logo
As Trump's August 1 deadline looms, tariffs are here to stay, experts say

As Trump's August 1 deadline looms, tariffs are here to stay, experts say

Al Jazeera29-07-2025
As United States President Donald Trump blasts his way through tariff announcements, one thing is clear, experts say: Some level of duties is here to stay.
In the past few weeks, Trump has announced a string of deals – with the European Union, Japan, Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines – with tariffs ranging from 15 percent to 20 percent.
He has also threatened Brazil with a 50 percent tariff, unveiled duties of 30 percent and 35 percent for major trading partners Mexico and Canada, and indicated that deals with China and India are close.
How many of Trump's tariff rates will shake out is anybody's guess, but one thing is clear, according to Vina Nadjibulla, vice president of research and strategy at the Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada: 'No one is getting zero tariffs. There's no going back.'
Trump's various announcements have spelled months of chaos for industry, leaving businesses in limbo and forcing them to pause investment and hiring decisions.
The World Bank has slashed its growth forecasts for nearly 70 percent of economies – including the US, China and Europe, and six emerging market regions – and cut its global growth estimate to 2.3 percent, down from 2.7 percent in January.
Oxford Economics has forecast a shallow recession in capital spending in the Group of Seven (G7) countries – Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the US – lasting from the second quarter to the third quarter of this year.
'What we're seeing is the Donald Trump business style: There's lots of commotion, lots of claim, lots of activity and lots of b*******,' Robert Rogowsky, professor of international trade at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, told Al Jazeera.
'That's his business model, and that's how he operates. That's why he's driven so many of his businesses into bankruptcy. It's not strategic or tactical. It's instinctive.'
Rogowsky said he expects Trump to push back his tariff deadline again, after delaying it from April to July, and then to August 1.
'It's going to be a series of TACO tariffs,' Rogowsky said, referring to the acronym for 'Trump Always Chickens Out', a phrase coined by Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong in early May to describe the US president's backpedalling on tariffs in the face of stock market turmoil.
'He will bump them again,' Rogowsky said. 'He's just exerting the image of power.'
Trump's back-and-forth policy moves have characterised his dealings with some of the US's biggest trade partners, including China and the EU.
China's tariff rate has gone from 20 percent to 54 percent, to 104 percent, to 145 percent, and then 30 percent, while the deadline for implementation has shifted repeatedly.
The proposed tariff rates for the EU have followed a similar pattern, going from 20 percent to 50 percent to 30 percent, and then 15 percent following the latest trade deal.
The EU's current tariff rate only applies to 70 percent of goods, with a zero rate applying to a limited range of exports, including semiconductor equipment and some chemicals.
European steel exports will continue to be taxed at 50 percent, and Trump has indicated that new tariffs could be on the way for pharmaceutical products.
Despite the trade deals, many details of how Trump's tariffs will work in practice remain unclear.
Whether Trump announces more changes down the track, analysts agree that the world has entered a new phase in which countries are seeking to become less reliant on the US.
'Now that the initial shock and anger [at Trump policies] has subsided, there is a quiet determination to build resilience and become less reliant on the US,' Nadjibulla said, adding that Trump was pushing countries to address longstanding issues that had been untouchable before.
Canada, for instance, is tackling inter-provincial trade barriers, a politically sensitive issue historically, even as it looks elsewhere to increase exports, said Tony Stillo, director of Canada Economics at Oxford Economics.
'It would be foolhardy not to provide to the US, seeing as it's our largest market, but it also makes us more resilient to provide to other markets as well,' Stillo told Al Jazeera.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has reached out to the EU and Mexico and indicated his wish to improve his country's strained relations with China and India.
This month, Canada expanded its exports of liquified natural gas beyond the US market, with its first shipment of cargoes to Asia.
To mitigate the fallout of Trump's tariffs, Ottawa has been offering relief to Canadian businesses, including automakers, and has instituted a six-month pause on tariffs on some imports from the US to give firms time to re-adjust their supply chains.
There is also 'some relief' in the fact that other countries 'don't seem to be imitating the Trump show [by levying their own tariffs]. They're witnessing this attempt to strong-arm the rest of the world, but it doesn't seem to be working,' Mary Lovely, the Anthony M Solomon senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE), told Al Jazeera.
But the world is watching how the tariffs will affect the US economy, as 'that will also be instructive to other countries', Lovely said.
'If we see a slowdown, as we expect, it becomes a cautionary tale for others.'
Although the US stock market is near an all-time high, it is heavily weighted towards the 'magnificent seven', said Lovely, referring to the largest tech companies, and that reflects just one part of the economy.
Re-emergence of industrial policy
Trump's tariffs come on top of other growing challenges for exporters the world over, including China's subsidy-heavy industrial policy that allows its businesses to undercut its competitors.
'We've entered a period of global economic alignment with the reintroduction of industrial policies,' Nadjibulla said, explaining that more and more governments are likely to roll out support for their domestic industries.
'Each country will have to navigate these and find ways to de-risk and reduce overreliance on the US and China.'
Still, countries seeking to support their homegrown industries will have to do so while reckoning with the World Trade Organization and rules-based trade agreements such as the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, Nadjibulla said.
'It will take some tremendous leadership around the world to corral this wild mustang [Trump] before he breaks up the world order,' Rogowsky said.
'But it will break because I do think Donald Trump will drive us into a recession.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin to meet in coming days, Kremlin aide says
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin to meet in coming days, Kremlin aide says

Al Jazeera

time9 minutes ago

  • Al Jazeera

Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin to meet in coming days, Kremlin aide says

US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin are preparing to meet 'in the coming days', a Kremlin official has said, as a United States deadline for Russia to agree to a ceasefire in its war on Ukraine or face economic penalties approaches. Kremlin adviser Yuri Ushakov said on Thursday that a Trump-Putin meeting could happen as early as next week. A location has been chosen, he added, though it would be revealed at a later stage. 'At the request of the American side, both parties have effectively agreed to hold a high-level bilateral meeting in the coming days,' Ushakov told reporters. The announcement follows Trump's remarks on Wednesday that he was hopeful of holding a joint meeting with both Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy 'very soon'. Trump has warned Moscow that unless a ceasefire is reached by Friday, it will face broader sanctions. Ushakov said the prospect of a three-way summit came up during talks in Moscow with Trump's envoy, Steve Witkoff, who met Putin for the fifth time earlier this week. Russia offered no official comment on the potential trilateral meeting. Zelenskyy signalled support for such a summit, writing on X that 'Ukraine is not afraid of meetings and expects the same brave approach from the Russian side'. He added that discussions had included 'two bilateral and one trilateral' format, insisting Europe must be involved in efforts to end the war. Despite multiple visits to Moscow by Witkoff since Trump entered office in January after promising to end the war, no breakthrough has materialised. Trump acknowledged the lack of progress, saying: 'I don't call it a breakthrough … we have been working at this for a long time. There are thousands of young people dying … I'm here to get the thing over with.' The Kremlin described Witkoff's latest discussions as 'constructive' and said both sides had exchanged 'signals', though it provided few specifics. Meanwhile, Zelenskyy confirmed he had spoken with Trump about the meeting, alongside European leaders. Expectations remain low that a peace deal will be reached before Trump's deadline. Russia continues to launch air strikes across Ukraine, and Moscow's conditions for ending the war, such as Kyiv's demilitarisation, neutrality and renunciation of NATO membership, remain non-starters for Ukraine and its Western allies. Putin also demands Ukrainian withdrawal from Russian-occupied regions, the formal recognition of Crimea, and the lifting of international sanctions. Kyiv has consistently rejected those terms. Meanwhile, the White House has approved an additional $200m military aid package for Ukraine, including support for drone manufacturing. And in a separate move, Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday imposing 25 percent tariffs on Indian imports over its ongoing purchases of Russian oil.

Can Donald Trump take federal control of Washington, DC?
Can Donald Trump take federal control of Washington, DC?

Al Jazeera

time3 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Can Donald Trump take federal control of Washington, DC?

After a group of teenagers severely beat a prominent employee of President Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency in an attempted carjacking in Washington, DC, Trump threatened a federal takeover of the nation's capital. Trump shared an image on August 5 on Truth Social of a bloodied Edward Coristine, also known by his online alias as 'Big Balls'. 'If D.C. doesn't get its act together, and quickly, we will have no choice but to take Federal control of the City, and run this City how it should be run, and put criminals on notice that they're not going to get away with it anymore,' Trump wrote. 'Perhaps it should have been done a long time ago, then this incredible young man, and so many others, would not have had to go through the horrors of Violent Crime. If this continues, I am going to exert my powers, and FEDERALIZE this City. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' Trump repeated the idea to reporters on August 6, saying he was 'going to look at' revoking the city's home rule, citing the attack on Coristine. Data shows that in recent years, the district has had a significant crime problem, but offences such as homicide, gun-related and aggravated assault, carjacking, vehicle theft, robbery and sexual assault have declined from COVID-19-era peaks. But a big question remains: can Trump undertake a federal takeover of the District of Columbia? Experts say it's possible, but not necessarily simple – he'd have to get Congress to agree. What is DC's 'home rule'? The United States Constitution created the District of Columbia as a 10-square-mile seat of the federal government. Because the district is not a state, its residents lack full congressional representation; it has one House delegate who cannot vote on the floor, and no senators. For about a century until 1973, the city was run by three presidentially appointed commissioners. That year, President Richard Nixon signed the Home Rule Act, enabling district residents to elect a mayor and city council. While the home rule law granted the district significant autonomy for local governance, the city still answers to Congress on certain matters, including budgetary oversight and the ability to overturn local legislation. 'Since 1974, and indeed for all of DC history, members of Congress have interfered in city affairs to fiddle with everything from how long pools are open to banning the city from using its own tax money for a needle exchange programme,' said George Derek Musgrove, a University of Maryland-Baltimore County historian. What does it mean to federalise DC? Trump hasn't detailed how federalisation would work, or said whether there are specific services he wants to take over. Legal scholars agreed, given the explicit language in the Constitution, that Trump cannot simply take over the district and oust its home rule-elected leadership. He would have to work with Congress, the entity entrusted with overseeing the capital. 'Congress may exercise this authority, not exercise it, or delegate it,' Musgrove said. 'With the Home Rule Act of 1973, it delegated a good bit of that authority – though not all – to a local government. It would have to act to reclaim that authority, or to delegate it to another entity, like the executive branch.' Congress's Republican majorities have so far supported Trump's agenda with near-unanimity, but a repeal of home rule isn't a sure thing. It would need to win passage in the House, which the Republicans narrowly control and where Trump might be able to enforce his will with the majority. But it would also need to clear the Senate, which would take 60 votes, including at least seven Democratic votes, to proceed to final consideration. Democrats have generally been supportive of home rule for the district. In February, Senator Mike Lee and Representative Andrew Ogles introduced legislation to repeal home rule. But the measure has only three Senate co-sponsors and three House co-sponsors. 'According to the Constitution, Congress makes the laws for the district,' said University of North Carolina law professor Michael Gerhardt. If Trump wants to 'federalise DC in order for him to wipe out its Democratic leadership and replace it with people who are loyal only to him, that strikes me as precisely what the framers did not want'. Short of a law, the president has other ways to exert influence in the district, including the authority to mobilise the DC National Guard without local consent. That's a possibility he floated in remarks to reporters on August 6. The Home Rule Act also allows the president to assume temporary control over the city's police department in an emergency – something Trump threatened to do in 2020 amid nationwide protests over the killing of George Floyd. What has Trump said over time about this? Trump has talked broadly since his 2024 campaign about expanding the federal government's powers over the district, including enhanced oversight and direct management. During the March 2023 Conservative Political Action Conference, Trump spoke about driving through the district, lamenting dirty roads. 'It looked like somebody just took their garbage and just threw it all over the highways, the Beltway. It's so disgraceful, so disgusting,' Trump said. '… Frankly, the federal government should take over control and management of Washington, DC.' During a July 2024 Florida campaign rally, Trump promised to 'take over the horribly run capital of our nation in Washington, DC, and clean it up, renovate it, and rebuild our capital city so that it is no longer a nightmare of murder and crime, but rather it will become the most beautiful capital anywhere in the world'. Trump echoed this in February, again focusing on blight and crime: 'I think the federal government should take over the governance of DC and run it really, really properly.' In March, Trump signed an executive order establishing the 'DC Safe and Beautiful Task Force'. It mandates beautification efforts such as graffiti removal and enhanced park maintenance, and it includes provisions to address violent crime and issues related to homelessness. In a July Cabinet meeting, Trump pitched the idea again: 'We have tremendous power at the White House to run places where we have to. We could run DC. I mean, we're … looking at DC. We don't want crime in DC. We want the city to run well.' Has home rule been revoked before? There is precedent for removing home-rule powers, but not recently. In 1874, local conservatives angry about voting rights for local Black and working-class white residents teamed up with opponents of Reconstruction-era voting in the South and some of their Northern allies to roll back democratic laws in the district, Musgrove said. The changes lasted until Nixon signed the home rule bill a century later. A repeal of home rule would not be popular with Washingtonians. In 2024, Trump won less than 6.5 percent of the district's vote. While no city is perfect, the district has built a functioning city government under home rule, Musgrove said. 'There is no question that people would be mad,' Musgrove said.

The West's 'principles fall apart' over Palestine
The West's 'principles fall apart' over Palestine

Al Jazeera

time4 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

The West's 'principles fall apart' over Palestine

French political analyst Francois Burgat was charged with supporting terrorism over a social media post he shared, which included a statement by Hamas. He was later acquitted. Burgat joins Centre Stage to unpack the case, the politics behind it and what he believes it reveals about free speech and support for Palestine in the West. This episode is produced in partnership with the Islam and Muslims Initiative, an international platform that connects Muslims and non-Muslims in the realms of religion, politics, business, media, academia and civil society.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store