Before joining cabinet, public safety minister wrote immigration support letters for terror group ‘member'
The letters, dated 2023 and 2016, were written on Anandasangaree's House of Commons letterhead and sent to the Canada Border Services Agency on behalf of an alleged member of Sri Lanka's Tamil Tigers who wanted to move to Toronto.
Although Canadian immigration officials had repeatedly rejected Senthuran Selvakumaran as an immigrant due to what they described as his 'protracted involvement' in the Tigers, Anandasangaree asked them to reverse their decision.
Also known as the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, or LTTE, the Tamil Tigers fought a lengthy civil war against the Sri Lankan government. The conflict ended in 2009 but the Tigers remain on Canada's list of terrorist organizations.
In his most recent letter to the CBSA, Anandasangaree said the agency's refusal to grant Selvakumaran permanent residence had separated the 48-year-old Sri Lankan from his Canadian wife and child, which the Toronto-area MP called 'cruel and inhumane.'
'I respectfully ask that you review and reconsider this decision,' Anandasangaree wrote on July 19, 2023, when he was in the last days of his term as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General.
Anandasangaree's constituency assistant emailed the letter directly to the law firm representing Selvakumaran in his case against the government on July 25, 2023, according to records on the case released to Global News.
The following day, Anandasangaree received his first cabinet appointment as Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations in the government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. He was sworn in as Public Safety Minister on May 13.
Senthuran Selvakumaran has been trying to immigrate to Canada since 2005, but the CBSA has denied his application on the grounds he was a member of the Tamil Tigers. Federal Court
Asked about the matter, Anandasangaree said in a statement on Monday that it would not be appropriate to comment on a matter before the courts but that the 'letters in question here date from before I entered cabinet.'
Advertisement
'As minister, I have never sent a letter seeking ministerial relief in an immigration matter. When I was appointed minister in July 2023, I instructed my constituency staff to no longer provide such letters,' he said.
Read the minister's full statement here
In his new portfolio, Anandasangaree has been given the task of helping fend off a White House trade war by bringing in legislation to toughen Canada's borders, which President Donald Trump has complained are a threat to the United States.
But documents on Selvakumaran's case suggest that Anandasangaree's support for the would-be migrant may have put Canadian public safety officials in a potentially awkward position: standing up for border security against the wishes of the MP who is now their minister.
The recommendation to deny Selvakumaran's application for permanent residence was signed on Oct. 12, 2023, by Erin O'Gorman, the president of the CBSA, who now reports to Anandasangaree.
Her report mentioned a 'letter from Canadian Member of Parliament Gary Anandasangaree, wherein the MP expresses his support for reunification of Mr. Selvakumaran's family in Canada.'
She wrote that the letter was among several factors border officials took into account before coming to their decision, but that the CBSA's 'predominant considerations' were national security and public safety.
The minister's involvement in the case came to light as a result of a court challenge launched by Selvakumaran, who used Anandasangaree's endorsement to bolster his bid to join his family in Canada.
On Wednesday, the Federal Court rejected his appeal. The judge's decision said the evidence put forward by Selvakumaran included a letter of support from an MP, whom she did not name.
Global News reviewed the public court file in Ottawa and found it contained two letters signed by Anandasangaree in which he identified himself as a Member of Parliament.
'MP Gary Anandasangaree supported Mr. Selvakumaran's application for ministerial relief prior to taking on his current ministerial role,' Lorne Waldman, Selvakumaran's Toronto lawyer, said on Monday.
'Members of Parliament often choose to do so when approached by their constituents who have compelling circumstances, and there is nothing improper in doing so.'
Waldman said he was disappointed with the court's ruling. He said his client 'made a mistake well over two decades ago and claimed refugee status in the United Kingdom based on a false story of relatively low-level involvement with the LTTE.'
'He and his family have been attempting to correct the record and ask for compassionate consideration since 2007. The family will continue to suffer due to the court's decision.'
Prime Minister Mark Carney's office did not respond to questions by deadline.
The letters
View image in full screen
Image from government promotional video showing Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree with Canada Border Services Agency officers. Public Safety Canada
In his statement to Global News, Anandasangaree said he had recused himself from decisions related to the Tamil Tigers and the World Tamil Movement, which Public Safety Canada alleges is its Canadian front organization.
The recusal was a a response to what 'scurrilous and wrong' allegations, Anandasangaree said. He said he would also refrain from making decisions concerning those he had helped before joining cabinet.
'In the discharge of my duties as minister, I cannot, and will not, make decisions on any matter wherein I advocated for a constituent,' he said. 'This includes ministerial relief and stays of removals.'
It was a 'routine matter' for MPs from all parties to provide letters of support for constituents, he said. But Selvakumaran's case raised national security questions that are not as straightforward as a typical immigration file.
In his letters of support, Anandasangaree downplayed the CBSA's concerns about Selvakumaran, calling the decision to bar him from Canada due to his alleged role in the Tamil Tigers an 'error.'
Advertisement
He claimed there were 'no records … suggesting reasons he might be inadmissible to Canada' — although CBSA officials had compiled a detailed report assessing the evidence they relied on to make their decision.
The CBSA's report on Selvakumaran said he had acknowledged that he began working for the Tigers in 1992 when he joined a friend who distributed propaganda for the group. He continued doing so until 1998, the report said.
The LTTE attacked civilian centres and assassinated politicians such as Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, the CBSA wrote in its report recommending the rejection of Selvakumaran's application for permanent residence.
The Tigers also ran an 'extensive' fundraising, propaganda and arms procurement network in Sri Lanka and 'within the Tamil diaspora,' the CBSA wrote in its 29-page report.
The network raised millions for the Tigers in Toronto and other Canadian cities, partly through intimidation and extortion, according to the RCMP. 'Although the LTTE was militarily defeated in May 2009, fundraising efforts continue, particularly within the diaspora,' the report said.
Canadian officials are not alleging that Selvakumaran committed any attacks, but said his involvement as a propaganda distributor had 'the effect of facilitating the organization's efforts to spread its messaging at a time to LTTE was actively involved in committing terrorist acts.'
Timeline: Click through a slideshow of photos and documents
View full screen
View full screen
View full screen
View full screen
View full screen
View full screen
View full screen
View full screen
Previous Image
Next Image
Close Modal Gallery
In asking the CBSA to approve Selvakumaran's permanent residence, Anandasangaree's letters focused on the emotional toll on his family.
Selvakumaran's daughter was 'growing up without both parents,' and lacking 'emotional connection to her father,' while his wife, 'has endured a lot of emotional and psychological stress over the prolonged separation from her husband,' the MP wrote.
'Separating the family for such a prolonged period of time, and depriving the child of the love and support of both parents is rather cruel and inhumane,' he wrote in his latest letter to the CBSA.
For its part, the CBSA wrote in its report that Selvakumaran's daughter was born almost a decade after he was informed he was not allowed into Canada due to membership in a terror group.
'It should be noted that Mr. Selvakumaran would have been aware, when he started a family with his wife, that he was inadmissible to Canada; he therefore would have been cognizant of the fact that he might not be in a position to join his wife and daughter,' it said.
The documents trail
View image in full screen
Propaganda billboards urge Tamils to join Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in a rebel controlled section of Sri Lanka, April 22, 2007. (AP Photo/Gemunu Amarasinghe).
Hundreds of pages of Federal Court documents released to Global News describe Selvakumaran's repeated attempts to immigrate to Canada from Sri Lanka over the past two decades.
Each time, immigration officials rejected him over his alleged membership in the LTTE. His appeals to the courts, in 2012, 2019 and 2024, were all dismissed — most recently last week.
Advertisement
Throughout his dealings with Canada's immigration system, he has given evolving versions of his past — at first providing details of what he said was his role in the LTTE, and then denying any involvement at all.
He initially sought asylum in the United Kingdom, where he told immigration authorities his duties with the LTTE included delivering the group's propaganda newspapers from house to house.
He also said he had put up 'notices of deceased LTTE members,' according to the CBSA report detailing his immigration history in Canada and the U.K., where he resided from 1998 to 2006.
He got involved 'not only because he wanted to help the organization, but also because he was paid for his work,' the CBSA wrote. He later said it was 'more of a compulsion by the LTTE that all residents should help them in their offensive against the Sri Lankan armed forces.'
Britain rejected his refugee claim, citing his lack of credibility. The U.K. did not make any finding on whether he was a member of the LTTE. He then married a woman from Canada. The wedding took place in the U.K. He was still living in London when he applied to immigrate as her spouse in 2005.
In 2007, during an interview at the Canadian High Commission in the Sri Lankan capital Colombo, Selvakumaran altered his story but still maintained he had worked for the Tamil Tigers.
The visa officer found that Selvakumaran's 'self-admitted paid work for the organization as articulated in statements to the U.K. authorities, and confirmed in the 2007 interview, serve as a sufficient basis for the refusal on security grounds.'
Following his rejection, Selvakumaran changed his story again. This time he said he had fabricated his account of working for the LTTE as a result of 'bad advice.' He also claimed the Canadian visa officer had 'intimidated' him.
He began asserting he had 'never done any work for the LTTE willingly or for payment.' But immigration officials pointed to holes in his timeline and rejected his permanent residence applications.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Observer
18 minutes ago
- National Observer
Snubs and scrambles ahead of Carney's major projects meeting with First Nations
Prime Minister Mark Carney speaks with reporters in Ottawa on May 2, 2025. Photo by: Natasha Bulowski / Canada's National Observer. Listen to article As First Nations leaders head to Gatineau for a high-stakes summit with Prime Minister Mark Carney, tensions are running high over the federal government's handling of Bill C-5 — a sweeping new law that accelerates approvals for major infrastructure and resource projects. Indigenous leaders say the process has left their communities out and broken promises to respect their rights, protect the environment and seek free, prior and informed consent. 'We worked hard to get the prime minister to agree to this meeting,' said national chief Cindy Woodhouse-Nepinak, calling it a 'historic' gathering. 'First Nations cannot be on the sidelines in the year 2025.' But many see the haste with which the July 17 meeting was assembled as a reflection of the flaws in the bill itself. Rushed preparations and disjointed messaging The July 17 summit at the Canadian Museum of History is the first in a series of promised meetings between Carney and Indigenous leaders, put together after increasing criticism of Bill C-5. Invitations, agenda and venue details landed in chiefs' inboxes with barely a week's notice, forcing communities to scramble for travel and messaging strategy. 'First Nations are united in an understanding that we have always supported economic development and prosperity for all,' said Cindy Woodhouse-Nepinak. 'But not at the expense of our rights.' Abram Benedict, Ontario regional chief for the Chiefs of Ontario said the lead-up was 'chaotic,' with little chance for communities to develop a clear message. 'We didn't have a national position on C-5. Every region, every community faces different realities. How can we possibly have a unified message for the prime minister when there's been no real chance to come together and talk?' Woodhouse-Nepinak said chiefs will be arriving with diametrically opposing goals and viewpoints, depending on their communities. 'Many chiefs are very concerned about Bill C-5,' said Woodhouse-Nepinak. 'Other chiefs are saying they want to proceed quickly with projects and resource revenue sharing.' The meeting with Carney and federal ministers is also limited to four hours — a timeframe seen insufficient for substantive dialogue. 'The challenge we are going to face [with] several hundred First Nation leadership or delegates in a room with the prime minister for four hours, I hope accomplishes more, but I'm going to be encouraging our leadership that we have a single message to the prime minister, and that four hours is not going to achieve enough,' Benedict said. Nation-building priorities One collective priority the national chief identified is the infrastructure gap separating life on reserves from the rest of the country. 'Canadians win by fast-tracking the construction of modern schools in First Nations, and housing in First Nations, by fast tracking clean water systems, all-season road access and reliable internet service.' She named 'a commitment to closing that infrastructure gap, with timelines' as a top priority for the meeting in Gatineau. Carney hasn't associated Bill C-5 with those priorities to date. Instead, he's sold the bill as a way to accelerate approvals for major projects — pipelines, mines, ports — deemed in the 'national interest.' The government touts the law as essential for economic growth and international competitiveness, but Indigenous leaders say the process sidelined their voices, undermined environmental protections, and broke faith with commitments to free, prior and informed consent under UNDRIP. Senator Paul Prosper, former chief of the Paqtnkek (Afton) Mi'kmaw Nation, said that trust is "the cornerstone of the relationship with government" for many First Nations and is concerned that the expedited process for Bill C-5 represents a setback due to the lack of real involvement from First Nations leadership. Russ Diabo, Indigenous policy analyst pointed out that some BC chiefs did not receive invites. 'I feel like the feds are purposely selecting those chiefs who will be favourable towards this Canada Act initiatives,' said Mike Christian, chief of Splatsin First Nation in BC. He said he recently got the registration link from another chief. Wet'suwet'en Hereditary chief Na'Moks was also not formally invited to the summit. 'This exclusion is not only disrespectful — it undermines the very foundation of Nation-to-Nation relationships,' said Na'Moks in a press release. 'Decisions made at this summit will impact our lands and people. We will not be silenced or sidelined.' Canada 'has to follow its own laws' A successful meeting, according to Benedict, would require the government to acknowledge the rushed and 'very disrespectful' process of Bill C-5 and commit to 'more solid engagement' with First Nations going forward. He said if the government is truly committed to working with First Nation leaders, then just holding national meetings about Bill C-5 isn't enough. He hopes Carney will promise a process with more direct regional engagement. Not all chiefs are opposed to the spirit of Bill C-5. 'There are those that want to get economic development going, they do want the jobs, the skills and training, they want the revenue sharing, the equity agreements in place where they're part of it and ownership of it on their own terms,' said Robert Phillips, a political executive with the First Nations Summit and regional chief with the BC Assembly of First Nations. 'But we can't have these agreements going ahead with 'trust us we will take care of you' and it can't be after the fact — we have to be at the table now.' With Carney suggesting that a pipeline to the coast is 'highly likely,' leaders in BC are seeking clarity on what projects are being considered and how decisions will be made. 'If the Liberal government wants to continue with reconciliation it has to follow its own laws. First Nations are very concerned, not only in terms of the law itself but significant procedural and substantive concerns with the bill,' Phillips said. 'We want to see our rights and interests met, not just be brought in after the fact.' A related challenge leaders want Carney to address in Gatineau is that many nations lack the resources to fully participate in project consultations. This makes it hard for them to make informed decisions or advocate for their interests during the development and implementation of major infrastructure initiatives. 'Without additional resources … we're going to end up in the same situation,' Benedict said. The PMO wrote in an email to Canada's National Observer that it has committed to establishing an Indigenous Advisory Council as part of the office managing the major projects under C-5, and that it will allocate $40 million to 'strengthen Indigenous Peoples' capacity to participate in implementing the Building Canada Act.' 'Forty million sounds like a lot, but spread across more than 600 First Nations? It's not nearly enough,' said Benedict. Legal flashpoint On Tuesday – two days before the Gatineau meeting – news broke that nine First Nations in Ontario are challenging the constitutionality of Bill C-5 in court; they're also seeking an injunction to block the bill until the court reaches a decision on their challenge. 'There is no standalone obligation to consult [Indigenous peoples] on proposed legislation,' explains Bruce McIvor, a Métis lawyer and the founder of First Peoples' Law firm. Governments routinely pass laws without consulting Indigenous groups – for instance, the tax cut Carney passed in June – which doesn't automatically raise any legal issues. 'But if you pass a law and that law has the effect of infringing Aboriginal and treaty rights, the law itself can be challenged. And if you didn't adequately consult before the law was passed, that's one of the things that the courts will take into account.' While challenging the law itself may be an uphill battle, First Nations have a long track record of defeating specific industrial projects in court. 'No projects in Canada will go ahead without the support of First Nations,' said the national chief, though she declined to comment on the constitutional challenge against C-5 itself. McIvor sees the moment when cabinet's uses its self-appointed power to define the 'national interest' as one critical legal flashpoint. 'My expectation is, when that occurs, if there's a court challenge, the court will look at whether the constitutional obligation to consult and accommodate was fulfilled up to that decision point.' Now that the legislation has passed, the government is focusing its consultation efforts on the projects themselves. In an email response to Canada's National Observer, Pierre-Alain Bujold, a spokesperson for the Privy Council Office, confirmed this approach. 'The Building Canada Act ensures that Indigenous Peoples whose rights — including treaty rights — may be affected are consulted at key stages: before a project is designated as being in the national interest, before the issuance of the conditions document, and before any amendment to the conditions document.' That may be enough for some nations. But the history of major industrial projects in this country – pipelines in particular – is that some Indigenous communities support them while others don't. A perfect example is the Coastal GasLink pipeline, which feeds the LNG Canada export terminal in Kitimat. That pipeline was supported by several First Nations whose territories it crossed; it also sparked the historic Wetsuwet'en protests that dragged on for years, briefly spread across the country, and provoked a violent RCMP response that made international headlines. Hereditary chief Na'moks, who wasn't invited to Gatineau, was a key leader of those protests. The government hasn't clarified what it would do should this scenario repeat itself, as appears likely if a new pipeline to BC makes the Major Projects list. This is the nightmare outcome for Indigenous leaders, opening the door for the 'divide-and-conquer' politics invoked by Robert Phillips. 'First Nations are united in an understanding that we have always supported economic development and prosperity for all,' said national chief Woodhouse-Nepinak. 'But not at the expense of our rights.' The future of Carney's bill is in the chiefs' hands going into Thursday's meeting. He's got a lot of ground to cover in four hours. July 15th 2025 Sonal Gupta Reporter Arno Kopecky National Politics Reporter Keep reading Federal departments fall short of Ottawa's 5% Indigenous procurement target By Sonal Gupta News Urban Indigenous Communities in Ottawa July 15th 2025 Toronto couple turns to green roof as city faces climate-driven flooding By Abdul Matin Sarfraz News Climate Solutions Reporting Ottawa Insider July 15th 2025 Extreme heat is a workplace hazard. We must treat it that way By Bea Bruske Opinion July 15th 2025 Share this article Share on Bluesky Share on LinkedIn Comments
Canada News.Net
an hour ago
- Canada News.Net
Vanishing data in the U.S. undermines good public policy, with global implications
The recent tragic floods in Texas have focused attention on the human impact of the cuts to government infrastructure and services in the United States by Donald Trump's administration. Although initial analyses suggest that recent budget cuts and loss of staff played no role in the timeliness of the warnings, many are concerned that a lack of data used to make critical predictions and decisions will increasingly become apparent as a serious problem. As researchers focused on data management (Kristi) and behavioural sciences (Albert) and whose work tackles the significance of research with open access data, we have been concerned about how the data sets that scholars around the world rely on have been vanishing from U.S. government sites. Vanishing data is of dire concern far beyond the U.S., including for Canadians. Danielle Goldfarb, an expert on trade, real-time data, economics and public policy, notes that cuts to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Arctic monitoring programs weaken Canada's ability to assess shared climate risks and global shipping impacts. The American dismantling of key weather reporting also threatens the availability of crucial data for Canada's disaster preparedness. The Canadian data community is watching U.S. events closely, and this has led to the recent founding of the Canadian Data Rescue Project. The project has a dual focus: to support data rescue efforts in the U.S. and to set up preventative life support for Canadian government data. The attack on knowledge in the U.S. began in January 2025 when Trump signed executive orders mandating the removal of information on topics such as diversity and "gender ideology" from government websites. Next, entire websites, data distribution systems and data collection systems began to disappear. The result was not only growing alarm over how the needs of marginalized populations are represented in democratic life and how public safety could be affected, but also concerns about a research and public policy crisis. Environmental data was a major target, with climate change tracking tools disappearing. And as part of the defunding of the Department of Education, nearly all of the staff, including the commissioner at the National Center for Education Statistics, were fired. Government data provides the most fundamental record of how a society works. Health, social, economic and education data collections show a clear picture of how people live, and allow researchers to track how public policy changes affect everyday lives. Government data is a unique resource because governments can require and enforce the collection of accurate information. This data also provides records of the activities of elected governments. Eliminating data collection breaks the system of knowledge that allows governments to work well, and lets the public transparently see how they are working well. Data and budget cuts are already undermining economic policy in the U.S. Inflation is a key indicator of economic health, and was an important electoral issue for Americans, with egg prices and other indicators coming up repeatedly in election campaigns. But the Bureau of Labor Statistics, responsible for monitoring price changes, has been forced by staffing shortages to rely on less accurate data-collection methods. Now, according to the Wall Street Journal, economists are questioning the accuracy of the government's inflation data. Similar budget pressures hit climate science. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration . This data tracked weather disasters where damages or costs reached or exceeded $1 billion and helped local and state governments plan, allocate budgets and advocate for funding. Employment losses are also expected. Internationally, shuttering the U.S. Agency for International Development has led to data losses that will severely hinder global development goals. The Demographic and Health Surveys program helped governments of many low- and middle-income countries collect health and service data. Losing aid funding will harm people directly. Losing the data will worsen that harm by preventing governments from making informed decision on allocating scarce resources, and it will hide how much harm is being done. Data destruction is a way to disrupt and control discourse by limiting what can be known. Without data, questions like "What impact are climate-related disasters having?" or "What's the inflation rate?" are unanswerable. It becomes harder to effectively critique government actions. If data destruction is an act of political suppression, then data preservation can be an act of political resistance. In February 2025, several U.S. academic and non-profit associations got together to form the Data Rescue Project. They have worked to download data files, create documentation and prepare the data for publication on donated platforms. While researchers are unable to change the termination of data collection programs, they are preserving as much data as possible so researchers and critics can at least access information. The Canadian Data Rescue Project has hosted three data rescue events to create documentation for rescued American data sets, and is setting up processes to download and archive Canadian government data as a safeguarding measure. Disappearing data could happen here, and similar events have. Stephen Harper's Conservative government cut data collection programs and issued gag orders to federal scientists. The federal government reduced funding for environmental data collection and eliminated the First Nations Statistical Institute. research on post-secondary education in Canada has been undermined by a systematic elimination of resources." With the termination of varied education bodies or councils also came a scarcity of data. resignation of Canada's national statistician and disrupting the baseline for all social and health data collection in Canada over the next few years. Subsequent governments restored the census and some other data-collection programs, but in the case of education, researchers say some of the pains now being felt in the sector can be traced back to this period. about what it values by what it chooses to count. health to climate and weather forecasting. We now need a national response to help mitigate the effects of data destruction.
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Edmonton-based ceremonial mounted army troop guarding London
OTTAWA – Just over a month after King Charles expressed his support for a 'strong and free' Canada in a visit to Ottawa, he invited Canadian soldiers to staff the ceremonial mounted troop which guards the official entrance to Buckingham Palace in London. The Edmonton-based Lord Strathcona's Horse regiment are in the British capital for 10 days of service, marking only the third time a non-British unit will mount the King's Life Guard. The Life Guard protects the Horse Guards building, which is the official entrance to St. James's and Buckingham Palace. The regiment is also known as the Royal Canadians and the members have had to adjust to larger horses used in London for the ceremonial guard. The only other two times foreign units mounted the Life Guard were also Canadian, including in 2012 when the RCMP took on the role to mark Queen Elizabeth's Diamond Jubilee and in 2000 when the Lord Strathcona's Horse regiment did it to mark its 100th anniversary. Canada's high commission in London says the arrangement symbolizes Canadian nationhood and sovereignty, and is an example of Ottawa's commitment to its allies. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 15, 2025.
