logo
North Korea's Insta-Fail: Cringe-Worthy Propaganda

North Korea's Insta-Fail: Cringe-Worthy Propaganda

Yahoo4 days ago
A flood of propaganda videos targeting American users has hit Instagram and X over the past year, many featuring stiff dialogue, clumsy editing, and bizarre rhetorical questions that attempt — and often fail — to portray North Korea as a thriving, free society.
One of the more prominent accounts in this wave is @MoveToNorthKorea, a mysterious Instagram page that posts upbeat propaganda targeting English-speaking audiences. It is unclear whether the account is state-run, operated by a private contractor, or simply run by a sympathizer. The effect, however, is the same: a stream of overly rosy portrayals of life inside one of the world's most repressive regimes.
The propaganda clips tend to follow a pattern.
Many are scored to Hundred Miles by Yall featuring Gabriela Richardson and begin with a rhetorical question starting with 'Who said…' The videos are often narrated in broken English by an AI voice that occasionally refers to North Koreans not by nationality but as 'esteemed citizens of the DPRK.' The editing is rudimentary, and the messaging leans on crude reversals of common criticisms — often to surreal effect.
Here are four recent examples that highlight just how far some of these efforts miss the mark:
'Action!': The Dinner Scene That Spoils Itself
In one widely shared clip, a girl named Zin-Mai sits down for dinner with a man implied to be her father. The premise is simple — a wholesome family meal — but the guise is subverted in the first second when someone audibly shouts a word translated as 'Action!' revealing the scene to be staged.
The father's dialogue is stilted and repetitive, as he aggressively insists they have plenty of food and repeatedly urges his daughter to eat more soup and kimchi. The pacing and conversation do not suggest that dialogue is spontaneous.
However, North Korea is not alone in staging dining scenes.
It's not just North Korean propagandists who stage mealtime settings to shape public perception. During the 2024 campaign, then-Vice President Kamala Harris was criticized for allegedly clearing out diners from a Pittsburgh restaurant so that campaign staff and supporters could pose as patrons during a campaign stop, as reported by the Daily Mail.
Google? Maybe — If You Don't Touch the Keyboard
'Who says Google doesn't work in North Korea?' asks another clip, as a man sits at a desktop computer with Google's homepage open. Yet at no point does he type anything, click a link, or interact with the browser. He merely stares at the screen.
No attempt is made to demonstrate actual use of Google or internet access. Instead, the scene appears constructed solely to suggest a normalcy that contradicts what human rights experts have long confirmed: the vast majority of North Koreans lack access to the global internet.
North Korea's intranet system, called Kwangmyong, offers only limited, state-approved content, and real internet use is typically restricted to a tiny ruling elite and tightly controlled government entities.
A 'Fair Trial' in the Hostage Confession Room
'Who said North Korea doesn't have a fair judicial system?' another video asks, before cutting to footage of a crying man in what appears to be a press conference, flanked by guards. A reverse image search identifies this man as Kim Tong Chol — a South Korean-American preacher reportedly imprisoned in North Korea on espionage charges — speaking inside a wood-paneled room infamous for its use in forced public confessions. Chol's name is sometimes spelled as Kim Dong Chul, depending on the news outlet.
This appears to be the same setting where Otto Warmbier, another detained American, was paraded before cameras in 2016. Warmbier died soon after being returned to the United States in a vegetative state.
Chul was released in 2018. He has kept a low profile since returning to the United States.
'I Have… Always Exciting!'
'Who said North Koreans don't speak English?' This clip opens with a young man struggling to form a sentence. After a long pause, he declares, 'I have… I am … always exciting!' A young woman follows, more fluent, and says she studies at Kim Il Sung University — but when asked about her major, she appears confused and unable to answer.
The clip then ends before the woman names a major.
Behind these awkward social media posts lies a country where information is tightly controlled and dissent is met with brutality.
According to Human Rights Watch, North Korea continues to its own citizens in labor camps, restrict movement, ban free expression, and enforce loyalty to the ruling Kim dynasty through surveillance and repression. A 2021 United Nations report found that more than 40% of the population suffers from food insecurity.
The Korean Peninsula was split after World War II, with the U.S. supporting the South and the Soviet Union backing the North. After a bloody civil war in the 1950s, the North remained under communist rule. Over decades, the Kim regime has relied on isolation, propaganda, and militarism to hold power, while neighboring South Korea has embraced a more Western-style government and economic growth.
As previously reported by The Dallas Express, North Korea's state media strategy has undergone significant evolution in recent years. YouTube vloggers like 'YuMi' and 'Song A' have tried to humanize the country by posting cheerful, English-language videos that depict life in Pyongyang as modern and upbeat, often in stark contrast to reports from defectors and human rights organizations.
'They are exploiting the social media environment where it is increasingly difficult to ascertain what is real and what is not,' Irina Tsukerman, a national security lawyer, told The Dallas Express.
Whether these influencers are state agents or merely sympathetic amplifiers, the outcome is the same: a disjointed, heavily curated vision of a regime that remains one of the most closed and repressive on Earth.
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Trump 2.0 Wrecked Bank Of Japan's Year
How Trump 2.0 Wrecked Bank Of Japan's Year

Forbes

time28 minutes ago

  • Forbes

How Trump 2.0 Wrecked Bank Of Japan's Year

Bank of Japan (BOJ) governor Kazuo Ueda YUICHI YAMAZAKI/AFP via Getty Images Poor Jerome Powell in Washington may be wearing the hard hat, but it's Kazuo Ueda here in Tokyo who's taking the real hits from Donald Trump. This week may be remembered as the moment when the Bank of Japan's second effort since 1999 to normalize rates died. BOJ Governor Ueda said nothing of the sort on Thursday when he left the benchmark rate unchanged. But Trump's trade war has narrowed Ueda's options to the point that BOJ watchers can barely see even a glimpse of a way forward. Most Japan watchers are focusing on the wrong data point. For many, the issues is the 15% tariff that Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba managed to score from Trump's trade team. Japan didn't get off easy, exactly, but with Tokyo staring down the barrel of a possible 35% Trump tax and another 25% on autos, the outcome was fine by Tokyo. If Trump wants to quibble about the mechanics, financing methods and timeline of the $550 billion 'signing bonus' fund he's demanded, so be it. By the time anyone figures out what this entity is and how it works, the U.S. and Japan could both have new leaders. The real issue is how the tariffs, and the chaos around them, have Japan barreling toward stagflation. As Ueda admitted on Thursday, inflation is accelerating. His team revised up its core consumer inflation forecast for fiscal year's to 2.7% from 2.2% projected three months ago. How to respond would be much clearer if Japanese growth wasn't essentially flat, at best. Team Ueda's forecast for real gross domestic product growth in fiscal 2025 is all 0.6%. The BOJ is as risk-adverse as any monetary institution — more so, in fact. After all, 26 years should be enough time to get rates away from zero. And to switch off the quantitative easing machine that hums 24/7 in the background supporting Asia's second-biggest economy. Ueda has been trying, of course. Over the last year, he's gotten the BOJ's benchmark to 0.5%. That's the highest since the BOJ last tried this in 2006 and 2007. By 2008, after Lehman Brothers collapsed, rates were headed back to zero. QE was back, too. Trump's trade war is proving to be just as devastating as the global crisis 17 years ago. Whereas Japan, China and South Korea avoided the worst of that crash, they're now directly in the collateral damage zone. The BOJ, especially. An argument can be made that Federal Reserve Chair Powell is having a worse 2025 than Ueda. Rarely does a day go by without Trump slamming Powell in ways investors have ever seen a president do. Ueda doesn't have Japanese leaders stopping by the BOJ for photo opps in front of construction crews. Yet the BOJ faces a near-impossible choice as Trump's tariffs cloud Japan's economic outlook. 'BOJ policymakers face a delicate balancing act between competing policy dilemmas, including sticky inflation, lukewarm consumer demand, fiscal pressures, and tariff impacts,' says Yuxuan Tang, global market strategist at J.P. Morgan Private Bank. One wildcard that really worries Tokyo: that China refuses to submit to the 'grand bargain' trade deal of Trump's dreams, triggering a whole new wave of Trump-driven tariff chaos. There's always the risk, too, that Detroit's complaints about Trump's Japan deal prompts the White House to backtrack on the 15% auto tax level. Japan's preexisting conditions are their own problem. A quarter century of zero rates and a weak yen deadened the urgency to reduce bureaucracy, internationalize labor markets, rekindle innovation, increase productivity or empower women. Now, as headwinds head Japan's way, Ueda's BOJ lacks the tools to save that day. And the BOJ's latest effort to normalize rates is rapidly getting trumped.

Inside the Summit Where China Pitched Its AI Agenda to the World
Inside the Summit Where China Pitched Its AI Agenda to the World

WIRED

timean hour ago

  • WIRED

Inside the Summit Where China Pitched Its AI Agenda to the World

Jul 31, 2025 11:04 AM Behind closed doors, Chinese researchers are laying the groundwork for a new global AI agenda—without input from the US. Three days after the Trump administration published its much-anticipated AI action plan, the Chinese government put out its own AI policy blueprint. Was the timing a coincidence? I doubt it. China's 'Global AI Governance Action Plan' was released on July 26, the first day of the World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC), the largest annual AI event in China. Geoffrey Hinton and Eric Schmidt were among the many Western tech industry figures who attended the festivities in Shanghai. Our WIRED colleague Will Knight was also on the scene. The vibe at WAIC was the polar opposite of Trump's America-first, regulation-light vision for AI, Will tells me. In his opening speech, Chinese Premier Li Qiang made a sobering case for the importance of global cooperation on AI. He was followed by a series of prominent Chinese AI researchers, who gave technical talks highlighting urgent questions the Trump administration appears to be largely brushing off. Zhou Bowen, leader of the Shanghai AI Lab, one of China's top AI research institutions, touted his team's work on AI safety at WAIC. He also suggested the government could play a role in monitoring commercial AI models for vulnerabilities. In an interview with WIRED, Yi Zeng, a professor at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and one of the country's leading voices on AI, said that he hopes AI safety organizations from around the world find ways to collaborate. 'It would be best if the UK, US, China, Singapore, and other institutes come together,' he said. The conference also included closed-door meetings about AI safety policy issues. Speaking after he attended one such confab, Paul Triolo, a partner at the advisory firm DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group, told WIRED that the discussions had been productive, despite the noticeable absence of American leadership. With the US out of the picture, 'a coalition of major AI safety players, co-led by China, Singapore, the UK, and the EU, will now drive efforts to construct guardrails around frontier AI model development,' Triolo told WIRED. He added that it wasn't just the US government that was missing: Of all the major US AI labs, only Elon Musk's xAI sent employees to attend the WAIC forum. Many Western visitors were surprised to learn how much of the conversation about AI in China revolves around safety regulations. 'You could literally attend AI safety events nonstop in the last seven days. And that was not the case with some of the other global AI summits,' Brian Tse, founder of the Beijing-based AI safety research institute Concordia AI, told me. Earlier this week, Concordia AI hosted a day-long safety forum in Shanghai with famous AI researchers like Stuart Russel and Yoshua Bengio. Switching Positions Comparing China's AI blueprint with Trump's action plan, it appears the two countries have switched positions. When Chinese companies first began developing advanced AI models, many observers thought they would be held back by censorship requirements imposed by the government. Now, US leaders say they want to ensure homegrown AI models 'pursue objective truth,' an endeavor that, as my colleague Steven Levy wrote in last week's Backchannel newsletter, is 'a blatant exercise in top-down ideological bias.' China's AI action plan, meanwhile, reads like a globalist manifesto: It recommends that the United Nations help lead international AI efforts and suggests governments have an important role to play in regulating the technology. Although their governments are very different, when it comes to AI safety, people in China and the US are worried about many of the same things: model hallucinations, discrimination, existential risks, cybersecurity vulnerabilities, etc. Because the US and China are developing frontier AI models 'trained on the same architecture and using the same methods of scaling laws, the types of societal impact and the risks they pose are very, very similar,' says Tse. That also means academic research on AI safety is converging in the two countries, including in areas like scalable oversight (how humans can monitor AI models with other AI models) and the development of interoperable safety testing standards. But Chinese and American leaders have demonstrated they have very different attitudes toward these issues. On one hand, the Trump administration recently tried and failed to put a 10-year moratorium on passing new state-level AI regulations. On the other hand, Chinese officials, including even Xi Jinping himself, are increasingly speaking out about the importance of putting guardrails on AI. Beijing has also been busy drafting domestic standards and rules for the technology, some of which are already in effect. As Trump goes rogue with unorthodox and inconsistent policies, the Chinese government increasingly looks like the adult in the room. With its new AI action plan, Beijing is trying to seize the moment and send the world a message: If you want leadership on this world-changing innovation, look here. Charm Offensive I don't know how effective China's charm offensive will be in the end, but the global retreat of the US does feel like a once-in-a-century opportunity for Beijing to spread its influence, especially at a moment when every country is looking for role models to help them make sense of AI risks and the best ways to manage them. But there's one thing I'm not sure about: How eager will China's domestic AI industry be to embrace this heightened focus on safety? While the Chinese government and academic circles have significantly ramped up their AI safety efforts, industry has so far seemed less enthusiastic—just like in the West. Chinese AI labs disclose less information about their AI safety efforts than their Western counterparts do, according to a recent report published by Concordia AI. Of the 13 frontier AI developers in China the report analyzed, only three produced details about safety assessments in their research publications. Will told me that several tech entrepreneurs he spoke to at WAIC said they were worried about AI risks such as hallucination, model bias, and criminal misuse. But when it came to AGI, many seemed optimistic that the technology will have positive impacts on their life, and they were less concerned about things like job loss or existential risks. Privately, Will says, some entrepreneurs admitted that addressing existential risks isn't as important to them as figuring out how to scale, make money, and beat the competition. But the clear signal from the Chinese government is that companies should be encouraged to tackle AI safety risks, and I wouldn't be surprised if many startups in the country change their tune. Triolo, of DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group, said he expected Chinese frontier research labs to begin publishing more cutting-edge safety work. Some WAIC attendees see China's focus on open source AI as a key part of the picture. 'As Chinese AI companies increasingly open-source powerful AIs, their American counterparts are pressured to do the same,' Bo Peng, a researcher who created the open source large language model RWKV, told WIRED. Peng envisions a future where different nations—including ones that do not always agree—work together on AI. 'A competitive landscape of multiple powerful open-source AIs is in the best interest of AI safety and humanity's future,' he explained. 'Because different AIs naturally embody different values and will keep each other in check.' This is an edition of Zeyi Yang and Louise Matsakis' Made in China newsletter . Read previous newsletters here.

White House responds to 'Rocket Man' and North Korea's threats over denuclearization
White House responds to 'Rocket Man' and North Korea's threats over denuclearization

Fox News

time3 hours ago

  • Fox News

White House responds to 'Rocket Man' and North Korea's threats over denuclearization

President Donald Trump remains open to meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un in hopes of achieving denuclearization, the White House said, even as Pyongyang warned against any pressure to abandon its nuclear arsenal. "President Trump in his first term held three historic summits with North Korean Leader Kim Jong Un that stabilized the Korean Peninsula and achieved the first-ever leader-level agreement on denuclearization," a White House official told Fox News Digital. "The President retains those objectives and remains open to engaging with Leader Kim to achieve a fully de-nuclearized North Korea." Kim Yo Jong, the powerful sister of Kim Jong Un, said in remarks carried by state media that relations between Trump and her brother are "not bad." However, she warned that any attempt to pressure North Korea to denuclearize would be viewed as "nothing but a mockery." She also claimed the country's nuclear arsenal has significantly expanded since the two leaders last met — despite their pledge to pursue denuclearization — and stated that no future summit would be possible if it centered on nuclear disarmament. "If the U.S. fails to accept the changed reality and persists in the failed past, the DPRK–U.S. meeting will remain as a 'hope' of the U.S. side," Kim Yo Jong said, referring to the country by its official name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. Trump held three unprecedented summits with the North Korean leader — whom he once nicknamed "Little Rocket Man" — during his first term: in Singapore in 2018, Hanoi in 2019, and at the Korean Demilitarized Zone later that year, where he became the first sitting U.S. president to step foot on North Korean soil. At the 2018 summit, Trump and Kim signed a joint statement pledging to "work toward complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula" and committed to establishing new U.S.–North Korea relations. However, talks broke down in subsequent meetings. North Korea did not give up its nuclear weapons, and the United States did not lift sanctions. Kim reportedly sought to dismantle only parts of the regime's arsenal in exchange for full sanctions relief — a proposal Trump rejected. By 2020, the talks had completely stalled, and North Korea resumed weapons testing. In a statement Monday commemorating the 72nd anniversary of the end of the Korean War, Trump reflected on his meetings with Kim, saying, "I was proud to become the first sitting President to cross this Demilitarized Zone into North Korea." He also reaffirmed the U.S. alliance with South Korea, adding: "Although the evils of communism still persist in Asia, American and South Korean forces remain united in an ironclad alliance to this day."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store