39,000 apply for Louisiana private school scholarship program
The Louisiana Department of Education announced the final application tally Wednesday, following the close of the application window for the Louisiana Giving All True Opportunity to Rise (LA GATOR) Scholarship Program. The program, signed into law by Gov. Jeff Landry last year, is Louisiana's first statewide education scholarship account (ESA).
Applications were open from March 1 to April 15 for the 2025–2026 school year. According to the department, 39,189 applications were submitted and 34,848 students have already been deemed eligible. About 81% of applicants come from families earning at or below 250% of the federal poverty level, and nearly 3,000 are students with disabilities.
'These astounding numbers show just how vital the Gator Scholarship is to Louisianans,' Landry said in a statement. 'This program is helping parents of children with disabilities and low-income families. The Gator Scholarship is finally putting parents in the driver's seat and allowing them to select the learning environment that best suits their needs and values.'
Under LA GATOR, eligible families can use public funds to cover approved education costs, including nonpublic school tuition and fees, tutoring, textbooks, dual enrollment courses, uniforms, and more. Families may also use the funds for homeschool programs and education therapies.
Louisiana ranks No. 4 in educational freedom report developed by Project 2025 think tank
If there is not enough funding to serve all eligible applicants, awards will be prioritized in the following order:
Students currently enrolled in LA GATOR or transitioning from the Louisiana Scholarship Program (LSP)
Students with disabilities or those from families earning at or below 250% of the federal poverty level
Siblings of current LA GATOR or LSP students
All other eligible applicants
Applications within the same priority group are ordered by submission time, meaning those who applied earlier will receive preference.
Landry requested $93 million in his executive budget to fund the program. If approved by the legislature, that amount would support approximately 12,000 students—about one-third of those currently eligible. The legislature has until June 12 to finalize the budget and approve funding levels.
The Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget is also expected to vote later this month on whether to extend the state's current contract with the private company administering the program. That contract is set to expire in June.
The LA GATOR program will fully replace the Louisiana Scholarship Program beginning with the 2025–2026 school year. Officials say over 91% of families currently enrolled in the LSP applied for LA GATOR.
For more information, visit lagator.la.gov.
Scholarships available for Louisiana families affected by childhood cancer
'I had no desire to come back' Vietnam vets make emotional return to battlefield
Marines still healing, 50 years after Vietnam
Trump says Fed chair termination can't come 'fast enough'
Appeals court won't lift order to 'facilitate' Abrego Garcia's return in blistering opinion
Trump administration targets college funding
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump unleashes troops on cities already making progress on crime
I was a mayor for 10 years. All mayors deal with crime, and we have learned a lot about what works to make cities safer for everyone. That's why so many cities, including Washington, D.C., are safer today than they were 10, 20, or 30 years ago. And that's why we know President Trump's send-in-the-troops stunt in Washington, D.C., is not really about public safety. People sometimes argue about whether Trump's actions are actually dangerous or merely efforts to distract people from news he wants to minimize. The truth is that all too frequently they are both. I believe Trump taking control of D.C.'s police department and calling out the National Guard, based on false claims about crime, is both an attempt to distract voters from bad news about the extraordinary harm he is unleashing on the American people and an effort to further test the limits of his own power. Let's not forget how much of Trump's second-term agenda — including the idea of undermining home rule for the citizens of Washington, D.C. and the deployment of troops against Americans — was envisioned and laid out in advance by the right-wing architects of Project 2025. Trump's ambitions to rule like the dictatorial strongmen he admires in other countries made him the perfect vehicle for a movement that wants to reverse a century of progress and legal protections regardless of how many workers, consumers, families and communities are harmed. And they're willing to use the military to quash inevitable protests. 'It's pretty clear that the president wants his own domestic police force, and step by step he's trying to create it,' Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) observed. Smith called Trump's maneuver 'a huge step toward an autocratic government.' Washington's unique status as a federal district — not a state or part of any state — makes it especially vulnerable to the abuse of presidential power. But no city is safe. Trump made it clear in Los Angeles that he will deploy National Guard troops over the objections of state and local officials. He has explicitly threatened to expand his tactics in D.C. to other cities where he has far less constitutional legitimacy to intervene. And just to clarify how much contempt the MAGA movement has for urban voters, Kevin Roberts, president of the Heritage Foundation and primary sponsor of Project 2025, recently called on right-wing state legislators to gut democracy in their own capitals and turn them into 'state municipal districts.' Trump and the movement behind him, the MAGA activists and the institutional muscle represented by the Heritage Foundation and the more than 100 organizations endorsing Project 2025, seem eager to dismantle the checks and balances that are meant to keep a corrupt and abusive president in line. And that is proving to be extremely dangerous. The deployment of American troops against American citizens is illegal except in extraordinary emergencies. It can't be done to intimidate dissenters. It can't be done to make Trump feel good. It can't be done to shift public attention from news that is unflattering to the president. To be sure, Trump would like to distract us from scrutiny of his relationship with the late sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein — and the sweetheart treatment his regime is now giving Epstein's accomplice and convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell. The president would like to distract us from bad economic news on jobs and the price of groceries. And, certainly, the president would rather that we not pay much attention to the astonishing levels of shady dealing that have made Trump and his family billions of dollars richer. Trump abusing his power to shift the narrative is an aspect of his authoritarian rule. It's not going to make the residents of D.C. or any other city safer. Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott, whose city has been another Trump target, noted in a CNN interview that his city has had the fewest homicides in 50 years this year. That kind of progress takes a thoughtful, collective effort — not just 'get tough' rhetoric and more militarized cops. It takes smart strategic investments in communities and stronger relationships between communities and police. 'Mayors across the country have brought together law enforcement, the legal community, the actual community through community violence intervention work, to reduce violence across this country in cities to lows that we have not seen in decades,' Scott told viewers. 'The president could learn a lot from us instead of throwing things at us,' he added. Listening and learning is not exactly the president's strong suit. Throwing things — smears, tantrums, distractions — is much more his style. That's bad for America and all Americans, not just those of us who live in the cities Trump likes to vilify.
The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
Trump stuns Wall Street, Washington with controversial BLS nominee
President Trump's pick to lead the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) is breaking the mold of his predecessors and causing alarm among economists of all stripes Commissioners of the BLS are usually academics or career civil servants with decades of experience in statistics and economics. But EJ Antoni, who Trump nominated to lead the agency after firing former BLS chief Erika McEntarfer on the heels of a disappointing jobs report earlier this month, has more bona fides as a pundit and conservative advocate than he does as a statistician. The choice of Antoni to lead a statistical division whose data is scrutinized by businesses and governments all over the world is getting major backlash from the economics profession and sparking concerns about the politicization of bedrock-level economic data. 'E.J. Antoni is completely unqualified to be BLS Commissioner,' Harvard University economist Jason Furman, who worked for the Obama administration, wrote on social media. 'He is an extreme partisan and does not have any relevant experience.' Stan Veuger, a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, echoed Furman's words. 'He's utterly unqualified and as partisan as it gets,' he told the Washington Post. Who is EJ Antoni? Antoni has been the chief economist of the Heritage Foundation's center on the federal budget for the past four months. The Heritage Foundation is a right-wing think tank that produced the wide-ranging Project 2025 policy agenda. Project 2025 took aim at the 'permanent political class' in Washington, and many of its budget-cutting recommendations have been carried out by the Trump administration. He held two research fellowships at Heritage prior to his current position and two other fellowships at the Committee to Unleash Prosperity, a conservative advocacy group led by billionaire Steve Forbes. Antoni submitted his doctoral dissertation in 2020, in which he defends positions associated with 'supply-side economics,' a conservative policy doctrine that became popular in the 1980s. Besides stints as an adjunct at a community college and as an instructor at his alma mater of Northern Illinois University, he's held no other academic posts. By comparison, McEntarfer worked for 20 years as an economist with the Census Bureau. Her predecessor William Beach was the chief economist for the Senate Budget Committee, and his predecessor Erica Groshen spent 20 years as an economist at the New York Federal Reserve and referees for about a dozen academic journals. Antoni is a frequent guest on a number of conservative media outlets. While BLS makes it a point to produce — rather than interpret — economic data, Antoni has been hitting talking points on recent BLS releases in media appearances, a stark contrast with the agency's typical cut-and-dry communications. Discussing the dismal July jobs report, he emphasized job growth among native-born Americans on former Trump adviser Steven Bannon's internet podcast. 'There was some good news in the report, too, that we should definitely highlight,' he said. 'All of the net job growth over the last 12 months has gone to native-born Americans.' The Heritage Foundation did not respond to a request for an interview with Antoni. Backlash from economists Economists aren't mincing their words about Antoni's credentials. One economist at the University of Wisconsin refuted one of Antoni's recent papers, showing it contained basic statistical mistakes and finding that it wasn't possible to replicate its results — an academic kiss of death. Alan Cole, an economist with the conservative Tax Foundation think tank, described the errors in the paper as 'stunning.' 'Stunning errors in a tweet are bad, but worse to do it in long form, where there's more time and effort involved,' he wrote on social media. Conservative economists have also been blasting the firing of McEntarfer after the July jobs report showed that a meager 106,000 jobs have been added to the economy since May. Trump accused the agency — without any evidence — of producing 'rigged' data, which many economists have said is poppycock. 'The totally groundless firing of Dr. Erika McEntarfer … sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau,' William Beach, a Trump appointee who preceded McEntarfer as head of the BLS, wrote online. Warnings to senators Antoni is expected to be easily confirmed by the GOP-controlled Senate after he appears before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, which will also need to approve his nomination. Antoni's critics are waging a long-shot effort to turn GOP members of the committee against the nominee ahead of his likely confirmation. Friends of the BLS, a group that advocates for the agency and that's chaired by Beach and his predecessor Erica Groshen, called out Antoni in a statement Wednesday, describing the debate about his nomination as 'contentious.' 'BLS now … faces the additional challenge of a contentious debate over the nominee for the next Commissioner, Dr. EJ Antoni,' they said. Groshen told The Hill they hope the nomination process will be 'very thorough.' 'The responsibility of the Senate HELP committee … is particularly important at this time,' she added. The Hill reached out to all Republican members of the committee about Antoni's qualifications, most of whom didn't respond. A representative for Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) said she wouldn't be commenting on the nomination prior to the hearing. What would politicized labor data look like? Antoni has already floated some massive changes to BLS data releases, including canceling regular monthly reports in favor of quarterly releases — a change that would alter the entire cadence of economic data output and affect nearly every private and public sector model of the U.S. economy. He told Fox News before his nomination that 'the BLS should suspend issuing the monthly jobs reports, but keep publishing more accurate, though less timely, quarterly data,' since BLS data is often subject to revision. Former BLS chiefs told The Hill they're keeping an eye on a regulatory standard known as OMB Directive No. 3, which governs the rules of BLS releases, for any sign that agency data could become politicized. 'Violations of that would be very unusual, and therefore indicative of something unusual underneath it,' Groshen said. Antoni has delivered some conflicting remarks on BLS data revisions, attributing them to 'incompetent' leadership under McEntarfer during his appearance on Bannon's podcast and then noting later that the problems pre-dated her time as agency commissioner. 'I think that's part of the reason why we continue to have all of these different data problems,' he said before adding that 'this is not a problem unique to the Trump administration.' Real problems with BLS data In fact, the downward revisions in the July jobs report that prompted Trump's firing of McEntarfer were due to the late reporting of educational employment figures by state and local governments, along with the more pronounced seasonal effects in that sector since teachers don't work in the summer. That's fairly typical for the agency, current and former employees of the BLS told The Hill. Political narratives aside, the BLS has seen a substantial drop in survey response rates in the aftermath of the pandemic, a decline that has made the data less reliable, but that has affected statistical agencies in a number of countries beyond the U.S. 'This is not a failure of the BLS … This is a phenomenon that is worldwide,' Erica Groshen told The Hill. 'This is a slow-moving train wreck,' she added, exhorting CEOs across the economy to make a priority of the surveys. 'There is no silver bullet. Believe me – people have been looking for it for a long time.' Economists have been lamenting the survey response rates for years. 'Like Orwellian newspeak, [the U.S. employment report] can often mean the reverse of what it says it means. The household and establishment surveys portray contrasting pictures of employment (and both have shocking response rates),' UBS economist Paul Donovan wrote earlier this month, having noted declines since 2023.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Here's what you need to know about Louisiana's new cell phone law
Louisiana drivers have to put down their cell phones while in motion under a new law that took effect last week. Gov. Jeff Landry believes the new law will help lower the state's auto insurance rates, which are the most expensive in the country. Republican Slidell Rep. Brian Glorioso's Act 288 makes handheld cell phone use illegal while driving, including talking, texting and engaging in social media or apps. Drivers can still operate their phone using hands-free technology. They can also hold their phones while parked or stopped at red lights. "This is one of the great pieces of legislation that has evaded us at this Capitol," the Republican governor said while signing Glorioso's bill into law. "Finally this year we were able to pass a distracted driving (law). "If you quit texting and driving it's less accidents and if there's less accidents there's less lawsuites. It's a great bill." More than 30 states have enacted bans on hand-held cell phone use while driving. Though the law took effect Aug. 1, police officers can only give drivers a warning until Jan. 1, 2026. And the law prevents officers from conducting a traffic stop based only for violating the cell phone ban. Drivers can only be ticketed for violating the ban as a secondary offense, which means they were pulled over for another primary violation. But current law does allow officers to pull drivers over for violating the ban in school and construction zones. The penalty for violating the new law will be a $100 citation, while the fine is $250 in school zones. More: Frog gigging law changes in Louisiana, home to Frog Capital of the World Greg Hilburn covers state politics for the USA TODAY Network of Louisiana. Follow him on Twitter @GregHilburn1. This article originally appeared on Shreveport Times: Will Louisiana's new cell phone law lower auto insurance rates? Solve the daily Crossword
