3 Best Stocks to Buy Now, 5/1/2025, According to Top Analysts
Which stocks are best to buy now? According to Top Wall Street Analysts, the three stocks listed below are Strong Buys. Each stock received a new Buy rating recently and has a significant upside as well.
Protect Your Portfolio Against Market Uncertainty
Discover companies with rock-solid fundamentals in TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter.
Receive undervalued stocks, resilient to market uncertainty, delivered straight to your inbox.
To find more stocks like these, take a look at TipRanks' Analyst Top Stocks tool. It shows you a real-time list of all stocks that have been recently rated by Top-ranking Analysts.
Here are today's top stock picks, according to analysts. Click on any ticker to thoroughly research the stock before you decide whether to add it to your portfolio.
Meta Platforms (META) – This is a global technology company that owns and operates major social media and communication platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Messenger, and Threads. Today, RBC Capital analyst Brad Erickson maintained a Buy rating on the stock with a price target of $740 per share. Interestingly, 34 out of the 35 Top Analysts who recently rated the stock gave it a Buy. Taken together, their 12-month price targets imply an upside of about 25%.
Waystar Holding Corp. (WAY) – This is a healthcare technology company that provides cloud-based software solutions. Today, William Blair analyst Ryan Daniels maintained a Buy rating on the stock. In the last three months, all five Top Analysts covering the stock have rated it a Buy. Taken together, their 12-month price targets imply an upside of about 28.25%.
Edgewise Therapeutics (EWTX) – This is a digital accessibility platform that combines AI-powered automation with expert human testing to help businesses of all sizes. Yesterday, Guggenheim analyst Debjit Chattopadhyay maintained a Buy rating on the stock with a price target of $41 per share. In the last three months, all four Top Analysts covering the stock have rated it a Buy. Taken together, their 12-month price targets imply an upside of about 186.6%.
Who Are the Top Analysts?
TipRanks ranks financial analysts according to the success rates of their ratings and the average return on each of their ratings. The Top Analysts have each earned a five-star ranking, thanks to the accuracy and profitability of their ratings over time.
See real-time analyst rankings and learn more about the performance of Top Analysts on TipRanks' Top Wall Street Analysts page.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
6 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Snap Is Getting Ready to Launch AR Glasses. Does That Make SNAP Stock a Buy?
Social media company Snap (SNAP) is seeing some lift in its beaten-down stock after the company announced the launch of its lightweight, immersive spectacles next year. These techy eyeglasses are part of the company's aggressive push into augmented reality (AR) products, which are expected to be endowed with artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities. However, Snap has stiff competition in this space, primarily from Meta's (META) Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses, which are generally well-accepted by customers. At this juncture, should you consider buying Snap's stock? About Snap Stock Founded in 2010, California-based tech company Snap (SNAP) operates a social media platform that offers the visual messaging application Snapchat. In addition to visual communication, the company is also focused on areas such as augmented reality and camera technology. Snap has a market cap of around $14.3 billion. Once a soaring name on Wall Street, Snap's stock has fallen on hard times recently. It has declined 47% over the past 52 weeks and 23% year-to-date. Just for comparison, the broader S&P 500 Index ($SPX) has gained 11.5% and 2.7% over the same periods. Snap recorded a 52-week high of $17.33 back in July 2024. The stock is now 52% off its high. Despite the stock's recent selloff, Snap is not exactly a cheap buy. Its price sits at 30.21 times forward non-GAAP earnings, which is significantly stretched compared to the industry average of 13.85x. Snap's Q1 Results Surpassed Expectations On April 29, Snap published its first-quarter results, which failed to impress investors, and the stock experienced a sharp 12.4% selloff in the very next trading session. The company's revenue increased by 14% year-over-year to $1.36 billion. The reported figure slightly surpassed the $1.35 billion that Wall Street analysts had expected. At the heart of this double-digit revenue increase was Snap's increase in active users. For Q1, the company's daily active user (DAU) count went up by 9% from the prior year's period to 460 million. While DAUs dropped by 1% in North America and grew slowly by 3% in Europe, the rest of the world segment's DAU numbers grew by 16% year-over-year. Snap's average revenue per user (ARPU) increased by 5% from its year-ago value to $2.96. Snap's ARPU from the North American segment grew by 13%, followed by growth in the European market at 11%, and then the rest of the world at 4%. Based on the top-line and customer growth, Snap managed to gain back some lost ground. While the company still posted a quarterly net loss of $139.6 million, it was significantly lower than the $305.1 million net loss from the year-ago quarter. Its loss per share stood at $0.08, narrower than the $0.19 in Q1 2024 and better than the $0.13 that Wall Street analysts were expecting. Its adjusted EBITDA jumped by a staggering 137% year-over-year to $108.43 million, surpassing the estimated $64.77 million. Snap's Q1 results were not unimpressive. Its top line grew, customer count expanded, and bottom-line losses narrowed. Yet, the company's share prices took a hit because Snap was unable to provide an outlook for the second quarter. The company cited uncertainty due to the macroeconomic pressures as a reason for this. Snap did mention that it had faced headwinds at the start of the current quarter. Analysts do not have high expectations about Snap's future earnings, projecting its Q2 EPS to decline by 23.1% year-over-year to a negative $0.16. For the current year, Snap's loss per share is expected to come in at $0.39, indicating a worsening of 11.4% year-over-year. The situation is expected to improve in the next fiscal year, when the loss per share is projected to narrow by 28.2% to $0.28. What Do Analysts Expect for Snap Stock? Analysts have started to turn sour on Snap's stock. Last month, Loop Capital analyst Alan Gould lowered Snap's price target from $16 to $12, while still maintaining a 'Buy' rating on the stock. While Loop Capital did not reverse its verdict on the stock, the lowering of the price target reflects that analysts are taking a more conservative stance on the company's potential. Morgan Stanley is also pretty conservative about Snap's prospects. Analyst Brian Nowak lowered the price target from $8 to $6.50, while maintaining an 'Equal Weight' rating. Earlier, the investment firm had lowered its price target from $10 to $8 due to macroeconomic uncertainties affecting e-commerce and digital ad sectors. The latest price cut likely stemmed from the same set of reasons. Overall, Wall Street analysts are taking a conservative stance on Snap's stock, giving it a consensus 'Hold' rating. Based on 36 analysts' ratings, seven analysts have given the stock a 'Strong Buy' rating, one rated the stock as a 'Moderate Buy,' and one analyst rated it 'Strong Sell,' while a majority of 27 analysts are playing it safe with a 'Hold' rating. The consensus analyst price target of $9.72 indicates moderate potential upside of 14% from current levels. Key Takeaways Snap's AR push through the new eyeglasses is commendable. However, the launch is still too far away to be meaningful for shares here. Meanwhile, the company faces challenges from the current macroeconomic scenario, which has been marred by concerns about tariffs. Therefore, investors might consider putting off investing in Snap's stock for now.
Global News
a day ago
- Global News
WestJet says operations running smoothly after ‘cybersecurity incident'
See more sharing options Send this page to someone via email Share this item on Twitter Share this item via WhatsApp Share this item on Facebook WestJet says a 'cybersecurity incident' is affecting access to some of its servers and software systems. The Calgary-based airline says its operations are nonetheless running safely, and they have not been affected by the incident. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy In a statement posted to its website, the company says it is working to figure out the impacts of the event. The airline issued a series of social media posts Friday night saying its app had been affected, and 'several users' were having difficulty accessing the platform. WestJet asked guests and employees to be careful when sharing personal information. The air carrier said it had a team investigating the incident alongside police and Transport Canada.
CBC
a day ago
- CBC
As disinformation and hate thrive online, YouTube quietly changed how it moderates content
Social Sharing YouTube, the world's largest video platform, appears to have changed its moderation policies to allow more content that violates its own rules to remain online. The change happened quietly in December, according to The New York Times, which reviewed training documents for moderators indicating that a video could stay online if the offending material did not account for more than 50 per cent of the video's duration — that's double what it was prior to the new guidelines. YouTube, which sees 20 million videos uploaded a day, says it updates its guidance regularly and that it has a "long-standing practice of applying exceptions" when it suits the public interest or when something is presented in an educational, documentary, scientific or artistic context. "These exceptions apply to a small fraction of the videos on YouTube, but are vital for ensuring important content remains available," YouTube spokesperson Nicole Bell said in a statement to CBC News this week. But in a time when social media platforms are awash with misinformation and conspiracy theories, there are concerns that YouTube is only opening the door for more people to spread problematic or harmful content — and to make a profit doing so. YouTube isn't alone. Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, dialled back its content moderation earlier this year, and Elon Musk sacked Twitter's moderators when he purchased the platform in 2022 and rebranded it as X. "We're seeing a race to the bottom now," Imran Ahmed, CEO for the U.S.-based Center for Countering Digital Hate, told CBC News. "What we're going to see is a growth in the economy around hate and disinformation." Meta's move away from fact checking could have dangerous consequences, experts warn 5 months ago Duration 2:05 Facebook and Instagram's parent-company Meta is getting rid of fact checkers on the platforms and will instead rely on users to comment on accuracy, but experts warn the move will likely increase the spread of misinformation. Public interest vs public harm YouTube's goal is "to protect free expression," Brooks said in her statement, explaining that easing its community guidelines "reflect the new types of content" on the platform. For example, she said, a long-form podcast containing one short clip of violence may no longer need to be removed. The T imes reported Monday that examples presented to YouTube staff included a video in which someone used a derogatory term for transgender people during a discussion about hearings for U.S. President Donald Trump's cabinet appointees, and another that shared false information about COVID-19 vaccines but that did not outright tell people not to get vaccinated. A platform like YouTube does have to make some "genuinely very difficult decisions" when moderating content, says Matt Hatfield, executive director of the Canadian digital rights group OpenMedia. He believes platforms do take the issue seriously, but he says there's a balance between removing harmful or illegal content, such as child abuse material or clear incitements to violence, and allowing content to stay online, even if it's offensive to many or contains some false information. The problem, he says, is that social media platforms also "create environments that encourage some bad behaviour" among creators, who like to walk the line of what's acceptable. "The core model of these platforms is to keep you clicking, keep you watching, get you to try a video from someone you've never experienced before and then stick with that person." And that's what concerns Ahmed. He says these companies put profits over online safety and that they don't face consequences because there are no regulations forcing them to limit what can be posted on their platforms. He believes YouTube's relaxed policies will only encourage more people to exploit them. How well YouTube is moderating In a recent transparency report, YouTube said it had removed nearly 2.9 million channels containing more than 47 million videos for community guideline violations in the first quarter — that came after the reported policy change. The overwhelming majority of those, 81.8 per cent, were considered spam, but other reasons included violence, hateful or abusive material and child safety. Hatfield says there is a public interest in having harmful content like that removed, but that doesn't mean all controversial or offensive content must go. However, he says YouTube does make mistakes in content moderation, explaining that it judges individual videos in a sort of "vacuum" without considering how each piece of content fits into a broader context. "Some content can't really be fairly interpreted in that way." Regulations not a perfect solution Ahmed says companies should be held accountable for the content on their platforms through government regulation. He pointed to Canada's controversial but now-scuttled Online Harms Act, also known as Bill C-63, as an example. It proposed heavier sentences, new regulatory bodies and changes to a number of laws to tackle online abuse. The bill died when former prime minister Justin Trudeau announced his resignation and prorogued Parliament back in January. Ahmed says he hopes the new government under Prime Minister Mark Carney will enact similar legislation. Hatfield says he liked parts of that act, but his group ultimately opposed it after it tacked on some other changes to the Criminal Code and Human Rights Act that he says were unrelated to the platforms. He says groups like OpenMedia would have liked to see a strategy addressing business models that encourage users to post and profit off of "lawful but awful" content. "We're not going to have a hate-free internet," he said. "We can have an internet that makes it less profitable to spread certain types of hate and misinformation."
