‘I cannot believe I survived', says lone survivor of Air India crash in emotional meeting with PM Modi
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi with
Image: IANS
AHMEDABAD: Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday met Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, the sole survivor of the devastating Air India plane crash. Ramesh, a British national of Indian origin, is recovering from injuries sustained in the crash and is being treated at a hospital in Ahmedabad.
Ramesh, traveling with his 45-year-old brother Ajay Kumar Rakesh, recounted the harrowing moments to Prime Minister Modi during their meeting.
'My brother was seated in a different row and didn't survive. I still don't know how I made it out alive,' he told the Prime Minister.
'For a while, I thought I was going to die. Everything happened in front of my eyes - the noise, the impact, the fire. I somehow found a small space to escape.'
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Describing the terrifying seconds before the crash, he said, 'After take-off, the aircraft seemed to stall briefly. Then it suddenly nosedived and crashed into the building. I was on the opposite side of where the plane hit. That saved me.'
Ramesh, who was seen walking away from the wreckage despite his injuries, added that he was receiving good medical care.
Prime Minister Modi also visited the Civil Hospital and met with several injured victims of the crash, many of whom are students of the BJ Medical College.
The hostel that bore the brunt of the impact was filled with young MBBS students, many of whom had no time to react when the plane hit the building.
The ill-fated Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner was en route to London when it crashed shortly after takeoff from Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport on Thursday. It slammed into the hostel of BJ Medical College in the densely populated Meghaninagar area, just 3km from the airport.
The crash occurred around 1.30pm - just as medical students had gathered in the mess-cum-dining hall for lunch.
Authorities have launched a massive rescue and identification operation. The process of handing over bodies to grieving families has begun, even as investigators comb through the debris to determine the cause of one of India's deadliest aviation tragedies in recent memory. - IANS
THE POST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
a day ago
- Daily Maverick
Human rights for all: Why I am in Egypt to join the Global March to Gaza
Gaza, right now, is the largest concentration camp the world has ever seen, dwarfing in size the camps set up by the British in South Africa or by the Germans in Namibia and Poland. In Gaza, two million people are incarcerated by Israel's powerful military, backed by US bombs. They live without homes (which have all been bombed), without hospitals (which have also all been bombed) and without safe drinking water (Israel has bombed that too). The people of Gaza are also starving. They have no access to food. This is by design. Thousands of trucks packed with food and medical supplies have been waiting at the border for more than two months. Israel has refused to let them in. Instead of opening the border it is setting up militarised distribution points, and then shooting the starving civilians who gather, desperate for food. Israel is purposely starving Gazans to force them to give up their struggle for freedom and accept their removal out of the strip. This is the definition of ethnic cleansing. I do not merely give my opinion here. This is actually the stated policy of the Israeli government, which has boasted that the 'Trump Plan' to remove Palestinians from Gaza is one of their central war aims. Even a former Israeli prime minister, who has been defending the war for 20 months, now concedes that Israel is committing war crimes. But this isn't just a war crime. According to Holocaust experts like Raz Segal as well as independent human rights organisations like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, this is a textbook case of genocide. We are looking at what is arguably the worst atrocity of the 21st Century. If not that, certainly the most documented. The Global March to Gaza is a humanitarian protest that seeks to pressure the Israeli government to stop the blockade and end its genocidal war in the Gaza Strip. Along with more than 50 other South Africans, we have flown to Cairo. From there we will take a bus into the Sinai Peninsula and march for two days (50 kilometres) all the way to the Rafah Crossing. The march will also be joined by the Sumud humanitarian convoy of 7,000 people that began in Tunisia and will also reach Rafah on 15 June. Despite the obvious danger, we have decided to join this first-of-its-kind global march to the doorstep of genocide. For over 20 months, we have been protesting against the genocide in our own countries. (Some of us have been protesting Israeli apartheid for decades.) We have been publishing articles, writing books, painting murals, hanging banners, speaking at Jewish, Christian and Muslim faith events. We have also been lobbying our governments to act against and sanction the Israeli regime. Yet the genocide has continued. Where is the backbone of those governments who claim to support the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinians? We feel we have no other choice but to try something new. Never before have thousands of civilians travelled thousands of kilometres to converge on the site of an ongoing genocide to try to stop it. We are doing this because we are desperate for real change rather than platitudes. When we see photos of starving children, when we watch videos of a man pushing a wheelbarrow of dismembered body parts through the ruins of Khan Yunis, when we hear the last words of little Hind Rajab before being shot by surrounding tanks, we see what could so easily be ourselves. And we see the necessity of our intervention. What if this were happening to us? What would we want the world to do about it? This is why we chant we are all Palestinians. This is why we call for freedom from the river to the sea. When Jews have asserted 'never again' after the Nazi Holocaust killed tens of millions of Roma, Slavs, homosexuals, disabled people and people of the Jewish faith, we know that its real meaning was not 'never again' just for Jews. For those of us who believe in the equality of all human beings, we recognise that this means that we should stand against the persecution of all people. We mean that we must fight all structures of colonialism, racism, sexism, queerphobia and of all other forms of oppression — wherever we encounter it. Since never again must mean never again for anyone; we march to make this a reality. As we head to Rafah, you can support our call to end the siege and end the genocide by following our journey, by amplifying it on social media, and by calling on your government to sanction the Israeli regime. DM
Eyewitness News
2 days ago
- Eyewitness News
Airlines halt many Middle East flights after Israel hits Iran
PARIS - Global airlines on Friday cancelled flights to Tel Aviv, Tehran and other Middle East destinations, or rerouted planes, as airspaces shut following Israeli strikes on Iran. Israel, Iran, Iraq, Jordan and Syria closed their airspaces after Israel hit military and nuclear facilities in Iran. Israel said Tehran launched drones in retaliation. Air India's New Delhi-Vienna and Mumbai-London flights were about to enter Iranian airspace when Israel launched its attack, forcing the planes to turn back to their origin, according to aircraft tracker Flight Aware. Its London-New Delhi flight had just entered Iranian airspace and was rerouted over Iraq before arriving in India one hour late, according to Flight Aware. Air India diverted or called back a total of 16 flights between India and London and cities in Canada and the United States "due to the emerging situation in Iran". Emirates, the Middle East's largest airline, cancelled flights to and from Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon and Iran after Israel launched the strikes. Qatar Airways, the country's national carrier and one of the Middle East's largest, said it had "temporarily cancelled flights to Iran and Iraq due to the current situation in the region". Air France said it was suspending its flights to and from Tel Aviv "until further notice" following the closure of Israeli airspace. "Air France is closely monitoring the situation in the Middle East in real time," a spokesman for the French airline told AFP, adding that "the safety of its customers and crews is its absolute priority". Russia's aviation authority Rosaviatsiya instructed Russian airlines not to fly "in the airspace of Israel, Jordan, Iraq and Iran" or use airports in Israel and Iran. It said the restrictions will stay in place until June 26 or until further notice. German airline group Lufthansa suspended flights to and from Tehran until July 31. It also extended the suspension of Tel Aviv flights for the same period. Swiss airline, which is owned by Lufthansa, suspended its Tel Aviv flights until October 25, while those to Beirut were suspended until the end of July. In the United Arab Emirates, Abu Dhabi airport warned, "flight disruptions are expected through today (Friday)" as a result of the Israeli strikes. Dubai's airport also announced flight delays and cancellations due to the closure of airspaces in Iran, Iraq and Syria.
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Justice in Kashmir is the only path to peace for Indian and Pakistan
Tensions between India and Pakistan have escalated following a deadly attack in Kashmir. This article delves into the historical context of the Kashmir conflict and argues that true peace can only be achieved through justice for the Kashmiri people. Image: AFP Imraan Buccus Tensions between India and Pakistan soared following an attack On 22 April 2025, after militants opened fire on a group of mostly Hindu tourists in the Baisaran Valley near Pahalgam, killing 26 civilians. The Indian government swiftly alleged Pakistani involvement—a claim for which no evidence has been provided. The Indian media followed suit, stoking nationalist fervour. In the days that followed, both sides engaged in military posturing and cross-border exchanges of fire. Now that the immediate crisis has passed, it is time to take a deeper look at the unresolved tragedy of Kashmir—one of the longest-running and most dangerous conflicts in modern history. What makes the current moment especially dangerous is the ideological nature of the regime in New Delhi. Prime Minister Narendra Modi and the BJP first came to power in 2014. Modi built his national standing with the far right following the anti-Muslim pogrom in Gujarat, where he was chief minister, in 2002. Under Modi's rule India has taken an openly authoritarian turn, built on a toxic cocktail of neoliberal economic policies and Hindu nationalism. The annexation of Jammu and Kashmir in 2019—stripping the region of its autonomy, dissolving its legislature, and imposing a sweeping military clampdown—was a key moment in the BJP's consolidation of power. It sent a clear message: for this government, Kashmiris are not equal participants in a democratic polity but a population to be subdued and ruled. The parallels with the occupation of Palestine are impossible to ignore. Like Israel, India seeks to dominate a territory whose people overwhelmingly reject its rule. It floods the area with soldiers and surveillance. It shuts down internet access. It detains thousands without trial. It promotes demographic change through settler policies, hoping to shift the region's character. And it silences dissent by branding it terrorism. This is not a project of democracy. It is a project of colonialism. One of the most searing literary accounts of Kashmir's anguish comes from Indian novelist and essayist Arundhati Roy, whose 2017 novel, The Ministry of Utmost Happiness, is partly set in the valley. Through the voice of a Kashmiri militant, she captures both the trauma of military repression and the clarity of defiance. Reflecting on the use of pellet guns—non-lethal weapons deployed by Indian forces that have blinded hundreds of young Kashmiris—Roy writes: 'One day Kashmir will make India self‑destruct in the same way. You may have blinded all of us, every one of us, with your pellet guns by then. But you will still have eyes to see what you have done to us… You're not destroying us. You are constructing us. It's yourselves that you are destroying.' This haunting passage speaks not only to the physical brutality visited upon the Kashmiri people, but also to the long-term moral corrosion inflicted on the Indian state. The attempt to crush dissent with overwhelming force is, as Roy suggests, a form of slow national suicide—one that eats away at democracy from within. South African journalist Azad Essa, whose excellent book Hostile Homelands: The New Alliance Between India and Israel was published in 2023, maps the deepening strategic ties between the two states—from arms deals to surveillance systems and demographic policies. In an October 2024 interview, Essa observed: 'For example, in 2019, India essentially annexes Kashmir... Later, the Indian ambassador to the US makes a statement saying that they're going to build settlements in the territory, just as Israel has built settlements in Palestine.' Essa's book explores how converging ethno-nationalist logics—Hindutva in India and Zionism in Israel—are driving policies in both regions, from annexation and surveillance to demographic engineering. In both cases, the occupying power claims that it is the victim. And in both cases, any call for justice—any demand that the people of the land be given their basic political and human rights—is dismissed as extremism. When a Kashmiri teenager throws a stone, or a Palestinian farmer defends his land, it is cast as an existential threat to a nuclear state. This absurd logic holds because it is backed by power: military, economic, and increasingly, diplomatic. India's international image has shifted dramatically in the last two decades. Once a leader of the Non-Aligned Movement, it now seeks to be a junior partner to Western powers in the emerging strategic contest with China. As such, it benefits from the same impunity that shields Israeli aggression. While Pakistan grapples with significant internal challenges across the economic, political, security and terrorism sectors, the oppression of Kashmir by India remains a paramount concern. India's refusal to recognise the political aspirations of the Kashmiri people is rooted in a narrow, majoritarian nationalism that sees Indian Muslims in general—and Kashmiris in particular—as suspect, as not fully Indian, as a fifth column. The rise of Hindutva, or Hindu nationalist ideology, has made it almost impossible for even liberal voices inside India to advocate for justice in Kashmir without being labelled as traitors. Hindu nationalism is not merely a cultural or religious identity. It is a form of fascism that seeks to define the Indian state in terms of an exclusionary ethno-religious ideal. It treats secularism and pluralism as threats. It rewrites history to suit its mythologies. It demonises minorities, especially Muslims, and it weaponises the media, the courts, and the police. In this context, Kashmir becomes both a real place and a symbol—a place to be crushed to prove the supremacy of what is now understood as a Hindu nation. In South Africa, we have learned that peace cannot be built on injustice. The apartheid regime tried for decades to impose peace without justice. It failed. Our transition, for all its compromises, was grounded in the recognition that a lasting future required recognition, inclusion, and dignity for the oppressed. In Kashmir, as in Palestine, peace will only come when justice is done. This means supporting the demand for self-determination. It means ending military occupation. It means releasing political prisoners, restoring civil liberties, and ending the project of demographic change. South Africa has an important role to play here. Our history gives us a particular moral voice in the international arena. We have used it in relation to Palestine—and rightly so. We should do the same for Kashmir, the Congo and other countries suffering oppression. ** Dr Buccus is a research fellow at ASRI and at the University of the Free State *** The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of IOL or Independent Media IOL Opinion Dr Imraan Buccus Image: IOL
