its own classics and conventions. This robust menagerie encompasses pulpy household names, including E. L. James's Fifty Shades of Grey, which in 2011 vaulted BDSM onto the New York Times fiction best-seller list. It has a literary canon— Marquis de Sade 's Justine, Pauline Réage's Story of O —and elevated LGBTQ smut standards such as Patrick Califia's Macho Sluts. Over in the nonfiction aisle are more practical selections, a hefty cascade of volumes that explore kink from all angles: how-to, history, philosophy, psychology, memoir.
The expansion of the genre tracks the broadening acceptability of erotic inclinations that were previously pathologized (and, at times, criminalized). The 2013 edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) hastened this shift by redefining certain practices, including ' BDSM, fetishism, and transvestic fetishism (a variant of cross-dressing),' as behaviors rather than illnesses, according to an Atlantic article: 'Consenting adults were no longer deemed mentally ill for choosing sexual behavior outside the mainstream.'
As stigma recedes, the subculture meets the marketplace. While fiction continues to revel in fantasy and the forbidden, nonfiction is bending toward demystifying and normalizing BDSM. The latter form tends to emphasize the community credo of being 'safe, sane, and consensual.' It also participates in a broader project: staking out a claim to legitimacy by assuring the public that deviance is, paradoxically, normal. Redefining the transgressive as conventional might feel self-contradictory, but the pursuit of acceptance is as strong a human impulse as the appetite for risk. Call it a respectability kink.
Fiction still offers more freedom to roam outside the bounds of propriety, and the most ambitious kink novels venture beyond titillation. The author Brittany Newell sails over the guardrail between fantasy and reality with her second novel, Soft Core, by centering it on a protagonist, Ruth, and a setting, San Francisco's sex industry, that are both lively and deeply believable. Ruth is known as 'Baby' at the strip club where she works, an ever-chugging factory of arousal in which wigs and fake names and alternative personas are accessed on the fly to suit customer caprice. All this quick-change artistry offers her a welcome distraction from her existential fears, including the anxiety that her master's thesis, on surveillance, ghosts, and reality TV, was a waste of time. Having started out as something of an accidental sugar baby at 24, she is now 27. 'Youth made my general aimlessness cute,' she thinks. 'Without it, I was just a bad investment.'
As someone with professional knowledge of Bay Area strip clubs and dungeons—having worked in them during that same phase of my own life—I understood that although Ruth is haunted by many things, chief among them is the ticking of the clock. Slipping from Ruth to 'Baby' at the club gives her both an escape hatch from her Saturn-return blues and a whole new set of problems.
Strip clubs aren't really on the kink continuum, but I'd argue that the customer-dancer dynamic is its own form of advanced, high-stakes role-playing. BDSM is definitely an element, for instance, in Baby's relationship with her client Simon, a lonely cipher who PayPals her $800 a month for outré sexual indulgences, then later beseeches her to delete him from her phone.
Newell's gifts for sensory details (a dancer 'smelled like crème brûlée'; a woman's mouth is 'like a Slurpee: endless, red and wet') and for tracing the wavy contours of human connection make her work feel like that of a glitter-bomb David Lynch. Things get wavier still when she wakes one morning to find that her ex-boyfriend Dino, a dashing, fastidious ketamine dealer who loves his dogs and lounges around in elegant women's lingerie, has vanished from the Victorian flat they share.
Within a week of Dino's disappearance, the gamine and eerily familiar Emeline starts dancing at Ruth's club. Like a pampered duckling, Emeline imprints on Ruth, even hunting down her signature perfume—the titular Soft Core, which, as a besotted customer once gushed, makes Ruth 'smell like a library in ancient Egypt.' Newell's story begins to simmer with noirish detail: mysterious notes appearing in Ruth's belongings; bizarre anonymous emails materializing in her inbox; fast drives on twisty streets; fog rolling in and out, an enigmatic character unto itself. Ruth keeps thinking that she spies Dino everywhere. But does she?
To fill the empty hours without Dino, Ruth takes on an additional hustle as 'Sunday,' a dominatrix for hire at the Dream House, which is not so much a dungeon as 'a pea-green four-bedroom house in a quiet cul-de-sac.' There, she broadens her client base as a compassionate consort to men who prefer to indulge darker fantasies. These include Albert. In front of Ruth, he takes on an alternative persona, named 'Allie,' who claims that Albert is her sugar daddy. Ruth doesn't remark on the irony of tending to an affluent sex-work client who is cosplaying as a sex worker.
Ruth assumes—incorrectly—that she can take Dino's disappearance in stride by overworking, given, as she puts it, her 'native ability to absorb any trauma like it was just one more step in my skin-care routine. Wake up at five, wash face, stare into void, moisturize.' (I snort-laughed in recognition.) She learns, as the days pass, that dissociative endurance is not necessarily a positive attribute, and that sadness can seep into any space—VIP room, dungeon chamber—as if rising through the floorboards.
Although her rootlessness and sorrow originate from experiences that predate her lover's departure, Ruth wonders if these haunting feelings are exacerbated by her profession. 'Maybe my work was partly to blame,' she thinks. 'I'd been method-acting as a dream girl, and now I couldn't touch back down to earth.' Newell skillfully renders the exhaustion of sex work, especially the weird repetitiveness of trying to keep things exciting and new for clients. Years ago in Los Angeles, one friend of mine, a kink impresario who was winding down from a draining day of video shoots by sorting through a rucksack full of black and red leather floggers, sighed to me: 'It's not the sex; it's the work.'
In interviews, Newell has shared that the scenes set at the Dream House are modeled on her own experience. As a Stanford graduate who published her first novel, Oola, an obsessive love story, when she was 21, Newell might strike the reader as a hyper-literate Persephone: equally adept at chronicling the velvety, narcotic appeal of the 'libidinal underworld' and the bell-clang wake-up calls that chase off the escapist high. Her admixture of emotion, intellect, and erotic perceptivity achieves what nonfiction writers—sincere sex positivists and edgy academics alike—often fail at: an explication of the psychology of kink that maintains the heat of intrigue.
Soft Core is more a study in feeling-tones than a tightly plotted thriller. It's a trippy excursion down the rabbit hole into a particular substratum of culture, maintaining a tether to the 'real' world while burrowing out to the misty shoreline where it's hard to tell horizon from sky. Each subplot sounds a distant foghorn of loneliness.
As Ruth turns 28, she begins to see that she can't be sustained by a hail of compliments and cash and evanescent male companions. That's not a life; that's a never-ending ghost hunt. This book's growth arc doesn't depend on Ruth/Baby/Sunday finding someone or something she's looking for; it lands on her figuring out what she herself lacks. Transactional fascination pales next to devotion—but you need the eyes to see it.
Soft Core is also a novel about a city. San Francisco has always been a frontier town—a place to pursue an outlier dream. Before it became, as Ruth observes, a 'seasick city of data and drugs' that drew hordes of gentrifying tech evangelists, people came seeking queer liberation and a vibrant leather community. And before that: punks, hippies, Beats, and on back to prospectors panning for gold. Many San Francisco seekers find themselves contending with the sour note of the utopian quest. As a canny cartographer of want, Newell takes her place among the city's storied sexual intelligentsia. Though at times her eye for the awkwardness of interrelation points to Mary Gaitskill, she's more a descendent of Danielle Willis, the latex-clad poet whose Zeitgeist Press book, Dogs in Lingerie, gave voice to San Francisco's spooky, kink-conversant stripper narrators 30-plus years ago.
Outsiders often deride kink for both its earnestness and its deviance. The same can be said of sex work. In the words of the San Francisco–based sexologist Carol Queen, 'Trashing other people's sexual vision is so common. It's the highbrow's lowest road.' But the elusiveness of something (respect, satiety, understanding) often only makes you crave it more, and Soft Core shows us the magnetizing, if at times humbling, pull of raw need. 'Nothing lasts forever,' Ruth muses. 'Except, of course, longing.' That is a frontier that some of us will always be chasing. I guess some girls are just kinky that way.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pete Davidson Was ‘Embarrassed' by the Focus on His ‘Big Dick Energy'
Pete Davidson Was ‘Embarrassed' by the Focus on His ‘Big Dick Energy'

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Pete Davidson Was ‘Embarrassed' by the Focus on His ‘Big Dick Energy'

Pete Davidson wasn't a fan of the media attention he received during the early years of his career. During an appearance on The Breakfast Club on Wednesday, Davidson reflected on how he was perceived by the public and how it impacted his work on Saturday Night Live. Davidson explained that being a tabloid fixture during his high-profile relationship with ex-fiancée Ariana Grande was often humiliating for him. 'I brought a lot of pop culture into the show,' he said. 'I made it [a] sort of tabloidly, trendy thing, unintentionally. And, also I was embarrassed by it because—now it's starting to change a little bit—but no one talked about any work I was doing. They were just like, 'Oh, that's the fuck stick.' And that hurt so much.' More from Rolling Stone Bill Hader Once Went Blind From a Migraine Before a 'SNL' Sketch With Neil Young and Johnny Knoxville Pete Davidson Reflects on Fatherhood: 'It's My Dream to Be a Dad' Return to Oz: How to Pre-Order Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo's 'Wicked: For Good' Dolls Online The actor said that after a year or two of this going on 'everyone saw how sad I was about it and embarrassed.' 'I was never on Instagram, you know, flexing that sort of lifestyle at all,' he said. 'I was very embarrassed by it. So I think after a while they understood… But I just want to be clear, no one was outrightly mean by any means.' Host Charlamagne Tha God asked, 'What were you embarrassed by though? You was banging a lot of hot chicks and people knew you had a 10-inch penis.' 'You know, on paper, that sounds great,' Davidson replied. 'But it's embarrassing. Because first of all, it's Hollywood. Everybody fucks everyone. Everybody's dating everybody. Why are they focusing on me? It's because I'm not Glen Powell-handsome. I'm just this dude that tells dick jokes and is a drug addict.' He added, 'Also, that stuff affects relationships. Seeing that and trying to move around and go on dates and just be a young dude who's trying to figure out who he is—I don't want to victimize myself in any way because I'm cool. But the sexualization of me—if that was a girl, people would be like, there would be a march for it. Seriously. You're just talking about my dick all day… They don't talk about girls like that professionally.' The host asked how the rumor about Davidson's 'big dick energy' got started. 'I think it was like the New York Times or something when I started dating someone that I guess they considered out of my league, which I think everyone is out of my league,' he replied. 'They were like, 'This guy must have big dick energy.' And then someone confirmed it.' Davidson said it was exhausting having his relationships be so public. 'I got really tired of my whole career just being my personal life,' he said. 'And living through that is sort of traumatic. Not to be like lame, but it's traumatic to live in your own crap all the time.' Davidson is currently starring in two movies, thriller The Home and heist action comedy The Pickup, which also features Eddie Murphy and Keke Palmer. The comedian and actor recently announced that he's expecting a baby with Elsie Hewitt. He told Jimmy Fallon on The Tonight Show, 'For anybody who knows me it's my dream to be a dad, so I'm so excited. Elsie's excited. I'm excited to see her be a mom. So we're stoked.' Best of Rolling Stone The 50 Best 'Saturday Night Live' Characters of All Time Denzel Washington's Movies Ranked, From Worst to Best 70 Greatest Comedies of the 21st Century Solve the daily Crossword

Strands hints today: Clues and answers on Thursday, August 14 2025
Strands hints today: Clues and answers on Thursday, August 14 2025

USA Today

time3 hours ago

  • USA Today

Strands hints today: Clues and answers on Thursday, August 14 2025

WARNING: THERE ARE STRANDS CLUES, SPOILERS AND ANSWERS AHEAD! DO NOT READ FURTHER IF YOU DON'T WANT THE AUGUST 14, 2025 STRANDS ANSWER SPOILED FOR YOU. Ready? OK! Have you been playing Strands, the super fun game from the New York Times, the makers of Connections and other brain-teasers like Wordle in which you have to do a search in a jumble of letters and find words based on a theme? It's pretty fun and sometimes very challenging, so we're here to help you out with some clues and the answers, including the "Spangram" that connects all the words. NYT Strands clue for today's puzzle: Honest-to-goodness If you want our help? Think about reality! As for the answers, scroll below the photo below: Kosher, True, Legitimate, Genuine, Authentic, Real The Spangram is ... BONAFIDE. Play more word games Looking for more word games?

What a 62-year-old maid explains about childhood
What a 62-year-old maid explains about childhood

Vox

time3 hours ago

  • Vox

What a 62-year-old maid explains about childhood

is a senior correspondent for Vox, where she covers American family life, work, and education. Previously, she was an editor and writer at the New York Times. She is also the author of four novels, including the forthcoming Bog Queen, which you can preorder here This story originally appeared in Kids Today, Vox's newsletter about kids, for everyone. Sign up here for future editions. I'm on vacation this week, so instead of a regular newsletter, I decided to examine a children's classic that has been taking up a lot of my brain space lately. Back next week! Raising children frequently offers one the opportunity to revisit the touchstones of one's youth with a more experienced, critical eye. Who among us has not wondered how Garfield knows that it is Monday, or why Mickey is a mouse who owns a dog? But perhaps no artifact of children's pop culture feels more bizarre, more confounding, or, on closer inspection, more fascinating, to me than the multivolume story of Amelia Bedelia. Written by Peggy Parish from 1963 to 1988, and continued by her nephew Herman for decades after, the Amelia Bedelia stories revolve around the eponymous Amelia, a rosy-cheeked woman with a starched apron and a perpetual smile who spends her days absolutely laying waste to her employers' home. Asked to 'change the towels,' she cuts them to pieces. Asked to check Mr. Rogers' shirts, she covers them with a checkerboard pattern. Asked to strip the sheets off a bed, she tears them to shreds. Part of the pleasure of revisiting the Parish oeuvre is just how strange even the supposedly normal requests made by Mr. and Mrs. Rogers seem today, some 40 to 60 years after they were first issued. At one point, Mrs. Rogers asks Amelia Bedelia to 'dress the chicken,' so she stuffs a raw chicken into some lederhosen. But what was she supposed to do with the chicken carcass she was given? Marinate it? What is this lost art of chicken dressing? My core question, though, revolves around Ms. Bedelia herself: What exactly is it that makes her not merely misinterpret her employers' instructions, but interpret them in the most floridly destructive way possible? The standard explanation is that Amelia Bedelia takes her bosses' commands too literally — failing to understand colloquialisms like 'draw the drapes,' for example, she produces a sketch of them instead. One popular interpretation is that Amelia is autistic, and some autistic commentators have described finding traits in common with Amelia Bedelia or even learning common idioms from the books. She's someone who's supposed to follow other people's commands, and who instead performs bizarre acts that make those commands look silly. Under this interpretation, Amelia wants to do what she's asked; she just has trouble figuring out what that is (understandable given some of her bosses' arcane assignments). There's another school of thought, however, that asks whether the chaos Amelia produces might be a little bit intentional. Given the way she frustrates and flummoxes her wealthy bosses, it's not surprising that some see Amelia as a class warrior. For the New Yorker's Sarah Blackwood, she's Bartleby in an apron, 'a figure of rebellion: against the work that women do in the home, against the work that lower-class women do for upper-class women.' It's instructive to see which tasks Mrs. Rogers delegates to Amelia. In particular, the maid is supposed to act as a kind of prep cook for the lady of the house, tasked with paring the vegetables (she puts them together in pairs, obvs), measuring cups of rice (she fills teacups with rice and then uses a tape measure), and, of course, dressing the chicken (again: what?). Amelia Bedelia draws the drapes. Images from 'Amelia Bedelia' by Margaret Parish, illustrated by Fritz Siebel. Used with permission of HarperCollins Children's Books. Mrs. Rogers, emerging from her limousine wearing a fur stole, intends to finish the process of making dinner, and presumably get credit from her husband for her wonderful cooking. But her plans are upended when Amelia not only royally screws up all the prep tasks, but also makes pies and other baked goods so delicious that no one is thinking about dinner anyway (and also no one can bear to fire her). Amelia Bedelia gets the upper hand, turning repetitive, invisible, literally thankless labor into highly visible performance art, destroying her bosses' property and getting paid to do it. I do not think Peggy Parish intentionally wrote Amelia Bedelia as a working-class revolutionary, but I do think there's a bit of the trickster in her, despite her innocent demeanor (when she 'changes' the towels, for example, she cuts a jack-o-lantern grin into one of them). I think my children, who are even further removed than I am from a world in which people drew drapes, like her because she is an adult who does silly things, a category of character that children tend to enjoy (see also Peppa Pig's father, Daddy Pig, who reads maps upside down and once accidentally fell out of an airplane). It's not just my kids who weirdly reach for a book about a mid-century maid doing chores they can't begin to understand. By the eve of her 50th anniversary in 2012, stories of Amelia Bedelia had sold over 35 million copies in the US alone. The character remains popular enough today that Herman Parish wrote an updated version in the 2010s and 2020s in which Amelia is no longer a servant, but a child whose misunderstandings take place on field trips and family house-hunting expeditions. My kids don't like this version as much, and I can see why. The core of Amelia Bedelia isn't just that she has trouble with figures of speech. It's that she's someone who's supposed to follow other people's commands, and who instead performs bizarre acts that make those commands look silly. For a child — someone constantly being told what to do in terms that are often less than clear, by people who seem to hold all the power — what could be more satisfying?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store