
South Korea to restore pact curbing military activity on North Korean border
The 2018 military accord was designed to curb the risk of inadvertent clashes, but broke down after a spike in tensions.
The so-called Comprehensive Military Agreement (CMA) signed between the two Koreas was the most substantive deal to result from months of historic meetings between leader Kim Jong Un and then-South Korean President Moon Jae-in.
On September 19, 2018, South Korea's defence minister and his North Korean counterpart signed the CMA in the North's capital, Pyongyang, accompanied by polite applause from the onlooking leaders.
Under the CMA, both countries agreed to "completely cease all hostile acts against each other" and implement military confidence-building measures in air, land and sea domains.
The measures included the two sides ending military drills near the border, banning live-fire exercises in certain areas, the imposition of no-fly zones, the removal of some guard posts along the Demilitarized Zone, and maintaining hotlines.
On the ground, both sides agreed to completely cease artillery drills and field training within 5 km (3 miles) of the Military Demarcation Line (MDL) between the countries.
At sea, they installed covers on the barrels of naval guns and coastal artillery and closed gun ports in a buffer zone along the sea border.
With inter-Korean and denuclearisation talks long stalled, the military accord started to fracture in recent years amid drills and shows of force along the fortified border between the Koreas as they accused the other of breaches.
North Korea's launch of a spy satellite in 2023 further ratcheted up tensions on the Korean peninsula, and the countries walked away from the confidence-building pact.
South Korea's National Security Council that year moved to "suspend the effect of Article 1, Clause 3" establishing no-fly zones close to the border in the 2018 military agreement, enabling Seoul to restore reconnaissance and surveillance activities along the border.
South Korea's military then restarted aerial surveillance in border areas, the defence ministry said.
North Korea in return said its army would "never be bound" by the pact, ripping up the agreement and vowing to restore all military measures it had halted under the deal.
In June 2024, former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol declared a complete suspension of the military pact in response to North Korea's move to send hundreds of rubbish-stuffed balloons across the border.
Later that year, as hostilities increased state-run news agency KCNA said North Korea amended its constitution to designate the South as a "hostile state".
HOW WILL PYONGYANG RESPOND?
President Lee, who won a snap election in June, has sought to re-engage Pyongyang after a period of cross-border tension and shown a willingness to return to dialogue.
He touted on Friday his government's efforts to ease tensions, including halting the launch of balloons floated by activists with anti-North Korea leaflets and dismantling loudspeaker propaganda broadcasts across the border.
How Pyongyang might respond remains unclear. Top North Korean officials have in recent weeks dismissed moves taken by Lee's new liberal government to ease tensions.
Some analysts are also sceptical about the short-term prospects of a favourable response from North Korea to such overtures.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Karoline Leavitt rips into New York Times reporter after giving major update on Trump-brokered Putin and Zelensky talks
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt ripped into press coverage of Donald Trump's Russia-Ukraine peace talks. She also confirmed that Russia 's Vladimir Putin agreed to a one-on-one meeting with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky, saying it's a major step toward a Trump-brokered peace deal. Leavitt criticized the media's coverage of the president's summit with Putin in Alaska on Friday and White House talks with Zelensky and European leaders on Monday. The president excused himself after a meeting with Zelensky and the other world leaders on Monday to call Putin to fill him in on progress. The president revealed Tuesday morning in an interview on Fox & Friends that he felt it would be 'disrespectful' to make the call in the middle of the meeting with Zelensky and the European leaders. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen, French President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and others visited the White House to try and broker a deal between Russia and Ukraine. But Leavitt turned on a reporter from the New York Times who questioned why the president didn't take the call with Putin in the same room with the other leaders. 'If the point is to get everybody on the same page, why wouldn't Trump just take the call from Putin while the other leaders were in the room?' asked New York Times reporter Shawn McCreesh. 'So it would be disrespectful to do that. Why is it disrespectful?' he asked. 'With all due respect, only a reporter from the New York Times would ask a question like that, Sean,' Leavitt shot back. Leavitt also revealed that Putin had officially agreed to a one-on-one meeting with Zelensky after his conversations with Trump. The announcement was a welcome clarification from the White House as the Kremlin has remained elusive about exactly what Putin promised the president of the United States. When a reporter asked to confirm Putin's 'promise' to do a meeting with Zelensky in the coming weeks, Leavitt replied, 'He has, and I just answered that question for you.' Trump indicated on social media Monday night that he spoke with Putin and the pair of them agreed to begin the process to set up a bilateral meeting. 'At the conclusion of the meetings, I called President Putin, and began the arrangements for a meeting, at a location to be determined, between President Putin and President Zelensky,' the president wrote. The Russians were less transparent. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov appeared to slow-walk the timing of the meeting in an interview, describing the process as 'step by step, gradually, starting from the expert level and then going through all the necessary stages.' Leavitt scolded the press for their negative coverage of the president's meeting with Putin, arguing it was so 'highly productive' that it prompted Zelensky and other world leaders to fly to Washington, D.C., immediately to discuss the details. She said that Trump 'learned a lot' during his meeting with Putin and the importance of open dialog between both the Ukrainians and the Russians. Leavitt excoriated former President Joe Biden for pushing an 'America last foreign policy' that did not leave the option for peace open in the conflict. 'President Trump rejected that failed approach, and instead, over the last seven months, has relentlessly pursued peace throughout his second term,' she said. The president said earlier Monday, he wanted Putin and Zelensky to have a bilateral meeting to solve the war and make assurances to bring about peace, and even rebuild a relationship with each other to negotiate a peace. 'It takes, in this case, two to tango, they have to have a relationship otherwise we're just wasting our time,' he said.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump shows off merch teasing third term as Zelensky visits seeking end to Ukraine war: ‘Exit through the gift shop'
To cap off Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky 's meeting about to pursue peace in his war-torn home country, U.S. President Donald Trump appeared to give his Ukrainian counterpart a tour of the MAGA gift shop. A photo circulating on social media, shared by Special Assistant to the President and Communications Advisor Margo Martin, captures Zelensky staring at a wall of red and white MAGA caps and other pro-Trump merchandise in a room — reminiscent of a gift shop — that appears to be part of the White House. The picture was posted on Monday, following the world leaders' meeting at the White House to discuss the future of Russia's war in Ukraine. Zelensky, boasting an all-black suit, stands with his arms crossed under a chandelier as Trump grabs a red hat, emblazoned with '4 More Years,' from the collection. The 22nd Amendment bars anyone from serving as president for more than two terms, meaning Trump will be ineligible to stand again at the next election. It's not immediately clear what Zelensky's reaction was to the MAGA merchandise. The Independent has reached out to the White House for comment. Ever the salesman, Trump has sold just about everything, from golden sneakers to perfumes to bibles. But social media users slammed the untimely nature of his latest offering. One X user commented on the strangeness of showing off merch to a world leader hoping to end a war in his home country: 'Imagine if Churchill went to the US during WW2, trying to defend against a shared opponent.. And they stopped for a merch flex break!' 'This is so embarrassing!' another user bluntly remarked. Another similarly said: 'Beyond tacky!' One suggested Zelensky get a discount: 'They get 10 percent off.' Yet another quipped: 'Imagine flying across the ocean just to see a closet of red hats.' And one tweeted: 'The White House exit is through the gift shop.' On Monday, Trump and Zelensky, along with a group of European leaders, met in Washington, D.C. to discuss the next steps in securing peace in Ukraine after Russia invaded the country in February 2022. In vague terms in a Truth Social post following the summit, Trump hailed it as a 'very good meeting,' noting they discussed security guarantees for Ukraine. The U.S. president also announced he began making arrangements for a trilateral meeting with Zelensky, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and himself. The date of that meeting has not yet been determined, he said. As of Tuesday afternoon, Swiss officials have suggested hosting the high stakes summit in Geneva — a move that French President Emmanuel Macron and Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani have backed.


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
What could US and Europe security guarantees look like for Ukraine?
World leaders gathered in Washington on Monday for a summit billed as a potential turning point in efforts to end the most significant ground war in Europe since the Second World War. In the Oval Office, Donald Trump hosted Ukraine 's Volodymyr Zelensky and senior European figures to thrash out what security guarantees for Ukraine might look like if a peace deal with Russia can be reached. The meeting was described as 'historic' by Sir Keir Starmer, who has emerged as one of the driving forces behind Europe's response. But even as the talks took place, Moscow dismissed the plans as dangerous and warned against any Western military presence in Ukraine. Trump has made clear that the United States will not commit troops on the ground in Ukraine. But the prospect of an arrangement that borrows some of the deterrent effect of Nato's Article 5 has been discussed, a move revealed by the alliance's secretary general Mark Rutte. He told Fox News: 'What we are discussing here is not Nato membership, what we are discussing here is Article 5 type of security guarantees for Ukraine and what exactly they will entail will now be more specifically discussed." Ukraine also wants to buy $90 billion (£67bn) worth of US weapons and says they could form part of the security guarantee. Beyond that, however, Trump has been vague about how much the US would contribute. Speaking in the Oval Office on Monday, Trump underlined that European nations would be expected to carry most of the burden. 'When it comes to security, there's going to be a lot of help,' he said, sitting next to Zelensky. 'They are a first line of defence because they're there. But we'll help them out.' British guarantees and the coalition of the willing The United Kingdom has taken a leading role in shaping European proposals. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has spearheaded the creation of a 'coalition of the willing', a group of allies prepared to go further than financial and weapons support. Under this plan, international 'reassurance' forces could be deployed in Ukraine after a ceasefire or peace deal, helping to deter renewed Russian attacks and to provide reassurance that Kyiv is not left to stand alone. The plan was discussed in a virtual meeting on Tuesday attended by more than 30 international leaders. The virtual meeting, co-chaired by Sir Keir, also discussed possible further sanctions on Russia to pile pressure on Vladimir Putin to end the war. European leaders see security guarantees as essential to any peace deal, but they also stress that Ukraine must be directly involved in shaping the terms. The European Union 's existing training mission for Ukrainian troops will also continue, ensuring that Kyiv can sustain and modernise its armed forces in the years ahead. Moscow has dismissed Western plans for security guarantees. The Russian foreign ministry yesterday reiterated its opposition to the deployment of Nato or Nato-affiliated troops in Ukraine, warning that such a move would be seen as a direct threat to Russia's security.