Bag These Colorful CMF Buds Pro 2 Wireless Earbuds at a Record Low Price of Just $47 Today
With summer just around the corner, it's time to get out of the house for a bit. Whether you're taking a leisurely walk or hiking through the mountains, adding some music, a podcast or even an audiobook can really make the time fly by.
For that, you're going to need a good pair of earbuds, and the CMF Buds Pro 2 buds definitely fit the bill. Even better, you can get a pair today for just $47 -- a price that matches their lowest-ever.
Available in four colors -- blue, orange, black or dark gray -- the CMF Buds Pro 2 have active noise cancellation of up to 50 decibels as well as an expansive frequency range of up to 5,000Hz. One new feature is ChatGPT integration, which can be accessed from your buds or Nothing smartphone, since the CMF brand is owned by the latter.
Hey, did you know? CNET Deals texts are free, easy and save you money.
Alongside having Bluetooth, ultra bass technology 2.0 "intelligently identifies bass elements in your music and dynamically enhances low frequencies in real time," CMF says, so that you can enjoy richer bass from mid to high tones. Battery-wise, you're looking at 10 hours from one charge but 43 hours overall when you include the case. It's fitted with a large 60 mAH battery that makes this possible.
The only possible catch that we can see here is that this limited-time deal could end at any time and without warning. If a discounted pair of CMF Buds Pro 2 sounds like a good time to you, we suggest getting that order in sooner rather than later.
Why this deal matters
Not only is this a new record low price for the wireless earbuds, but with Bluetooth 5.3, a 43-hour playback time, ChatGPT and noise canceling tech, a $47 asking price is more than fair for what you're getting in return. And the choice of four different colors is a neat bonus. If you just need an everyday set of buds but don't want to spend over the odds, you'll struggle to find better. Remember that the 32% discount is due to expire anytime, so act fast if interested.
For more wireless picks, check out the best budget earbuds for 2025 where we've rounded up awesome audio at an affordable price.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Better Artificial Intelligence Stock: CoreWeave vs. C3.ai
CoreWeave and are showing resilience amid macroeconomic uncertainty. CoreWeave's revenues rose 420% in Q1 as a wave of hyperscalers sought more AI computing power. enterprise AI software is proving popular; its sales jumped 25% in its fiscal 2025. 10 stocks we like better than CoreWeave › Amid this year's chaotic macroeconomic environment, many businesses face uncertain sales outlooks. Yet one sector that's showing resilience is artificial intelligence (AI). Two examples of this are CoreWeave (NASDAQ: CRWV) and (NYSE: AI). Insatiable customer demand for AI has driven strong year-over-year sales growth at both companies. This is despite the ongoing saga of President Donald Trump's tariffs and trade wars. Both might appeal to some investors, but if you had to choose just one to add to your portfolio now, would CoreWeave or be the better AI stock to buy? CoreWeave sells computing power to businesses that are developing AI systems. It operates more than 30 cloud computing data centers that house the types of hardware needed to train and power sophisticated AI models. Demand for that sort of computing power has gotten so hot that ChatGPT creator OpenAI changed its exclusive deal with Microsoft this year so it can lease more from others, including CoreWeave, and even Alphabet-owned Google Cloud. The OpenAI example illustrates the kind of AI demand CoreWeave benefits from. Its customers include a who's who of AI hyperscalers, including Microsoft, IBM, and Facebook parent Meta Platforms. With so many top hyperscalers flocking to CoreWeave, its first-quarter revenue surged by 420% year over year to $981.6 million. And in Q2, management is guiding for it to hit $1.1 billion in sales, up from $395 million in the prior-year period. However, CoreWeave is not profitable, and it has accrued substantial debt in the course of building out its AI data centers. In Q1, its operating expenses were $1.01 billion, which resulted in an operating loss of $27.5 million. CoreWeave's debts loom over its balance sheet. Its total assets of $21.9 billion as of the end of Q1 were not much of a cushion against its total liabilities of $18.8 billion, including $8.7 billion in debt. The company will have to continue investing in its infrastructure to keep pace with its customers' needs, so that debt load could grow over time. While CoreWeave's business revolves around artificial intelligence hardware, focuses on AI software for enterprise customers. It went public in 2020 and has built up a substantial business in the intervening years. For instance, revenue totaled $156.7 million in its fiscal 2020 (which ended April 30, 2020). By its fiscal 2025, its sales had grown to $389.1 million, which was a healthy 25% increase from its fiscal 2024 result. And despite the current macroeconomic turmoil, management is forecasting that its sales will continue growing in the new fiscal year. The company expects fiscal 2026 revenue to land in the $447.5 million to $484.5 million range. artificial intelligence capabilities apply to a wide range of use cases, from proactively monitoring aircraft maintenance needs for the U.S. Air Force to automatically transcribing and indexing archival content for the University of Southern California. Its customers include the U.S. Army, the Department of Defense, ExxonMobil, Boston Scientific, and Rolls-Royce. The need for AI enterprise software is so great that enlisted a network of partners to help capture this demand. Its partnerships encompass Amazon Web Services, energy giant Baker Hughes, and Microsoft Azure, which "acknowledge that the C3 enterprise AI applications are their preferred AI solutions," according to CEO Tom Siebel. But like CoreWeave, is not profitable. In its fiscal 2025, it booked a net loss of $288.7 million. While neither CoreWeave nor are profitable, it's common for high-growth tech companies to spend years prioritizing business expansion and the pursuit of top-line growth over near-term profits. Amazon, for example, famously ran at a loss for many years. Both of these companies expect their sales to continue increasing, so their lack of profitability should not be an overriding concern at this point. But given that, which factors should investors focus on in their effort to determine which would be a better AI investment today? One natural stock valuation metric to weigh heavily is the price-to-sales (P/S) ratio, which measures how much investors are paying for every dollar of a company's revenue. CoreWeave's valuation has surged to a lofty level this year while P/S multiple has remained far more reasonable. In fact, shares look undervalued, especially considering that the P/S ratios of AI leaders Nvidia and Microsoft were hovering around 24 and 13, respectively, as of the end of last week. Given the combination of CoreWeave's debt and its high valuation, it would be prudent for investors to wait and see how the company's financials evolve over the next few quarters before making a decision about the stock. After all, CoreWeave's Q1 earnings report was its first one since it went public in March. Meanwhile, finances are solid. At the end of its fiscal Q4, its balance sheet sported total assets of $1 billion compared to total liabilities of $187.6 million. This, its growing business, and its attractive valuation make the better AI investment for the long term. Before you buy stock in CoreWeave, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and CoreWeave wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $658,297!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $883,386!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 995% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 173% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Robert Izquierdo has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, International Business Machines, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, International Business Machines, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends and Rolls-Royce Plc and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better Artificial Intelligence Stock: CoreWeave vs. was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
News24
an hour ago
- News24
Elon Musk's X Corp sues to block New York social media transparency law
• Elon Musk's X Corp has filed a federal lawsuit against a New York state law 'Stop Hiding Hate Act' that requires social media companies to submit semi-annual reports on how they moderate hate speech and disinformation. • X argues the law violates the First Amendment by forcing platforms to disclose sensitive moderation practices. • The law targets companies with over $100 million in annual revenue, imposes $15 000 daily fines for violations. Elon Musk's X Corp has filed a lawsuit challenging a New York state law that requires social media companies to report how they moderate hate speech and disinformation. The complaint, filed in a federal court in Manhattan, seeks to halt the law, which X argues violates the First Amendment by forcing platforms to disclose sensitive information about their content moderation practices. "Today, @X filed a First Amendment lawsuit against a New York law, NY S895B," X's Global Government Affairs team posted Tuesday, adding that it had successfully challenged a similar law in California. "X is the only platform fighting for its users by challenging the law, and we are confident we will prevail in this case as well," the company said. The New York law requires social media companies with more than $100 million in annual revenue to submit semi-annual reports detailing how they define and moderate hate speech, racism, extremism, disinformation and harassment. Companies face fines of $15 000 per day for violations, which can be sought by the attorney general's office. X says the law is "an impermissible attempt by the State to inject itself into the content-moderation editorial process" and seeks to pressure platforms into restricting constitutionally protected speech. The lawsuit comes after X successfully challenged a nearly identical California law last year, according to the filing. New York's law is "a carbon copy" of the California provisions that were struck down, the filing adds. X claims New York lawmakers refused to discuss changes to the bill after the California ruling, with sponsors saying they declined to meet because of content on X promoted by owner Musk that "threatens the foundations of our democracy." READ | Musk's X sues to block California anti-hate speech law The company argues this indicated "viewpoint discriminatory motives" behind the law's passage. Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal and Assembly member Grace Lee - who introduced the law - said in a statement that their act "does not infringe upon the First Amendment rights of social media companies, nor does it conflict with federal law". "Instead, the Stop Hiding Hate Act requires narrowly tailored disclosures by social media companies to allow consumers to better decide which social media platforms they utilise," they added. "The fact that Elon Musk would go to these lengths to avoid disclosing straightforward information to New Yorkers as required by our statute illustrates exactly why we need the Stop Hiding Hate Act."
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
How AI Can Teach Soft Skills: Shaping The Future Of Work And Education
How AI Can Teach Soft Skills: Shaping The Future Of Work And Education As a behavioral expert, AI's capability in terms of understanding soft skills is something I think about a lot. I have taught thousands of business courses, designed behavioral assessments, and interviewed leading experts on emotional intelligence, curiosity, and perception. All of this makes me question: Can AI help teach the kinds of soft skills it does not actually have? Is that even possible to teach something like empathy without feeling it? It cannot be curious in the human sense. A well-known Super Mario Brothers experiment developed at UC Berkeley programmed AI with a type of artificial curiosity. The AI did not just try to win. It intentionally let Mario fail just to explore what might happen next. So, while it doesn't have human curiosity, it does not mean it cannot help us practice behaviors that build things like empathy and curiosity. The trick is how we use it and what we ask of it. And that question is so important, because soft skills have always been what can make or break a career. Now with AI doing everything else, we need scalable, accessible ways to teach people these important skills, whether through universities, corporate training, or personal development. What Are Some Of The Biggest Issues With Teaching Soft Skills In The Age Of AI? One of the biggest issues in higher education is that many courses are written by those who have spent their careers in academia, often prioritizing theoretical knowledge over real-world behavior. In many online classes, which have become very popular, students read articles and write papers with little interaction. Some schools have even removed video lectures and assessments altogether and rely on essays to demonstrate learning. The result? Students turn in AI-generated work, instructors grade AI-generated submissions, and no one is certain what anyone actually learned. Universities need to shift from evaluating knowledge to practicing behavior. Instead of asking students for written reflections on empathy, they need to create opportunities for students to practice difficult conversations and receive real-time feedback. For example, an instructor might prompt AI to simulate a scenario where a student must deliver constructive feedback to a struggling teammate and then guide the student on tone and emotional safety. If I were designing a course using AI to help students learn soft skills, I might prompt it like this: 'Create behavioral-based learning outcomes for a course that develops soft skills. Make sure each outcome can be observed and measured in real workplace scenarios.' The problem is that if I gave that prompt to ChatGPT, it would generate something far different than if someone else prompted it, who did not have my background studying curiosity, perception, and emotional intelligence. If someone else entered that prompt, it might focus on active listening, use of body language and tone, tips to handle stress, and staying calm during conflict. All are great things to develop. What's important is to define the skills you want it to develop and not just rely on it to decide which soft skills matter. We still need people to guide it for that. Once that is clear, I would then prompt it to focus on those specific skills with a prompt like this: 'Design a 3-week course outline that teaches one soft skill each week: curiosity, perception, and emotional intelligence. Include a weekly objective, scenario-based activity, and self-reflection prompt.' By creating a course like that, students are more likely to get far more insight into their behavior rather than just complete an assignment. However, it is still important to ensure that the prompt outputs what you hope to accomplish. Humans still have to tweak AI's final suggestions to ensure it hasn't gone in an unanticipated direction. How Can Companies And Universities Use AI To Teach Soft Skills More Effectively? Corporate training often lags behind, relying heavily on passive video watching and text-heavy modules. AI can change this if we start using it for behavioral simulation rather than content delivery. Instead of summarizing leadership principles, AI can role-play challenging workplace scenarios, prompting learners to respond and then guiding them to refine their communication. Companies like Prisms VR are already exploring how immersive environments can be used to teach complex concepts. I interviewed Anurupa Ganguly, their founder, about how they are using headsets to teach math by immersing students in 3D environments where they can manipulate data and interact with concepts spatially. While most organizations are not yet equipped to hand out VR headsets, and the current devices remain cumbersome for widespread use, the idea of stepping into a virtual space to practice communication or conflict resolution has clear potential. As the technology becomes lighter and more affordable, it may open new dimensions in both education and workforce development. For now, even without VR, companies can use AI to help learners engage with soft skills scenarios like this: 'Simulate a performance review conversation where the employee feels underappreciated. Pause after each learner response and provide a prompt: 'How might this be received? Would another phrasing work better?'' Or to train perception and inclusion: 'Generate a cross-cultural meeting scenario. Ask the learner to identify the misunderstanding and respond in a way that builds clarity and psychological safety.' These examples help with behavior rehearsal. How Can Individuals Use AI To Build Their Own Soft Skills? For individuals, the key is to think of AI as more of a practice partner than just a search engine. You can engage with AI to simulate tough conversations, try out different ways of expressing empathy, and receive immediate feedback on your tone and clarity. Create a space where you can experiment with communication styles and develop self-awareness, all without the fear of judgment. For example, you could prompt AI to simulate a scenario where you need to navigate a cross-cultural misunderstanding, allowing you to practice and refine your response. This kind of practice helps you internalize soft skills in a way that traditional learning often cannot. ChatGPT, like many AI tools, is designed to be agreeable and encouraging. It is often trained to prioritize politeness, which means it might not challenge you directly. Sometimes a firmer approach might help you grow. It's important to guide it by asking for honest critique, not just compliments. For instance, you might say, 'Be blunt with me and tell me what part of this message sounds dismissive,' or 'Act like a coach and tell me what I'm doing wrong.' This teaches the AI how direct you want it to be and helps you avoid the trap of always being praised without learning anything new. The more intentional you are with your prompts, the more useful the practice becomes. What Is The Future Of Soft Skills Training With AI And VR? The world is not far from having AI-generated holograms or VR simulations become common tools in education and corporate training. As these technologies become more accessible and user-friendly, they will offer new ways for learners to practice soft skills. The challenge for universities, companies, and individuals is to embrace these tools not as replacements for human interaction, but as enhancements to it. In the end, teaching soft skills with AI and VR creates new spaces for practice, reflection, and growth. And as these technologies evolve, they will reshape the future of learning.
