Gap shares slide as tariffs loom large over apparel maker's turnaround plans
Gap shares fell 20% in early trading on Friday after the Old Navy owner warned that U.S. tariffs would squeeze this year's profit, even as the apparel maker aims to soften the blow by diversifying its supply chain and investing in U.S. cotton.
The company reaffirmed its annual forecasts that did not include tariff-related costs but flagged expenses of up to $300 million, which analysts said would weigh on Gap's margins through the second half of the year and into 2026.
Shares of the company, which owns brands such as Banana Republic and ON, were trading at $22.44. The stock has surged 30% so far this month, as investors focused on the firm's efforts to improve product innovation and store operations.
At least three brokerages trimmed price targets on the stock, with Jefferies cutting it by the most, to $26 from $29.
"Banana Republic and Athleta likely need much reinvestment to drive consistent positive comparable sales and margin expansion, in our view," UBS analyst Jay Sole said.
President Donald Trump 's trade policy has threatened to upend supply chains and push up prices for everyday essentials.
Some retailers including Best Buy have accounted for the tariffs and a few others have pulled their forecasts. However, firms like Gap have excluded the impact from their outlook, citing an ever evolving trade policy.
Under the leadership of Richard Dickson, who took helm in 2023, Gap laid out plans to double the use of America-grown cotton by 2026, with executives on a post-earnings call saying that investing in the U.S., its biggest market, remains a key priority.
It has been diversifying its supplier footprint for several years, and currently has a less than 10% exposure to China. The region was one of its top manufacturing hubs, followed by Vietnam and Indonesia. It aims for no country to account for more than 25% by the end of 2026.
The company topped Wall Street estimates first-quarter sales and profit helped by full-price selling in its namesake and Old Navy brands.
Gap's forward price-to-earnings multiple (P/E), a common benchmark for valuing stocks, is 11.69, compared to a P/E ratio of 7.99 for Abercrombie & Fitch and 10.02 for American Eagle Outfitters, according to LSEG.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Most NATO members endorse Trump demand to up defence spending
Most US allies at NATO have endorsed US President Donald Trump's demand that they invest 5% of GDP on defence and are ready to ramp up security spending, the alliance's Secretary General Mark Rutte said on Thursday. "There's broad support," Rutte told reporters after chairing a meeting of NATO defence ministers at the alliance's Brussels headquarters. "We are really close," he said, adding that he has "total confidence that we will get there" by the next NATO summit in three weeks. European allies and Canada have already been investing heavily in their armed forces, as well as on weapons and ammunition, since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. At the same time, some have balked at US demands to invest 5% of GDP on defence; 3.5% on core military spending and 1.5% on the roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports needed to deploy armies more quickly. In 2023, as Russia's war on Ukraine entered its second year, NATO leaders agreed to spend at least 2% of GDP on national defence budgets. So far, 22 of the 32 member countries have done so, and others are still struggling to meet the target. Trump and his NATO counterparts appear likely to endorse the new goal at a summit in The Hague on 24-25 June. Trump insists that US allies should spend at least 5% so America can focus on security priorities elsewhere, mostly in the Indo-Pacific and on its own borders. He has gained important leverage over other NATO countries by casting doubt over whether the United States would defend allies that spend too little. The new goal would involve a 1.5% increase over the current 2% goal for defence budgets. It means that all 32 countries would be investing the same percentage. The United States spends by far more than any other ally in dollar terms. But according to NATO's most recent figures, it was estimated to have spent 3.19% of GDP in 2024, down from 3.68% a decade ago. It's the only ally whose spending has dropped since 2014. While the two new figures do add up to 5%, factoring in improvements to civilian infrastructure so that armies can deploy more quickly significantly changes the basis on which NATO traditionally calculates defence spending. The seven-year time frame is also short by the alliance's usual standards. The far more modest 2% target, set after Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula in 2014, was meant to be reached over a decade. According to US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, Trump has done nothing less than save NATO. He told reporters that European allies around the table on Thursday had said: "We hear you. We all need increased capabilities. We all need to spend more. Thank you, President Trump, for reviving this alliance. It was an alliance that was sleepwalking to irrelevance." The extra spending will also be needed should the Trump administration announce a force draw down in Europe, where around 84,000 US troops are based, leaving European allies to plug any security gaps. Asked what the Pentagon's plans are, Hegseth did not explain but he said: "It would only be responsible for the United States to continually assess our force posture, which is precisely what we've done." "America can't be everywhere all the time, nor should we be and so there are reasons why we have troops in certain places," he said, offering the assurance that any review would be done "alongside our allies and partners to make sure it's the right size." During the meeting, Hegseth and his defence counterparts also approved purchasing targets for stocking up on weapons and military equipment to better defend Europe, the Arctic and the North Atlantic. The "capability targets" lay out goals for each of the 32 nations to purchase priority equipment like air defence systems, long-range missiles, artillery, ammunition, drones and "strategic enablers" such as air-to-air refuelling, heavy air transport and logistics. Each nation's plan is classified, so details are scarce. The new targets are assigned by NATO based on a blueprint agreed upon in 2023, the alliance's biggest planning shakeup since the Cold War, to defend its territory from an attack by Russia or another major adversary. Under those plans, NATO would aim to have up to 300,000 troops ready to move to its eastern flank within 30 days, although experts suggest the allies would struggle to muster those kinds of numbers.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
NATO to propose upping members' defence spending to 5%, chief indicates broad support'
Most US allies at NATO endorse President Donald Trump 's demand that they invest 5 percent of GDP on their defence needs and are ready to ramp up security spending even more, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said Thursday. 'There's broad support,' Rutte told reporters after chairing a meeting of NATO defence ministers at the alliance's Brussels headquarters. 'We are really close,' he said, and added that he has 'total confidence that we will get there' by the next NATO summit in three weeks. European allies and Canada have already been investing heavily in their armed forces, as well as on weapons and ammunition, since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. At the same time, some have balked at US demands to invest 5 percent of GDP on defense — 3.5 percent on core military spending and 1.5 percent on the roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports needed to deploy armies more quickly. In 2023, as Russia's full-scale war on Ukraine entered its second year, NATO leaders agreed to spend at least 2 percent of GDP on national defense budgets. So far, 22 of the 32 member countries have done so, and others still struggle to do so. Pressured by Trump Trump and his NATO counterparts appear likely to endorse the new goal at a summit in The Hague on June 24-25. Trump insists that US allies should spend at least 5 percent so America can focus on security priorities elsewhere, mostly in the Indo-Pacific and its own borders. He has gained important leverage over the other NATO countries by casting doubt over whether the US would defend allies that spend too little. The new goal would involve a 1.5 percent increase over the current 2 percent goal for defence budgets. It means that all 32 countries would be investing the same percentage. The United States spends by far more than any other ally in dollar terms. But according to NATO's most recent figures, it was estimated to have spent 3.19 percent of GDP in 2024, down from 3.68 percent a decade ago. It's the only ally whose spending has dropped since 2014. Seven-year time frame While the two new figures do add up to 5 percent, factoring in improvements to civilian infrastructure so that armies can deploy more quickly significantly changes the basis on which NATO traditionally calculates defence spending. The seven-year time frame is also short by the alliance's usual standards. The far more modest 2 percent target – set after Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula in 2014 – was meant to be reached over a decade. The extra spending will also be needed should the Trump administration announce a force draw down in Europe, where around 84,000 US troops are based, leaving European allies to plug any security gaps. The new targets are assigned by NATO based on a blueprint agreed upon in 2023 – the military organisation's biggest planning shakeup since the Cold War – to defend its territory from an attack by Russia or another major adversary. Under those plans, NATO would aim to have up to 300,000 troops ready to move to its eastern flank within 30 days, although experts suggest the allies would struggle to muster those kinds of numbers. NATO planners believe that the targets must be met within 5-10 years, given the speed at which Russia is building its armed forces now, and which would accelerate were any peace agreement reached to end its war on Ukraine.
Fashion Network
3 hours ago
- Fashion Network
US textile and apparel imports surge on the eve of Trump tariffs
The United States boosted its textile-clothing imports by 9.4% in the first quarter (January-March 2025). This increase is explained by the then uncertain prospect of new customs taxes, which Donald Trump finally announced on April 2. This acceleration mainly benefited Asian suppliers, up 15.4%, to the detriment of China, Latin America, and the European Union. Over the first three months of the year, the United States imported $26.9 billion worth of goods, including $20 billion worth of clothing (+10.9%) and $6.9 billion worth of textiles and materials (+4.9%). However, the countries most targeted by Donald Trump at the beginning of the year did not benefit from this last-minute acceleration, with principals likely anticipating the trade war promised by the Republican president. China is one of the countries not to benefit from this early-year acceleration. As the leading supplier of textiles and clothing to the United States, China's sales rose by just 3.6% over the period. At a time when other key Asian suppliers have seen significant increases. These include Vietnam (+14%), India (+20%), Bangladesh (+25%), Indonesia (+20%), Cambodia (+15.8%), and Pakistan (+10.5%). The European Union, the USA's sixth-largest supplier, remained stable in terms of textile-clothing exports to the USA, with 1.3 billion euros worth of goods shipped over the quarter. Italy, which alone ranks tenth among suppliers, even saw a contraction of 2.7%, ahead of Portugal (+0.9%) ranked 23rd and France (-1.9%) ranked 29th. Mexico, the United States' 8th-largest supplier of textiles and apparel, posted a positive variation of just 1% over the quarter. The Trump administration's repeated attacks on Latin America as a whole also partly explain the falls experienced by Honduras (-10%), Nicaragua (-5.6%), Guatemala (-1%), and El Salvador (-11%). Only Peru seems to be doing well, with orders up 25%. Vietnamese garments and European textiles lead the way If we look solely at the ranking of clothing suppliers, the figures show that China, the leading supplier in 2024, falls behind Vietnam in the first quarter of 2025, with a gap of almost $300 million. Mexico also posted 2.6% growth in this specific market. In terms of fabric imports, the EU leads the way with $278 million worth of materials, at a stable level. However, the Old Continent was followed by China, which grew by 2%, to within three million dollars. Their first challenger, India, came in at just 174 million, but posted growth of 12.5%.
