Students, community brace for elimination of DEI at Ohio University
This article was originally published by the Athens County Independent.
ATHENS, Ohio — As an anti-diversity, equity and inclusion bill moves through the Ohio legislature, the Ohio University community is bracing for major changes to the institution, including the possible loss of its Women's Center, Multicultural Center, and Pride Center.
Senate Bill 1 passed in the Ohio Senate and the Ohio House and now heads back to the Senate for concurrence before going to Gov. Mike DeWine for his signature. It would reshape Ohio's public universities by banning diversity and inclusion programs and practices, preventing faculty from striking, instituting post-tenure reviews for faculty, requiring 'intellectual diversity' in the classroom, and more.
The presidents of Ohio University and other public universities jointly decided to stay silent on SB 1 in hopes of gaining a 2% increase in higher education funding in the next biennial budget. But DeWine's budget proposal includes just a 0.1% boost next year.
However, students and the public have staged multiple demonstrations opposing the bill in recent weeks, including several in Athens.
'I just can't stop thinking about the students … that are in high school right now and are going to be a part of the new norm that is a university without Diversity Equity and Inclusion in the state of Ohio,' OU undergraduate student Mia Walsh told the Independent after a protest Wednesday, March 12. 'I think of those students, and my heart breaks for them.'
Ohio University has already placed the annual Celebrate Women and Black Alumni Reunion events on hold to preemptively comply with changes to DEI at the state and national levels.
If SB 1 passes, public universities will have 90 days to become compliant. Patricia Stokes, associate professor in Women's Gender and Sexuality Studies, said she hopes OU will not comply with provisions in SB 1 any sooner than it needs to.
'SB 1 is all but a done deal at this point, and the university will have no choice but to comply at least with the most clear cut elements of it. But they have a choice as to whether they do it right away or use that 90-day window,' Stokes said. 'I think it's imperative that they allow this to be an orderly transition, so that people who will be losing their current positions can seek other work, either internally or elsewhere.'
Ohio University Vice President for University Communications and Marketing Robin Oliver told the Independent, 'Some changes will take time to complete, and we would need to act with urgency to ensure compliance within the 90-day window.'
OU declined the Independent's request for comment on specific changes it would implement should SB 1 become law. The university has made multiple public statements on SB 1 without offering any details of the university's planned response.
'These two obligations – to our state and to our mission – are equally non-negotiable and, in many ways, interlinked,' OU President Lori Stewart Gonzalez and Executive Vice President and Provost Donald J. Leo said in a Feb. 12 statement. 'The question, not specifically in light of this proposed legislation but in every situation and every day, is how we effectively fulfill both of these obligations and ensure student success.'
In a March 3 statement, Gonzalez referred to the university's elimination of race-based scholarship awards last year as part of an ongoing effort to respond to a slew of federal and state policy changes related to DEI. Gonzalez framed the elimination of these scholarships as an 'action to ensure our scholarships and programming are open to all.'
Ohio state Sen. Brian Chavez (R-30), who co-sponsored SB 1, declined to comment for this story, as did Ohio House representative Don Jones (R-95). Ohio House representative Kevin Ritter (R-94) did not respond to a request for comment.
While OU declined to comment on specific changes that would result should SB1 become law, The Ohio State University has already begun instituting changes to preemptively comply with the bill, providing a preview of what is to come. At OSU, these changes have included the elimination of its Office of Diversity and Inclusion and Center for Belonging and Social Change, and the elimination of 16 staff positions, according to The Columbus Dispatch.
Ohio University has three centers as part of its DEI initiatives, including the Women's Center, Pride Center, and Multicultural Center. The centers would likely close should SB1 become law.
The bill would prohibit 'continuation of existing diversity, equity, and inclusion offices or departments' as well as 'establishing new diversity, equity, and inclusion offices or departments.'
Walsh, who is studying journalism and Women's Gender and Sexuality Studies, said the university's DEI initiatives — especially the Multicultural Center and Pride Center — have enriched her experience on campus.
'I can't disentangle my college career from diversity, equity and inclusion,' Walsh said. 'If I try to imagine my college career without those three things, there's no point in even coming here.'
United Campus Ministry acting executive director Ari Faber, also an OU alum, spoke at last Wednesday's protest and said they arrived on campus after being 'kicked out of my parents' home due to my queer identity.' OU's Pride Center was 'instrumental in helping me navigate an incredibly challenging and vulnerable period in my life,' Faber said.
Stokes told the Independent that support for students contributes directly to OU's academic mission.
'When we're thinking about … the very kind of core elements of the university's mission — effective teaching and learning — students who have a place where they feel they belong are going to simply do better on all measures of that: grades, retention, time to degree,' Stokes said.
The centers also play a direct role in education, said Women's Gender and Sexuality Studies professor Julie White.
'The centers provide educational roles with respect to the student body at large,' White said. 'So, for example, Black History Month, Women's History Month are times during the year when the centers have been really critical to expanding the kind of educational content that happens in some classrooms and making it available to the student body at large.'
White added that it is part of 'what it means to be an educated person, to take seriously the experiences of people who are less familiar to you, who have life experiences that are not yours.'
Associate Professor of African American Studies Robin Muhammad told the Independent she expects her department will be 'targeted for elimination or restructuring.'
'We're talking about global perspectives, critical thinking,' Muhammad said. 'This is not fringe-y stuff. It is at the heart of higher education, not just in the United States, but the world.'
Muhammad said this will affect what students are able to get out of an education at OU.
'If we want to be able to tell students that you're going to be able to compete domestically as well as internationally, with other researchers, with other thinkers, with other executives, then we have to be able to say, 'We're going to give you know the diploma that has the kind of content that will enable you to compete right and converse,'' Muhammad said. 'It's like saying, 'Okay, well, we're not going to teach math.''
White said she is less concerned about the immediate impact of SB1 on academic programs than on OU's diversity centers, citing conversations with university leaders.
'These programs — WGSS and African American Studies, for instance, but also Environmental Studies — perform really important roles in the four year education of undergraduates,' White said. She added that curricula in those programs are 'already recognized by the Ohio Department of Higher Education as accredited' and that 'it's clear' that the programs meet 'degree-granting requirements.'
More than 700 people submitted opponent testimony against controversial Ohio higher education bill
OU declined to comment on specific impacts of SB1.
Tom Hodson, a retired Athens County judge and the Athens County Independent's legal columnist, told the Independent in an email, 'The bill does not specifically say those academic pursuits [in WGSS and African American Studies] must be eliminated but there is enough vagueness that I feel the university will be super cautious.'
'There is enough language in the bill for the university to put those programs on the chopping block,' he added.
However, eliminating or making major changes to those programs is not the only way of interpreting provisions in the bill, Hodson explained.
'One of the major problems with SB1 is its vagueness,' Hodson said. 'That will be, I am sure, one of the attacks on it in litigation.'
Muhammad said the combined impact of eliminating departments such as African American Studies and closing the diversity centers would 'rob [students] of that intellectual and community-rooted content that students here have just come to expect.'
'Students are under attack.' Ohio State students and faculty rally against controversial bill
That work benefits everyone, Muhammad said, and is particularly important in a predominantly white institution.
'We address socio-economic disparity, and if you're in southeastern Ohio and you don't address that, then you're not doing your job,' Muhammad said.
Stokes said the bill — especially its provisions around post-tenure review and a student complaint process the bill says is intended to ensure 'intellectual diversity' — could result in a 'chilling effect' in classrooms across the board.
Should SB 1 pass, Muhammad will call on OU to minimize disruption.
'It will be strategic for the university, those who are at that particular table, to find ways to mitigate the damage — that's the most I could expect from it at the institutional level,' Muhammad said.
Stokes said OU should support marginalized students, including by offering meeting spaces for student clubs representing minority groups and supporting first-generation students and those without access to family wealth.
Community organizations are also working to address the likely fallout. United Campus Ministry, for instance, is preparing to host an influx of students, resources, and programming currently supported by OU's Pride Center, Faber said.
Community leaders in Lancaster have organized a women's conference in place of the one OU canceled earlier this month, WOUB reported.
Meanwhile, Muhammad said, 'What people do on the ground — faculty, staff and students — is to continue to protest, push for, argue for, advocate for not being robbed of the essence of who we are.'
Keri Johnson contributed reporting to this story.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Amid Intel delays, state lawmakers call for public updates, fiscal accounting
Two state lawmakers are calling for Intel to provide quarterly updates and a full financial accounting of its Ohio One microchip factories that have been plagued by delays. State Reps. Beryl Brown Piccolantonio, D-Gahanna, and Sean Patrick Brennan, D-Parma, introduced a House resolution Aug. 14, calling on the chipmaker to provide more information given the delays. Intel's first Ohio plant was originally set to open in 2025, but financial challenges forced the company to delay that opening to 2030 or 2031. The Democrats' resolution likely faces an uphill battle in a legislature dominated by Republicans. Related Ohio Intel factory article: Gov. Mike DeWine responds to news Intel will 'further slow' construction on Ohio factories Intel is required to provide state officials an annual status report and an updated timeline each year, and the next one is not expected to be filed until March. The $28 billion Ohio One campus was projected to bring 3,000 new jobs to New Albany, where construction continues, though it has slowed in recent months, according to Intel. The company was awarded $7.865 billion in funding as part of the federal CHIPS Incentives Program, at least $1.5 billion of which was set to go toward the New Albany project, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce. An agreement between Intel and the Ohio Department of Development offered the company $300 million in grants to help with the construction of each factory, as long as they were completed by the end of 2028. 'Ohioans deserve a full accounting of the millions of our dollars that have been spent on the Intel chip factories and a reliable plan for the millions more that are to come," Brown Piccolantonio said in a news release. "In addition to the extraordinary investment of public dollars, the impact of this project on our surrounding communities has already been tremendous." The resolution calls on Gov. Mike DeWine's office, the state Development Department and its private nonprofit development corporation JobsOhio to release quarterly updates beginning in the fall. The resolution asks for those updates to include construction progress, financial disclosures and strategic changes Intel might be considering for its Ohio One project. The resolution would also seek to make contingency planning for the project public, including any options for tax dollar claw-backs, changes to partnerships or the potential for other chipmakers to take over or co-develop the site. 'This is not about assigning blame — it's about ensuring accountability,' Brennan said in the release. 'As Intel reevaluates its global footprint and as market conditions shift, we need real-time information. We owe it to every Ohioan who has a stake in this deal.' Intel already provides quarterly financial reports for the water reclamation grant it received from the state, DeWine spokesperson Dan Tierney said. The latest report was filed July 9, and the state will provide it and previous reports filed by Intel to Piccolantonio and Brennan, Tierney said. To date, Ohio has paid Intel $718 million in incentives, which Tierney said the state can claw back in January 2029 should the company fail to meet its commitments. Intel has already invested $7 billion in its Ohio One project, Tierney said. The Dispatch has also reached out to Intel for comment. Brown Piccolantonio and Brennan introduced the resolution a week after U.S. Sen. Bernie Moreno raised concerns about Intel's local plans. Moreno called for an investigation into how Intel has used its public funding for the Ohio factories. "They made lots of promises to Ohio. What I worry about is we end up with a white elephant in Licking County with a facility or fab that isn't completed," Moreno told The Dispatch. "We should investigate to see if there was fraud committed." Dispatch investigative reporter Max Filby can be reached by email at mfilby@ Find him on X at the handle @MaxFilby or on Facebook at @ReporterMaxFilby.
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine loves assigning task forces to tackle thorny problems
When a thorny problem comes up, Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine calls on friends and experts to quickly size up the issue and draft recommendations. Since he took the oath of office in January 2019, DeWine has appointed two dozen working groups to wrestle with issues such as school bus safety and nursing home safety. Task forces are as much as DeWine's brand as homemade pie, baseball and grandkids. "It's a way to focus on particular problems and come up with practical solutions that will work," DeWine said. He added "I think with every task force we've been able to do something that was positive." The latest groups are working on property tax reforms and how to restrict SNAP recipients from using the program to buy sugary drinks. Not surprisingly, a chunk of the 24 working groups has focused on issues near and dear to DeWine: children, health and safety, and criminal justice. Some of DeWine's appointed groups are spurred by investigative journalism such as a Cincinnati Enquirer, Columbus Dispatch, Akron Beacon Journal and Canton Repository investigation into conditions in Ohio's youth prisons, and Dispatch projects on failures in how missing persons are handled, and problems with outstanding warrants. Here's a list of working groups launched by DeWine: 2025: Public safety in state parks; property tax reform; Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; missing persons. 2024: Diversion from state mental health hospitals; children's vision screening and eyeglasses. 2023: Juvenile detention and youth prisons; school bus safety; nursing home quality and accountability. 2022: Volunteer fire service. 2021: Racial disparities in infant mortality. 2020: COVID-19; traffic safety. 2019: Home Visitation for newborns; Mental health and drug abuse; minority health; criminal warrants; Medical Board's handling of Dr. Richard Strauss case; school safety; oversight of people released from prison; foster care system; Ohio State Fairgrounds upgrades; preventing lead poisoning; transportation infrastructure. "Yeah, I like it. I think it works. We're going to continue to do them," DeWine said. Some of the task forces resulted in change. Ohio plans to close its larger youth prisons and replace them with smaller, closer-to-home facilities. The State Medical Board reopened 91 cases of sexual assault allegations against licensed medical professionals. And one of DeWine's earliest task forces, established when he was attorney general, made recommendations on how to clear an enormous backlog of untested rape kits held in evidence rooms by local police departments. As governor, John Kasich didn't use working groups very often, but Bob Taft did. Calling in outside advisors can broaden input and support for recommendations, said Jon Allison, who served as Taft's chief of staff. "My observation has been that Bob Taft and Mike DeWine kind of come out of the same era of governing," said Allison. "He loved a good blue ribbon task force. And as snarky as I could be about them, I'd say they absolutely have a legitimate place." State government reporter Laura Bischoff can be reached at lbischoff@ and @lbischoff on X. This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine appoints a lot of task forces Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine calls sending National Guard to D.C. 'the right thing to do'
Gov. Mike DeWine says it's the "right thing to do" to send 150 Ohio National Guard members to Washington, D.C., as President Donald Trump deploys troops and seizes control of the city's Metropolitan Police Department. Trump announced on Aug. 11 that he would deploy National Guard troops to Washington to crack down on crime in the nation's capital. Late Aug. 15, Secretary of the Army Daniel P. Driscoll asked DeWine to send military police to D.C. "The initial decision to deploy D.C. National Guard was not my decision. That was the president of the United States' decision," DeWine told the statehouse bureau. "But when the secretary of the Army asks for backup support to our troops that are already deployed, yes, we will back up our troops." DeWine is one of three Republican governors who said they'll send additional troops, Reuters reported. Ohio House Democrats are calling on DeWine to bring the Ohio National Guard home. 'Ohio's National Guard exists to protect and serve Ohioans and other Americans in moments of true crisis. When disasters like floods, storms, or community emergencies happen here at home, they're there to rebuild," said House Minority Leader Dani Isaacsohn, D-Cincinnati. "Their mission is helping Ohioans, not serving as props in a president's political theatre." But DeWine says his decision, which was optional, is consistent with how he's deployed the Ohio National Guard in the past. More: DeWine ordered National Guard troops to assist in DC. What to know about Trump's plan What will the Ohio National Guard do in D.C.? The Ohio National Guard will patrol Washington, D.C., and protect federal buildings, DeWine said. "If in doing a patrol or if in standing guard of a federal building, an arrest has to be made, our guard will be in direct contact with the D.C. police department who will make arrests," DeWine said. "Our people won't make the arrests." How long will the Ohio National Guard be in the nation's capital? The Ohio National Guard will leave Aug. 20 for a 30-day deployment, DeWine said. The secretary of the Army could ask for an extension, which DeWine could grant or deny. How often does DeWine deploy the Ohio National Guard? DeWine deployed Ohio National Guard members and Ohio State Highway Patrol troopers to the southern border in 2021. He also sent members to assist with hurricane recovery in Florida, North Carolina and Louisiana. In 2020, DeWine sent the National Guard to Columbus and Cleveland to respond to protests following the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis. In both instances, mayors requested help. The Ohio National Guard played a key role in Ohio's COVID-19 response and assisted with the aftermath of a train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, in February 2023. Is the D.C. deployment different? Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser didn't ask for help with the city's violent crime rate, which declined 35% between 2023 and 2024. Attorneys for the District of Columbia are suing the Trump administration over its police takeover. DeWine says that doesn't matter, legally. "The people who don't like it in D.C. don't have the authority. The president of the United States has that authority," DeWine said. "Anybody can argue whether or not he should or shouldn't have the authority, but it's very clear. There is no debate he has the authority to do what he did." But Democrats say the deployment is political. Rep. Joyce Beatty, D-Columbus, said in a statement: "The men and women of Ohio's National Guard signed up to serve their country, not a lawless president who has repeatedly ignored our nation's constitution and principles." What will this cost and who pays? The federal government will pay for the Ohio National Guard's service, a spokesperson said. No cost estimate was available as of Aug. 18. Is sending the National Guard optional? It depends. Typically, governors control the National Guard within their states. The federal government can request assistance from state National Guard members, which governors can approve or reject. That is the case with Secretary Driscoll's request for Ohio National Guard assistance in D.C. "The law is not a blank check allowing the president to use military forces anywhere in the country and for any purpose so long as they can find one willing governor," according to a Brennan Center for Justice analysis. In certain circumstances, presidents can federalize the National Guard by invoking the Insurrection Act. But this is rare. Earlier this year, Trump deployed the California National Guard to respond to protests over immigration enforcement − against the wishes of California Gov. Gavin Newsom. An appeals court ruled that Trump could retain control of the troops while a judge reviews the legality of Trump's decision. Will the Ohio National Guard be deployed to Cincinnati? DeWine said he's received no requests to deploy the Ohio National Guard to Cincinnati, where a viral brawl led to debates about the city's security, and has no plans to deploy them. DeWine instead offered other help to Cincinnati officials that included traffic enforcement and aviation surveillance. "They've taken me up on part of it, but not all of it," DeWine said. "But that's their choice. They have the choice." USA TODAY contributed to this article. State government reporter Jessie Balmert can be reached at jbalmert@ or @jbalmert on X. What do you think of Gov. DeWine sending Ohio Guard troops to DC? This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: DeWine explains why he sent Ohio National Guard to Washington, DC Solve the daily Crossword