
Why Vietnam's US trade deal is a high-risk economic gamble
surprise deal . Vietnam agreed to a tariff of 20 per cent on direct exports to the United States and 40 per cent on
transshipped goods . In return for the reduced US tariffs, Vietnam grants zero-tariff access to American goods entering its market.
Advertisement
Presented as a pragmatic trade compromise, the deal's deeper significance lies in its geopolitical and structural dimensions. It underscores both Vietnam's urgency to safeguard US market access and a shifting – though still tentative – strategic alignment between Hanoi and Washington amid rising Chinese economic and military assertiveness.
Vietnam has long benefited from preferential trade access to the US market, particularly during the first Trump term, when Chinese companies fleeing US tariffs
relocated their manufacturing to Vietnam. But that advantage became a liability: last year, Vietnam's
trade surplus with the US surged to US$123.5 billion – raising alarm in Washington over alleged transshipments and the back-door benefits to China.
Back in office, US President Donald Trump has turned that imbalance into a political flashpoint. By agreeing to the tariffs, Vietnam has temporarily averted direct punitive measures. But in doing so, it has opened its market – completely and unconditionally – to US goods.
Vietnam's decision to eliminate import duties on a broad swathe of American exports – from liquefied natural gas (LNG) and aircraft to semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, agriculture and even automobiles – represents a dramatic shift. For US exporters, it unlocks a US$100 billion consumer market in Southeast Asia with a rapidly expanding middle class. For Vietnamese producers, however, the competitive landscape just became significantly more challenging.
Advertisement
The impact is expected to be broad. In the LNG sector, with multiple terminals under development, Vietnam's energy diversification strategy could align with US suppliers such as Cheniere Energy, which are
well-positioned to secure long-term contracts.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking ‘client list' does not exist, Justice Department says
Jeffrey Epstein did not maintain a 'client list', the Justice Department acknowledged on Monday as it said no more files related to the wealthy financier's sex trafficking investigation would be made public despite promises from Attorney General Pam Bondi that had raised the expectations of conservative influencers and conspiracy theorists. Advertisement The acknowledgement that the well-connected Epstein did not have a list of clients to whom underage girls were trafficked represents a public walk-back of a theory that the Trump administration had helped promote, with Bondi suggesting in a Fox News interview earlier this year that such a document was 'sitting on my desk' in preparation for release. Even as it released video from inside a New York prison meant to definitively prove that Epstein committed suicide, the department also said in a memo that it was refusing to release other evidence investigators had collected. Bondi for weeks had suggested that more material was going to be revealed – 'It's a new administration and everything is going to come out to the public', she said at one point – after a first document dump she had hyped angered US President Donald Trump's base by failing to deliver revelations. That episode, in which conservative internet personalities were invited to the White House in February and provided with binders marked 'The Epstein Files: Phase 1' and 'Declassified' that contained documents that had largely already been in the public domain, has spurred far-right influencers to lambast and deride Bondi. Advertisement After the first release fell flat, Bondi said officials were poring over a 'truckload' of previously withheld evidence she said had been handed over by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). In a March television interview, she claimed the Biden administration 'sat on these documents, no one did anything with them', adding: 'Sadly these people don't believe in transparency, but I think more unfortunately, I think a lot of them don't believe in honesty.'


South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Brics leaders hold off responding to Trump's threat to raise US tariffs against member nations
The leaders of Brics nations remained silent on Monday in the face of US President Donald Trump's latest tariff threat against the bloc, offering no public response to what critics called an alarming act of economic intimidation. Trump said on Sunday that he would impose an additional 10 per cent tariffs on imports from Brics members and aligned countries that pursue what he called the group's 'anti-American policies' after Brics issued a leaders' declaration condemning tariffs, unilateralism and protectionism without naming the US. Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, in opening remarks on the final day of the leaders' summit in Rio de Janeiro, spoke about climate change and global health but did not address tariffs or Trump. Lula was expected to hold a news conference later in the day, though, where that could change. Others were not so quiet. Russian spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Sunday that Trump's latest statement on Brics had been 'noticed', Russia's state-owned news agency Tass reported. Beijing also reacted to the US president's comments, with Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning saying on Monday that Brics 'is not a bloc for confrontation, nor does it target any country'.


HKFP
4 hours ago
- HKFP
China says BRICS not seeking ‘confrontation' after Trump's tariff threat
China said on Monday that BRICS, the grouping that also includes Brazil, Russia and India, was not seeking 'confrontation' after US President Donald Trump vowed to impose an extra 10 percent tariff on countries aligning with the bloc. 'Regarding the imposition of tariffs, China has repeatedly stated its position that trade and tariff wars have no winners and protectionism offers no way forward,' foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said. Trump said he would send the first tariff letters to various countries on Monday, days before his deadline for trading partners to reach a deal expires. He said on Sunday he would send a first batch of up to 15 letters, warning that US levies on imports would snap back to the high levels he set in April if countries failed to make agreements. And, in a post on his Truth Social network, he threatened a further 10 percent tariff on countries aligning themselves with the emerging BRICS nations, accusing them of 'anti-Americanism' after they slammed his tariffs at a summit in Rio de Janeiro on Sunday. Conceived two decades ago as a forum for fast-growing economies, BRICS has come to be seen as a Chinese-driven counterbalance to US and western European power. However, Beijing defended the grouping on Monday as 'an important platform for cooperation between emerging markets and developing countries'. 'It advocates openness, inclusivity and win-win cooperation,' Mao said. 'It does not engage in camp confrontation and is not targeted at any country,' she said.