logo
Trump's federal aid freeze sparks confusion and anxiety in Arizona: What to know

Trump's federal aid freeze sparks confusion and anxiety in Arizona: What to know

Yahoo29-01-2025
President Donald Trump set off a political whirlwind when his budget office released a memo announcing that some federal spending would be frozen the following day.
The Monday announcement sparked chaos as state and local governments, nonprofits and other stakeholders tried to figure out what exactly would be on the chopping block.
The funding pause was scheduled to go into effect on Tuesday afternoon, but was temporarily blocked until Monday by a federal judge.
Though the order is temporarily on ice, uncertainty still swirls around which programs exactly will and won't be affected should the order go into effect.
Though the orders didn't go into place, Tuesday saw some hiccups and interruptions in Arizona, with temporary outages to Medicaid and Head Start.
Here's how the saga has played out so far, and what's next for Trump's proposed funding freeze.
Trump and his allies have promoted the federal funding freeze as a way to make sure that U.S. government spending aligns with the mandate he campaigned on and began implementing since taking office.
A memo penned Monday by the acting director of the Office of Management and Budget foregrounded hot-button issues such as gender, climate and socially progressive policies.
'The use of federal resources to advance Marxist equity, transgenderism and green new deal social engineering policies is a waste of taxpayer dollars that does not improve the day-to-day lives of those we serve,' the memo reads.
It creates a roughly two-week window for the federal government to review and re-approve that spending.
The funding freeze did not affect funding that is provided directly to individuals — such as Medicare and Social Security — but other details about its scope remained unclear. Initially the Budget Department circulated a memo requesting information on programs such as low-income economic assistance and food programs, Politico reported.
In follow-up guidance released Tuesday, the office clarified that the freeze will only impact programs that are related to the flurry of executive orders Trump signed when he took office. Stakeholders said it was still hard to tell what exactly falls into that category.
AGs speak out: Mayes, other state attorneys general sue over Trump halting federal aid
Though the funding freeze was directed at programs affected by Trump's recent executive orders, Tuesday also brought interruptions to government operations which appeared to fall outside that scope.
The online portals through which states receive federal Medicaid funding were down on Tuesday morning, despite guidance from the Trump administration that the program would 'continue without pause.'
Trump Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said the White House was aware of website outages but said that Medicaid payments were still flowing.
Christian Slater, a spokesperson for Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs, said that the state did not have access to federal Medicaid dollars, which fund about 70% of Arizona's Medicaid program, as the clock ticked toward the funding freeze deadline. The website was back up and running later that afternoon, he confirmed.
White House officials told CBS News that the Medicaid outages were unrelated to the federal funding freeze.
Head Start, a federal program that provides early child care for low-income families, also saw outages Tuesday despite assurances from OMB that it would not be affected. The program's grantees reported being locked out of the payment systems that they usually use to draw down grant funding.
Kelley Murphy with the Arizona Early Childhood Alliance said "all hell broke loose" when OMB released its guidance, in part because there was no clear way to request an exemption from the funding freeze.
It was unclear to her why the Head Start portal was blocked before the freeze was supposed to go into effect. National child care advocates told CNN they believe it was related to Trump's order.
"All of this stuff is programs that impact young children," she said. "I am fearful that this will harm children in our state."
What to know in Trump's Week 2: Immigration crackdown is starting
In the hours before Trump's orders were put on ice, stakeholders were still trying to understand which programs exactly would be affected.
U.S. Rep. Greg Stanton, a Democrat who represents much of the East Valley, argued it would have "immediate and dangerous consequences in Arizona."
Allison Childress, a Stanton spokesperson, said his office fielded concerns from around the district all day Tuesday.
That included queries from from health centers, who were weighing whether they would need to furlough or lay off staff; a local homelessness organization that was unable to draw their monthly reimbursement from the federal government; business development groups who had paused their workforce development programs; and constituents who work on federally funded research at Arizona State University, Childress said.
Allies of Trump argued the impacts of the funding freeze were exaggerated in the media.
U.S. Rep. Eli Crane, a Republican who represents much of northeastern Arizona, accused Democrats of 'needlessly scaring hardworking Arizonans by perpetuating lies for raw political gain.'
In an email Tuesday afternoon, the White House communications team accused the media of a 'Fake News Hoax.' They pointed to the OMB guidance released earlier that day which clarified that programs such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and SNAP were excluded from the pause in funding.
Other government stakeholders preemptively took steps to prepare for the funding freeze — some of them going beyond what feds had warned them to do.
Tom Horne, the Arizona superintendent of public instruction and a Republican, said he had received notice that the funding review wouldn't apply to "Title I" economically disadvantaged schools.
'Nevertheless,' he wrote, 'because there are many details yet to be clarified, as a contingency I have directed this department to draw down the funds needed during the two-week period covered by the federal pause.'
This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Trump's federal aid freeze: After a day of chaos, what's next?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Who really suffers from Trump Derangement Syndrome?
Who really suffers from Trump Derangement Syndrome?

Boston Globe

time18 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Who really suffers from Trump Derangement Syndrome?

Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Two decades on, Krauthammer's coinage has been appropriated, rebranded, and defined down — way down. 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' is now flung at anyone who objects to President Trump's conduct or opposes his policies. The term is no longer reserved for over-the-top expressions of revulsion — like actor Robert De Niro using a televised appearance at the Tony Awards to Advertisement No — today 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' is used as an all-purpose put-down to deride any Trump critics, including those who stick to serious, fact-based analysis. I've lost count of all the times I've been Advertisement A woman seen at the Iowa State Fairgrounds on July 3, when President Trump was speaking there. Scott Olson/Getty The word 'syndrome' notwithstanding, this is merely political trash talk, popularized by Trump and his allies as a way to wave off criticism without having to engage it. Instead of refuting arguments or defending policy, the magic letters 'TDS' turn disagreement into proof of mental defect. Yet if 'derangement' means the loss of proportion and judgment Krauthammer was getting at, then the most severe cases aren't among Trump's critics. They're in the ranks of his most ardent loyalists. The real Trump Derangement Syndrome shows up in three telltale symptoms. First is the cult-like worship that treats Trump as infallible — his acolytes profess adoration not only for what he does, but for whatever could flow from him. Emblematic of that mindset are the Advertisement Second is the abandonment of principles that once seemed non-negotiable. Conservatives and Republicans who used to champion free trade A man with a MAGA tattoo on his stomach attended a rally at Macomb Community College in Warren, Mich., to mark President Trump's 100th day in office on April 29. EMILY ELCONIN/NYT Third is the unsettling delight so many supporters take in Trump's most outrageous behavior — a kind of giddy worship that equates offensiveness with authenticity. Such brazenness has been a hallmark of his political career — from mocking John McCain's Vietnam War heroism to charging undocumented immigrants with ' Advertisement Meanwhile, they reflexively use 'TDS!' as a go-to put-down for anything from mild disagreement to serious moral critique, framing opposition not as argument but as pathology — an easy, cheap discredit. Yes, plenty of Trump-haters go overboard — but in MAGA circles, the 'TDS' tag is sprayed far wider, hitting thoughtful critics just as readily as the genuinely unhinged. What is truly alarming is how some have sought to legalize that insult by casting dissent as disease. In Minnesota this spring, five Republican senators proposed a bill that would Krauthammer's original point in 2003 was that derangement is the breakdown of proportion and prudence. That breakdown isn't found among critics who quote Trump accurately and challenge his claims. The most alarming political derangement today affects those who cannot conceive that there are legitimate reasons to be appalled by the president, and so explain anti-Trump dissent as a sign of mental weakness. If reason is the measure, then those who shout 'TDS!' the loudest are the ones most in need of treatment. Jeff Jacoby can be reached at

Donald Trump and Prince Andrew Were 'Swapping Tales About Women'—Author
Donald Trump and Prince Andrew Were 'Swapping Tales About Women'—Author

Newsweek

time19 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump and Prince Andrew Were 'Swapping Tales About Women'—Author

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Donald Trump and Prince Andrew were overheard "swapping tales about women" by a diplomat in New York, a royal author told Newsweek. The two men have both been under fire over their respective friendships with Jeffrey Epstein, the New York sex trafficker who died in jail in August 2019. The president denied knowing Andrew that same year despite having previously said, in 2000, that he was a "lot of fun to be with." Now, historian Andrew Lownie argues in his new biography Entitled that the pair did enjoy each other's company and were seen together by diplomats. Steven Cheung, the White House communications director, told Newsweek: "It seems like this random individual wrote a book of fiction that belongs in the bargain bin of a discount bookstore." Donald and Melania Trump and Prince Andrew pose at Mar-a-Lago, Palm Beach, Florida, on February 12, 2000. Donald and Melania Trump and Prince Andrew pose at Mar-a-Lago, Palm Beach, Florida, on February 12, It Matters Prince Andrew's reputation disintegrated due to allegations by Virginia Giuffre that she was forced to have sex with him by Epstein and Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, as a 17-year-old sex trafficking victim. Trump has denied knowing about Jeffrey Epstein's crimes, but their friendship has been haunting him in recent weeks, since botched promises to release the Epstein files this year. Trump administration officials had hinted at major revelations and even new charges in the case after the president ordered a review of the files. Yet in July, the D.O.J. and FBI released a memo saying there was no "Epstein client list" to release, there would be no new investigations and there was no evidence the financier blackmailed prominent figures. What to Know Lownie said in an upcoming episode of Newsweek's The Royal Report podcast: "I had this fascinating lunch with the diplomat at the New York consulate, who had stories of Trump and Andrew swapping tales about women, swapping notes about masseurs, talking about golf. "They have all these interests, golf, sex and money. So, I mean, it was amazing that Trump subsequently denied having any knowledge of Andrew, having any contact with him, when of course there's plenty of pictures of them together in London, in Mar-a-Lago and elsewhere. "They were all fishing in the same waters. But I can understand why they may want to distance themselves now." Newsweek representatives of Prince Andrew for comment. What Donald Trump Said About Andrew After Prince Andrew's car crash interview in 2019, Trump denied knowing the royal: "I don't know Prince Andrew, but it's a tough story, it's a very tough story." Yet he told People at a party in October 2000: "He's not pretentious. He's a lot of fun to be with." The magazine's article read: "Attending a Halloween costume party hosted by model Heidi Klum at the chic Hudson Bar, the teetotaling Andrew sipped bottled water and chatted with Maxwell, who wore a leopard-print jacket and platinum wig, as well as with Donald Trump and his girlfriend, model Melania Knauss [as the First Lady was then known]." Months earlier, that February, Andrew was photographed chatting with the Trumps at Mar-a-Lago. Epstein and Maxwell were at the same event and were also pictured socializing with both Andrew and Trump. Melania Trump, Prince Andrew, Gwendolyn Beck and Jeffrey Epstein at a party at the Mar-a-Lago club, Palm Beach, Florida, February 12, 2000. Melania Trump, Prince Andrew, Gwendolyn Beck and Jeffrey Epstein at a party at the Mar-a-Lago club, Palm Beach, Florida, February 12, Happens Next The Epstein-shaped storm swirling around Trump has moved to questions about Ghislaine Maxwell, who had meetings over two days with Todd Blanche, deputy U.S. Attorney General, in July. Shortly afterward, she was moved to a minimum security prison to continue serving her 20-year sentence for sex trafficking related offences. Maxwell was convicted over allegations that she groomed girls for Epstein to sexually abuse. Democrat Senator Sheldon Whitehouse has requested documents relating to the transfer, telling Newsweek it "reeks of a coordinated protection racket run at taxpayer expense to shield the president." Lownie said he was concerned Maxwell could be a flight risk: "I think she'll disappear. I mean, we may assume that she's in the American prison service but I think she'll be sunning herself on the beach somewhere." And on her transfer, he added: "The victims must feel very strongly about this, that you know, here's someone who had a very serious sentence, was charged and convicted on several counts, and, it was clear from the trial, had been deeply involved in what Epstein was doing. "And yet, you know, here she is with a 20-year sentence being basically given a get out of jail free card." Jack Royston is chief royal correspondent for Newsweek, based in London. You can find him on X, formerly Twitter, at @jack_royston and read his stories on Newsweek's The Royals Facebook page. Do you have a question about Charles and Queen Camilla, William and Kate, Meghan Markle and Harry, or their family that you would like our experienced royal correspondents to answer? Email royals@ We'd love to hear from you.

How to Keep Up With President Trump
How to Keep Up With President Trump

New York Times

time19 minutes ago

  • New York Times

How to Keep Up With President Trump

Times Insider explains who we are and what we do and delivers behind-the-scenes insights into how our journalism comes together. Erica L. Green entered Baltimore's foster care system when she was 7 years old. By the time she entered college, she had lived in six homes. From that experience, she learned how to navigate a diverse set of family structures and households. 'I'm extremely vigilant and extremely adaptable,' said Ms. Green, who credits those traits as essential to her job covering President Trump for The New York Times. 'I grew up that way. You go where the news takes you, and that means, especially under Trump, it could be in 10 different directions.' Ms. Green joined The Times in 2017, reporting on federal education policy. She saw the job as an opportunity to shine a light on an issue important to her — America's flawed education system — on a large scale. In 2023, she accepted a role as a White House correspondent. Soon after, she began reporting on the Biden administration and eventually Kamala Harris's 2024 presidential campaign. She's now covering the Trump administration, with much of her coverage focusing on how the president is attempting to roll back civil rights and change racial dynamics in the United States. 'It has become incredibly clear how important it is for people to see a Black White House reporter for The New York Times,' she said. In a recent interview, Ms. Green spoke about the day-to-day demands of the job and the challenges that come with the beat. This interview has been condensed and edited. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store