Judge sides with ACLU in lawsuit against CCSD over graduation stole ban
During an emergency court hearing Sunday, U.S. District Judge Richard Boulware found that two stoles, one featuring the phrase 'Black Girl Magic' on kente cloth and another representing the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Nevada's Emerging Leaders Program, were lawfully protected under the First Amendment.
Both stoles had previously been denied by a school administrator.
The decision prompted an agreement between the district and the ACLU requiring CCSD to notify all graduates and school leaders by 3 p.m. with clear guidance on what is permitted at graduation ceremonies.
Graduates will be allowed to wear up to five stoles and may decorate their caps and gowns with flat adornments.
Decorations must not be lewd, obscene, vulgar, profane, or promote violence, illegal drug use, harassment, bullying, or discrimination.
If any decoration or item is found to be substantially disruptive or materially interfering with the ceremony, the graduate may be asked to remove it to participate.
While certain items may still be restricted, any prohibition must be consistent with the First Amendment and state law.
Pre-approval of stoles and flat cap decorations will not be required, effectively lifting previous deadlines.
This new policy will apply to all high schools within the CCSD.
'It was important for us to bring this case because if we didn't, our client would have been prohibited from wearing her stole that reads 'Black Girl Magic' and those graduates in our Emerging Leaders Youth Leadership Program would have have met the same fate depending on the school they attend. It was also important for us to ensure CCSD complies with the law and school faculty and administrators do not get to be the arbiters of the First Amendment based on their own viewpoints. Consistency matters across CCSD. The First Amendment is for everyone. ACLU of Nevada will always fight to make sure that's a reality, and we are grateful to the Judge in this matter for hearing this case when he did in an emergency fashion. You only graduate high school once and this moment is a time for graduates to celebrate their cultures, not experience censorship. We are grateful to spend our Memorial Day weekend defending the First Amendment.'
ACLU of Nevada Executive Director Athar Haseebullah
The ACLU is urging all administrators who receive the updated guidance to ensure their staff comply, warning that any violations could lead to further litigation, including potential claims for damages.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Supreme Court has 'good chance' of hearing Kim Davis' case urging same-sex marriage be overturned: lawyer
The former Kentucky county clerk who was jailed 10 years ago for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples is now asking the Supreme Court to review its landmark decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide, with her attorney telling Fox News Digital there's a "good chance" it will end up on their docket. Kim Davis, a devout Christian, made national headlines in 2015 when she refused to sign the marriage licenses of same-sex couples over her religious belief that marriage is between one man and one woman. Davis' lawyer, Mat Staver, is helping her appeal a ruling that she must pay $360,000 in legal fees and expenses to plaintiffs David Ermold and David Moore. "The First Amendment should be an absolute defense to Kim Davis. And secondly, we're asking the Supreme Court to overturn Obergefell, the 2015 decision that ultimately caused this problem in the first place," Staver told Fox News Digital. "For them not to review the matter I think is terrible for Kim Davis and also terrible for the country because they've damaged the Constitution and only the court can fix it," Staver added. Staver also told Fox News Digital, "I think we have a good chance at having the Supreme Court take up this case because you have three of the justices still on the bench that were part of the four dissenters in 2015" in Obergefell v. Hodges, "including the chief justice, who gave a very strong dissent." "There's only two justices still on the bench that were on the bench in the majority in 2015, and that would be Kagan and Sotomayor," Staver added. "This is the case with the most compelling facts that can challenge and overturn Obergefell." The case, if it reaches the Supreme Court, would be heard by Justices Clarence Thomas, John Roberts and Samuel Alito, who dissented to Obergefell v. Hodges; Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagen, who affirmed the decision; and four newly appointed justices. In March, a three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit wrote in a ruling that "As Davis sees it, issuing Plaintiffs a marriage license would have violated her own constitutionally protected religious beliefs; thus, she asserts, she cannot be held liable. We disagree." "Davis cannot raise a Free Exercise Clause defense because she is being held liable for state action, which the First Amendment does not protect," the ruling added. A petition for writ of certiorari filed last month on behalf of Davis is appealing that decision. "Obergefell was wrong when it was decided and it is wrong today because it was grounded entirely on the legal fiction of substantive due process," the filing said. "Overturning Obergefell would not undo any marriage licenses in effect at the time. All marriage licenses, including those between same-sex couples, would continue to be recognized. They would be 'grandfathered.' Going forward, marriage would return to the states as it was prior to Obergefell. It would be up to each state to define marriage," it added. William Powell, an attorney representing Ermold and Moore, and a Senior Counsel with the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection, told Fox News Digital that "We are confident the Supreme Court, like the court of appeals, will conclude that Davis's arguments do not merit further attention. "Marriage equality is settled law," he added.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Can you flip off a cop? Here's what the law says in Oklahoma
Traffic stops can get frustrating for drivers in a hurry, and sometimes lead people to do or say things they may regret later. But is lashing out, maybe just by flipping off the officer who pulled you over, a punishable offense in Oklahoma? In recent years, the Oklahoma City Police Department has taken a firm stance against members of their agency using the gesture after a metro officer flipped a driver off in 2023. But what are citizens able to do without facing a fine or consequence? Here's what to know about the legality of the action, how the Constitution may come into play, and what to know next time you're interacting with police in Oklahoma. Can you flip off a police officer during a traffic stop? In short, yes. Though it's impolite, it's not against the law according to a few legal precedents. This decision came in 2019, after Debra Cruise-Gulyas was pulled over in 2017 during a routine traffic stop in Michigan. The officer, Matthew Minard, pulled her over for speeding and gave her a ticket for a non-moving violation, a lesser charge. Cruise-Gulyas, in turn, gave him a two-word statement with her middle finger while driving away. Minard pulled her over again and raised the violation to a speeding ticket. Cruise-Gulyas then sued Minard on the grounds there was no probable cause for seizure during the second stop, thus violating her Fourth Amendment right; upgrading her ticket to a higher offense due to the gesture, thus violating her First Amendment right of freedom of speech; and that it overall violated her right to due process as set by the 14th Amendment. First Amendment protected speech The district court presiding over the case sided with Minard, who stated that the second stop was a continuation of the first. But, when Cruise-Gulyas took the case to the Appellate Court, the Sixth Circuit US Court of Appeals ruled in Cruise-Gulyas' favor in 2019. Circuit Judge Jeffrey Sutton stated that 'Fits of rudeness or lack of gratitude may violate the Golden Rule. But that doesn't make them illegal or, for that matter, punishable or, for that matter, grounds for a seizure.' Sutton later noted "Any reasonable officer would know that a citizen who raises her middle finger engages in speech protected by the First Amendment." What to do during a traffic stop While different states have different rules for drivers' duties during a traffic stop, experts generally agree on a few steps drivers should take to ensure the traffic stop remains calm. The American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma recommends that if you're pulled over by police, you should take the following steps: Stop the car in a safe place as quickly as possible. Turn off the car's engine. Turn on the internal light. Open the window partway. Place your hands on the wheel. The ACLU also encourages people to stay calm during the traffic stop and not to run, resist or obstruct officers. More: Do you have to roll your window down during a traffic stop? ACLU, police weigh in The Oklahoma City Police Department recommends many of the same actions, including lowering your window to speak with the officer. If you're afraid during the stop, the police department's website also suggests you can lower your window a few inches, ask to speak with a supervisor or call 911. This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Is it illegal to flip off a cop? Here's what Oklahoma law says Solve the daily Crossword
New York Times
5 hours ago
- New York Times
The Battle to Define Luigi Mangione Takes Center Stage
On a recent Friday evening in San Francisco, I attended a live musical staging of an internet spectacle I had experienced seven months before. As I entered the 60-seat black box theater, a security guard scanned me with a wand. An attendant sealed my phone into a plastic pouch. The program began with a disclaimer. The show I was about to watch was 'a satirical work of fiction,' which 'falls under the legal protections afforded to parody and satire under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution,' it said. I had read the same disclosure on the website where I secured my ticket, and just before the show began, I heard it repeated once more — this time over a loudspeaker in the rapid-fire style of pharmaceutical legalese. The little production with the security protocol and the preshow legal defense is 'Luigi: The Musical.' It's a comedy that imagines the days following the arrest of Luigi Mangione — the man accused of assassinating the chief executive of UnitedHealthcare, Brian Thompson, last December, setting off a five-day manhunt and inspiring more than 70,000 Facebook users to apply a laughing emoji to a somber UnitedHealth tribute to Mr. Thompson. The shooting itself had been staged like a performance, with a message etched on bullet casings and a backpack of Monopoly money left near the scene. As the police pursued their suspect, they released surveillance images to aid in his capture — and instead provoked an internet-wide investigation into whether the shooter might be righteous, cool, hot, tall, straight, bisexual, single or taken. By the time the cops apprehended the 26-year-old Mangione inside a Pennsylvania McDonalds, he had a fandom ready to hail him as an outlaw hero for the internet age. If previous American outlaws — Jesse James, John Dillinger, Bonnie and Clyde — were constructed through dime novels, ballads and films, Mr. Mangione's persona was built by and for social media. He's a software engineer with a face for the internet's hard turn from text to image. As TikTokers of increasingly obscure expertise weighed in on his arrest — astrologer, physiognomist, brow groomer, certified color analyst — they sent a message that Mr. Mangione's moon sign and his color story were of greater public interest than the murder he was accused of committing. The phenomenon inspired 'Saturday Night Live' bits, stand-up routines and academic inquiries into the regulation of health care algorithms and the psychosocial effects of chronic pain. Also, a counter movement of outraged commentators arose, ready to scold anyone who would make light of a killing. Mr. Mangione's court dates have drawn supportive crowds with placards reading 'Free Luigi,' but also the artist Scott LoBaido, who has hauled with him a skeleton in a Nintendo costume strapped to an electric chair that he calls 'Deep Fried Luigi.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
