Snubs and scrambles ahead of Carney's major projects meeting with First Nations
Listen to article
As First Nations leaders head to Gatineau for a high-stakes summit with Prime Minister Mark Carney, tensions are running high over the federal government's handling of Bill C-5 — a sweeping new law that accelerates approvals for major infrastructure and resource projects.
Indigenous leaders say the process has left their communities out and broken promises to respect their rights, protect the environment and seek free, prior and informed consent.
'We worked hard to get the prime minister to agree to this meeting,' said national chief Cindy Woodhouse-Nepinak, calling it a 'historic' gathering. 'First Nations cannot be on the sidelines in the year 2025.'
But many see the haste with which the July 17 meeting was assembled as a reflection of the flaws in the bill itself.
Rushed preparations and disjointed messaging
The July 17 summit at the Canadian Museum of History is the first in a series of promised meetings between Carney and Indigenous leaders, put together after increasing criticism of Bill C-5.
Invitations, agenda and venue details landed in chiefs' inboxes with barely a week's notice, forcing communities to scramble for travel and messaging strategy.
'First Nations are united in an understanding that we have always supported economic development and prosperity for all,' said Cindy Woodhouse-Nepinak. 'But not at the expense of our rights.'
Abram Benedict, Ontario regional chief for the Chiefs of Ontario said the lead-up was 'chaotic,' with little chance for communities to develop a clear message.
'We didn't have a national position on C-5. Every region, every community faces different realities. How can we possibly have a unified message for the prime minister when there's been no real chance to come together and talk?'
Woodhouse-Nepinak said chiefs will be arriving with diametrically opposing goals and viewpoints, depending on their communities.
'Many chiefs are very concerned about Bill C-5,' said Woodhouse-Nepinak. 'Other chiefs are saying they want to proceed quickly with projects and resource revenue sharing.'
The meeting with Carney and federal ministers is also limited to four hours — a timeframe seen insufficient for substantive dialogue.
'The challenge we are going to face [with] several hundred First Nation leadership or delegates in a room with the prime minister for four hours, I hope accomplishes more, but I'm going to be encouraging our leadership that we have a single message to the prime minister, and that four hours is not going to achieve enough,' Benedict said.
Nation-building priorities
One collective priority the national chief identified is the infrastructure gap separating life on reserves from the rest of the country. 'Canadians win by fast-tracking the construction of modern schools in First Nations, and housing in First Nations, by fast tracking clean water systems, all-season road access and reliable internet service.' She named 'a commitment to closing that infrastructure gap, with timelines' as a top priority for the meeting in Gatineau.
Carney hasn't associated Bill C-5 with those priorities to date. Instead, he's sold the bill as a way to accelerate approvals for major projects — pipelines, mines, ports — deemed in the 'national interest.' The government touts the law as essential for economic growth and international competitiveness, but Indigenous leaders say the process sidelined their voices, undermined environmental protections, and broke faith with commitments to free, prior and informed consent under UNDRIP.
Senator Paul Prosper, former chief of the Paqtnkek (Afton) Mi'kmaw Nation, said that trust is "the cornerstone of the relationship with government" for many First Nations and is concerned that the expedited process for Bill C-5 represents a setback due to the lack of real involvement from First Nations leadership.
Russ Diabo, Indigenous policy analyst pointed out that some BC chiefs did not receive invites.
'I feel like the feds are purposely selecting those chiefs who will be favourable towards this Canada Act initiatives,' said Mike Christian, chief of Splatsin First Nation in BC.
He said he recently got the registration link from another chief.
Wet'suwet'en Hereditary chief Na'Moks was also not formally invited to the summit.
'This exclusion is not only disrespectful — it undermines the very foundation of Nation-to-Nation relationships,' said Na'Moks in a press release. 'Decisions made at this summit will impact our lands and people. We will not be silenced or sidelined.'
Canada 'has to follow its own laws'
A successful meeting, according to Benedict, would require the government to acknowledge the rushed and 'very disrespectful' process of Bill C-5 and commit to 'more solid engagement' with First Nations going forward.
He said if the government is truly committed to working with First Nation leaders, then just holding national meetings about Bill C-5 isn't enough. He hopes Carney will promise a process with more direct regional engagement.
Not all chiefs are opposed to the spirit of Bill C-5.
'There are those that want to get economic development going, they do want the jobs, the skills and training, they want the revenue sharing, the equity agreements in place where they're part of it and ownership of it on their own terms,' said Robert Phillips, a political executive with the First Nations Summit and regional chief with the BC Assembly of First Nations. 'But we can't have these agreements going ahead with 'trust us we will take care of you' and it can't be after the fact — we have to be at the table now.'
With Carney suggesting that a pipeline to the coast is 'highly likely,' leaders in BC are seeking clarity on what projects are being considered and how decisions will be made.
'If the Liberal government wants to continue with reconciliation it has to follow its own laws. First Nations are very concerned, not only in terms of the law itself but significant procedural and substantive concerns with the bill,' Phillips said. 'We want to see our rights and interests met, not just be brought in after the fact.'
A related challenge leaders want Carney to address in Gatineau is that many nations lack the resources to fully participate in project consultations. This makes it hard for them to make informed decisions or advocate for their interests during the development and implementation of major infrastructure initiatives.
'Without additional resources … we're going to end up in the same situation,' Benedict said.
The PMO wrote in an email to Canada's National Observer that it has committed to establishing an Indigenous Advisory Council as part of the office managing the major projects under C-5, and that it will allocate $40 million to 'strengthen Indigenous Peoples' capacity to participate in implementing the Building Canada Act.'
'Forty million sounds like a lot, but spread across more than 600 First Nations? It's not nearly enough,' said Benedict.
Legal flashpoint
On Tuesday – two days before the Gatineau meeting – news broke that nine First Nations in Ontario are challenging the constitutionality of Bill C-5 in court; they're also seeking an injunction to block the bill until the court reaches a decision on their challenge.
'There is no standalone obligation to consult [Indigenous peoples] on proposed legislation,' explains Bruce McIvor, a Métis lawyer and the founder of First Peoples' Law firm. Governments routinely pass laws without consulting Indigenous groups – for instance, the tax cut Carney passed in June – which doesn't automatically raise any legal issues. 'But if you pass a law and that law has the effect of infringing Aboriginal and treaty rights, the law itself can be challenged. And if you didn't adequately consult before the law was passed, that's one of the things that the courts will take into account.'
While challenging the law itself may be an uphill battle, First Nations have a long track record of defeating specific industrial projects in court. 'No projects in Canada will go ahead without the support of First Nations,' said the national chief, though she declined to comment on the constitutional challenge against C-5 itself.
McIvor sees the moment when cabinet's uses its self-appointed power to define the 'national interest' as one critical legal flashpoint. 'My expectation is, when that occurs, if there's a court challenge, the court will look at whether the constitutional obligation to consult and accommodate was fulfilled up to that decision point.'
Now that the legislation has passed, the government is focusing its consultation efforts on the projects themselves. In an email response to Canada's National Observer, Pierre-Alain Bujold, a spokesperson for the Privy Council Office, confirmed this approach. 'The Building Canada Act ensures that Indigenous Peoples whose rights — including treaty rights — may be affected are consulted at key stages: before a project is designated as being in the national interest, before the issuance of the conditions document, and before any amendment to the conditions document.'
That may be enough for some nations. But the history of major industrial projects in this country – pipelines in particular – is that some Indigenous communities support them while others don't. A perfect example is the Coastal GasLink pipeline, which feeds the LNG Canada export terminal in Kitimat. That pipeline was supported by several First Nations whose territories it crossed; it also sparked the historic Wetsuwet'en protests that dragged on for years, briefly spread across the country, and provoked a violent RCMP response that made international headlines. Hereditary chief Na'moks, who wasn't invited to Gatineau, was a key leader of those protests.
The government hasn't clarified what it would do should this scenario repeat itself, as appears likely if a new pipeline to BC makes the Major Projects list. This is the nightmare outcome for Indigenous leaders, opening the door for the 'divide-and-conquer' politics invoked by Robert Phillips.
'First Nations are united in an understanding that we have always supported economic development and prosperity for all,' said national chief Woodhouse-Nepinak. 'But not at the expense of our rights.'
The future of Carney's bill is in the chiefs' hands going into Thursday's meeting. He's got a lot of ground to cover in four hours.
July 15th 2025
Sonal Gupta
Reporter
Arno Kopecky
National Politics Reporter
Keep reading
Federal departments fall short of Ottawa's 5% Indigenous procurement target
By
Sonal Gupta
News
Urban Indigenous Communities in Ottawa
July 15th 2025
Toronto couple turns to green roof as city faces climate-driven flooding
By
Abdul Matin Sarfraz
News
Climate Solutions Reporting
Ottawa Insider
July 15th 2025
Extreme heat is a workplace hazard. We must treat it that way
By
Bea Bruske
Opinion
July 15th 2025
Share this article
Share on Bluesky
Share on LinkedIn
Comments
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Montreal Gazette
40 minutes ago
- Montreal Gazette
After two turbulent years, McGill University eyes a rebrand
McGill wants a fresh start. The Montreal university is preparing to overhaul its public image after two turbulent years, seeking outside help for a brand repositioning, The Gazette has learned. Despite its standing as one of the world's top universities, McGill has lately been rocked by a series of conflicts and challenges. Clashes with the Quebec government. Hesitation and confusion among out-of-province and international students. Criticism from both pro-Palestinian and Jewish students. Tensions with Indigenous groups. And growing financial strain. In a recent call for tender seeking a branding agency, McGill says it wants to 'reposition how McGill is perceived by key audiences (students, government, donors, public) over a multi-year period.' The new 'positioning/messaging must be as effective in French as it is in English' and should 'illustrate how we are a true bridge between generations, between research and community, between Quebec and the world.' The estimated cost of the contract spans a wide range, from $707,000 to $6.7 million. McGill expects to select an agency in September and launch a multi-year branding campaign one year later. In a statement to The Gazette on Thursday, McGill said it carries out marketing each year to support student recruitment and share knowledge. The public tender, it said, is part of a periodic review to ensure its marketing is as effective as possible. Harold Simpkins, an emeritus marketing professor at Concordia University, said McGill has frequently been in damage-control mode over the past two years. 'Instead of consistently promoting their strengths — the success of their graduates or the breakthroughs of their faculty — they've been on the defensive,' he said. McGill has to refocus attention on its position as 'a leading university — leading in terms of thought, in terms of the quality of the professionals who graduate.' Simpkins said many of the crises McGill has faced were beyond its control, including 'attacks by the Quebec government.' Premier François Legault has singled out McGill and Concordia, another English university. His government aims to reduce their enrolment, arguing that non-French-speaking students from outside Quebec and abroad pose a threat to the province's French-speaking majority. The universities went so far as to sue the province over a series of measures that targeted them. 'It's definitely not a good look to be at war with your province,' said Ken Steele, an Ontario-based consultant who advises universities on branding and strategy. He said McGill president Deep Saini 'may have the toughest job in Canadian post-secondary education, mostly due to the CAQ government,' which 'seems hell-bent on undermining' and 'starving' English universities, particularly McGill. Among other things, the Coalition Avenir Québec government dramatically increased tuition fees for out-of-province students at McGill and Concordia, with the French language minister blaming anglophone students for anglicizing Montreal. Steele said the government is 'making Quebec unpopular for students (from other places), like (American) detentions at the border have made U.S. travel unpopular for Canadians.' He added: 'Academics elsewhere in Canada have been openly musing why McGill wouldn't simply relocate out of Quebec, to a province that actually wants it.' Universities usually undertake brand repositioning exercises 'to address external or even internal misperceptions,' Steele said. In this case, however, McGill already has 'one of Canada's strongest brands.' Founded in 1821, McGill has 36,000 students and is one of Canada's oldest and most prestigious universities. It was recently ranked as Canada's top university in the QS World University Rankings, a globally influential assessment. Domestically, Maclean's latest rankings named McGill the leading medical-doctoral university. Steele said the university's 'big challenge may be positioning Montreal and Quebec as welcoming for anglophones. It's a bigger brand challenge than merely positioning the university.' In the tender document, McGill includes a list of 'primary audiences' for its branding: prospective students (local, national, international), current students, faculty, researchers, staff, donors, alumni, government, opinion leaders, the business community and the 'general public in Quebec.' Simpkins said securing the backing of Quebec's business community — and of French-speaking Quebecers more broadly — is critical. Francophone business leaders have been largely silent about the government's treatment of English universities, even though their companies heavily rely on the institutions for employees, he said. Many Quebecers appear to hold negative views of McGill, he added. 'Your average francophone Quebecer sees McGill as a threat or as being snobby or anti-French.' They think money spent on McGill should instead be spent on French universities, he added. Yet McGill is one of Quebec's best-known brands internationally. Simpkins said the university could try to 'get Quebecers to stop just focusing on Quebec, to take a broader perspective.' Healthy English universities can help attract quality students and faculty to the province, with well-rounded graduates ending up filling key jobs, he said. Many may not realize that 20 per cent of McGill's students have French as their mother tongue. Simpkins said McGill should 'communicate consistently all of the francophone success stories that have come out of McGill,' including its well-regarded law and medical schools. 'There are thousands of francophone success stories.' Without francophones on board, he said, 'it becomes a much more difficult political sell for the government to support McGill.' McGill's rough two years Once best known for its international academic prestige, McGill University has, since 2023, found itself in the spotlight — not for accolades, but for controversy and crises. Quebec government Since the fall of 2023, Premier François Legault's government has targeted McGill and Concordia, accusing them of undermining the French language. The Coalition Avenir Québec government has framed the issue as a broader clash between anglophone institutions and Quebec's francophone majority. The government hiked tuition for out-of-province students, introduced a new international student funding framework, and announced French proficiency requirements. The measures blindsided McGill and Concordia and attracted national and international attention, largely because of McGill's global reputation. McGill and Concordia went to court, calling the measures unconstitutional and unsupported by any data from Higher Education Minister Pascale Déry. A judge partially agreed. Out-of-province students Quebec initially announced it would almost double tuition for out-of-province students at McGill and Concordia — from $9,000 to $17,000. It later scaled back the increase to $3,000, or 33 per cent. Even so, the new rate priced Quebec's English universities out of the national market. The move triggered confusion and dismay across Canada, with media quoting frustrated students vowing to study elsewhere. Many ultimately opted not to apply to McGill or Concordia, feeling unwelcome and deterred by the higher fees. In April, a court ruled the tuition hike was 'unreasonable,' giving Quebec nine months to revise the fee structure. McGill and Concordia saw the decision as a reversal of the increase. But Déry disagreed, saying the judge objected not to the hike itself, but to 'the path we've taken and the reasons invoked for the increase.' International students For international students, the new rules focused on a government clawback and a new minimum annual tuition rate of $20,000, though in many cases, actual tuition didn't increase. Coming amid the outcry over out-of-province tuition hikes, the changes caused confusion and hesitation among prospective students worldwide, leading to a drop in applications. More recently, new federal and provincial limits on foreign enrolment further hampered international recruitment. French requirement In the fall of 2023, Quebec announced French proficiency requirements for non-Quebec students at McGill and Concordia. Starting in 2025, 80 per cent of newly enrolled undergraduates would need intermediate-level spoken French by graduation, with financial penalties for universities that fell short. The move prompted uncertainty and pushback, with concerns that students from outside Quebec might need an extra semester. A graduation test initially seemed possible, but Quebec confirmed in February 2025 that none would be required. The rule's future is uncertain. In April, a court ordered it scrapped. Two months later, Déry said she would 'continue discussions' with McGill and Concordia. Israel and Gaza Within hours of the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attacks on Israel, which killed 1,200 — mostly civilians — McGill faced controversy when a student group praised the assaults as 'heroic,' prompting a university condemnation. In the following months, McGill became a protest hot spot, drawing international attention as pro-Palestinian activists camped on its front lawn for 75 days. They condemned Israeli attacks on Gaza and accused McGill of complicity for refusing to sever ties with Israel and divest from companies supporting its military. Jewish students also lashed out at McGill. In April 2025, a Jewish undergraduate sought approval for a class-action lawsuit alleging McGill failed to take 'meaningful disciplinary action' against campus antisemitism since October 2023. Mohawk Mothers For years, the Mohawk Mothers, a group of Indigenous women, have criticized McGill's handling of searches for possible unmarked graves at the former Royal Victoria Hospital and Allan Memorial Institute site. McGill and Quebec are redeveloping the area in an $870-million project called the New Vic. As work accelerated over the past two years, the Mohawk Mothers accused them of rushing archeological digs and violating a court-approved investigation agreement. McGill and Quebec maintain they are committed to uncovering the truth. The group has kept attention on the issue through protests, press conferences and legal action. Financial troubles McGill's shaky finances have raised concerns. In February, the university announced plans for up to 500 job cuts to address a $45-million deficit, but ended up laying off about 60 employees. McGill has since warned of 'more hard decisions this year — including cuts and potentially more staff reductions.' It has almost 13,000 employees. The university, whose annual budget is about $1.1 billion, blames factors such as the out-of-province tuition hikes, provincial grant reductions, tuition clawbacks and limits on international student admissions. Despite the fiscal pressure, McGill's $2-billion endowment keeps it far from financial ruin.
Canada News.Net
3 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
"Working to get High Commissioners deployed in two capitals": MEA reiterates to normalise India-Canada ties
New Delhi [India], July 18 (ANI): The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has reaffirmed its efforts to normalise India-Canada relations again, reiterating that both nations are working towards deploying High Commissioners in their respective capitals. During a press briefing on Thursday, Jaiswal highlighted the progress, noting that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Canadian counterpart, Mark Carney, held a discussion on the matter in Kananaskis on the sidelines of the G7 Summit last month. He further expressed optimism in the 'movement' of India-Canada ties. 'We had the meeting at the Prime Minister level in Kananaskis, where both leaders reaffirmed their commitment to the importance of India-Canada ties and to rebuild these ties. We are working; both sides are now working towards it. We are also working to get High Commissioners deployed in the two capitals. We are positive about the movement in India-Canada ties,' Jaiswal stated during the briefing. Last month, the MEA had stated that both nations are working to reinstate the High Commissioners to each other's capitals in an effort to normalise relations between New Delhi and Ottawa, which had sharply deteriorated last year. At a press briefing, Jaiswal said PM Modi and Carney had reaffirmed the importance of India-Canada ties during a meeting on the sidelines of the G7 Summit in Kananaskis in Canada. He added that both sides agreed to take constructive steps to 'restore stability' in the relationship. 'We had issued a press release when we had the last meeting of PM Modi with Prime Minister Carney on the sidelines of the G7 in Kananaskis in Alberta. Both leaders then reaffirmed the importance of India-Canada ties based on shared democratic values, respect for the rule of law, and commitment to upholding the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity. Both sides agreed to take calibrated and constructive steps to restore stability in the relationship, beginning with the early return of high commissioners to each other's capitals,' the MEA spokesperson said. Diplomatic tensions between the two nations flared up last year after the former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau alleged that his government had 'credible allegations' of India's involvement in the killing of Khalistani terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in Canada in 2023. India had strongly denied the charges, calling them 'absurd' and 'motivated'. In response, India recalled six diplomats, including its High Commissioner to Canada, after they were labelled 'persons of interest' by Canadian authorities investigating the killing. India also expelled six Canadian diplomats, including Canada's High Commissioner to India. Nijjar was shot dead outside a gurdwara in Surrey, British Columbia, on June 18, 2023. With Mark Carney now serving as the Canadian Prime Minister after Trudeau's resignation, both countries appear to be taking steps to improve ties. According to the MEA, India and Canada also agreed to resume senior and working-level mechanisms and discussions in various areas, including trade, people-to-people contact, connectivity and collaboration in key areas like cooperating on clean energy and technology initiatives, collaborating on digital infrastructure projects, exploring opportunities for cooperation in artificial intelligence and discussing potential collaboration on food security and critical minerals. (ANI)
Toronto Star
5 hours ago
- Toronto Star
First Nations leaders have low expectations for progress at meeting with Carney
OTTAWA - Many First Nations leaders say their expectations are low for the meeting planned on Thursday with Prime Minister Mark Carney and are warning it should not be seen as the full and fair consultation required on major projects. The closed-door meeting was promised by Carney in June after chiefs said their rights were not respected by the rush to push the Building Canada Act, known as Bill C-5, through Parliament in June.
