BMW M135 xDrive review: Faster, sharper and still premium
The Citizen reports that over time, with the advent of the world going SUV-crazy, the BMW 1 Series has become more of a niche car. And with the change from the old days of them being rear-wheel driven and powered by those legendary N54 and N55 engines, dare I say it, the car has become more civilised in M135 xDrive guise.
Just like the VAG boys have moved from 2.0-litre, four-cylinder, VW Golf Rs to 2.5-litre, five-cylinder Audi RS3s for breaking records. With the new M135 now running the same 2.0-litre B48 four-cylinder powerplant as before, it's no longer considered a weapon for the BMW guys that want to tear up the streets and dragstrips. Today they are spending stupid money on S58 3.0-litre straight-six powered M2s, M3s and M4s.
New naming strategy
A quick lesson in BMW badging might also be in order right now. BMW have dropped the 'i' from the naming of their gasoline-powered cars because this letter is now reserved for their electric cars like the i4 etc. But the diesel cars still get a 'd', and the plug-in hybrids get an 'e' and the mild hybrids don't crack a mention.
I think these corporate execs have too much free time on their hands like the Audi guys who decided the 30 TFSI and 40 TFSI means something to them and only them. So, when I type M135 and M135i, I am actually referring to two different cars and have not just made a typo.
This is in no way a VW Golf 8 R versus BMW M135 shootout. But almost everybody I spoke to had to chip in and say that the Golf would smoke the M135. So, for what it is worth, these two are separated by mere hundredths of a second here and there at any measured distance. And by less than one kilometre too as you can see from the comparison chart.
Faster than before
This does not mean the BMW M135 is slow by any means. It is in fact now very much back on par with the VW Golf R. And also somewhat quicker than its predecessor despite making less power and torque, while almost weighing in the same. But how? Let me give you the numbers first, so that you too can try figure this out, before I add my two cents.
The BMW M135 hit 100km/h in a fraction better than claimed 4.77 seconds, while the previous M135i did this sprint in 5.41 seconds. At the longer 800m mark, the new car is doing 212km/h, while the old one is lagging at 199 km/h. This is an advantage that stays all the way to their electronically limited top speeds of 250 km/h. Even in the roll-on acceleration runs, the new M135 outguns the old M135i.
For 2025 the F70 BMW M135 xDrive produces 221kW of power and 400Nm of torque. The previous F40 BMW M135i xDrive with the same engine churned out 225kW and 450Nm. 50Nm of lost torque is not easy to overcome, especially when the listed kerb weights are only a mere 5kg in favour of the new car.
Dual-clutch advantage
The power now comes in a bit later, as does the torque. Yes, the power holds a bit longer, but the torque starts running down at the same place on paper. But this alone can't explain the difference in performance on the road.
I have only two explanations that make some sort of sense to me. One, put the two cars on a dyno and you might see graphs that indicate different power and torque figures throughout the rev range that differ from the claimed numbers. Two, the change in transmissions from the previous gen's eight-speed, torque converter back to a seven-speed dual-clutch unit has had a bigger effect on the performance than we thought it would.
I thought the old transmission was really good, but my off the line data indicates that the dual-clutch set-up gets up and bolts away from torque-converter. And without anything else to work with, unless I got a dud M135i from the manufacturer a few years ago, I am just going to say that the new F70 BMW M135 is quicker than the old F40 M135i. And I have no idea why.
BMW M135 road test data
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
16 hours ago
- The Citizen
Tata Motors to make SA comeback after 8-year passenger vehicle pause
In a surprise development, Indian auto giant Tata has announced its return to South Africa next month after quietly ending its passenger vehicle operations eight years ago, The Citizen reports. 'New' Tata Still present via its truck and bus division, the Mumbai-based brand has provided no details of its planned product range, though a hint has been provided by the official event invitation. Its current line-up comprises two A- and B-segment hatchbacks — the Tiago and its sedan sibling, the Tigor — and the Altroz. It also fields two B-segment SUVs, the Punch and Nexon, plus two C-segment SUVs: The Harrier and Safari. On Safari According to the mentioned document, the Safari appears set to be one of the products Tata will launch with, as the original had been a quiet presence in the local market more than two decades ago. A radical departure from its predecessor, the current second-generation Safari made its world debut four years ago and received a mid-life facelift two years back. Drawing on Tata's ownership of JLR, the Safari rides on the same D8 platform as the Land Rover Discovery Sport and Range Rover Evoque, with dimensions of 4 668mm in overall length, a wheelbase of 2 741mm, width of 1 922mm and height of 1 795mm. Offered only with front-wheel drive — unlike the original body-on-frame version that had part-time four-wheel drive — the Safari comes standard with seven seats or, optionally, six, featuring ventilated captain's chairs in the second row. Boot space, depending on configuration, ranges from 211L with all seven seats up, to 1 550L with the second and third rows folded flat. Available in five trim levels — Smart, Pure, limited-edition Stealth, Adventure and flagship Accomplished — the Safari uses Tata's Kryotec 2.0-litre turbo diesel engine based on Fiat's earlier Multijet design as part of a long-standing licensing agreement. Developing 125kW/350Nm, the engine is paired either with a six-speed manual gearbox or a six-speed torque converter automatic. Depending on the trim, the Safari features 16-inch steel or 19-inch alloy wheels, a six-speaker or upgraded 10-speaker JBL sound system, dual-zone climate control, ventilated and electric front seats, LED headlights, push-button start, a panoramic sunroof, rain-sensing wipers, a wireless smartphone charger, rear window blinds, a hands-free electric tailgate and ambient lighting. Standard features also include Type-A and Type-C USB ports, a 10.25-inch digital instrument cluster, and a choice between a 10.25-inch or 12.3-inch infotainment display, both with wireless Apple CarPlay, Android Auto and voice recognition. Safety and tech On the safety front, the Safari boasts: Tyre pressure monitor 360-degree surround-view camera Seven airbags Front and rear parking sensors Hill Descent Control Rollover Mitigation Hill Hold Assist Driver Attention Alert Tata also includes 21 additional advanced safety systems, a drive mode selector with Eco, City and Sport modes, and a terrain selector with Normal, Wet and Rough settings. Pricing and outlook Priced from ₹1 549 900 to ₹2 724 990 — roughly R320 481 to R563 461 before taxes — the Safari is likely to headline Tata's local line-up, although exact details remain unconfirmed. Other likely options At the lower end of the range, the Punch, which has been a runaway success since debuting two years ago, could serve as Tata's entry-level model locally, possibly alongside the Altroz, which premiered in 2020. Another contender is the coupe-styled Curvv, launched last year as Tata's newest offering in its global portfolio. More clarity is expected next month.
IOL News
a day ago
- IOL News
Woman claims BMW Financial Services' non-cooperation led to R787,000 debt
A South African woman claims that BMW Financial Services failed to assist her when she struggled to make payments on her R787,000 vehicle, leading to a distressing financial battle that raises questions about consumer rights and corporate responsibility. Image: Supplied A woman who bought a car through BMW Financial Services is accusing the motor company of failing to cooperate when she indicated that she was unable to continue making payments to her car. The woman, who has chosen to remain anonymous, purchased a BMW 218i Gran Coupe M Sport in October 2021, with the vehicle being financed through BMW Financial Services. According to the terms of the agreement, she was granted a credit facility exceeding R787,000 to cover the cost of the vehicle. This financing arrangement came with an estimated monthly repayment obligation of more than R11,000, placing a significant financial commitment on her. She was able to maintain her monthly instalments for just over six months before coming to a realisation that the monthly instalments were financially not viable as it was consuming nearly half her salary leaving her with insufficient funds to cover her basic financial needs and other financial obligations. This growing strain on her finances forced her to reassess her ability to continue honouring the credit agreement, prompting her to reach out to BMW Financial Services to seek relief or explore alternative solutions. She explained that after recognising the financial strain, she approached BMW Financial Services to request assistance in selling the vehicle, hoping to find a solution that would alleviate her debt burden. However, she was informed by the motor company that the total amount required to settle the outstanding debt on the vehicle was R814,000. At the same time, BMW offered to purchase the vehicle for only R600,000, which would leave her with a significant shortfall of R214,000. Despite her efforts to engage and find a mutually beneficial resolution, she alleges that no further assistance, guidance, or alternative options were provided by the company. This left her feeling abandoned and solely responsible for the substantial debt, with no meaningful support from the institution that had financed the purchase. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading "After mounting arrears and further attempts to engage BMW, our client voluntarily surrendered the vehicle on June 7, 2022 – the valuation provided by BMW reflected a large shortfall, and she took back the vehicle in an effort to secure a better private offer," said her attorney, Liesel Kriel. After relocating from Gauteng to Durban in an effort to improve her financial circumstances, she said she actively sought out better trade-in or resale offers for the vehicle. She managed to secure more favourable valuations from multiple third-party dealers, which exceeded the initial offer made by BMW. In a bid to resolve the matter, she submitted the alternative quotes to BMW Financial Services, along with supporting financial documentation detailing her income and financial hardship. However, despite her proactive approach and willingness to cooperate, she claims that BMW failed to respond and completely ignored her submissions. To her shock, she later discovered in November 2022 that the vehicle had been transferred out of her name as far back as June 2022 without her knowledge, permission, or any formal notification. This discovery raised serious concerns for her, not only about the handling of the vehicle but also about the lack of transparency and communication from BMW Financial Services throughout the process. After the shocking discovery she lodged a complaint against BMW with the Motor Industry Ombudsman of South Africa (MIOSA), which directed her to the National Credit Regulator (NCR) due to the matter relating to reckless lending. According to her, it was around this time that , she was also informed that legal proceedings had been instituted against her by BMW Financial Services. She expressed shock and frustration, particularly because she had previously notified BMW in writing, via email, of her change of address following her relocation from Gauteng to Durban. Despite this clear communication, she claims that BMW continued to serve legal documents at her former address, effectively depriving her of the opportunity to respond to or engage with the legal process in a timely and meaningful manner. As a result, she believes that BMW acted negligently and unfairly, further compounding her distress and legal vulnerability. She said the NCR process was plagued with delays – it was only in June 2024 that the NCR advised her the matter had not been considered and then issued a non-referral notice, prompting her to refer the matter to the National Consumer Tribunal (NCT). During the tribunal proceedings, it was noted that woman had opted not to defend herself when the case was in the High Court, and as a result, her claims of reckless lending against BMW were not considered. In February 2025, the NCT held that the high court is a competent forum that had already reached a decisive conclusion on her failure to honour her financial commitments. "Any subsequent ruling by the tribunal regarding reckless lending will impact the high court's judgment, which goes against the principle of res judicata," said the tribunal. She said following the judgment, in March 2025, BMW attempted to enforce the judgment and execute the warrant at her erstwhile address – the address was later amended. "Due to BMW's lack of cooperation, our client had no choice but to obtain legal assistance and as such our offices proceeded to launch a rescission application based on the pending regulatory processes and improper service," said Kriel. Kriel said BMW has opposed the rescission application, raising technical defences, including the time delay in bringing the application. "BMW maintains that our client was aware of the proceedings, had a chance to respond, and that the regulatory complaints were merely delay tactics," Kriel added. When approached for comment, BMW declined to speak on the matter, stating that it remained sub judice. "I have, however, determined the matter is still being considered by a court. We cannot, therefore, provide comments to you at this time," said BMW spokesperson, Hailey Philander. In closing, the woman's case reflects the complex and often frustrating journey consumers face when navigating disputes with large financial institutions. Despite her efforts to seek assistance from BMW Financial Services, the National Credit Regulator, and eventually the National Consumer Tribunal, procedural technicalities and jurisdictional limitations ultimately stood in the way of her reckless lending claim being meaningfully assessed. The High Court's prior ruling based on her failure to defend the matter effectively closed the door to further adjudication by the Tribunal, citing the legal principle of res judicata, which prevents re-litigation of issues already decided by a competent court. The attempted enforcement of the judgment at her former address and the subsequent legal wrangling over the rescission application have only added to the woman's sense of being sidelined by a system she believes failed to accommodate her financial vulnerability. Her legal representative, Kriel, argues that the mishandling of notices and the disregard of pending regulatory processes justify reopening the case. BMW, however, continues to oppose the rescission, framing the delays and regulatory complaints as tactical manoeuvres rather than legitimate grievances. With BMW declining to comment further due to the matter being sub judice, the case remains in legal limbo highlighting the wider challenges consumers face when trying to assert their rights in the face of institutional power and procedural complexity. IOL
The Citizen
3 days ago
- The Citizen
Hilux named world's best-selling bakkie, SA among top markets
Having taken first place with the previous-generation RAV4 as the world's best-selling vehicle of 2024, Toyota has also ranked top as the best-selling bakkie manufacturer over the past 12 months. Global top 10 The Citizen reports that, according to a six-month market study by renowned automotive analyst Felipe Munoz, the Hilux ranked above the Ford F-150 as the world's best-seller with sales of 618 200 versus 594 100. Admittedly sold in more markets compared to the F-150's North American focus, the Hilux finished as one of three Toyota products within the global top 10. Its US counterpart, the Tacoma, placed eighth with 215 600 units sold, while the full-size Tundra ranked ninth on 179 400. The Blue Oval also secured three places within the top 10, with the Ranger in fourth (386 900) and the F-250 10th (167 300). General Motors filled the third and sixth spots with the Chevrolet Silverado 1500 (418 300) and its upscale twin, the GMC Sierra 1500 (267 500), respectively. Stellantis followed in fifth with the Ram 1500 (282 300), and Isuzu took seventh with the D-Max (262 200). View this post on Instagram A post shared by Felipe Munoz | Automotive (@carindustryanalysis) South Africa ranked In a separate ranking of the biggest non-US market bakkies, South Africa featured in the top 10 for no fewer than six mainstream global models. These include the Hilux (4th), D-Max (4th), Ranger (5th), Nissan Navara (7th), Volkswagen Amarok (4th) and Peugeot Landtrek. Most likely a result of their local production — with Landtrek manufacturing set to start next year — the report excludes Chinese brands and the ageing Mahindra Pik Up, which is sold in fewer international markets. So far this year, South Africa's perennial top three — the Hilux, Ranger and D-Max — again feature among the 10 best-selling vehicles for the first half of 2025, with the Hilux remaining at number one overall, followed by the Ranger in second and the Isuzu fifth. View this post on Instagram A post shared by Felipe Munoz | Automotive (@carindustryanalysis)
